In Defense of Water Injection
#41
Latent heat of evaporation:
Water: 2260kJ/kg
Methanol: 1100kJ/kg
And no I am not done yet with the other thread, it is a lot more to explain in that one vs this one.
When Methanol gets combusted in the cylinder its sure not cooling it during this process :P
Water: 2260kJ/kg
Methanol: 1100kJ/kg
And no I am not done yet with the other thread, it is a lot more to explain in that one vs this one.
When Methanol gets combusted in the cylinder its sure not cooling it during this process :P
#42
Melting Slicks
At the temperatures in the combustion chamber water will have a much easier time cooling. A little water can absorb a lot of heat. The reason that cars run on straight meth so cool is the volume of fuel they use. Cars running meth have to run way more fuel than even E85 cars.
#43
Melting Slicks
#44
Premium Supporting Vendor
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Providing the most proven supercharger kits for your C5/6/7 609-752-0321
Posts: 23,315
Received 1,085 Likes
on
656 Posts
I think the best is just do what you prefer, and if you wish to line up an equal build to equal build, one with water injection, one with straight meth, (in our general capacity of LS builds) then I will gladly wager you on the straight meth car to win, and I'm not much of a gambling man, I just have a lot of seat time with this in particular.
That said, if your not looking for more power, then yes I understand the physics behind the two.
That said, if your not looking for more power, then yes I understand the physics behind the two.
#45
#46
Melting Slicks
I think the best is just do what you prefer, and if you wish to line up an equal build to equal build, one with water injection, one with straight meth, (in our general capacity of LS builds) then I will gladly wager you on the straight meth car to win, and I'm not much of a gambling man, I just have a lot of seat time with this in particular.
That said, if your not looking for more power, then yes I understand the physics behind the two.
That said, if your not looking for more power, then yes I understand the physics behind the two.
For a 100% fast road car, water can make a lot of sense. It's free, it works, it's available almost everywhere, and in terms of usage, it is more efficient by volume. And of course it is 99.9% safe.
Even for a track, road course or whatever. ie any hard use longer than a few seconds. Water again would be more efficient, any volume would last longer.
If you couldnt make 750-800rwhp using water/pump, then something is badly wrong. Certainly at that sort of level, methanol is not required IMO.
Would methanol make the task easier ? Yes it probably would. But not 100% necessary.
#48
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Mar 2008
Location: Houston/Dayton Texas
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Number's don't lie. By all means sir give your scientific response with data to back it up. Still waiting on your scientific response in the other thread surly you have finished moving by now.
So what your saying is that methanol itself dont actually cool the combustion chamber? If that's what your saying I don't think your correct.
I suppose for now we will have to agree to disagree.
So what your saying is that methanol itself dont actually cool the combustion chamber? If that's what your saying I don't think your correct.
I suppose for now we will have to agree to disagree.
just because you have 415 days a year that its 65 degrees and sunny with a 1% chance of sprinkles doesn't mean your right..
and btw.. when that 1% does happen.. you people go crazy... really.. its just WATER!!!
#49
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Mar 2008
Location: Houston/Dayton Texas
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
I think the best is just do what you prefer, and if you wish to line up an equal build to equal build, one with water injection, one with straight meth, (in our general capacity of LS builds) then I will gladly wager you on the straight meth car to win, and I'm not much of a gambling man, I just have a lot of seat time with this in particular.
That said, if your not looking for more power, then yes I understand the physics behind the two.
That said, if your not looking for more power, then yes I understand the physics behind the two.
#50
Melting Slicks
So meth and E85 makes more power and burns cooler sounds like a win win. What is the water for again?
#51
Le Mans Master
I get my car tuned Friday. I have an Alky Control kit, and it will be a non-meth dependent tune, just for safety, single nozzle. So since not looking for extra power, and I think I will have plenty of fuel, should I have it tuned with water? If I have it tuned with meth, could I use water if I wanted to later without a retune, say if I ran out etc?
#52
Melting Slicks
2 different arguments in here. If you are arguing about making the most power like Doug@ECS said meth only wins hands down. Now, add some water on top of that volume of meth, and you will have a setup even less prone to detonation if you were approaching the limits of the tune via boost, timing, etc. That's my experience.
#54
Melting Slicks
Just went back and read the first post. That was in the first post lol.oops
Last edited by SBCGENII; 12-09-2013 at 07:37 PM.
#55
ISIS SUCKS FAT CHOAD
Guess ill just have to use my car for testing. Ill call julio tomorrow and order some different nozzles. I predict a 4-8 % power loss between 100% meth and a 50/50 mix.
#56
Drifting