LS6 Build for boost
#1
Advanced
Thread Starter
LS6 Build for boost
So i am in the process of rebuilding my Procharged LS6 after 2 spun rod bearings in my 2003 z06..
Looking to go with a forged rotating assembly. Does anyone have any good package deals? Are there any I should stay away from?
I was running 575hp - 511ft/lbs to the rear tires @ 7psi on a stock long block...
Looking to pulley down for around 10psi and shooting for 650hp at the tire. Not a track car, just a fun street machine.
What are your recommendations?
Thanks!
Looking to go with a forged rotating assembly. Does anyone have any good package deals? Are there any I should stay away from?
I was running 575hp - 511ft/lbs to the rear tires @ 7psi on a stock long block...
Looking to pulley down for around 10psi and shooting for 650hp at the tire. Not a track car, just a fun street machine.
What are your recommendations?
Thanks!
Last edited by ezstreet; 08-23-2016 at 04:10 PM. Reason: I can't make a post with out needing to edit.....
#2
Instructor
Tick Performance has some rotating assembly packages on sale right now that would meet your needs sans crank, no need to spend money there for your goals.
#3
So i am in the process of rebuilding my Procharged LS6 after 2 spun rod bearings in my 2003 z06..
Looking to go with a forged rotating assembly. Does anyone have any good package deals? Are there any I should stay away from?
I was running 575hp - 511ft/lbs to the rear tires @ 7psi on a stock long block...
Looking to pulley down for around 10psi and shooting for 650hp at the tire. Not a track car, just a fun street machine.
What are your recommendations?
Thanks!
Looking to go with a forged rotating assembly. Does anyone have any good package deals? Are there any I should stay away from?
I was running 575hp - 511ft/lbs to the rear tires @ 7psi on a stock long block...
Looking to pulley down for around 10psi and shooting for 650hp at the tire. Not a track car, just a fun street machine.
What are your recommendations?
Thanks!
#4
Melting Slicks
can do the standard recipe, callies rods and wiseco or diamond pistons, ARPs.
should let your builder choose the combo after inspecting your block. just incase you have oversize a little
should let your builder choose the combo after inspecting your block. just incase you have oversize a little
Last edited by FourG63 97GST; 08-25-2016 at 09:46 PM.
#5
Race Director
Pro Mechanic
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Fort Wayne IN
Posts: 12,244
Received 813 Likes
on
431 Posts
C5 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019
2017 C5 of the Year Finalist
2016 C5 of the Year Finalist
2015 C5 of the Year Finalist
I Believe In The Beer Fairy
Budget? Future goals beyond the 650 RWHP?
I'd say stick with a factory crank, it's cost efficient and they take a beating (running one in my LS3 shortblock @ ~850 RWHP). If you can afford a new block, then I'd say do that and go for more bore. Otherwise for your power goals in the original post, toss some forged Eagle H Beams and Diamond pistons in it and call it a day.
I'd say stick with a factory crank, it's cost efficient and they take a beating (running one in my LS3 shortblock @ ~850 RWHP). If you can afford a new block, then I'd say do that and go for more bore. Otherwise for your power goals in the original post, toss some forged Eagle H Beams and Diamond pistons in it and call it a day.
#6
Le Mans Master
What's the details on your ls6? I'm suprised it let go with that power, unless you were using it a lot at the track or so. I'm right at 650 rwhp on stock longblock.
Last edited by NVTHIS; 08-25-2016 at 10:40 PM.
#8
Advanced
Thread Starter
It has 75k miles... It has been boosted for almost 7years now. I was not the owner that installed, and feel as though it was not properly cared for at least a few of those years prior to my ownership.
#9
Advanced
Thread Starter
I might have to "settle" and have a shop check it over and hone/deck if needed, then assemble the entire thing myself
#10
Advanced
Thread Starter
Budget? Future goals beyond the 650 RWHP?
I'd say stick with a factory crank, it's cost efficient and they take a beating (running one in my LS3 shortblock @ ~850 RWHP). If you can afford a new block, then I'd say do that and go for more bore. Otherwise for your power goals in the original post, toss some forged Eagle H Beams and Diamond pistons in it and call it a day.
I'd say stick with a factory crank, it's cost efficient and they take a beating (running one in my LS3 shortblock @ ~850 RWHP). If you can afford a new block, then I'd say do that and go for more bore. Otherwise for your power goals in the original post, toss some forged Eagle H Beams and Diamond pistons in it and call it a day.
#11
Advanced
Thread Starter
At this point im looking to start fresh and keep better record than the PO.
It's comments like that "I'm right at 650 rwhp on stock longblock." that make me want to just put it back together with all GM parts...
Crappy thing is i only ran down the strip 2x before the harmonic balancer failed. Replaced that, on 1st start up after the rod bearings let go
#12
Melting Slicks
yea, you're in a tough spot, lot of oem motors take it, but have the few that let go, spinning a bearing a barely a let go also, probably just rattled it one too many time. could be knock, bad gas, not sure how aggressive the tune is.
since you're doing the labor, another cost alternative is just switch to GenIV rods, they're safe to the 800-850 range. can through some pistons in it, since ringlands usually goes first. you can fiddle with compression when you're there also.
since you're doing the labor, another cost alternative is just switch to GenIV rods, they're safe to the 800-850 range. can through some pistons in it, since ringlands usually goes first. you can fiddle with compression when you're there also.
#13
Advanced
Thread Starter
A lot of what i am seeing are guys using 6.125 the h-beam rods instead of going stock length of 6.100 and using the ARP2000 cap screws and dished 2618 forged pistons giving 9.5:1 compression. I'm limited to 93 octane fuel and want to keep it reliable and this seems to be the best bet.
Anyone with input on the technical side of things?
Thanks,
EZ
Anyone with input on the technical side of things?
Thanks,
EZ
#14
Melting Slicks
6.125 is the new "standard", the non oem length is compensated by piston wrist pin location, most piston manufacturers have a piston that'll work with those rods, it became the new"standard" also, just copy and paste. it's tried and true. desired compression is preference, that's based on fueling you're using ( E85 or meth) 9.5:1 is a safe bet for a 93 car.
Last edited by FourG63 97GST; 08-29-2016 at 04:35 PM.
#15
Advanced
Thread Starter
In order to achieve a 9.5:1 compression with a 6.125 rod length, factory GM MLS head gaskets, and factory 243 ls6 heads, what piston dish would i need to be looking at?
I've tried a few calculators but they all seem to produce different results...
Also i have no idea the standard factory head gasket bore to plug into the calcs.
I tried using the 3.622 stroke and stock bore with not much luck
I've tried a few calculators but they all seem to produce different results...
Also i have no idea the standard factory head gasket bore to plug into the calcs.
I tried using the 3.622 stroke and stock bore with not much luck
#16
Melting Slicks
http://www.csgnetwork.com/compcalc.html
i'm getting -5.0 dish
bore 3.898
stroke 3.622
gasket thickness .051
gasket bore 3.910
64.65 cc chamber
i'm getting -5.0 dish
bore 3.898
stroke 3.622
gasket thickness .051
gasket bore 3.910
64.65 cc chamber
The following users liked this post:
ezstreet (08-30-2016)
#17
Advanced
Thread Starter
I have been eye balling this package from Texas-Speed
https://www.texas-speed.com/shoppingcart.aspx
Think this would cover my basis? They don't have an option for -5.0cc dish but i think the -4.0 would get me close enough
https://www.texas-speed.com/shoppingcart.aspx
Think this would cover my basis? They don't have an option for -5.0cc dish but i think the -4.0 would get me close enough