LT5 Throttlebody size
#1
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
LT5 Throttlebody size
I was reading on my mpg thread that the throttlebody had a smaller butterfly opening for cruise and better mileage any pictures or how that system works? The stock lt1 is 48 mm, what is the size for the lt5?
#2
Race Director
Member Since: Feb 2002
Location: Compound in the Grove, Ga.
Posts: 11,329
Received 910 Likes
on
583 Posts
2020 C3 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2019 C4 of Year Finalist (performance mods)
2018 C4 of Year Finalist
2015 C4 of the Year Finalist
St. Jude Donor '16
2020 C3 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
The primary plate is 22 mm the two larger secondary plates are 59 mm
#4
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Having never seen a lt5 throttle body, is it bigger in physical size than the lt1? Would it work on a lt1? How do the plates open, small one first before the larger? Could a lt1 be machined to be like the lt5? Are there aftermarket throttle bodies for the lt5 and if so, do they do away with the smaller plate!
#5
Race Director
Member Since: Feb 2002
Location: Compound in the Grove, Ga.
Posts: 11,329
Received 910 Likes
on
583 Posts
2020 C3 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2019 C4 of Year Finalist (performance mods)
2018 C4 of Year Finalist
2015 C4 of the Year Finalist
St. Jude Donor '16
2020 C3 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
#6
Team Owner
Pro Mechanic
It doesn't work (for gas mileage). The purpose is easier management of the "valet" feature. Today, that would all be done w/software controlling the TB blade action. Back then, it had to be done mechanically.
#7
Team Owner
Pro Mechanic
Having never seen a lt5 throttle body, is it bigger in physical size than the lt1? Would it work on a lt1? How do the plates open, small one first before the larger? Could a lt1 be machined to be like the lt5? Are there aftermarket throttle bodies for the lt5 and if so, do they do away with the smaller plate!
2. No.
3. Small first, larger second....like an '80's VW.
4. possibly. Anything can be done w/enough $$
5. No aftermarket TB's for LT5. No need, IMO.
FYI, there is no practical advantage to adding this style TB to an LT1. Would be a total waste of time and money.
#8
Race Director
Member Since: Feb 2002
Location: Compound in the Grove, Ga.
Posts: 11,329
Received 910 Likes
on
583 Posts
2020 C3 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2019 C4 of Year Finalist (performance mods)
2018 C4 of Year Finalist
2015 C4 of the Year Finalist
St. Jude Donor '16
2020 C3 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
"Quote" From Graham Behan, one of the original LT5 Engineers now working for Lingenfelter Performance Engineering:
"The intent of the "Valet" mode was actually to allow the engine to operate on eight injectors whilst on the emission test cycle. The primary lobe of the LT5 intake cam is 20 deg shorter in duration than the secondary lobe. On a 90 MY car the power key could be left in the full power mode at all times, unfortunately for the 91 MY and above we were forced to adopt a strategy whereby the system would be in "Normal" mode(8 injectors) at every start. Hence the change in the key system for the later cars, this strategy prevented the power key from being considered an emission defeat device."
#9
Melting Slicks
#10
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
So does the car get better fuel mileage in valet mode or is it restricted in speed also? Is tuning a better choice on the lt5 for better economy? Why couldn't there be a ecm with two proms with a switch to go with a economy mode to a performance mode?
#11
Team Owner
Pro Mechanic
Tom while agree with most of this I don't think the primary throttle plate has anything to do with the "valet" feature. The valet key controls the secondary port vacuum system and 8 secondary injectors, it was primary for emissions.
"Quote" From Graham Behan, one of the original LT5 Engineers now working for Lingenfelter Performance Engineering:
"The intent of the "Valet" mode was actually to allow the engine to operate on eight injectors whilst on the emission test cycle. The primary lobe of the LT5 intake cam is 20 deg shorter in duration than the secondary lobe. On a 90 MY car the power key could be left in the full power mode at all times, unfortunately for the 91 MY and above we were forced to adopt a strategy whereby the system would be in "Normal" mode(8 injectors) at every start. Hence the change in the key system for the later cars, this strategy prevented the power key from being considered an emission defeat device."
"Quote" From Graham Behan, one of the original LT5 Engineers now working for Lingenfelter Performance Engineering:
"The intent of the "Valet" mode was actually to allow the engine to operate on eight injectors whilst on the emission test cycle. The primary lobe of the LT5 intake cam is 20 deg shorter in duration than the secondary lobe. On a 90 MY car the power key could be left in the full power mode at all times, unfortunately for the 91 MY and above we were forced to adopt a strategy whereby the system would be in "Normal" mode(8 injectors) at every start. Hence the change in the key system for the later cars, this strategy prevented the power key from being considered an emission defeat device."
At least, that is what I've read. Otherwise, why spend the $$$ on machining, parts etc, for that itty bitty throttle plate and bore? You can get a progressive throttle much more cheaply and simply by using a cam on the throttle arm.
#12
Le Mans Master
for the LT1 there are numerous high flow throttle body setups
I've always wanted to port the "primary" on my throttle body but I've never heard of anyone doing it.
I agree that for stock LT5s a ported TB is a waste and there is some debate if it's even needed on the big doggies.
bet cool to do a back to back dyno test. my bet is that it's not a restriction even stock.
#13
Race Director
Member Since: Feb 2002
Location: Compound in the Grove, Ga.
Posts: 11,329
Received 910 Likes
on
583 Posts
2020 C3 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2019 C4 of Year Finalist (performance mods)
2018 C4 of Year Finalist
2015 C4 of the Year Finalist
St. Jude Donor '16
2020 C3 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
Yes, I agree w/all of that...however, when in Valet mode, only the small throttle plate opens (in addition to only the primary runners, function.).
At least, that is what I've read. Otherwise, why spend the $$$ on machining, parts etc, for that itty bitty throttle plate and bore? You can get a progressive throttle much more cheaply and simply by using a cam on the throttle arm.
At least, that is what I've read. Otherwise, why spend the $$$ on machining, parts etc, for that itty bitty throttle plate and bore? You can get a progressive throttle much more cheaply and simply by using a cam on the throttle arm.
#14
Team Owner
Pro Mechanic
Copy that. I had read (probably in Motor Trend, as that is what I subscribed to back then), waaaay back when the LT5 came out, that the small throttle plate was the only one activated when in Valet mode, limiting the engine to 250 hp.
I think the author must have been confused at to which throttle plates he was writing about. I can't see an engine making 250 horse through that sized orifice, I don't know of any device that would limit the secondaries from opening, since it's all mechanical.
What you're saying makes more sense than what I had read. Thanks for the correction.
I think the author must have been confused at to which throttle plates he was writing about. I can't see an engine making 250 horse through that sized orifice, I don't know of any device that would limit the secondaries from opening, since it's all mechanical.
What you're saying makes more sense than what I had read. Thanks for the correction.
#15
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
#16
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: South-central Missouri
Posts: 6,314
Received 500 Likes
on
395 Posts
While driving, there isn't much throttle input above idle when I can feel ever so slight of a power (I hesitate to say) "surge". I'm not sure it is the main throttle plates opening or just a ripple in the AF tables or when the secondary injectors come on in the "secondary deleted" mod config that I have...or both?
#17
Hey guys I have done a lot of tuning with the LT5 computer. the throttle body is all mechanical and the secondary plates start to open at about 25% throttle opening. Your foot goes down and and the throttle opens. the Valet part of it is all computer controlled, there are two sets of fuel and spark tables, one set is for 8 throttles and another set for all 16. the throttle blades being open can overlap on these tables based on tps position. there is a tremendous amount of tuning for all tables and varying sensor input.
hope that clears up some questions. It is almost too much to play with really
hope that clears up some questions. It is almost too much to play with really
#18
Heel & Toe
Member Since: Mar 2002
Location: Fitchburg MA
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Having never seen a lt5 throttle body, is it bigger in physical size than the lt1? Would it work on a lt1? How do the plates open, small one first before the larger? Could a lt1 be machined to be like the lt5? Are there aftermarket throttle bodies for the lt5 and if so, do they do away with the smaller plate!
These should give an idea of the differences between & LT1 & LT5 throttle bodies (LT1 throttle bores have been enlarged to 58mm for this example):
Front:
Back:
I'll let someone else ponder the concept of using an LT5 throttle body on an LT1 with the primary throttle feeding the under-manifold transfer passage
#19
Team Owner
Pro Mechanic
Actually, it was for fuel economy/gas mileage. Remember the LT5 is a speed/density system, the smaller throttle valve gave a better TPS vs flow relationship at low power demand like cruising. Two large throttle valves were tried in the beginning but air and fuel distribution problems occurred at low engine RPM.
Those are currently fed by the IAC. Don't know what benefit you'd get by feeding them w/a mini throttle. No "ROI" that I can see there.
#20
Le Mans Master
Page 40 of HOTB has the info you're looking for. The small throttle valve wasn't in the original throttle body, there was a separate "sub-plenum" with a small throttle valve feeding it and the main throttle body with only two large throttle valves. They abandoned the sub-plenum and put the small throttle in the main throttle body. So to answer your questions, the small throttle valve wasn't left over from the development phase and it is necessary for final production since they added it to the main throttle body after eliminating the sub-plenum. Also, it was going to idle at 450 RPM but I think they ended up at 500 RPM...the low idle RPM is one reason for the dual mass flywheel.
under the plenum.