3.15 Performance Axle Ratio
#2
Drifting
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Celina ohio
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have an auto with the 3:15. I struggle to get the tires to break loose, with 3:15's. I would think that the 2:73's would be even worse.
If you have a choice I would get the 3:15's if possible. From what I have read you only loose about 1-2 mpg.
If you have a choice I would get the 3:15's if possible. From what I have read you only loose about 1-2 mpg.
#6
Race Director
Member Since: Nov 1999
Location: Greer SC
Posts: 12,952
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cruise-In II Veteran
3.15's provide better acceleration. Here is GM's info:
Axle....0-60 MPH...1/4 Mile
2.73...4.90 Sec....13.65 Sec
3.15...4.75 Sec....13.50 Sec
Axle....0-60 MPH...1/4 Mile
2.73...4.90 Sec....13.65 Sec
3.15...4.75 Sec....13.50 Sec
#7
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Dec 2003
Location: That dam place where it rains all the time
Posts: 8,119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Stupid!
Ok, I'm gonna show some stupidity now! When I got my 99 A-4 I did'nt know that it had the G-92 (3.15). I wanted 3.15 or 3.42's bad! Well then I drove a friends A-4 and thought he had some motor issues because it was weak. Then I had SpongeVette do a born on date and wala, I have 3.15's. So my point here is GET 315's or get the 2.73's with the understanding that you MUST replace them soon!
P.S. Now I want 3.73's BAD!
P.S. Now I want 3.73's BAD!
#8
Administrator
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: In a parallel universe. Currently own 2014 Stingray Coupe.
Posts: 342,982
Received 19,300 Likes
on
13,973 Posts
C7 of the Year - Modified Finalist 2021
MO Events Coordinator
St. Jude Co-Organizer
St. Jude Donor '03-'04-'05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-'18-'19-
'20-'21-'22-'23-'24
NCM Sinkhole Donor
CI 5, 8 & 11 Veteran
If you want some decent acceleration performance from the automatic, you should get the 3.15 axle. However, a number of forum members have ultimately swapped it out for 3.42's or lower gears.
#9
Originally Posted by JDs00PewterCoupe
If you want some decent acceleration performance from the automatic, you should get the 3.15 axle. However, a number of forum members have ultimately swapped it out for 3.42's or lower gears.
I don't know what the allure with 3.15s is. "Performance" differential???? If you want performance, you'll have to go beyond 3.15s.
Having driven a 2.73 geared car, my own, before the 3.42s and an '04 3.15 geared car, there is not a dimes worth of difference between the 2.73s and the 3.15s. As evidenced by the 0.15 difference in quarter mile times described above.
You'll have to replace either one if you are looking for real performance.
#10
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Feb 2004
Location: Austin
Posts: 2,549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pettrix
3.15 are MANDATORY
They make the car FASTER and it is much more fun to drive. 3.42s would be better but they are NOT factory options with an A4.
They make the car FASTER and it is much more fun to drive. 3.42s would be better but they are NOT factory options with an A4.
#12
Burning Brakes
Member Since: Sep 2003
Location: baton rouge la
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sully C5
3.15's provide better acceleration. Here is GM's info:
Axle....0-60 MPH...1/4 Mile
2.73...4.90 Sec....13.65 Sec
3.15...4.75 Sec....13.50 Sec
Axle....0-60 MPH...1/4 Mile
2.73...4.90 Sec....13.65 Sec
3.15...4.75 Sec....13.50 Sec
it's like bolting 100hp to the car.
as mods go, this is the most defining seat of the pants performance mod
in its price range.
GM suggests the 3.15 performance ratio.
I suggest what GM doesn't deliver in a 3.42 gear as A4's go.
#13
Burning Brakes
Member Since: Sep 2003
Location: baton rouge la
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by EB20003
I don't know what the allure with 3.15s is. "Performance" differential???? If you want performance, you'll have to go beyond 3.15s.
Having driven a 2.73 geared car, my own, before the 3.42s and an '04 3.15 geared car, there is not a dimes worth of difference between the 2.73s and the 3.15s. As evidenced by the 0.15 difference in quarter mile times described above.
You'll have to replace either one if you are looking for real performance.
Having driven a 2.73 geared car, my own, before the 3.42s and an '04 3.15 geared car, there is not a dimes worth of difference between the 2.73s and the 3.15s. As evidenced by the 0.15 difference in quarter mile times described above.
You'll have to replace either one if you are looking for real performance.
Oh youre wrong about that my friend.
theres a very noticable difference between a 2.73 gear and a 3.42 gear.
#14
Melting Slicks
the performance ratio is a must. Having 3.15's (c5) or 3.07 (c4) is like the 6sp's have 3.73's. See manuals always haved to be geared lower (higher number) to make up for it being a 6sp with the pauses in shifting etcetc. So when manual guys upgrade gears they go to 3.73-4.10 and a4's 3.45-3.73.
in a c4 a 3.45 geard 6sp pretty much is like having the 2.59's in the auto.
the 3.07 auto c4 is like a 6sp having 3.73.
you can tell a good bit of difference the 99 I had before my 95 vert had 2.73 and my c4 with 3.07s gets a better track time so it makes a lot of difference.
in a c4 a 3.45 geard 6sp pretty much is like having the 2.59's in the auto.
the 3.07 auto c4 is like a 6sp having 3.73.
you can tell a good bit of difference the 99 I had before my 95 vert had 2.73 and my c4 with 3.07s gets a better track time so it makes a lot of difference.
#15
Originally Posted by I X L R 8
Oh youre wrong about that my friend.
theres a very noticable difference between a 2.73 gear and a 3.42 gear.
theres a very noticable difference between a 2.73 gear and a 3.42 gear.
And I agree with you, that there is a very noticable difference between a 2.73 geared C5 and a 3.42 geared one. Actually the difference is huge. I should know by now. My car has had 3.42s in it since this past spring, upgraded from 2.73s.
Last edited by '06 Quicksilver Z06; 09-25-2004 at 01:33 AM.
#16
Originally Posted by boatboatboat
I have an auto with the 3:15. I struggle to get the tires to break loose, with 3:15's. I would think that the 2:73's would be even worse.
If you have a choice I would get the 3:15's if possible. From what I have read you only loose about 1-2 mpg.
If you have a choice I would get the 3:15's if possible. From what I have read you only loose about 1-2 mpg.
Hmm.....my 3.15'ed C5 has had traction control/active handling kick in quite a few times while punching it from a roll....much less a stop!
#17
Drifting
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Sacramento CA
Posts: 1,396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A4 wit 3.15s
I can break my tires loose at will under 35 mph, let alone from a stop. Now I have some mods also. But I like the top end speed of the 3:15's I hit 164mph 3nights ago with the top down. The 30 mpg at 85 mph is really nice to for a long trip. You guys might beat me off the line but lets go play on the freeways sometime (oops sorry that's right no one from this forum would do that)
#18
Team Owner
Member Since: Apr 2001
Location: S.W. Ohio. . . . . . NRA Life Member
Posts: 54,199
Received 173 Likes
on
107 Posts
You'll have to replace either one if you are looking for real performance.
But also like you; I also have driven C5 A4s with 2.73, 3.15, and 3.42 and I could tell a difference between them almost instantly.
Give me any C5 A4 (without telling me the rear ratio), and I bet that after two dead-stop launches I could tell you the ratio (without going 75mph in 3rd gear... HE-HE ).
Many here aren't into modding... and simply want what's the best the factory has to offer; and I think that was the post originators question.
Obviously the 2.73 to 3.15 is much more noticeable (15 percent change) than the 3.15 to 3.42 route (8.6 percent).
Last edited by Mike Mercury; 09-25-2004 at 09:18 PM.