C5 Tech Corvette Tech/Performance: LS1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Tech Topics, Basic Tech, Maintenance, How to Remove & Replace
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Loss Of Low End Torque With 3 Inch Exaust?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-28-2005, 09:06 PM
  #1  
big tony
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
big tony's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2005
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Loss Of Low End Torque With 3 Inch Exaust?

I Want To Go With Lg Headers In 2003 Coupe With Stingers At Both Ends Intake And Exaust.i Was Told That With The 3'' Exaust I Would Lose Low End Torque Especially Since I Was Going Without Cats.they Said Not Enough Back Pressure For A Basicaly Stock Motor.please Give Opinions.
Old 03-28-2005, 11:02 PM
  #2  
02ElectronZ
Instructor
 
02ElectronZ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: Auburn NE
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default I agree with not needing 3" exhaust

Here is basically how I understand it. I assume you have the standard 346 CID LS1. Which means your engine cannot flow enough air to give you the right back pressure w/a 3" exhaust system, then your headers are not creating the most efficient scavaging of exhaust gases from the exhaust cycle. Therefore, reduced vacuum on the exhaust valve does not help it shut in time for the intake stroke to achieve maximum new air instead of exhaust. Kind of like backwash from your brother when you had to share a Mt. Dew. This is where you lose the torque. You also lose HP, but it is not as noticeable at low RPMs where you need torque, not HP.

Hope this helps. If not, PM me.
Old 03-29-2005, 02:40 AM
  #3  
loudsam
Burning Brakes
 
loudsam's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2004
Location: Country Boys Can Survive.
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

What all are you planning as far as performance mods for your car? It's a KNOWN fact that Longtube headers are an absolute pre-req to other more serious "power-mods".

Plus, If your thinking of performance, than you must be pushing the revs high enough to realize good torque/horsepower gains from longtubes. IMHO, I wouldn't even think of doing anything else till I had LT headers on my car! Except for of course, air-intake!

IMHO, and from a little bit of performance driving, these ls1 engines were "BORN TO BE WILD"!!! Something like Dynatech Supermaxx have only 2.5" merge collectors, and they usually produce good low-end torque. Especially if your planning on doing more serious performance mods! But, the LG headers also have been shown to produce very good torque throughout the rpm range
Old 03-29-2005, 03:31 AM
  #4  
big tony
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
big tony's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2005
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thats Why I Was Asking About 3" Exaust I Want To Go With Lg Headers But Was Afraid I Would Lose Low End Torque.thans You Guys For Answering.
Old 03-29-2005, 04:50 AM
  #5  
vettenuts
Team Owner
 
vettenuts's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 1999
Location: At the beach in little Rhody
Posts: 22,024
Received 186 Likes on 169 Posts

Default

You might also want to look into the Tri-Y design, which is different than the 4 to1 design. There are three companies that make them, Bassani, Bellanger and QTP. QTP are all stainless, the others are not. Here is a good article:

Header Article
Old 03-29-2005, 07:54 AM
  #6  
Mr. Jones
Drifting
 
Mr. Jones's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2002
Location: Bedford Va.
Posts: 1,332
Received 74 Likes on 59 Posts

Default

LG long tubes are all stainless. call them and ask for examples/numbers on a stock setup. I don't remember anyone
loosing torque with any header install. 3" pipes or 2-1/2"
Old 03-29-2005, 09:15 AM
  #7  
Michael Tucker
Burning Brakes
 
Michael Tucker's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i went to LGM's site and did not see any graphs where tq or hp was lost????? can anybody show one that shows a loss?
Mike
Old 03-29-2005, 09:41 AM
  #8  
2000BSME
Le Mans Master
 
2000BSME's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2005
Posts: 9,996
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

I lost low end torque, noticeably, when I put on my Corsa Indy exhaust mufflers, I can imagine the 3" pipes having even more of a noticeable affect. I also noticed that engine braking decreased a slight amount with the Corsa Indy's, which made the car feel a little more comfortable at high rpms.
Old 03-29-2005, 03:40 PM
  #9  
XPC5R
Drifting
 
XPC5R's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2002
Location: DFW TX
Posts: 1,614
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

3" in the rear section may be overkill for an LS1 head/cam engine, but the gains from the headers alone will probably show you no loss over stock.

On an LS6 (stock heads and cam - 2001), the 3" rear section is they way to go. I tried many dyno runs with different configurationsand tuning with our LG LT equipped Z06, from dumps to tapered merge down to the factory 2.5" y-pipe into Z06 Ti mufflers. The more 3" tubing after the x-pipe, the more power and torque it made everywhere. The best combo was 3" dumps under the trans, which made 390 ft/lbs at the wheels ( with a halltech intake, shaner TB, LG LTs, tuning, and light flywheel).

If you go with H/C, then 3" is a must, otherwise you are leaving power on the table.

You can be sure LG did not use 3" unless it proved to be the best combo. The extra tubing size and weight cost more to mfg.
Old 03-29-2005, 04:08 PM
  #10  
Michael Tucker
Burning Brakes
 
Michael Tucker's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BPC5R
You can be sure LG did not use 3" unless it proved to be the best combo. The extra tubing size and weight cost more to mfg.
thats what i was thinking

Mike
Old 03-29-2005, 04:55 PM
  #11  
FRC Rob
Racer
 
FRC Rob's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2003
Location: Coconut Creek FL
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I put LG Long Tubes with their off-road 3" x-pipe on my stock (except for Vararam) '99 FRC. The top end is stronger, but the most noticable improvement is the low to mid range torque. Very noticable gain...definitely no loss!
Old 03-29-2005, 05:04 PM
  #12  
Phil97SVT
Le Mans Master
 
Phil97SVT's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2001
Location: Southern Maryland Maryland
Posts: 5,577
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I've got a full 3" system I fabricated about a year ago. The car went .1 to .2 faster than with the 2.5" rear system. Now its got a 90mm intake and TB and the gains are even greater.
Phil
Old 03-29-2005, 05:06 PM
  #13  
CNB
Drifting
Support Corvetteforum!
 
CNB's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: DFW Texas
Posts: 1,663
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

I have these headers along with pre and post dyno graphs. Let me assure you there is no loss of torque anywhere. The mid range torque gains with these headers is huge.
Old 03-29-2005, 05:44 PM
  #14  
Rag-Top Rick
Melting Slicks
 
Rag-Top Rick's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: N. County/San Diego
Posts: 3,177
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by vettenuts
You might also want to look into the Tri-Y design, which is different than the 4 to1 design. There are three companies that make them, Bassani, Bellanger and QTP. QTP are all stainless, the others are not. Here is a good article:

Header Article
Big Tony, you didn`t mention if your car will see track time or will be strictly a street car!
If strictly a street car, which mine is, a tri-y header with a 2.5in. system will give you a "broad torque" curve (bottom/mid range) while giving up a tad at the top end.
The tri-y will however give you tq & hp in the rev range used most on the street (merging in/out of traffic/canyon carving, etc) as opposed to an 4 into 1 which gives a little more top end and will benefit more at the track, IMO.

Either way you can`t go wrong, just do your homework before you buy.

Cheers, Rick
Old 03-29-2005, 06:54 PM
  #15  
big tony
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
big tony's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2005
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks For All The Input Guys.my Car Probally Wont See The Track But Alot Of Street Romping.i Have Narrowed It Down To Lg Or Qtp Tri Y.keep Opinions Coming.
Old 03-29-2005, 07:07 PM
  #16  
vettenuts
Team Owner
 
vettenuts's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 1999
Location: At the beach in little Rhody
Posts: 22,024
Received 186 Likes on 169 Posts

Default

Other things to consider, ease of installation (if you are doing them) and track record for not coming up with errors. Other things to think about, when you put them on the tunnel plate will be fully exposed. I found the stiffening plate (I have the Backbone by VnM) to be a very worthwhile modification and it is simple once the exhause is off for the headers.
Old 03-29-2005, 07:24 PM
  #17  
big tony
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
big tony's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2005
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well Guys I Just Pulled The Trigger And Ordered The Lg With Cats.they Seem To Have A Strong Following.i Hope I Did The Right Thing.
Old 03-29-2005, 07:41 PM
  #18  
Rag-Top Rick
Melting Slicks
 
Rag-Top Rick's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: N. County/San Diego
Posts: 3,177
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by vettenuts
Other things to consider, ease of installation (if you are doing them) and track record for not coming up with errors. Other things to think about, when you put them on the tunnel plate will be fully exposed. I found the stiffening plate (I have the Backbone by VnM) to be a very worthwhile modification and it is simple once the exhause is off for the headers.
Big Tony, vettenuts brings up a good point, especially if you do the install yourself!
Install difficulty on the QTP`s vs LGM`s appear about even, however, the QTP`s "DO NOT" require dyno/ls1 edit tuning (they retain all 4 oxygen sensors) the LGM`s from what I have read (REQUIRE 02 simulators/TUNING,) which also adds to the cost.
If you have a reputable tuner in your area and don`t mind the extra effort/cost to have the car tuned, then it`s a non-issue, otherwise this is something to consider when making your choice.

As mentioned previously, do your homework, both are great choices so you can`t go wrong either way.

Cheers, Rick
Old 03-30-2005, 05:10 AM
  #19  
vettenuts
Team Owner
 
vettenuts's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 1999
Location: At the beach in little Rhody
Posts: 22,024
Received 186 Likes on 169 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by big tony
Well Guys I Just Pulled The Trigger And Ordered The Lg With Cats.they Seem To Have A Strong Following.i Hope I Did The Right Thing.
Congratulations, and good luck. I think you will find this to be a very worthwhile mod, I know I did. I also kept all my original parts in case I sell the car some day.

Get notified of new replies

To Loss Of Low End Torque With 3 Inch Exaust?




Quick Reply: Loss Of Low End Torque With 3 Inch Exaust?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:22 PM.