C5 Tech Corvette Tech/Performance: LS1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Tech Topics, Basic Tech, Maintenance, How to Remove & Replace
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Difference between camaro LS1 and vette LS1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-08-2005, 10:08 PM
  #1  
NAZ06
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
NAZ06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2004
Location: Chicago il
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Difference between camaro LS1 and vette LS1

Can someone tell me the difference between a Camaro LS1 and a vette? I searched the topic but didn't find anything so sorry if this is a drawn out question.
Old 06-08-2005, 10:27 PM
  #2  
LoneStarFRC
Team Owner
 
LoneStarFRC's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2001
Location: Dear Karma, I have a list of people you missed.
Posts: 36,836
Received 226 Likes on 213 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16

Default

Originally Posted by NAZ06
Can someone tell me the difference between a Camaro LS1 and a vette? I searched the topic but didn't find anything so sorry if this is a drawn out question.
Cam specs, different oil pans and Vette LS1/6 not having an EGR system are maybe a couple that come to mind. Of course there's also the fact that Vettes have a true dual exhaust vs the F bodies Y-pipe, but that has nothing to do with the actual engines per se. By and large there are far more similarities than differences. HTH
Old 06-08-2005, 11:26 PM
  #3  
patmo
Instructor
 
patmo's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2004
Location: Highlands Ranch Co
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Corvette fly-by-wire throttle, Camaro NOT!
Old 06-08-2005, 11:47 PM
  #4  
0EG@EnglandGreen
Supporting Tuner
Support Corvetteforum!
 
EG@EnglandGreen's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: ================== Houston, Texas www.englandgreen.com ================== Necessary Evil™ __________
Posts: 51,896
Received 37 Likes on 23 Posts
CI 6-7-8-9-10 Veteran
St. Jude Donor '05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14


Default

What about internals? Crank, rods, pistons, heads, oil pump, etc.

F-Body engine parts are about 10 timess LESS than Vette parts.

Will internals work?

EG
Old 06-09-2005, 01:34 AM
  #5  
Mike94ZLT1
Le Mans Master
 
Mike94ZLT1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2002
Location: In the pit, trying to love someone.
Posts: 8,345
Received 96 Likes on 60 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by EnglandGreen
What about internals? Crank, rods, pistons, heads, oil pump, etc.

F-Body engine parts are about 10 timess LESS than Vette parts.

Will internals work?

EG

Guts are the same! Exhaust manifolds, oil pan, lack of EGR, and throttle bodies. Thats about it.

Last edited by Mike94ZLT1; 06-09-2005 at 01:38 AM.
Old 06-09-2005, 02:56 AM
  #6  
tslawsky
Racer
 
tslawsky's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: St. Pete, Fl
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LoneStarFRC
Cam specs, different oil pans and Vette LS1/6 not having an EGR system are maybe a couple that come to mind. Of course there's also the fact that Vettes have a true dual exhaust vs the F bodies Y-pipe, but that has nothing to do with the actual engines per se. By and large there are far more similarities than differences. HTH
Dont know about pre 2001, but for 2001, 2002, the cam is the same part numbr, as is the exhaust manifold. I think that the only major part that is diff. is the oil pan shape. By the way, don't let anyone tell you otherwise, the F body LS1, although rated at 310 HP, pumped out the same 350 HP as the Corvette.
Old 06-09-2005, 03:01 AM
  #7  
SPD KILZ
Pro
 
SPD KILZ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2004
Location: TX
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EnglandGreen
What about internals? Crank, rods, pistons, heads, oil pump, etc.

F-Body engine parts are about 10 timess LESS than Vette parts.

Will internals work?

EG
Yes internals will work. An ls1 is an ls1 no matter what it is in. 80% if the fbody stuff is the same under the hood of a vette, and most of the parts are the same infact. The ones that arnt are just cast differently.

As far as internals everything is the same. (TB and manifold arent)
Old 06-09-2005, 05:28 AM
  #8  
Vette_Fan
Safety Car
 
Vette_Fan's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: Hayward (Bay Area) CA
Posts: 3,675
Received 55 Likes on 42 Posts

Default

WHY are the F-body cars then not rated at 345/350 HP ?? Is it because GM wanted to keep the numbers "looking high" for the Vette, to justify its price?

Infact, I think if GM HAD advertised F-body at 345 HP, they might still be in business. And those numbers would look better on the charts and for advertising for the F-body, when compared against the Mustangs, which are still very much in business (unlike F-bodies).

Its confusing for me, why LS1 in Vette and F-body are not rated the same. I understand the weight difference in cars and design, etc. But the engine ratings should've been the same.

Last edited by Vette_Fan; 06-09-2005 at 05:30 AM.
Old 06-09-2005, 07:43 AM
  #9  
0EG@EnglandGreen
Supporting Tuner
Support Corvetteforum!
 
EG@EnglandGreen's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: ================== Houston, Texas www.englandgreen.com ================== Necessary Evil™ __________
Posts: 51,896
Received 37 Likes on 23 Posts
CI 6-7-8-9-10 Veteran
St. Jude Donor '05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14


Default

Originally Posted by Mike94ZLT1
Guts are the same! Exhaust manifolds, oil pan, lack of EGR, and throttle bodies. Thats about it.
WooHoo - off to look at the F-body engine sites!!!!

Corvette Tax can kiss my a$$
Old 06-09-2005, 08:01 AM
  #10  
Silver98
Burning Brakes
 
Silver98's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 993
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Hey EG,
Looking at the F-body sites is a great idea. I checked out a few things last week and was shocked at the obvious Vette tax for LS1 upgrades we pay.
Old 06-09-2005, 10:47 AM
  #11  
Cajundude
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Cajundude's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2003
Location: Now in God's Country, the Big Sky, Montana!
Posts: 13,550
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Cruise-In 7-8-9-10 Veteran
St. Jude Donor '06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12

Default

EG, please let us know if you find any hidden treasures! I'll do the same.
Old 06-09-2005, 11:04 AM
  #12  
123Gone
Safety Car
 
123Gone's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2001
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 4,947
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I had a 1998 Z28, then a 2000 SS Vert, now a 2002 Vette Vert. The 1998 LS1 had a different cam than the Vette's LS1, the 2000 was exactly the same LS1. If you ordered (from the factory) the SLP package (which I had) which included different wheels and exhaust, the HP was near the Vette's HP. In (I think) 2001, the SLP package also include a low restriction airbox and the advertised HP was 345. My SS was a great car. The top was hydrolic which I really miss in my current Vette. Here's my 2000 SS Vert:



You can tell if Camaro's had the SLP option by the exhaust: Regular exhaust had one pipe on each side, SLP had two pipes on each side.

Last edited by 123Gone; 06-09-2005 at 11:09 AM.
Old 06-09-2005, 11:04 AM
  #13  
Heretic
Pro
 
Heretic's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2003
Location: Castle Rock Co
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vette_Fan
WHY are the F-body cars then not rated at 345/350 HP ?? Is it because GM wanted to keep the numbers "looking high" for the Vette, to justify its price?

Infact, I think if GM HAD advertised F-body at 345 HP, they might still be in business. And those numbers would look better on the charts and for advertising for the F-body, when compared against the Mustangs, which are still very much in business (unlike F-bodies).

Its confusing for me, why LS1 in Vette and F-body are not rated the same. I understand the weight difference in cars and design, etc. But the engine ratings should've been the same.

GM plays those games all the time. The L19 454 I bought out of a 99 suburban was rated at 295HP. If you look at the rated torque number at the peak HP and work the math, its really 305HP. But when the engine was released in 96, the Corvette had a 300HP engine, and you can't be having a truck with more HP than the 'vette right?
Old 06-09-2005, 12:12 PM
  #14  
DickieC.99
Pro
 
DickieC.99's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2003
Location: Alexandria VA
Posts: 682
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Excuse my ignorance about f-bodies and lack of direct corvette related talk, but what seperated the z28 from the SS? Different cam? manifolds? I always thought the SS had the "corvette engine" and the z28 had something different...
Old 06-09-2005, 12:48 PM
  #15  
screw991le
Race Director
 
screw991le's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: Redsox, Pats, Celts & Bruins !!! Redsox Nation !!!
Posts: 17,786
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
St. Jude Donor '06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12

Default

The Engine is the same, the internals are the same, the cam is the same, the tune is the same etc etc.

Why do you think Z28s and such have the same dyno #s.

I have owned plenty of Camaros and they were well under rated.

The engine comes from the same factory. Just a few outer parts are different.

Look up the part #s if you think they are the same.

The Cams and rods and pistons are all the same part #s.

I used to love while at the track the Z28 would click off 13.4 quarters and the Vette owners would say "oh got some mods?"

I love my vette, but I paid 19k for my 99' Z28 1LE brand spanking new and 7 miles on her.

But a Vette is a Vette and a Camaro is a Camaro
Old 06-09-2005, 12:50 PM
  #16  
0EG@EnglandGreen
Supporting Tuner
Support Corvetteforum!
 
EG@EnglandGreen's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: ================== Houston, Texas www.englandgreen.com ================== Necessary Evil™ __________
Posts: 51,896
Received 37 Likes on 23 Posts
CI 6-7-8-9-10 Veteran
St. Jude Donor '05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14


Default

I'm not interested in stock Camaro intake/exhaust/TB or cam - or stock anything actually. It's the aftermarket internals like Jesel rockers, chromemoly pushrods, valves, Crane valve springs, Rhodes lifters, Manley oil pump, timing chain etc. etc. etc. that has that stupid Corvette tax added.

Why would I pay as much as 5-10 times as much for something I can buy from Summit Racing at a tithe of the cost???

I'm off to Jegs and Summit Racing. I'll keep you folks updated on what works in my 01 Coupe!

EG
Old 06-09-2005, 07:06 PM
  #17  
LoneStarFRC
Team Owner
 
LoneStarFRC's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2001
Location: Dear Karma, I have a list of people you missed.
Posts: 36,836
Received 226 Likes on 213 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16

Default

Originally Posted by tslawsky
Dont know about pre 2001, but for 2001, 2002, the cam is the same part numbr, as is the exhaust manifold. I think that the only major part that is diff. is the oil pan shape. By the way, don't let anyone tell you otherwise, the F body LS1, although rated at 310 HP, pumped out the same 350 HP as the Corvette.
Flywheel maybe, but that single exhaust doesn't help a whole lot. I used to have an F-Body. Pontiac Firebird Formula 6spd. It used to surprise some of the T/A guys occasionally.

Get notified of new replies

To Difference between camaro LS1 and vette LS1

Old 06-09-2005, 08:09 PM
  #18  
LoneStarFRC
Team Owner
 
LoneStarFRC's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2001
Location: Dear Karma, I have a list of people you missed.
Posts: 36,836
Received 226 Likes on 213 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16

Default

Originally Posted by DickieC.99
Excuse my ignorance about f-bodies and lack of direct corvette related talk, but what seperated the z28 from the SS? Different cam? manifolds? I always thought the SS had the "corvette engine" and the z28 had something different...
Back in the early 90's, GM entered into an agreement with SLP (Street Legal Performance) to offer performance enhancement upgrades to the Pontiac Firebirds and still have a factory warranty. There were a variety of things that could be ordered, and the package included SLP putting the "FireHawk" logo on these cars too. Most of the conversion work involved better exhaust, Air intake (with new hoods),Auburn rear-ends, specific wheels, etc. To my knowledge, none of the engines themselves were modified. The "Firehawk" designated cars were shipped directly from the St. Therese assembly plant in Canada to SLP's Canadian facility (about 20 minutes by truck), where the conversion, depending on what was ordered, was done. The vehicles were then sent straight back to the GM plant for shipping by rail to the U.S.. Sometime, at a later date, GM wanted to revive the "SS"
name for the Camaro buyers and SLP started doing the conversion work for them too. I've kind of lost track of what ever became of that arraingment over the last few years of the F-Bodys' life, but it seems as if GM did the same thing to SLP that Ford did to Carroll Shelby and that was to bring everything back "in house" so-to-speak and tell Carroll "buh-bye"
BTW, this was the main reason that SLP was offering many of the wheels, tires, etc for sale to the public through their own company. These were all brand new "take-off" parts that they would wind up with after the conversions. HTH
Old 06-09-2005, 08:46 PM
  #19  
BlownV6
Drifting
 
BlownV6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: Tempe Az
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Vette_Fan
WHY are the F-body cars then not rated at 345/350 HP ?? Is it because GM wanted to keep the numbers "looking high" for the Vette, to justify its price?

Infact, I think if GM HAD advertised F-body at 345 HP, they might still be in business. And those numbers would look better on the charts and for advertising for the F-body, when compared against the Mustangs, which are still very much in business (unlike F-bodies).

Its confusing for me, why LS1 in Vette and F-body are not rated the same. I understand the weight difference in cars and design, etc. But the engine ratings should've been the same.
2003 F-Bodies did NOT pass federal crash standards. Another reason why they were killed.
Old 06-09-2005, 09:17 PM
  #20  
tslawsky
Racer
 
tslawsky's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: St. Pete, Fl
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

With 4,000 miles on the clock and a borla catback and cold air lid, my 2001 6 speed Z28 put out 318 SAE corrected rear wheel horse power (340 tq.). My friends 2000 Vette pumped out 299 HP (305 tq) on the same dyno, the same day. He was pissed. That is why, I think the camaro was underrated. I know the Vette is a better car, but I have a back seat, which is precious to me! We all make out decisions and compramizes in life, right. Tough choice, (C5 or Z28) huh? Life ain't so bad when you have to chose between those 2 cars!


Quick Reply: Difference between camaro LS1 and vette LS1



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:45 PM.