C6 Corvette General Discussion General C6 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

San Rafael chevrolet went out of their way to replace our damaged vette with a new, b

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-27-2006, 08:37 PM
  #201  
APLark
Racer
 
APLark's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Chino Ca
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

You have to do what you have to do. DO NOT PICK THAT CAR UP AND DRIVE IT OFF THE LOT IF THEY TRY AND REPAIR IT AND GIVE IT BACK TO YOU. You will never get the money back that you have and will invest in a wrecked Vette. Keep all correspondence between you and the dealership. Any good lawyer would love to take this case on they terms that that will get paid "when" they win. Because they will win. You can have your lawyer fee's paid, new car and strain and stress which the proof is in the correspondence. I din't believe in the sue syndrome but this is a true exception. You've given them the chance to make it right and they won't. Go for blood. I had a fender bender in my Chrysler 300M and when I wanted to trade it in the could tell and I was only going to get half of what the car was worth. The fender was just replaced. They could tell by the inside of the fender. Plus I had other problems later down the line after a year that wasn't covered after that amonut of time. Police weren't involved. Other car wasn't damaged, air bag never went off. It was just a slight fender-bender.

Last edited by APLark; 12-27-2006 at 08:41 PM.
Old 12-27-2006, 08:45 PM
  #202  
webdzynes
Safety Car
 
webdzynes's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2000
Location: Orlando Fl
Posts: 4,146
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ask1ed
Now our marriage is going through hell over this because the dealer pointed out to my wife, I wouldn't let her drive my car, on one of these posts, on top of the other stress.
The dealer intended to cause some strife at home and as such, put you into a position to "get through it as quickly as possible" and turn the screws on you a bit in the process. What he didnt realize is that he hurt himself that much more. Here's why: If you were highly aprehensive about letting your trusted life partner drive your car, you certainly would not want a complete stranger doing so. This adds credibility to your comment telling them NOT to drive it when the car was dropped off. It is a bit of a stretch but because he shared the dialogue between you and he with your wife, he made clear an intention to create some disharmony, which he did. That in turn starts falling under the auspices of punitive damages as that conduct was malicious in intent. (Conduct is malicious if it is accompanied by ill will, or spite, or if it is for the purpose of injuring another.)As I said, it is a reach but worth pursuing.

Last edited by webdzynes; 12-27-2006 at 08:54 PM.
Old 12-27-2006, 08:47 PM
  #203  
Hoonose
Team Owner
 
Hoonose's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2000
Location: Arizona
Posts: 52,258
Received 77 Likes on 66 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ask1ed
Let's wreck your car and see if you think it's ever fixed properly. I'm not the one who's rich. It's not my ego on the line. It's my car, my wife's feelings, my stress level, my m______ f______ hard earned money, etc. It's my smashed dream car.
We still drive a 'wrecked' new car, since it was correctly repaired 3 years ago. But the yearly depreciation of Jags is so horrific, that the report would have minimal impact at resale time.

I said in my previous post that I meant no offense, just throwing out some ideas.

When I meant 'ego', I meant the overall mental damage, which you do confirm.

I do believe that owners of new Corvettes will be considered 'rich' by the general public, and I just don't think the public would be too sympathetic with any negative campaigning, assuming the car is properly fixed.
You do need to consider and look at this issue from more angles.
You will find that on this forum when there is a thread about a dealer screw up, the comments start out mostly kill, kill, kill, or sue, sue, sue. Not always the best or most realistic course to take.
Old 12-27-2006, 09:20 PM
  #204  
webdzynes
Safety Car
 
webdzynes's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2000
Location: Orlando Fl
Posts: 4,146
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Hoonose
We still drive a 'wrecked' new car, since it was correctly repaired 3 years ago. But the yearly depreciation of Jags is so horrific, that the report would have minimal impact at resale time.

I said in my previous post that I meant no offense, just throwing out some ideas.

When I meant 'ego', I meant the overall mental damage, which you do confirm.

I do believe that owners of new Corvettes will be considered 'rich' by the general public, and I just don't think the public would be too sympathetic with any negative campaigning, assuming the car is properly fixed.
You do need to consider and look at this issue from more angles.
You will find that on this forum when there is a thread about a dealer screw up, the comments start out mostly kill, kill, kill, or sue, sue, sue. Not always the best or most realistic course to take.
If the car is "properly fixed", there is no case. Afterall, legally, that is all that is required. May not be right, but at least in the states I'm familiar with, thats the law.
Old 12-27-2006, 09:22 PM
  #205  
KingAustin
Instructor
 
KingAustin's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2005
Location: Iowa State University
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jod1921@yahoo.com
I wonder if this is legit. Has anyone called the dealer or any one else and confirmed any of this. The poster states that this corvette forum was a reason that he bought his vette some time ago in the first place. I know when I first came to this forum I was so excited to view members corvette pictures that I didn't even take time to come up with a screen name for my membership. Seems like he would have joined sooner. Be carefull.

Be careful of what? What could he possibly do to us by creating a false story, and also why would someone go through the trouble of doing this?

Also he could have just been a lurker and just read threads about people and their corvettes that could have made him decide to buy a vette. Someone's paranoid
Old 12-27-2006, 10:04 PM
  #206  
Rich Z
Drifting
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Rich Z's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Tallahassee FL
Posts: 1,788
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Hoonose
To think something like this would ever reach a jury is too far fetched, and a would be a waste of precious court time and resources.

A problem with increasing the pressure on the dealer through publicity, is that many people may wonder just what the problem is if the dealer fixes your car properly. You could end up on the wrong side if the public feels that the 'poor little rich boy's ego is all in a pinch'.

I mean no offense by any of this.
I disagree. That is EXACTLY what lawyers and the courts are for: To arbitrate over a situation where harm has been done by one party and will not make good on it through other means. The courts are there to FORCE restitution in such instances. That is what the legal system is there for. To protect US from the depredations of others that leaves us no other avenue to right a wrong.

And this guy does not want a wrecked and fixed car. If he did, he would have likely bought used in the first place to save money. He wanted NEW, which implies undamaged and in perfect condition off of the showroom floor. I wouldn't even THINK of buying a new car if I knew it had been wrecked but then repaired, no matter how "perfectly" that repair was done and by whom.

The dealer was entrusted with the care of this vehicle, and everyone who takes their car to a dealer in such manner fully expects due care in the way it is handled. Allowing an employee to take the car and wreck it is culpable negligence. Allowing the injury to stand without proper and complete restitution is ethically criminal, albeit not legally so, IMHO. No one in their right mind would take a vehicle to a dealer who allows such actions from their employees. That employee still works there? The dealer has not made good on THEIR responsibility to their customer? They could be the LAST Corvette dealer on earth and I would not buy a car, much less a spark plug from them.
Old 12-27-2006, 10:05 PM
  #207  
OzzyC4
Drifting
 
OzzyC4's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Sonoran Desert of Arizona
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

find a lawyer to take it on contingency, and sue for damages and included a large amount to compensate for emotional stress, inconvenience, etc.
Old 12-27-2006, 10:42 PM
  #208  
Hoonose
Team Owner
 
Hoonose's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2000
Location: Arizona
Posts: 52,258
Received 77 Likes on 66 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Rich Z
I disagree. That is EXACTLY what lawyers and the courts are for: To arbitrate over a situation where harm has been done by one party and will not make good on it through other means. The courts are there to FORCE restitution in such instances. That is what the legal system is there for. To protect US from the depredations of others that leaves us no other avenue to right a wrong.
Of course he's been wronged.
But the whole car is around $50K. I could see something progressing if the car was gone. But it's not. It's repairable. Most insurance companies leave it at that.

But also there are emotional damages. But how much? $50K?
Never.
1/2 that, I really doubt it.
$10K? Well maybe.
I can't imagine going through the courts for that amount of money.
Unless someone has a wild enough hair up their *** to try.
And there are certainly enough rooters in this peanut gallery to support going in for the kill!
Old 12-27-2006, 10:43 PM
  #209  
AP
Team Owner
 
AP's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2001
Location: Cleveland OH
Posts: 100,669
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Hoonose
Of course he's been wronged.
But the whole car is around $50K. I could see something progressing if the car was gone. But it's not. It's repairable. Most insurance companies leave it at that.

But also there are emotional damages. But how much? $50K?
Never.
1/2 that, I really doubt it.
$10K? Well maybe.
I can't imagine going through the courts for that amount of money.
Unless someone has a wild enough hair up their *** to try.
And there are certainly enough rooters in this peanut gallery to support going in for the kill!
... but it was an accident that someone else created ... and they should pay something ...
Old 12-27-2006, 10:51 PM
  #210  
ECV
Advanced
 
ECV's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: Loves Park Illinois
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If the dealer thinks a repaired wreck is fine, they should have no quams keeping the car they wrecked and give you a NEW one!
Old 12-27-2006, 10:53 PM
  #211  
johnodrake
Moderator

Support Corvetteforum!
 
johnodrake's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2002
Location: Lakewood Ranch, FL
Posts: 40,065
Received 3,578 Likes on 1,619 Posts

Default

The gent entrusted his car to a dealer. An agent of the dealer wrecked the car. The gent should get from said dealer an equal or better car as a replacement. The dealer can keep the wreck and do whatever with it. The dealer should also pay whatever payments are due until the replacement is provided.

Nothing less...nothing more. You don't get rich, you just get whole.
Old 12-27-2006, 10:55 PM
  #212  
knkali
Melting Slicks
 
knkali's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Northern Calif
Posts: 2,690
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Hoonose and I are on the same page.
Old 12-27-2006, 11:07 PM
  #213  
Hoonose
Team Owner
 
Hoonose's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2000
Location: Arizona
Posts: 52,258
Received 77 Likes on 66 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ECV
If the dealer thinks a repaired wreck is fine, they should have no quams keeping the car they wrecked and give you a NEW one!

Or how about repairing the car like new, plus offer the owner a check for 10 G's?
Does that sound fair?
Old 12-27-2006, 11:15 PM
  #214  
cthusker
Le Mans Master
 
cthusker's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2005
Location: North Western Connecticut
Posts: 7,594
Received 91 Likes on 54 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ECV
If the dealer thinks a repaired wreck is fine, they should have no quams keeping the car they wrecked and give you a NEW one!
... but the dealer isn't going to think that's such a great idea! Why should he pay out of pocket when he thinks he can stick the cars owner for the loss. Right now the dealer is out EXACTY ZERO because his insurance covers the repairs. Only person I see holding the bag here is the cars owner! This isn't about going in for a kill it's about the dealer stepping up and doing the right thing. He can accomplish that by buying the car at full market value and offering a new one at dealer cost. Not a heavy financial burden for a dealership to handle. It’s a cost of doing business in such a slipshod manner. I think the dealer can afford it a lot more than the cars owner. The dealership even had the gall to drag the guy’s wife into the fray! That is pretty damn low and another reason I would sue this POS! Obviously the cars owner has to make the decision on what’s best for him and his family. I do believe his best course of action is to seek legal counsel to fully explore all his options. If that’s considered by some as going for the “KILL” or advice from the peanut gallery so be it………
Old 12-27-2006, 11:31 PM
  #215  
webdzynes
Safety Car
 
webdzynes's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2000
Location: Orlando Fl
Posts: 4,146
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Certainly we can all agree on what "should" happen and what would be proper and ethical conduct. Unfortunately however, the law dosent require that. Repair which is deemed reasonable and satisfactory is all the dealer is obligated to perform. No, it isnt right but on the surface, that is the only legal issue of merit which the law will clearly stand behind. Essentially, anything beyond that is emotionally driven justice which may sound fair but in actuallity, has no legs in court. (Unless you get a very shrewd and articulate attorney - which can happen!)
Old 12-28-2006, 12:18 AM
  #216  
9T3vert
Advanced
 
9T3vert's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2006
Location: Palm Bay FL
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well I have been reading all of these post from the beginning and I have not heard mentioned anyone recommending that you contact the witnesses of the accident. They are the best leverage that you have. Especially the ones that were also involved in the accident.
It has been said 10,000 times GET A LAWYER! If you look hard enough, you will find one that will take this case for very little down. If you don't get a lawyer then you are just wasting your time and ours.
Old 12-28-2006, 12:38 AM
  #217  
427Z
Le Mans Master
 
427Z's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2000
Location: Fort Worth Tx.
Posts: 7,868
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

i have not read all the 200+ replies but has anyone who is an actual lawyer given any advice for this situation? i know there are several lawyers on this board

Get notified of new replies

To San Rafael chevrolet went out of their way to replace our damaged vette with a new, b

Old 12-28-2006, 12:52 AM
  #218  
ask1ed
Instructor
Support Corvetteforum!
Thread Starter
 
ask1ed's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2006
Location: berkeley ca
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by webdzynes
The dealer intended to cause some strife at home and as such, put you into a position to "get through it as quickly as possible" and turn the screws on you a bit in the process. What he didnt realize is that he hurt himself that much more. Here's why: If you were highly aprehensive about letting your trusted life partner drive your car, you certainly would not want a complete stranger doing so. This adds credibility to your comment telling them NOT to drive it when the car was dropped off. It is a bit of a stretch but because he shared the dialogue between you and he with your wife, he made clear an intention to create some disharmony, which he did. That in turn starts falling under the auspices of punitive damages as that conduct was malicious in intent. (Conduct is malicious if it is accompanied by ill will, or spite, or if it is for the purpose of injuring another.)As I said, it is a reach but worth pursuing.
He was pissed off about the publicity. Maybe we can turn it around for a pos. google result.

Last edited by ask1ed; 01-04-2007 at 11:10 AM.
Old 12-28-2006, 12:56 AM
  #219  
ask1ed
Instructor
Support Corvetteforum!
Thread Starter
 
ask1ed's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2006
Location: berkeley ca
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KingAustin
Be careful of what? What could he possibly do to us by creating a false story, and also why would someone go through the trouble of doing this?

Also he could have just been a lurker and just read threads about people and their corvettes that could have made him decide to buy a vette. Someone's paranoid
Exactly.
Old 12-28-2006, 01:34 AM
  #220  
jabez
Race Director
 
jabez's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2004
Location: Milpitas ca
Posts: 17,066
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ask1ed
The dealer stood up for him and has not fired him yet.
What a joke of a dealership. They do thousands of dollars of damages to your car when you take it in for minor fixes. As soon as you get a decison of your liking take your business elsewhere immediately. Its the actions of dealerships like this that give all a bad name. I hope GM gets word of this place and pulls the plug on them.

Sorry for all your problems. You shouldn't have gone through any of this and be treated this way.


Quick Reply: San Rafael chevrolet went out of their way to replace our damaged vette with a new, b



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:16 PM.