Notices
C5 General General C5 Corvette and C5 Z06 Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

[Z06] Z06 Diet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-28-2014, 06:19 PM
  #21  
PeteZ06
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
PeteZ06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Bartlett IL
Posts: 4,427
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07-'08-'09-'10-'11

Default

Originally Posted by vant
I can attest to this. Had a Braille battery a few years ago. Didn't drive the car for about a week without a tender...battery died. Tried reconditioning it without success. $190 down the drain.
Not sure if the Braille battery is a AGM type battery, because if it is, your tender needs to be able to charge at no more than 1.5 amps.
Old 12-28-2014, 06:21 PM
  #22  
PeteZ06
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
PeteZ06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Bartlett IL
Posts: 4,427
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07-'08-'09-'10-'11

Default

Originally Posted by troyguitar
Wow I was not aware of that at all.

Is the LS3 also as light as an LS7?

Apparently there is an engine swap in the distant future for my car, 50 lbs up front is HUGE.
No idea about the LS3
Old 12-28-2014, 06:24 PM
  #23  
95wht6spd
Le Mans Master
 
95wht6spd's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: Greenville SC
Posts: 7,408
Received 271 Likes on 211 Posts

Default

The lithium batteries are more expensive, but will hold a charge longer.
Old 12-28-2014, 07:24 PM
  #24  
Solofast
Melting Slicks
 
Solofast's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: Indy IN
Posts: 3,003
Received 85 Likes on 71 Posts

Default

I'd be very suspicious of the engine weight difference. Need to see an "apples to apples" comparison there. 40 pounds is huge and it is more likely that the comparison is a fully dressed engine vs the shipping weight of a crate motor, or something like that. Sounds more like a weight with and without a flywheel or something like that.

Then remember that you need to add a dry sump to the 7, unless you go back to the C5Z pan and pump (if it even fits).

It's just hard to believe that the LS7 is that much lighter.
Old 12-28-2014, 07:54 PM
  #25  
PeteZ06
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
PeteZ06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Bartlett IL
Posts: 4,427
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07-'08-'09-'10-'11

Default

Originally Posted by Solofast
I'd be very suspicious of the engine weight difference. Need to see an "apples to apples" comparison there. 40 pounds is huge and it is more likely that the comparison is a fully dressed engine vs the shipping weight of a crate motor, or something like that. Sounds more like a weight with and without a flywheel or something like that.

Then remember that you need to add a dry sump to the 7, unless you go back to the C5Z pan and pump (if it even fits).

It's just hard to believe that the LS7 is that much lighter.
Do the research.. the info is out there. Both fully dressed engines are with exhaust manifolds, clutch and flywheel. The LS7 clutch/flywheel weighs 60 lbs vs 50 lbs for the LS6.. so actually the engine itself is 60 lbs lighter.

The weight of these engines isnt news, its been known for many years already.. it was another deciding factor why I went with it.

Plus I went with a wet sump, so no added weight with the dry sump.
Old 12-29-2014, 07:54 AM
  #26  
TXGS507
Race Director
 
TXGS507's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2006
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere at all
Posts: 15,357
Received 1,679 Likes on 1,135 Posts

Default

1fitty....

Originally Posted by PeteZ06
How big of a shot you plan on spraying?

I picked up a radically ported LS7 manifold and TB.. Also been running mostly 100 octane so come spring I'll have it retuned for the mods and bump up my timing.. Hoping to break into the 600 range.
Old 12-29-2014, 11:50 AM
  #27  
PeteZ06
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
PeteZ06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Bartlett IL
Posts: 4,427
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07-'08-'09-'10-'11

Default

Originally Posted by 0H1Z06
1fitty....
Nice.. You'll probably pick up around 200 tq!!
Old 12-29-2014, 02:12 PM
  #28  
TXGS507
Race Director
 
TXGS507's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2006
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere at all
Posts: 15,357
Received 1,679 Likes on 1,135 Posts

Default

Yeah, that is what I have been told....

Originally Posted by PeteZ06
Nice.. You'll probably pick up around 200 tq!!
Old 12-29-2014, 10:11 PM
  #29  
Solofast
Melting Slicks
 
Solofast's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: Indy IN
Posts: 3,003
Received 85 Likes on 71 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PeteZ06
Do the research.. the info is out there. Both fully dressed engines are with exhaust manifolds, clutch and flywheel. The LS7 clutch/flywheel weighs 60 lbs vs 50 lbs for the LS6.. so actually the engine itself is 60 lbs lighter.

The weight of these engines isnt news, its been known for many years already.. it was another deciding factor why I went with it.

Plus I went with a wet sump, so no added weight with the dry sump.
Actually I did the research and the LS7 weight is listed as 458 pounds. That does NOT include the clutch assembly as the LS7 crate motor is delivered with the flywheel, but without the clutch assembly.

The LS6 was never configured as an automatic, and the clutch assembly was included in the fully dressed engine weight. The LS7 clutch weighs 25.5 pounds. Add that to the listed weight of the LS7 and the weight of the LS7 goes up to 483.5 pounds.

So the real difference between an LS6 and an LS7 similarly equipped and ready to be dropped into the car is actually only 13.7 pounds. The lighter connecting rods account for 2.2 pounds of that, and the LS7 has lighter weight stainless steel exhaust manifolds. If you are going to put on a set of headers a chunk of that 13.7 pounds weight savings is gone since no matter which engine you have the headers will weigh pretty much the same.

Bottom line is that the LS7 is indeed lighter, but when it's on the hook and ready to be installed don't think that it's going to be 40 pounds lighter because that's just not the case, the real number is less than 14 pounds. If you're going to use a set of headers the LS7 isn't going to change the weight of the car by much if at all.

Last edited by Solofast; 12-29-2014 at 10:20 PM.
Old 12-29-2014, 11:33 PM
  #30  
PeteZ06
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
PeteZ06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Bartlett IL
Posts: 4,427
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07-'08-'09-'10-'11

Default

Originally Posted by Solofast
Actually I did the research and the LS7 weight is listed as 458 pounds. That does NOT include the clutch assembly as the LS7 crate motor is delivered with the flywheel, but without the clutch assembly.

The LS6 was never configured as an automatic, and the clutch assembly was included in the fully dressed engine weight. The LS7 clutch weighs 25.5 pounds. Add that to the listed weight of the LS7 and the weight of the LS7 goes up to 483.5 pounds.

So the real difference between an LS6 and an LS7 similarly equipped and ready to be dropped into the car is actually only 13.7 pounds. The lighter connecting rods account for 2.2 pounds of that, and the LS7 has lighter weight stainless steel exhaust manifolds. If you are going to put on a set of headers a chunk of that 13.7 pounds weight savings is gone since no matter which engine you have the headers will weigh pretty much the same.

Bottom line is that the LS7 is indeed lighter, but when it's on the hook and ready to be installed don't think that it's going to be 40 pounds lighter because that's just not the case, the real number is less than 14 pounds. If you're going to use a set of headers the LS7 isn't going to change the weight of the car by much if at all.
Post the link.

I'm not here to argue.. I have found info stating 40-60 lbs less so I took the average. All numbers I was taking into account were fully dressed crate engines that came with manifolds, flywheel and clutch.
Old 12-30-2014, 12:16 AM
  #31  
PeteZ06
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
PeteZ06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Bartlett IL
Posts: 4,427
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07-'08-'09-'10-'11

Default

Solofast..

http://ls1tech.com/forums/generation...ls7-crate.html
Old 12-30-2014, 01:46 AM
  #32  
The Highlander
Drifting
 
The Highlander's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2003
Location: Brighton, MI
Posts: 1,696
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

It would be awesome if it were lighter.....
Old 12-30-2014, 08:51 AM
  #33  
Solofast
Melting Slicks
 
Solofast's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: Indy IN
Posts: 3,003
Received 85 Likes on 71 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PeteZ06
Post the link.

I'm not here to argue.. I have found info stating 40-60 lbs less so I took the average. All numbers I was taking into account were fully dressed crate engines that came with manifolds, flywheel and clutch.
Here is the installation guide for the LS7. It says the engine is equipped with a flywheel and pilot bearing. That is what the specified weight includes. You can get the clutch assembly, but it isn't in the spec weight.

http://www.chevrolet.com/content/dam...tion-guide.pdf

Think about it for a minute, these engines are all based on very similar block and heads. Yes the LS7 has Ti rods, but that's only two pounds less. The 7 has a longer throw crank, iron liners, a heavier flywheel, and lots more stuff that while small does weigh something. The big weight loss was getting rid of the cast iron exhaust headers for the stainless ones. Forty pounds is a huge chunk of aluminum.

Aluminum weighs .1 pounds per cubic inch so 40 pounds is about 400 cubic inches or about the size of a jug a gallon and a half in volume. There isn't that much more aluminum in the LS6 than the LS7.

In terms of steel, 40 pounds is a big chunk of steel too. A little bit bigger than a two liter jug. Again there simply isn't that much difference unless you leave off something big, like the clutch.

Just remember that "fully dressed" can mean a lot of things and the folks that are selling these crate engines are in an advertising mode. Making the weight look as low as possible means sales. The clutch and the exhaust manifolds are where the big weight differences are, and you are going to need a clutch, and if you use similar weight headers there isn't going to be much difference.

Sorry, but that's the reality of the situation.

Last edited by Solofast; 12-30-2014 at 09:08 AM.
Old 12-30-2014, 10:32 AM
  #34  
PeteZ06
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
PeteZ06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Bartlett IL
Posts: 4,427
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07-'08-'09-'10-'11

Default

I hear what you're saying but I prefer going with numbers where someone actually put things on a scale to get first hand data vs what a manual says.

Last edited by PeteZ06; 12-30-2014 at 01:26 PM.
Old 12-30-2014, 01:40 PM
  #35  
95wht6spd
Le Mans Master
 
95wht6spd's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: Greenville SC
Posts: 7,408
Received 271 Likes on 211 Posts

Default

Are any of the weights of the LS7 with a oil pump/pan or dry sump included?
Old 12-30-2014, 03:07 PM
  #36  
Solofast
Melting Slicks
 
Solofast's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: Indy IN
Posts: 3,003
Received 85 Likes on 71 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 95wht6spd
Are any of the weights of the LS7 with a oil pump/pan or dry sump included?
The LS7 weights include the Corvette pan and pump as run in the Corvette, but do not include the external dry sump tank and the related plumbing. If you are going to run a dry sump that will also cost you some weight that isn't in the numbers. If you go wet sump you will have to change the oil pump and the oil pan.
Old 12-31-2014, 10:45 AM
  #37  
JeremyGSU
Drifting
 
JeremyGSU's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2008
Location: Ocala FL
Posts: 1,464
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by fisher auto
I'm going back to Ti's vs Corsa's should shave a few, I'm going to remove pass seat on track days, the battery is another good idea!
I wouldn't waste your time removing the passenger seat. You aren't going to notice a difference.

Get notified of new replies

To Z06 Diet

Old 01-02-2015, 10:11 PM
  #38  
PeteZ06
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
PeteZ06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Bartlett IL
Posts: 4,427
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07-'08-'09-'10-'11

Default

Dropped 35 lbs today. Weighed everything with a digital scale.

Power seat tracks with seatbelt receiver are 21 lbs.
Manual seat tracks with seatbelt receiver are 10 lbs.

Pulled out my stock battery.. 35 lbs
Got a Braille 14115.. 11 lbs

Still cannot believe that little battery starts up my 427 with ease!!
Old 01-04-2015, 01:03 PM
  #39  
PeteZ06
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
PeteZ06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Bartlett IL
Posts: 4,427
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07-'08-'09-'10-'11

Default

Since they discontinued doing 1/2 mile races in my area for the time being.. I'm going back to a shorter tire..

Current rears are 33 lbs each.. Going with 315/30/18 Hoosier DRs.. 24 lbs each
Stock runflats were 33 lbs as well.

Plus I found a local shop that sells rear race rotor at 9 lbs.. Stockers are 14 lbs.

That's 28 lbs of unsprung weight saved!!!

Last edited by PeteZ06; 01-04-2015 at 01:10 PM.
Old 01-04-2015, 01:16 PM
  #40  
troyguitar
Drifting
 
troyguitar's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2013
Location: Lawrenceburg KY
Posts: 1,943
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

9 lb rear rotor = no parking brake?


Quick Reply: [Z06] Z06 Diet



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:00 PM.