GM's of C-5 column lock "fix" dangerous (Sorry, cannot quote source.)
#1
Drifting
Thread Starter
Member Since: Sep 1999
Location: Arroyo Grande CA
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
GM's C-5 column lock "fix" dangerous (Sorry, cannot quote source.)
The following is quoted from the classic "reputable source". I am NOT attributing it because it could cause legal trouble for the source. For those of you with the technical know how to make some sense of this and arrive at your own informed conclusions, here's what this source had to say:
"The GM column lock "fix" is actually dangerous. The lock-pin feedback signal now comes from the added latching relay, which is not an indication of the true lock or unlock state of the pin. With the "fix", you will still be able to drive, even if the locking pin fails to retract! The engine cut-off above idle will not work anymore, which was a safety back-up feature of the BCM. I think this GM "fix" is a farce. I believe GM has 2 problems with the lock actuator
design :
1) The gear-train between the motor and the pin binds, causing the failure to unlock. I don't GM (or the actuator supplier) has a bulletproof fix for this problem yet. Maybe the new actuator is an improvement, but the addition of the latching relay is evidence that GM is unsure of the reliability of the feedback switch (see below)
2) The feedback switch, part of the actuator mechanism, must have its own failure mechanism, where the actuator locks or unlocks, but the feedback switch does not respond. Then the BCM invokes the failsafe engine cut above idle to prevent driving with a potentially locked column.
This "fix" only addresses #2, and will reduce GM warrantee work if the feedback switch fails but the lock mechanism is still working."
[Modified by TCSF, 2:58 PM 9/25/2001]
"The GM column lock "fix" is actually dangerous. The lock-pin feedback signal now comes from the added latching relay, which is not an indication of the true lock or unlock state of the pin. With the "fix", you will still be able to drive, even if the locking pin fails to retract! The engine cut-off above idle will not work anymore, which was a safety back-up feature of the BCM. I think this GM "fix" is a farce. I believe GM has 2 problems with the lock actuator
design :
1) The gear-train between the motor and the pin binds, causing the failure to unlock. I don't GM (or the actuator supplier) has a bulletproof fix for this problem yet. Maybe the new actuator is an improvement, but the addition of the latching relay is evidence that GM is unsure of the reliability of the feedback switch (see below)
2) The feedback switch, part of the actuator mechanism, must have its own failure mechanism, where the actuator locks or unlocks, but the feedback switch does not respond. Then the BCM invokes the failsafe engine cut above idle to prevent driving with a potentially locked column.
This "fix" only addresses #2, and will reduce GM warrantee work if the feedback switch fails but the lock mechanism is still working."
[Modified by TCSF, 2:58 PM 9/25/2001]
#2
Safety Car
Re: GM's C-5 column lock "fix" dangerous (TCSF)
My car is at the dealer now for warranty engine work. I was just about to comment on the column lock recall and then held my tongue. I'll spend the $50 and defeat it myself. It will be worth the peace of mind. After reading this, I'm even more sure I made the right decision.
[Modified by JohnnyB, 4:59 PM 9/25/2001]
[Modified by JohnnyB, 4:59 PM 9/25/2001]
#3
Melting Slicks
Re: GM's C-5 column lock "fix" dangerous (TCSF)
2) The feedback switch, part of the actuator mechanism, must have its own failure mechanism, where the actuator locks or unlocks, but the feedback switch does not respond. Then the BCM invokes the failsafe engine cut above idle to prevent driving with a potentially locked column.
This "fix" only addresses #2, and will reduce GM warrantee work if the feedback switch fails but the lock mechanism is still working."
Up to your point No. 2 things were clear, but beyond that I don't have the foggiest notion of what you are saying.
I do know that yesterday I took my steed to the dealer for it's state mandated annual inspection. The excellent service writer asked me if I wanted to have the Steering Column Lock serviced with the "Open Recall". I told him NOT to do the work on the Steering Column.
He had me sign a release specifying that I had declined the Steering Column Lock Recall. I told him that the reason I didn't want that work done was I had a Steering Column Lock Bypass on the car and everything was :cool: . He said that that was fine and he was only protecting his butt in the event the GM wanted to know why he didn't do the Recall.
I recall someone stating that they were forced to have the Collumn Lock recall work done. There was none of that :bs with the guys at Del Chevrolet in Paoli, PA. We should start "Ranking" dealers. I will give Del Chevrolet a 9.5 on a scale of Zreo to 10. :yesnod:
#4
Re: GM's C-5 column lock "fix" dangerous (TCSF)
"The GM column lock "fix" is actually dangerous. The lock-pin feedback signal now comes from the added latching relay, which is not an indication of the true lock or unlock state of the pin. With the "fix", you will still be able to drive, even if the locking pin fails to retract! The engine cut-off above idle will not work anymore, which was a safety back-up feature of the BCM. I think this GM "fix" is a farce.
But this only applies to the M6 cars, the A4 recall kit includes a lock plate without any locking holes for the pin to engage in. Now whether the dealer installs that part is another story :rolleyes:
#5
Drifting
Re: GM's C-5 column lock "fix" dangerous (TCSF)
Does anybody have a wiring diagram, or a copy of the procedure to do the recall? It was just done on mine and I'd like to know exactly what was done.
If the purpose was to defeat the feedback, why wouldnt they just disable this in software in the BCM?
Eric
[Modified by 66ImpalaLT1, 4:28 PM 9/25/2001]
If the purpose was to defeat the feedback, why wouldnt they just disable this in software in the BCM?
Eric
[Modified by 66ImpalaLT1, 4:28 PM 9/25/2001]
#6
Melting Slicks
Re: GM's C-5 column lock "fix" dangerous (66ImpalaLT1)
GM is not allowed to defeat the colum lock feature (in manual tranny C5s) by changing the BCM software. Federal law requires it as an antitheft requirement. The automatic C5s can have the steering colum lock disabled (by the GM recall) because they also have the transmission shift lever lock, which meets the intent of the law.
#7
Drifting
Re: GM's C-5 column lock "fix" dangerous (ersatz928)
GM is not allowed to defeat the colum lock feature (in manual tranny C5s) by changing the BCM software. Federal law requires it as an antitheft requirement. The automatic C5s can have the steering colum lock disabled (by the GM recall) because they also have the transmission shift lever lock, which meets the intent of the law.
I understand why GM cannot remove the column lock feature in M6 C5's.
Eric
#8
Re: GM's C-5 column lock "fix" dangerous (TCSF)
I think the reliable source was speculation by someone on this forum.
It came out somewhere within a week of the recall announcement
if I remember right. That said, I don't know if its truth or speculation.
It came out somewhere within a week of the recall announcement
if I remember right. That said, I don't know if its truth or speculation.
#9
Former Vendor
Member Since: Apr 2001
Location: FL
Posts: 10,976
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes
on
21 Posts
St. Jude Donor '13
Re: GM's C-5 column lock "fix" dangerous (ersatz928)
GM is not allowed to defeat the colum lock feature (in manual tranny C5s) by changing the BCM software. Federal law requires it as an antitheft requirement. The automatic C5s can have the steering colum lock disabled (by the GM recall) because they also have the transmission shift lever lock, which meets the intent of the law.
The whole problem relates back to the column lock actuator itself.The actuator replaced in the recall for the M6 is NOT updated.We are putting in the same one that we are taking out!!! The recall only provides some enhanced wiring to the actuator.The actuator is a simply "in/out" winding motor.Any electrical motor is subject to getting a "dead spot" in the windings due to things beyond our control such as moisture,temperature,condesation,humidit y,lack of use,corrosion,etc...
In other words,the column lock issue will be around for a long time to come :(
#10
Drifting
Re: GM's C-5 column lock "fix" dangerous (C-5 TECH)
I'm starting to wish I wouldnt have let them 'fix' mine yesterday.
C-5 Tech: I saw the car with the air bag out with a steering wheel puller, and lock plate tool on the floor of the car. What is updated inside the column?
Eric
[Modified by 66ImpalaLT1, 7:49 PM 9/25/2001]
C-5 Tech: I saw the car with the air bag out with a steering wheel puller, and lock plate tool on the floor of the car. What is updated inside the column?
Eric
[Modified by 66ImpalaLT1, 7:49 PM 9/25/2001]
#11
Former Vendor
Member Since: Apr 2001
Location: FL
Posts: 10,976
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes
on
21 Posts
St. Jude Donor '13
Re: GM's C-5 column lock "fix" dangerous (66ImpalaLT1)
I'm starting to wish I wouldnt have let them 'fix' mine yesterday.
C-5 Tech: I saw the car with the air bag out with a steering wheel puller, and lock plate tool on the floor of the car. What is updated inside the column?
Eric
On the M6 only,the column lock actuator in the column is replaced...
[Modified by 66ImpalaLT1, 7:49 PM 9/25/2001]
C-5 Tech: I saw the car with the air bag out with a steering wheel puller, and lock plate tool on the floor of the car. What is updated inside the column?
Eric
On the M6 only,the column lock actuator in the column is replaced...
[Modified by 66ImpalaLT1, 7:49 PM 9/25/2001]
#12
Safety Car
Member Since: Jan 2000
Location: Midlothian, VA
Posts: 4,965
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: GM's C-5 column lock "fix" dangerous (C-5 TECH)
I took my car to the dealer for some warranty work well they tried to put the "new" column lock in but my "aftermarket alarm system" aka COLUMN LOCK BYPASS :rolleyes: was interfering. I told them that that was the "new" CL that my dealer back home put in :D, they bought it and left it be. Suckers :D
[Modified by C5Noir, 9:02 PM 9/25/2001]
[Modified by C5Noir, 9:02 PM 9/25/2001]
#13
Instructor
Member Since: Aug 2001
Location: Midland MI
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: GM's C-5 column lock "fix" dangerous (C5 Solutions)
The revised lock plate (the one that prevents the pin from entering),that is currently being installed on the A4's; can it be installed on a M6? Is it possible to obtain the part from a dealer and install it myself?
#14
Former Vendor
Member Since: Apr 2001
Location: FL
Posts: 10,976
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes
on
21 Posts
St. Jude Donor '13
Re: GM's C-5 column lock "fix" dangerous (Nekbyter)
The revised lock plate (the one that prevents the pin from entering),that is currently being installed on the A4's; can it be installed on a M6? Is it possible to obtain the part from a dealer and install it myself?