C5 Tech Corvette Tech/Performance: LS1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Tech Topics, Basic Tech, Maintenance, How to Remove & Replace
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

alignment... Whatcha think?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-22-2014, 11:42 AM
  #1  
FRiCK916
Pro
Thread Starter
 
FRiCK916's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2011
Location: Sacramento Ca
Posts: 694
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default alignment... Whatcha think?

So the car has been apart several times and I got new rear tires and the front are about 3 years old with 10k miles on them, with minimal camber wear on inside edges as the car has been lowered about 1/2"... anyways the car was aligned to pfadt's least aggressive specs and I left the car had a right pull and felt very "darty" wanting to go left right left right.. I had to chase the wheel at all times it seemed...

First alignment:




And this is their 2nd attempt to correct my complaints of right pull and "darty" feeling. He wrote on the invoice.. "fine tuned alignment, still pulling R, suggest swapping front tires to check for radial tire pull".


Old 10-22-2014, 12:12 PM
  #2  
Gordy M
Melting Slicks
 
Gordy M's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2001
Location: Plymouth MI
Posts: 2,657
Received 316 Likes on 271 Posts

Default

Check with the alignment shop and determine what they call toe in and toe out. Some machines use a positive number for toe in. If that is the case, then the alignment looks OK and you have adverse tire wear in the front tires.
Old 10-22-2014, 03:53 PM
  #3  
mrr23
Melting Slicks
 
mrr23's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: orlando florida
Posts: 3,092
Received 114 Likes on 98 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15

Default

Look into the front tires for abnormal wear. If anything the car should be pulling left now with that much caster spread of -0.70. Should only need about -0.30 cross caster.

Edit: read your comments about inside tire wear. Most likely left tire is worn more than the right one. Camber wear gives you a conical wear across the tire. Think like a paper cup. one side is a little taller than the other side. Can see with a tire depth gauge measuring across the tire.

Signed the alignment guy

Last edited by mrr23; 10-22-2014 at 03:56 PM.
Old 10-22-2014, 04:09 PM
  #4  
FRiCK916
Pro
Thread Starter
 
FRiCK916's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2011
Location: Sacramento Ca
Posts: 694
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mrr23
Look into the front tires for abnormal wear. If anything the car should be pulling left now with that much caster spread of -0.70. Should only need about -0.30 cross caster.

Edit: read your comments about inside tire wear. Most likely left tire is worn more than the right one. Camber wear gives you a conical wear across the tire. Think like a paper cup. one side is a little taller than the other side. Can see with a tire depth gauge measuring across the tire.

Signed the alignment guy
Which is what they told me... they didn't like that they had to put that much in it... and they also said on paper it should have a left pull. I'll be looking into some new fronts... thanks guys.
Old 10-22-2014, 04:34 PM
  #5  
racebum
Race Director
 
racebum's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2008
Location: oregon
Posts: 15,978
Received 153 Likes on 146 Posts

Default

more rear toe in will help with stability. you already have more caster and more toe than most, it could just be the tires

toe the rear in to .10 each side, that can calm a car down and make straight line stability much better
Old 10-22-2014, 05:42 PM
  #6  
lionelhutz
Race Director
 
lionelhutz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: South Western Ontario
Posts: 11,061
Received 845 Likes on 721 Posts

Default

The fronts have too much toe in. The front toe values are not equal. The rears are both pointing left. The rear thrust angle should be 0. I'm assuming that a positive toe number is toe-in.
Old 10-23-2014, 10:50 AM
  #7  
mrr23
Melting Slicks
 
mrr23's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: orlando florida
Posts: 3,092
Received 114 Likes on 98 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15

Default

Originally Posted by lionelhutz
The fronts have too much toe in. The front toe values are not equal. The rears are both pointing left. The rear thrust angle should be 0. I'm assuming that a positive toe number is toe-in.
You think .01* difference in toe up front is causing an issue really?

I'll agree the rear should have been the same .02 instead of the left being -.02. But minor still.

Yes positive number on toe is inward.

Signed- the alignment guy

Last edited by mrr23; 10-23-2014 at 11:24 AM.
Old 10-23-2014, 01:01 PM
  #8  
lionelhutz
Race Director
 
lionelhutz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: South Western Ontario
Posts: 11,061
Received 845 Likes on 721 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mrr23
You think .01* difference in toe up front is causing an issue really?

I'll agree the rear should have been the same .02 instead of the left being -.02. But minor still.

Yes positive number on toe is inward.

Signed- the alignment guy

He asked what people thought. I think it looks a little sketchy.

I also noticed that the first time on the rack the car initially had major toe-out on the front wheels which was changed to toe-in but then the second time on the rack it initially had toe out again. If they put 0.07* toe-in the first time how's it change to 0.15* of toe out the 2nd time the car was put back on the rack? This makes me question the competence of the shop. Either something is wrong with the car or something is wrong with their methods.

Last edited by lionelhutz; 10-23-2014 at 01:06 PM.
Old 10-23-2014, 02:11 PM
  #9  
mrr23
Melting Slicks
 
mrr23's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: orlando florida
Posts: 3,092
Received 114 Likes on 98 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15

Default

You can align a vehicle, pull it off the rack, go drive it, recheck it and it will not give the exact same readings. There will be some minor variances.

In your original post, you had concerns over very minor variances that has absolutely no bearing on the issue at hand. None of what you originally posted would ever contribute to the pull the car has.

As far as the competency of the shop goes, they nailed it when they said check the tires.

Now as far as the variances between the first and second time, even to me it is a bit much. Could be slightly worn control arm bushings or a bolt didn't get tight enough and slipped.
Old 10-23-2014, 02:47 PM
  #10  
lionelhutz
Race Director
 
lionelhutz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: South Western Ontario
Posts: 11,061
Received 845 Likes on 721 Posts

Default

How competent is the shop if they are aligning the car twice without noticing the initial toe out both times? Or without noticing the issue causes the front alignment to go toe out after it comes off the rack? Or, leaving a bolt loose that is causing it?
Old 10-23-2014, 03:05 PM
  #11  
mrr23
Melting Slicks
 
mrr23's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: orlando florida
Posts: 3,092
Received 114 Likes on 98 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15

Default

Originally Posted by lionelhutz
How competent is the shop if they are aligning the car twice without noticing the initial toe out both times?
How would they not notice the toe out when it's right on the screen in front of them and on the printout?

Originally Posted by lionelhutz
Or without noticing the issue causes the front alignment to go toe out after it comes off the rack? Or, leaving a bolt loose that is causing it?
I'll reword my last statement. Not tight enough that it slips slight while driving it. In my 14 years of doing alignments, it has happened to me. Tightened the bolt down only for it to slip after the owner drives it. These are eccentric washer bolts. And I use a 4 foot breaker bar to tighten these bolts down. Over time the bolts stretch and lose their ability to stay tight. And this is just one possibility. I've had the wheel adapter slip while doing the alignment. And before you go why didn't the incompetent shop see that, can you see 1/32" movement? You're better than me on that one.i figured it out when the customer brought it back and I saw the amount of number changes with no loose bolts. Things happen.

The op even said in his initial post he knew his tires had inner wear before the first alignment.

So again anything you've written has absolutely nothing to do with the issue at hand. And the shop is plenty competent.

Last edited by mrr23; 10-23-2014 at 03:43 PM.
Old 10-23-2014, 05:59 PM
  #12  
lionelhutz
Race Director
 
lionelhutz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: South Western Ontario
Posts: 11,061
Received 845 Likes on 721 Posts

Default

Some people are too touchy. The front toe changed by 0.22* between alignments. No matter what the cause, there is no good excuse for no saying something about that. If no explanation can be found for that change then it should really be checked a 3rd time to ensure the alignment has stayed correct.

Of course, worn components and changing alignments have nothing to do with how the car drives....

Last edited by lionelhutz; 10-23-2014 at 06:01 PM.
Old 10-23-2014, 06:09 PM
  #13  
racebum
Race Director
 
racebum's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2008
Location: oregon
Posts: 15,978
Received 153 Likes on 146 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mrr23
You can align a vehicle, pull it off the rack, go drive it, recheck it and it will not give the exact same readings. There will be some minor variances.

In your original post, you had concerns over very minor variances that has absolutely no bearing on the issue at hand. None of what you originally posted would ever contribute to the pull the car has.

As far as the competency of the shop goes, they nailed it when they said check the tires.

Now as far as the variances between the first and second time, even to me it is a bit much. Could be slightly worn control arm bushings or a bolt didn't get tight enough and slipped.

this is my opinion too after thinking about it

a car with an off alignment will wear tires in that groove, when the alignment is corrected the tires will still have uneven wear and won't behave like they should. the situation may correct itself in a few thousand miles of driving
Old 10-23-2014, 07:13 PM
  #14  
mrr23
Melting Slicks
 
mrr23's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: orlando florida
Posts: 3,092
Received 114 Likes on 98 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15

Default

Originally Posted by racebum
this is my opinion too after thinking about it

a car with an off alignment will wear tires in that groove, when the alignment is corrected the tires will still have uneven wear and won't behave like they should. the situation may correct itself in a few thousand miles of driving
Depends on how bad the wear is. Once a tire is worn a certain way, it stays that way. You would have to catch it real early to get the wear out.
Old 10-23-2014, 07:16 PM
  #15  
mrr23
Melting Slicks
 
mrr23's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: orlando florida
Posts: 3,092
Received 114 Likes on 98 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15

Default

Originally Posted by lionelhutz
Some people are too touchy. The front toe changed by 0.22* between alignments. No matter what the cause, there is no good excuse for no saying something about that. If no explanation can be found for that change then it should really be checked a 3rd time to ensure the alignment has stayed correct.

Of course, worn components and changing alignments have nothing to do with how the car drives....
How do you know they didn't talk with the op about it? After all, they did mention the tires....

And who knows, the op may have a worn control arm bushing you can't see without removing the arms to see.

Get notified of new replies

To alignment... Whatcha think?




Quick Reply: alignment... Whatcha think?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:09 PM.