Horsepower
#3
Le Mans Master
early years around 335 at the tire
later 93-95 around 350
due to the early ZR-1s being a bit lighter, there really isn't much of a performance difference
a few freaks out there did better but there are some happy dynos too so trap speed at the track is a much better indicator
later 93-95 around 350
due to the early ZR-1s being a bit lighter, there really isn't much of a performance difference
a few freaks out there did better but there are some happy dynos too so trap speed at the track is a much better indicator
#4
Race Director
Member Since: Feb 2002
Location: Compound in the Grove, Ga.
Posts: 11,328
Received 910 Likes
on
583 Posts
2020 C3 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2019 C4 of Year Finalist (performance mods)
2018 C4 of Year Finalist
2015 C4 of the Year Finalist
St. Jude Donor '16
2020 C3 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
My 91 was 326rwhp bone stock 10K miles on it.
#5
Safety Car
Member Since: Mar 2005
Location: Fredonia WI
Posts: 3,566
Received 491 Likes
on
392 Posts
2023 C4 of the Year Finalist- Modified
Finalist 2020 C4 of the Year - Modified
C4 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019
2018 C4 of Year Finalist
My 1990 put down 350 RWHP (WCF) before mods on a Mustang Dyno -- although it did have a Corsa exhaust on it.
#7
Drifting
Thread Starter
#8
Race Director
Member Since: Feb 2002
Location: Compound in the Grove, Ga.
Posts: 11,328
Received 910 Likes
on
583 Posts
2020 C3 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2019 C4 of Year Finalist (performance mods)
2018 C4 of Year Finalist
2015 C4 of the Year Finalist
St. Jude Donor '16
2020 C3 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
That they do. I've had Marc H. do all my work.
I started at 326rwhp, After Long tube headers Corsa, full P&P and a Marc tune. I'm at 420+ rwhp. Still Have stock cams, cats & DM flywheel.
Last edited by FASTAZU; 11-28-2015 at 03:29 PM.
#9
Racer
since you live in texas i would go to corey henderson who owns henderson performance in new braunfells tx. he is the one who did all the work on my car. mark hibeck is good also but corey is alot closer to you .
The following users liked this post:
FASTAZU (11-28-2015)
#11
Pro
#13
Race Director
Take a look at the 11+ quart oil pan when you can. Its pretty difficult to have an oil starvation issue with the cover at the top of the oil pan. By design it keeps the containment factor pretty high from what I can see.
The highest I have ever monitored my oil temp is half way on the gauge. Not sure what the approximate temperature is... my best guess is low 200s.
Engine durabilty? Order a copy of the coffee table book, "Heart of the Beast". Also, over on the ZR-1 Net website you can read up on it there.
Its still the unofficial 24 hour record holder for a production car with a stock engine. VW has broken and then reset this record, however,
they never produced the car in numbers big enough for it to qualify as a production car.
#17
Race Director
#18
Team Owner
My 93 dynoed 372 with a K&N and Desert Development exhaust. Added a Doug Rippie chip, pulled the cats and dynoed 411 SAE.
For grins, we dynoed it with the valet key turned off, still dynoed about 360.
Never dynoed my 91 still (stock), but it doesn't feel as strong as my 93 did when stock.
For grins, we dynoed it with the valet key turned off, still dynoed about 360.
Never dynoed my 91 still (stock), but it doesn't feel as strong as my 93 did when stock.
#19
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: South-central Missouri
Posts: 6,314
Received 500 Likes
on
395 Posts
My stock 1990, save for a Borla cat-back (see graph) managed a 336.8 pull.
After porting alone, this is (more or less) typical with top-end porting, headers (and I believe sans cats) and a free(er) flowing cat-back...)
The same motor as in the top graph after full porting, except the TB, and free flowing exhaust and headers and tune...
with your comment about the LT5's responding well to porting. That's one of the truly exciting things about that motor! On the other hand, due primarily to its limited production, the supply of parts or especially trick parts is very expensive. However, if you read between the lines, it is clear there is significant potential therein, and experimenting and developments on their own motors (e.g., the latest "Voodoo" flat plane motor developed for the Mustang) is VERY intriguing!!
* Note: All dyno pulls shown performed on an inertia (Dynojet) machine, and measurements were actual values at the rear wheels
After porting alone, this is (more or less) typical with top-end porting, headers (and I believe sans cats) and a free(er) flowing cat-back...)
The same motor as in the top graph after full porting, except the TB, and free flowing exhaust and headers and tune...
with your comment about the LT5's responding well to porting. That's one of the truly exciting things about that motor! On the other hand, due primarily to its limited production, the supply of parts or especially trick parts is very expensive. However, if you read between the lines, it is clear there is significant potential therein, and experimenting and developments on their own motors (e.g., the latest "Voodoo" flat plane motor developed for the Mustang) is VERY intriguing!!
* Note: All dyno pulls shown performed on an inertia (Dynojet) machine, and measurements were actual values at the rear wheels
Last edited by Paul Workman; 12-12-2015 at 10:20 AM.