C6 Corvette General Discussion General C6 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

The 160* Thermostat

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-28-2012, 02:29 PM
  #1  
Chemdawg99
Administrator

Support Corvetteforum!
Thread Starter
 
Chemdawg99's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2007
Location: Bel Air (by way of Fort Worth, TX) Maryland
Posts: 64,785
Received 1,659 Likes on 846 Posts
St. Jude Donor '12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-'18-'19-'20-'21


Default The 160* Thermostat

Yeah, I know...................

THERMOSTAT: Probably the most misunderstood component in the cooling system, the thermostat has absolutely nothing to do with controlling maximum engine operating temperature. Period. What does it do? At cold start, it blocks the flow of coolant out of the engine until the trapped coolant reaches the thermostat’s rated temperature, at which point it opens and permits coolant to begin circulating. This aids rapid warm up, which reduces cylinder bore and piston-ring wear by bringing the engine up to operating temperature relatively quickly. Once it’s open, it modulates the flow of coolant through its calibrated restriction so coolant temperature never drops below its rated opening point, assuming the cooling system is efficient enough to cool the engine down to that level. In most cars, it’s essentially wide open all the time, and only the heat transfer efficiency of the radiator and the airflow through the radiator determine the engine’s maximum operating temperature.

If you have a 180º thermostat and your engine operates at 220º, changing to a 160º thermostat won’t change your operating temperature one bit – you need more radiator, more airflow, or both, to reduce operating temperature.

If you have an extremely efficient cooling system with more heat-rejection capability than your engine needs (runs at 180º with a 180º thermostat), changing to a 160º thermostat may result in reducing your operating temperature to 160º, but this is rare except in cold weather. Furthermore, 160º is too cold; OEM testing has proven that the rate of cylinder bore and piston-ring wear at 160º is double the wear rate at 180º, and a coolant temperature of 160º won’t let the oil in the pan get hot enough to boil off condensed moisture and blow-by contaminants, which then remain in suspension and accelerate the formation of acidic sludge. 160º thermostats were specified in the 1930s for the old alcohol-based antifreezes, which would boil off and evaporate at 185º; there’s no other reason for them.

“Balanced-Flow” thermostats like Robertshaw makes (also sold by Mr.Gasket with their name on them) are calibrated much more accurately than conventional parts-store thermostats, and if they fail, they do so in the open position. Conventional thermostats fail closed, which can cause a lot of engine damage in a big hurry if you don’t spot the sudden temperature rise.
http://www.dewitts.com/download/cooling.pdf

Given the information above, why do so many people buy and install 160* thermostats for otherwise stock Corvettes?

Totally get it if substantial mods like S/C and/or H/C packages are being done along with other upgrades to the cooling system for the track.

I'm talking doing this for a Corvette that will NEVER see the track nor ever be modded other than maybe a tune.

Last edited by Chemdawg99; 05-28-2012 at 02:33 PM.
Old 05-28-2012, 02:36 PM
  #2  
REVAK
Drifting
 
REVAK's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2006
Location: Ambler Pa.
Posts: 1,276
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Chemdawg99
Yeah, I know...................



http://www.dewitts.com/download/cooling.pdf

Given the information above, why do so many people buy and install 160* thermostats for otherwise stock Corvettes?

Totally get it if substantial mods like S/C and/or H/C packages are being done along with other upgrades to the cooling system for the track.

I'm talking doing this for a Corvette that will NEVER see the track nor ever be modded other than maybe a tune.
Because the information given above is incorrect. Talk to someone at Callaway, SLP, or Lingenfelter.
Old 05-28-2012, 02:48 PM
  #3  
Chemdawg99
Administrator

Support Corvetteforum!
Thread Starter
 
Chemdawg99's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2007
Location: Bel Air (by way of Fort Worth, TX) Maryland
Posts: 64,785
Received 1,659 Likes on 846 Posts
St. Jude Donor '12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-'18-'19-'20-'21


Default

Originally Posted by REVAK
Because the information given above is incorrect. Talk to someone at Callaway, SLP, or Lingenfelter.
How is it incorrect?

Please give me a detailed explanation that disproves the OP.

Callaway, SLP or Lingenfelter are modifying things that necessitate a modification to the cooling system and/or to the tune.

Are you telling me that for an otherwise stock car (i.e. no internal engine modifications) that putting a 160* thermostat is beneficial?
Old 05-28-2012, 02:52 PM
  #4  
jpee
Race Director
 
jpee's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 1999
Location: Somers NY
Posts: 13,298
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Why does my car run FASTER ET and higher MPH at the drag strip if I'm leaving the starting line at 150 deg. as opposed to 190... @ 190 I always run slower #s

I'm not an engineer, just a drag racer, and run the car so I get my best ET and that is at 150 deg.
Old 05-28-2012, 03:03 PM
  #5  
Boomer111
Race Director
 
Boomer111's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Bay Area Ca.
Posts: 14,999
Received 191 Likes on 151 Posts

Default

Just a guess but top performance from an engine may not provide best wear performance.
Old 05-28-2012, 03:03 PM
  #6  
Chemdawg99
Administrator

Support Corvetteforum!
Thread Starter
 
Chemdawg99's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2007
Location: Bel Air (by way of Fort Worth, TX) Maryland
Posts: 64,785
Received 1,659 Likes on 846 Posts
St. Jude Donor '12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-'18-'19-'20-'21


Default

Originally Posted by jpee
Why does my car run FASTER ET and higher MPH at the drag strip if I'm leaving the starting line at 150 deg. as opposed to 190... @ 190 I always run slower #s

I'm not an engineer, just a drag racer, and run the car so I get my best ET and that is at 150 deg.
You race your Vette. Totally get the "running cooler on the track" rationale.

I'm talking a street-driven Corvette that is possibly even a daily driver.

What benefit would 160* tstat be for a Corvette with no internal engine modifications?
Old 05-28-2012, 03:03 PM
  #7  
Chemdawg99
Administrator

Support Corvetteforum!
Thread Starter
 
Chemdawg99's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2007
Location: Bel Air (by way of Fort Worth, TX) Maryland
Posts: 64,785
Received 1,659 Likes on 846 Posts
St. Jude Donor '12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-'18-'19-'20-'21


Default

Originally Posted by Boomer111
Just a guess but top performance from an engine may not provide best wear performance.
Correct
Old 05-28-2012, 03:05 PM
  #8  
Sunset-C6
Le Mans Master
 
Sunset-C6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2010
Location: North of Canada
Posts: 8,957
Received 133 Likes on 75 Posts

Default

The only way to reduce operating temperature is a bigger radiator.
Old 05-28-2012, 03:05 PM
  #9  
johnodrake
Moderator

Support Corvetteforum!
 
johnodrake's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2002
Location: Lakewood Ranch, FL
Posts: 40,066
Received 3,579 Likes on 1,619 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jpee
Why does my car run FASTER ET and higher MPH at the drag strip if I'm leaving the starting line at 150 deg. as opposed to 190... @ 190 I always run slower #s

I'm not an engineer, just a drag racer, and run the car so I get my best ET and that is at 150 deg.
He gets that, JP; review his post: "I'm talking doing this for a Corvette that will NEVER see the track nor ever be modded other than maybe a tune."

If you aren't tracking your car where you worry about the timing being pulled, you don't need a 160* stat, the factory 190* is fine.
Old 05-28-2012, 03:08 PM
  #10  
EVRose
Race Director
 
EVRose's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2010
Location: Las Vegas NV
Posts: 14,475
Received 772 Likes on 612 Posts

Default

HERE's an article I found on the subject. Don't know who Steve Jack is though.
Old 05-28-2012, 03:14 PM
  #11  
Chemdawg99
Administrator

Support Corvetteforum!
Thread Starter
 
Chemdawg99's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2007
Location: Bel Air (by way of Fort Worth, TX) Maryland
Posts: 64,785
Received 1,659 Likes on 846 Posts
St. Jude Donor '12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-'18-'19-'20-'21


Default

Originally Posted by johnodrake
He gets that, JP; review his post: "I'm talking doing this for a Corvette that will NEVER see the track nor ever be modded other than maybe a tune."

If you aren't tracking your car where you worry about the timing being pulled, you don't need a 160* stat, the factory 190* is fine.
You got it John

Must be all that practice on PR&C
Old 05-28-2012, 03:15 PM
  #12  
johnodrake
Moderator

Support Corvetteforum!
 
johnodrake's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2002
Location: Lakewood Ranch, FL
Posts: 40,066
Received 3,579 Likes on 1,619 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Sunset-C6
The only way to reduce operating temperature is a bigger radiator.
There are other ways as well - like turning the fan on at a lower temperature. Factory set to come on at ~204* and be at 90% at 234* My fan is tuned to start at 190*
Old 05-28-2012, 03:17 PM
  #13  
johnodrake
Moderator

Support Corvetteforum!
 
johnodrake's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2002
Location: Lakewood Ranch, FL
Posts: 40,066
Received 3,579 Likes on 1,619 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Chemdawg99
You got it John

Must be all that practice on PR&C
Old 05-28-2012, 03:28 PM
  #14  
REVAK
Drifting
 
REVAK's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2006
Location: Ambler Pa.
Posts: 1,276
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Chemdawg99
How is it incorrect?

Please give me a detailed explanation that disproves the OP.

Callaway, SLP or Lingenfelter are modifying things that necessitate a modification to the cooling system and/or to the tune.

Are you telling me that for an otherwise stock car (i.e. no internal engine modifications) that putting a 160* thermostat is beneficial?
Yes , exactly. It is beneficial . Search a thread by Chuck Cow, or some of my previous threads as well as many others. The first requirement often specified in performance improvement is a 160* stat.
Old 05-28-2012, 03:39 PM
  #15  
Chemdawg99
Administrator

Support Corvetteforum!
Thread Starter
 
Chemdawg99's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2007
Location: Bel Air (by way of Fort Worth, TX) Maryland
Posts: 64,785
Received 1,659 Likes on 846 Posts
St. Jude Donor '12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-'18-'19-'20-'21


Default

Originally Posted by REVAK
Yes , exactly. It is beneficial . Search a thread by Chuck Cow, or some of my previous threads as well as many others. The first requirement often specified in performance improvement is a 160* stat.
I find any "explanation" or "counterargument" from a person who sells a product by touting it's benefits counter to solid evidence to the contrary to be specious at best.

I asked for your thoughts not someone else's.

How is a 160* tstat on an otherwise stock C6 beneficial?
Old 05-28-2012, 04:27 PM
  #16  
REVAK
Drifting
 
REVAK's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2006
Location: Ambler Pa.
Posts: 1,276
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Chemdawg99
I find any "explanation" or "counterargument" from a person who sells a product by touting it's benefits counter to solid evidence to the contrary to be specious at best.

I asked for your thoughts not someone else's.

How is a 160* tstat on an otherwise stock C6 beneficial?
It lowers your coolant temps. @ road speed on average 25 degrees. This also lowers IAT 's. This allows the pcm to follow a more aggressive timing map, It also can influence favorably A/F ratios. I don't sell anything here, I have nothing to gain by sharing 40+ years of experience with other interested members. There is no verified evidence to the contrary. All the nay sayers theorize why it is not beneficial. Everyone who has tried it is well aware of the benefits. I don't think you will accept my , or probably anyone else's explanation . Try it yourself, log data before and after, note the results. And for the record, although I haven't met Chuck Cow personally, his threads on this subject are spot on as well as comprehensive. [ by that I mean that his observations match mine and therefore I concur with his conclusions even though I am not , as of yet, a customer of his. ] I am not sure why this subject has always been a hot spot on this forum. If you have confidence in the evidence to the contrary, then by all means, don't try it. Have a great day. On a lighter note, Thank you for your US Army service .

Last edited by REVAK; 05-28-2012 at 04:31 PM. Reason: add on
Old 05-28-2012, 07:36 PM
  #17  
Chemdawg99
Administrator

Support Corvetteforum!
Thread Starter
 
Chemdawg99's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2007
Location: Bel Air (by way of Fort Worth, TX) Maryland
Posts: 64,785
Received 1,659 Likes on 846 Posts
St. Jude Donor '12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-'18-'19-'20-'21


Default

Originally Posted by REVAK
It lowers your coolant temps. @ road speed on average 25 degrees. This also lowers IAT 's. This allows the pcm to follow a more aggressive timing map, It also can influence favorably A/F ratios.
Thank you for your answer
I still think the quote from link I posted disputes everything you just said above. A t-stat alone will not lower your coolant temps.

From the OP link:
the thermostat has absolutely nothing to do with controlling maximum engine operating temperature. Period. What does it do? At cold start, it blocks the flow of coolant out of the engine until the trapped coolant reaches the thermostat’s rated temperature, at which point it opens and permits coolant to begin circulating. This aids rapid warm up, which reduces cylinder bore and piston-ring wear by bringing the engine up to operating temperature relatively quickly

So tell me, why would I want to add a 160* t-stat to an otherwise stock car?

Seems to me that I would be shortening the lifecycle of my LS3



Have a great day. On a lighter note, Thank you for your US Army service .
The following users liked this post:
Proud Owner (12-13-2015)

Get notified of new replies

To The 160* Thermostat

Old 05-28-2012, 08:30 PM
  #18  
Steve_R
Team Owner

Support Corvetteforum!
 
Steve_R's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2012
Location: Anger Island
Posts: 45,945
Received 3,290 Likes on 1,400 Posts
St. Jude Donor '12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17

Default

I'd love to see dyno results with the stock t-stat and with a 160* t-stat with no other changes. This gets discussed a lot here - and I agree that putting a cooler t-stat on an otherwise stock car is useless - but I've never seen objective (real dyno results, not a butt dyno) that say a 160* t-stat on an otherwise stock car does anything for performance.
Old 05-28-2012, 08:35 PM
  #19  
Chemdawg99
Administrator

Support Corvetteforum!
Thread Starter
 
Chemdawg99's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2007
Location: Bel Air (by way of Fort Worth, TX) Maryland
Posts: 64,785
Received 1,659 Likes on 846 Posts
St. Jude Donor '12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-'18-'19-'20-'21


Default

Originally Posted by Steve_R
I'd love to see dyno results with the stock t-stat and with a 160* t-stat with no other changes.
So would I

This gets discussed a lot here - and I agree that putting a cooler t-stat on an otherwise stock car is useless - but I've never seen objective (real dyno results, not a butt dyno) that say a 160* t-stat on an otherwise stock car does anything for performance.
Neither have I. But that doesn't stop people from claiming otherwise.

My larger concern is how such a useless mod (again, on an otherwise stock car) can shorten the lifecycle of your Vette.

Some would argue that GM actually wants to shorten the life of your Vette with the stock t-stat
Old 05-28-2012, 08:54 PM
  #20  
Steve_R
Team Owner

Support Corvetteforum!
 
Steve_R's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2012
Location: Anger Island
Posts: 45,945
Received 3,290 Likes on 1,400 Posts
St. Jude Donor '12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17

Default

I have a '69 Ford Bronco built for serious rock crawling. I occasionally frequent an Early Bronco forum. Those things were notorious for overheating. It's funny how many people there put a 160* t-stat in thinking it'll make the vehicle run cooler. They're always disappointed and shocked when they find out it doesn't.


Quick Reply: The 160* Thermostat



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:55 AM.