C5 Forced Induction/Nitrous C5 Corvette Turbochargers, Superchargers, Centrifugal, Twin Screw & Roots Blowers, Twin Turbo Kits, Intercoolers, Wet & Dry Nitrous Injection, Meth
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

MSD intake

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-24-2015, 08:50 PM
  #21  
Tony @ Mamo Motorsports
Supporting Vendor
 
Tony @ Mamo Motorsports's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,096
Received 905 Likes on 370 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by slow ride
Tony, have you messed around with the shorter runner versions of the Fast 102 at all?
Still vaporware at this point.....the runners aren't actually available yet as far as I know

-Tony
Old 06-25-2015, 05:25 AM
  #22  
road pilot
Le Mans Master
Support Corvetteforum!
Thread Starter
 
road pilot's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: Oviedo Florida
Posts: 8,816
Received 1,254 Likes on 817 Posts
2023 C2 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2021 C2 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2016 C5 of Year Finalist

Default

Originally Posted by Tony Mamo
Interesting....actually more an LS1/LS2/LS6 intake.....all of which are cathedral ports

Very curious how this manifold will do against the gold standard.....LOL

I think this version was released ahead of schedule or at least the schedule I read about (they were initially targeting the fall I believe on the cathedral release).

Good stuff.....will have to get my hands on one of those as well!

-Tony
I didn't know. The retail price is pretty steep (over $1200) but I don't pay retail. I bought the MSD intake for a little over $800. Some guys
would have a problem with installation, right now it is not buy-bolt on
-run. It is a little more involved. I am hopeing for big numbers when
I get it on the dyno. The seat of the pants feel-------the car feels
strong.
Let me know what you think of this intake ;once you get one to
test.
Old 03-02-2016, 11:09 AM
  #23  
Stroker87
Melting Slicks
 
Stroker87's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2014
Location: chicago area IL.
Posts: 2,722
Received 152 Likes on 118 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by road pilot
I am hopeing for big numbers when
I get it on the dyno. The seat of the pants feel-------the car feels
strong.
Let me know what you think of this intake ;once you get one to
test.
have you had your car dyno'd yet?

I seen you posted about problems with your install because of your blower but for a N/A car do you think it would be less of a hassle? I read a few post about not clearing the water pump did you have this problem?

thanks
Old 03-02-2016, 02:58 PM
  #24  
road pilot
Le Mans Master
Support Corvetteforum!
Thread Starter
 
road pilot's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: Oviedo Florida
Posts: 8,816
Received 1,254 Likes on 817 Posts
2023 C2 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2021 C2 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2016 C5 of Year Finalist

Default

Originally Posted by Stroker87
have you had your car dyno'd yet?

I seen you posted about problems with your install because of your blower but for a N/A car do you think it would be less of a hassle? I read a few post about not clearing the water pump did you have this problem?

thanks
I am preparing my vette for the 2016 season, so no time for a dyno
right now. I had no problems with the water pump. I think you would
have a lot less hassle's with a N/A engine.
Old 03-02-2016, 11:31 PM
  #25  
reactor2
Drifting
 
reactor2's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,724
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 20 Posts

Default

I would have taken a grinder to the "atomic air force" letters before I installed it. That literally sounds like something a couple of junior high kids dreamed up.
Old 03-03-2016, 04:15 AM
  #26  
Tony @ Mamo Motorsports
Supporting Vendor
 
Tony @ Mamo Motorsports's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,096
Received 905 Likes on 370 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by reactor2
I would have taken a grinder to the "atomic air force" letters before I installed it. That literally sounds like something a couple of junior high kids dreamed up.
That's pretty funny actually.....I never gave the name much thought! (just thought the logos were a bit obnoxious with all four of them).

In the event you missed this thread, take a peak cause I certainly took a grinder to the logos!....LOL

https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...il-covers.html


Regards,
Tony
Old 03-03-2016, 07:26 AM
  #27  
John_B
Racer
 
John_B's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2015
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Hmm reading that thread really makes me want a msd intake now, how are the gains for the ls6 compared to the ls7 tho?
Old 03-03-2016, 10:34 AM
  #28  
Stroker87
Melting Slicks
 
Stroker87's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2014
Location: chicago area IL.
Posts: 2,722
Received 152 Likes on 118 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Tony Mamo
That's pretty funny actually.....I never gave the name much thought! (just thought the logos were a bit obnoxious with all four of them).

In the event you missed this thread, take a peak cause I certainly took a grinder to the logos!....LOL

https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...il-covers.html


Regards,
Tony
Tony i read true that hole link, you say on a ls6 the fast is still better?
Old 03-03-2016, 12:02 PM
  #29  
John_B
Racer
 
John_B's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2015
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stroker87
Tony i read true that hole link, you say on a ls6 the fast is still better?

Did he say that? I must of missed that
Old 03-03-2016, 12:11 PM
  #30  
neverstop
Melting Slicks
 
neverstop's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,034
Received 108 Likes on 102 Posts
Default

has anyone actually dyno tested this on a boosted 700+whp setup? I have yet to see a good dyno test and have yet to see anyone with any real street miles on it. I think the FAST intakes typically show decent gains but the reliability has not been good on big boost setups and lots of guys run stock ls7/3 intakes to 1,100+ whp so would have to be pretty good numbers and reliability for anyone with FI to car imo

in fact I think JBS ran this on his ~850whp setup and gained zero peak numbers with only modest mid range gains. I'd be not thrilled if I spent $800 on this, the time to install, and the money/time to retune and showed like 15hp of mid range and zero peak gains

Last edited by neverstop; 03-03-2016 at 12:12 PM.
Old 03-03-2016, 12:41 PM
  #31  
Stroker87
Melting Slicks
 
Stroker87's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2014
Location: chicago area IL.
Posts: 2,722
Received 152 Likes on 118 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by John_B
Did he say that? I must of missed that
post #69 in that topic

Originally Posted by Tony Mamo
A ported FAST is still the "gold standard". The cathedral MSD effort was close but the FAST edged them out a little bit based on a few tests I have seen. If I had to guess MSD focused alot more time on the LS7 intake design or they simply got lucky (it does happens occasionally....LOL)

Last edited by Stroker87; 03-03-2016 at 12:42 PM.
Old 03-03-2016, 12:55 PM
  #32  
John_B
Racer
 
John_B's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2015
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stroker87
post #69 in that topic
Thanks, I scrolled right by that apparently.



Quick Reply: MSD intake



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:48 PM.