naturally aspirated
#1
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
naturally aspirated
naturally aspirated LT5s have been built up to around 600hp. Maybe more, IDK. I am sure that the C3 big blocks can be built up to more without resorting to turbos or superchargers.
However, I do wonder what the C5, C6, & C7 naturally aspirated engines are capable of being built up to without resorting to nitrous, Turbos or Superchargers....while still being reasonably dependable? This may be common knowledge but I do not know.
How does the LT5 stack up against later engines as far as attainable, livable Horsepower? I know the expense, I wonder about possibilities.
However, I do wonder what the C5, C6, & C7 naturally aspirated engines are capable of being built up to without resorting to nitrous, Turbos or Superchargers....while still being reasonably dependable? This may be common knowledge but I do not know.
How does the LT5 stack up against later engines as far as attainable, livable Horsepower? I know the expense, I wonder about possibilities.
#2
Le Mans Master
naturally aspirated LT5s have been built up to around 600hp. Maybe more, IDK. I am sure that the C3 big blocks can be built up to more without resorting to turbos or superchargers.
However, I do wonder what the C5, C6, & C7 naturally aspirated engines are capable of being built up to without resorting to nitrous, Turbos or Superchargers....while still being reasonably dependable? This may be common knowledge but I do not know.
How does the LT5 stack up against later engines as far as attainable, livable Horsepower? I know the expense, I wonder about possibilities.
However, I do wonder what the C5, C6, & C7 naturally aspirated engines are capable of being built up to without resorting to nitrous, Turbos or Superchargers....while still being reasonably dependable? This may be common knowledge but I do not know.
How does the LT5 stack up against later engines as far as attainable, livable Horsepower? I know the expense, I wonder about possibilities.
LPE TT cars were over 1000
both these setups are bank breakers the LPE was 53k
Todd I believe is over 700
I think franks car was 660+ or so at the tire with the haibeck 441
it's not the HP, it's the durability that makes the LT5 an amazing engine
but much over 500 at the tire becomes academic on the street as most tires have a hard time hooking that
ask me how I know
#3
Le Mans Master
We have 5.7L LT-5s w 540-560 chp. 427 to 441 CID making 700hp. The difference between them and LSX type motors is that a 4 cam can make that power and idle while not sounding like a bathtub being drained of water. Glug, glug, glug.
#4
Team Owner
#5
NCM Lifetime # 982
While I like the LT5 esp. a very well modded one.
I'm going to say that Id love to mount a LS engine in a ZR1. Lose an easy 200+ lbs off the nose and those LS engines are just soooo damn nice.
I'm going to say that Id love to mount a LS engine in a ZR1. Lose an easy 200+ lbs off the nose and those LS engines are just soooo damn nice.
#6
Racer
hate to say it but have to agree the ls motor is sweet . I have diven bill boudreaus ls conversion and I runs pretty strong . and doesn't even have headers .. bill and I have talked about putting a ls3 with a little 5lb supercharger on it . leave the exhaust stk and what a sleeper . but it is so much fun to open the hood at the gas station . peoples jaw drops when they see the lt5.
#7
Safety Car
hate to say it but have to agree the ls motor is sweet . I have diven bill boudreaus ls conversion and I runs pretty strong . and doesn't even have headers .. bill and I have talked about putting a ls3 with a little 5lb supercharger on it . leave the exhaust stk and what a sleeper . but it is so much fun to open the hood at the gas station . peoples jaw drops when they see the lt5.
#9
Le Mans Master
cheap too. I know it's not going to make the purists happy but HP to me is more important than the brand name.
if Ford made a better bang for the buck than the vette, I'd be in one.
the new mustang is a pretty nice car now.
#11
Burning Brakes
why not? it will likely fit and stock they are at 440 with lots of potential!
cheap too. I know it's not going to make the purists happy but HP to me is more important than the brand name.
if Ford made a better bang for the buck than the vette, I'd be in one.
the new mustang is a pretty nice car now.
cheap too. I know it's not going to make the purists happy but HP to me is more important than the brand name.
if Ford made a better bang for the buck than the vette, I'd be in one.
the new mustang is a pretty nice car now.
Hopefully though my '94's LT5 lasts a long long time since it still sounds better than the Coyote and can't be beat on coolness.
#12
Safety Car
This is interesting stuff ! I LOL @ the bathtub comment !!!
That is precisely the difference. I have a 614 engine dynoed 370ci LT4 going in my 93. After breakin and tuning im hoping 620+ In order to make that power ALOT had to be sacrificed. It idles at 1200, 5th and 6th gear unuseable as it has a weak midrange as it was cammed for 8500 rpm. Its basically a radical toy that I cant really enjoy for longer drives or dd friendly tasks.
Its the single cam and its limits. Its the reason factory cars gain more with mods with a single cam because the oem cam has to do it all. pass emissions, make torque and power (or try because oem cams blow). Wit the LS7 they stuffed it with huge displacement and tried to rpm a little to make the hp goals with the oem cam. Because of the displacement and heads though.. its no wonder they are easily 100+ hp with cam swaps.
I have an LS6 in my ctsv and its smooth and torque and just dies of breath above 6000. Its a tow truck motor in my eyes. Im not hating on the LSx but its not a special motor. I don't even want to beat on it too much because it doesn't sound awesome nor make any special noises or rev hard top end.
I really like the idea of the coyote swap. Anyone know how realistic it might be in our cars? because of parts availability and cost I would definitely consider a build and maybe even do a custom billet manifold to look like the LT5
That is precisely the difference. I have a 614 engine dynoed 370ci LT4 going in my 93. After breakin and tuning im hoping 620+ In order to make that power ALOT had to be sacrificed. It idles at 1200, 5th and 6th gear unuseable as it has a weak midrange as it was cammed for 8500 rpm. Its basically a radical toy that I cant really enjoy for longer drives or dd friendly tasks.
Its the single cam and its limits. Its the reason factory cars gain more with mods with a single cam because the oem cam has to do it all. pass emissions, make torque and power (or try because oem cams blow). Wit the LS7 they stuffed it with huge displacement and tried to rpm a little to make the hp goals with the oem cam. Because of the displacement and heads though.. its no wonder they are easily 100+ hp with cam swaps.
I have an LS6 in my ctsv and its smooth and torque and just dies of breath above 6000. Its a tow truck motor in my eyes. Im not hating on the LSx but its not a special motor. I don't even want to beat on it too much because it doesn't sound awesome nor make any special noises or rev hard top end.
I really like the idea of the coyote swap. Anyone know how realistic it might be in our cars? because of parts availability and cost I would definitely consider a build and maybe even do a custom billet manifold to look like the LT5
#13
Racer
The LT5 has alot of power potential. The intake (plenum, injector housings) with its turns is a restrictor.
The racing team I do consult put straight single ports on their 350 cui LT5. The engine pulled on the dyno 565 crank hp at 7'100 rpm with 50% open trottles and 675 crank hp at 8'000 rpm and still didn't hit the power peak. Due to durability purposes they didn't turn further. The idling is by arround 1'100 rpm.
The motivation and challenge is to build a bridge between smooth idling and normal driveability and a high power output at WOT.
We calculated and found out a 427 with straight ports, fit cams, a good exhaust system and other goodies can pull +800 crank hp and can be even roadworthy.
The racing team I do consult put straight single ports on their 350 cui LT5. The engine pulled on the dyno 565 crank hp at 7'100 rpm with 50% open trottles and 675 crank hp at 8'000 rpm and still didn't hit the power peak. Due to durability purposes they didn't turn further. The idling is by arround 1'100 rpm.
The motivation and challenge is to build a bridge between smooth idling and normal driveability and a high power output at WOT.
We calculated and found out a 427 with straight ports, fit cams, a good exhaust system and other goodies can pull +800 crank hp and can be even roadworthy.
Last edited by SAM/CH ZR-1; 08-01-2015 at 06:57 AM.
#14
Race Director
This is interesting stuff ! I LOL @ the bathtub comment !!!
That is precisely the difference. I have a 614 engine dynoed 370ci LT4 going in my 93. After breakin and tuning im hoping 620+ In order to make that power ALOT had to be sacrificed. It idles at 1200, 5th and 6th gear unuseable as it has a weak midrange as it was cammed for 8500 rpm. Its basically a radical toy that I cant really enjoy for longer drives or dd friendly tasks.
Its the single cam and its limits. Its the reason factory cars gain more with mods with a single cam because the oem cam has to do it all. pass emissions, make torque and power (or try because oem cams blow). Wit the LS7 they stuffed it with huge displacement and tried to rpm a little to make the hp goals with the oem cam. Because of the displacement and heads though.. its no wonder they are easily 100+ hp with cam swaps.
I have an LS6 in my ctsv and its smooth and torque and just dies of breath above 6000. Its a tow truck motor in my eyes. Im not hating on the LSx but its not a special motor. I don't even want to beat on it too much because it doesn't sound awesome nor make any special noises or rev hard top end.
I really like the idea of the coyote swap. Anyone know how realistic it might be in our cars? because of parts availability and cost I would definitely consider a build and maybe even do a custom billet manifold to look like the LT5
That is precisely the difference. I have a 614 engine dynoed 370ci LT4 going in my 93. After breakin and tuning im hoping 620+ In order to make that power ALOT had to be sacrificed. It idles at 1200, 5th and 6th gear unuseable as it has a weak midrange as it was cammed for 8500 rpm. Its basically a radical toy that I cant really enjoy for longer drives or dd friendly tasks.
Its the single cam and its limits. Its the reason factory cars gain more with mods with a single cam because the oem cam has to do it all. pass emissions, make torque and power (or try because oem cams blow). Wit the LS7 they stuffed it with huge displacement and tried to rpm a little to make the hp goals with the oem cam. Because of the displacement and heads though.. its no wonder they are easily 100+ hp with cam swaps.
I have an LS6 in my ctsv and its smooth and torque and just dies of breath above 6000. Its a tow truck motor in my eyes. Im not hating on the LSx but its not a special motor. I don't even want to beat on it too much because it doesn't sound awesome nor make any special noises or rev hard top end.
I really like the idea of the coyote swap. Anyone know how realistic it might be in our cars? because of parts availability and cost I would definitely consider a build and maybe even do a custom billet manifold to look like the LT5
#15
Le Mans Master
The LT5 has alot of power potential. The intake (plenum, injector housings) with its turns is a restrictor.
The racing team I do consult put straight single ports on their 350 cui LT5. The engine pulled on the dyno 565 crank hp at 7'100 rpm with 50% open trottles and 675 crank hp at 8'000 rpm and still didn't hit the power peak. Due to durability purposes they didn't turn further. The idling is by arround 1'100 rpm.
The motivation and challenge is to build a bridge between smooth idling and normal driveability and a high power output at WOT.
We calculated and know a 427 with straight ports and fit cams and a good exhaust system and other goodies can pull +800 crank hp and can be roadworthy.
The racing team I do consult put straight single ports on their 350 cui LT5. The engine pulled on the dyno 565 crank hp at 7'100 rpm with 50% open trottles and 675 crank hp at 8'000 rpm and still didn't hit the power peak. Due to durability purposes they didn't turn further. The idling is by arround 1'100 rpm.
The motivation and challenge is to build a bridge between smooth idling and normal driveability and a high power output at WOT.
We calculated and know a 427 with straight ports and fit cams and a good exhaust system and other goodies can pull +800 crank hp and can be roadworthy.
looking to see if an obx ITB could be adapted to the lt5 with some sheet metal fabbed up base. concerned about the impact of low speed throttle response and ability to tune for the street.
I have a idea that the LSV 390 would jump from 619 to around 650 and pull much stronger up top. I need a bit more head porting too.
let me know if you are interested Sam in exploring this or have a similar solution. ITBs on an LT5 would really be cool.
#17
Racer
looking to see if an obx ITB could be adapted to the lt5 with some sheet metal fabbed up base. concerned about the impact of low speed throttle response and ability to tune for the street.
I have a idea that the LSV 390 would jump from 619 to around 650 and pull much stronger up top. I need a bit more head porting too.
let me know if you are interested Sam in exploring this or have a similar solution. ITBs on an LT5 would really be cool.
I have a idea that the LSV 390 would jump from 619 to around 650 and pull much stronger up top. I need a bit more head porting too.
let me know if you are interested Sam in exploring this or have a similar solution. ITBs on an LT5 would really be cool.
Ron
The OBX individual trottle body could be a interesting base. The custom made ITB the racing team did, cost alot (about Euro 14'000) and sacrifice the A/C compressor. I want to avoid that for other engines because as told the LT5 shall be useable for daily driving.
Many challenges must be solved to make it work and it's a question of time and financial resources.
Another option is to build a completely new plenum with another port design.
Whatever, I am interested.
Sam
Last edited by SAM/CH ZR-1; 07-18-2015 at 04:00 AM.
#18
Racer
#19
Le Mans Master
Ron
The OBX individual trottle body could be a interesting base. The custom made ITB the racing team did, cost alot (about Euro 14'000) and sacrifice the A/C compressor. I want to avoid that for other engines because as told the LT5 shall be useable for daily driving.
Many challenges must be solved to make it work and it's a question of time and financial resources.
Another option is to build a completely new plenum with another port design.
Whatever, I am interested.
Sam
The OBX individual trottle body could be a interesting base. The custom made ITB the racing team did, cost alot (about Euro 14'000) and sacrifice the A/C compressor. I want to avoid that for other engines because as told the LT5 shall be useable for daily driving.
Many challenges must be solved to make it work and it's a question of time and financial resources.
Another option is to build a completely new plenum with another port design.
Whatever, I am interested.
Sam
I'd like to retain AC though, that would be a deal breaker
maybe something along the lines of the new intake on the prototype MY 95 intake would work well
I think the factory intake might be leaving 30 or more hp on the table
Last edited by Rkreigh; 07-19-2015 at 06:30 AM.