street cam for daily & emissions
#1
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
street cam for daily & emissions
car is an 03 c5z with the following already done
kooks LT & katless X
vararam ram air / power duct
BB exhaust
dyno tuned
3.73 gear
monster stage 2 clutch
RPM level 5 trans
previous owner is the one who had it tuned 385rwhp/364rwtq
I have a set of of 243's that have a mild port job, fast92 & throttle body
I'm looking for a cam that will be good for a daily & pass emissions but make decent power i'd like to be in the 430 - 450rwhp range, another thing is really not wanting a hunting idle or a car that idles 1000+ rpms
I was told a cam under 230 @ 50 and less then 600 lift on a 114 lsa?
so whats my options? please include cam part #'s (if you can)
thanks
Edit: looking at this cam
Texas Speed 228R 228/228 .588"/.588" 114 lsa
would this be a good choice?
kooks LT & katless X
vararam ram air / power duct
BB exhaust
dyno tuned
3.73 gear
monster stage 2 clutch
RPM level 5 trans
previous owner is the one who had it tuned 385rwhp/364rwtq
I have a set of of 243's that have a mild port job, fast92 & throttle body
I'm looking for a cam that will be good for a daily & pass emissions but make decent power i'd like to be in the 430 - 450rwhp range, another thing is really not wanting a hunting idle or a car that idles 1000+ rpms
I was told a cam under 230 @ 50 and less then 600 lift on a 114 lsa?
so whats my options? please include cam part #'s (if you can)
thanks
Edit: looking at this cam
Texas Speed 228R 228/228 .588"/.588" 114 lsa
would this be a good choice?
Last edited by Stroker87; 04-08-2015 at 09:33 AM.
#2
Le Mans Master
My data points:
I stared with a stock '03 LS1 (with an LS6 intake). Added stock 243 heads, Cam is 224/230 .581/.588 LSA 113.
Mustang Dyno showed 420 rwhp/392 rwtq.
FYI, Those numbers were when my car was an A4. I would imagine that they would be ~5 hp and ~5 tq higher through an MN12.
Hope that helps.
I stared with a stock '03 LS1 (with an LS6 intake). Added stock 243 heads, Cam is 224/230 .581/.588 LSA 113.
Mustang Dyno showed 420 rwhp/392 rwtq.
FYI, Those numbers were when my car was an A4. I would imagine that they would be ~5 hp and ~5 tq higher through an MN12.
Hope that helps.
#4
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
My data points:
I stared with a stock '03 LS1 (with an LS6 intake). Added stock 243 heads, Cam is 224/230 .581/.588 LSA 113.
Mustang Dyno showed 420 rwhp/392 rwtq.
FYI, Those numbers were when my car was an A4. I would imagine that they would be ~5 hp and ~5 tq higher through an MN12.
Hope that helps.
I stared with a stock '03 LS1 (with an LS6 intake). Added stock 243 heads, Cam is 224/230 .581/.588 LSA 113.
Mustang Dyno showed 420 rwhp/392 rwtq.
FYI, Those numbers were when my car was an A4. I would imagine that they would be ~5 hp and ~5 tq higher through an MN12.
Hope that helps.
they dont put any thing in the exhaust just plug in under the dash so with the right tune its not a problem, I have kat's on the car but there for show
#5
Le Mans Master
It is my only car. Daily use is fine. Very street friendly (you can drive it like a Grandpa if you choose). Idle has a nice little rumble (lope)
I track (HPDE) my car ~10 times a year. IMHO this motor is a beast. I have no need/desire to make it faster. People have told me at the track is sounds like a NASCAR.
#6
Race Director
Member Since: Dec 2010
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 10,426
Received 1,261 Likes
on
1,056 Posts
2020 Corvette of the Year Finalist (performance mods)
C5 of Year Winner (performance mods) 2019
#7
Drifting
03 Z ported 243 heads, kooks headers / x-pipe with stock ti and an EPS 226/230 113 +3 cam. Idles fine at stock 800 rpm and low end is very good. If you're very in-tune with your car now, it's not totally 'stock like" driveability down low, but it's very good. Made 435 whp / 405 tq SAE and holds power to 7k. Made 390/375 before porting the heads and cam. A cam like this plus your FAST 92 should be 450whp easy. Here's a comparo dyno I put into excel:
#8
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
03 Z ported 243 heads, kooks headers / x-pipe with stock ti and an EPS 226/230 113 +3 cam. Idles fine at stock 800 rpm and low end is very good. If you're very in-tune with your car now, it's not totally 'stock like" driveability down low, but it's very good. Made 435 whp / 405 tq SAE and holds power to 7k. Made 390/375 before porting the heads and cam. A cam like this plus your FAST 92 should be 450whp easy. Here's a comparo dyno I put into excel:
#9
Drifting
.604" on both the intake and exhaust... I am running PSI 1511 beehive springs. Once in a blue moon it will surge slightly but I would not hesitate to drive this car to/from work for a week in traffic etc.
#10
Race Director
Be aware that increasing overlap will make your exhaust stinky. That's my wife's only objection to my mods. I even added cats, and a blower cam, but it still stinks.
#11
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
#13
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Apr 2001
Location: Was New Orleans but swam to Baton Rouge LA
Posts: 5,928
Received 275 Likes
on
232 Posts
Cruise-In IX Veteran
You can tune some of the stink out with injector timing. GM has it setup so the injector sprays on a closed intake valve. If you move the timing to after the exhaust valve closes and intake is open it eliminates the fuel charge going out the exhaust.
#15
This has been talked about alot,http://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomete...k-results.html high on my list when it is time to upgrade. Ron B.
#16
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
it was spec'd for a rear mount turbo setup but the numbers seam to be inline with what i was told to look for so really dont know if this would be ok?
#17
Team Owner
I would go with a single split or standard split (more intake than exhaust duration).
224 intake and 224-230 on the exhaust side makes a great daily cam. Honestly I would not bother going with a cam smaller than a 224, on NA build where it does not have to pass a sniffer test. A 224/224 114LSA can be very docile.
224 intake and 224-230 on the exhaust side makes a great daily cam. Honestly I would not bother going with a cam smaller than a 224, on NA build where it does not have to pass a sniffer test. A 224/224 114LSA can be very docile.
Last edited by 93Polo; 04-02-2015 at 12:28 PM.
#18
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
I would go with a single split or standard split (more intake than exhaust duration).
224 intake and 224-230 on the exhaust side makes a great daily cam. Honestly I would not bother going with a cam smaller than a 224, on NA build where it doe not have to pass a sniffer test. A 224/224 114LSA can be very docile.
224 intake and 224-230 on the exhaust side makes a great daily cam. Honestly I would not bother going with a cam smaller than a 224, on NA build where it doe not have to pass a sniffer test. A 224/224 114LSA can be very docile.
#19
Team Owner
I believe you would be leaving HP on the table, given all of the other trade offs that come with selecting a cam. How much I don't know. The specs look like a turbo cam. If it were my time and money, I would hold out for another cam if I were looking for a mild cam only NA build.
Reverse (more intake than exhaust duration) split cams were used on NA builds when the LS1 and LS6 intakes were the restriction point but with your FAST92 that is not a restriction point. In a simplified ideal world you would be fine with a single pattern cam and the exhaust track would flow 75%of the intake for a NA build.
Reverse (more intake than exhaust duration) split cams were used on NA builds when the LS1 and LS6 intakes were the restriction point but with your FAST92 that is not a restriction point. In a simplified ideal world you would be fine with a single pattern cam and the exhaust track would flow 75%of the intake for a NA build.
Last edited by 93Polo; 04-02-2015 at 12:23 PM.
#20
Team Owner
One other thing, if you get a cam and it does buck, I would buy your own HP tuners, get the Pro so you can do wideband tuning if needed, and the tuning school books. Most shops tune for Wide Open Throttle but spend little time doing drive ability. You can spend some time in the VE table logging and tightening the up the 02s which will make the car much smoother. A friend and I spent last Saturday doing that on my car.