Go Back   Corvette Forum > C6 Corvette, 2005 - 2013 > C6 Corvette General Discussion
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ Vendor Directory
Search
C6 Corvette General Discussion
General C6 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech Sponsored by
PFYC

Welcome to Corvetteforum.com!
Welcome to Corvetteforum.com.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join Corvetteforum.com today!


Corvette Store
 
 
C7 Parts & Accessories
C6 Parts & Accessories
C5 Parts & Accessories
C4 Parts & Accessories
C3 Parts & Accessories
C2 Parts & Accessories
C1 Parts & Accessories
Wheels & Tires
Sponsored Ads
 
 
Vendor Directory
  
Reply
 
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-30-2012, 01:23 PM   #1
CF Editor
IB Staff
 
Member Since: Apr 2011
Default Corvette Snaps Spot on Top 100 Most Powerful Cars

Read it here: Corvette Snaps Spot on Top 100 Most Powerful Cars

Number 38, in fact. Whats even more interesting is how many cars on this list use some version of the Corvette powerplant. I guess if you want to make power, the LS really is the best.
CF Editor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2012, 01:54 PM   #2
OnPoint
CF Senior Member
Support Corvetteforum!
 
OnPoint's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: Wichita Kansas - 2011 Callaway GS 606HP & 2010 ZR1 638HP
Default

Pretty cool.
OnPoint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2012, 01:55 PM   #3
Turbooo2u
CF Senior Member
 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: Providence RI
Default

Not that impressive IMHO. 38th for the ZR1. The C6Z06 wasn't even close, and the other LS engines wouldn't even be in the top 200.
Turbooo2u is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2012, 10:22 AM   #4
Vette_Pilot
CF Senior Member
 
Vette_Pilot's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2005
Location: Bonaire Ga.
Default

All of this HP and nothing to do with it. Like being all dressed up and having no place to go!!
Vette_Pilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2012, 10:51 AM   #5
peter pan
Life Time NCM #2196
Support Corvetteforum!
 
peter pan's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: Converse TX
Default

Cool
peter pan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2012, 11:33 AM   #6
Wayne O
CF Senior Member
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Wayne O's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Tucson Arizona
Default

It's interesting to see how car's compare with rated horsepower but that's about it. Including the Hennessey modified cars was stretching things a bit. If they include a Hennessey modded car why not include a 1,000+ hp Lingenfelter Corvette? Funny how the 2013 naturally aspirated Viper beats the Corvette ZR1 by 2 horsepower. Of course GM didn't build the ZR1 with any thought of retaking the horsepower 'crown' from Viper.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vette_Pilot View Post
All of this HP and nothing to do with it. Like being all dressed up and having no place to go!!
I'll agree with you to a point. Like with Corvette owners in general, I'll venture to say 99% of the owners of these high horsepower cars will never seriously track their car to push the envelope of performance....to utilize all the power they paid for. That being said even for street use a great deal of satisfaction and enjoyment is derived from simply starting, driving and owning a high power, high performance car. Knowing that you're never going to get more than a short, straight line blast in your high power/performance car would be utterly depressing to me but I guess it suffices for the majority.
__________________
2005 Corvette C6 Coupe
Magnetic Red Metallic II/Cashmere, MN6, 1SB, F55
Lingenfelter 403 Conversion, LG Pro Headers (coated), Corsa Sport Exhaust, Lingenfelter CAI, Accusump, LGM Coil-Over Suspension & Bump-Steer Kit, T1 Sway Bars, Pfadt Control Arm Bushing Kit, Elite Eng. Tunnel Plate & Oil Catch-Can, SKF Racing Hubs/Bearings, AP Racing Brakes, DRM Brake Ducts, Custom Roll Bar, Sparco Seats, Wide-Booty, CCW C10 Wheels,
Setup: LG Motorsports

Thanks to: 21st Century Muscle Cars
Wayne O is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2012, 11:41 AM   #7
Raazor
CF Senior Member
St. Jude Donor '08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13x3- '14
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Raazor's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2008
Location: Home Again, Home Again, jiggity-jig!!
Default

Raazor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2012, 12:16 PM   #8
ricknyc23
CF Senior Member
 
ricknyc23's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: Long Island, Nassau County New York
Default

If you look at what those other cars cost that were put ahead, I think its pretty impressive. I never even heard of some of those cars...
ricknyc23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2012, 12:33 PM   #9
Never-Enough
CF Senior Member
 
Never-Enough's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2010
Location: Chester County PA
NeverEnough415
Default

I feel very poor now.
Never-Enough is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2012, 01:19 PM   #10
F65MPH
CF Senior Member
 
F65MPH's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2010
Location: Greenwood MS
Default

Interesting...ZR1 0-60 in 3.8 sec while GM claims my GS will do it in 3.95 secs.
F65MPH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2012, 11:09 AM   #11
SEAICE
CF Senior Member
 
SEAICE's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: Seattle WA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by F65MPH View Post
Interesting...ZR1 0-60 in 3.8 sec while GM claims my GS will do it in 3.95 secs.
If you can't get traction, more HP is meaningless.
SEAICE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2012, 07:23 PM   #12
gflvette2
Junior Member
 
Member Since: Mar 2012
Location: Long Island New York
Gflvette2
Send a message via AIM to gflvette2 Send a message via Skype™ to gflvette2
Default

Cool Stuff!
gflvette2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2012, 08:07 AM   #13
Don 79 TA
CF Senior Member
 
Member Since: Aug 2011
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SEAICE View Post
If you can't get traction, more HP is meaningless.
absolutely right

WOW
i can only imagine the price tag on some of those cars
that GT500 is impressive too

man... i remember the days where if you had 400 it was a bad car
500 was considered so insane
and now-a-days, seems like under 1000hp seems just average

just amazes me that these types of power can be had now-a-days
and yet still achive some decent fuel mileage with creature comforts too
Don 79 TA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2012, 08:27 AM   #14
rob62
CF Senior Member
 
rob62's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SEAICE View Post
If you can't get traction, more HP is meaningless.
so true but when it does hook (and it will) you will find the "meaning" of life!
rob62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2012, 10:12 AM   #15
Daekwan06
CF Senior Member
 
Daekwan06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2011
Location: Arlington VA
Daekwan Daekwan Daekwan Daekwan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayne O View Post
I'll agree with you to a point. Like with Corvette owners in general, I'll venture to say 99% of the owners of these high horsepower cars will never seriously track their car to push the envelope of performance....to utilize all the power they paid for.
Never under estimate the power of bench racing. I know guys who couldnt tell you where a racetrack was to save their life, but will show up to coffee & cars with their latest dyno sheet. I'll never understand it, and don't necessarily want too. Their money, their business.

On another note.. anybody notice how many cars are in the 550hp range. The first 25 cars on that list. Seems like 600hp is looming as the base measurement for next generation, but there has to be traction concerns about putting this much power down on street tires. Expect AWD to get alot more popular.
Daekwan06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2012, 11:50 AM   #16
SEAICE
CF Senior Member
 
SEAICE's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: Seattle WA
Default

AWD is the way to go. Almost all the cars that are quicker than the ZR-1 are AWD (or mid/rear-engined). Even the Porsche Panamera Turbo, weighing 1,000 lbs more, is quicker (0-60 3.4 sec) with 145 less HP.

GM should at least offer an AWD version of the C-7
SEAICE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2012, 03:45 PM   #17
Daekwan06
CF Senior Member
 
Daekwan06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2011
Location: Arlington VA
Daekwan Daekwan Daekwan Daekwan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SEAICE View Post
AWD is the way to go. Almost all the cars that are quicker than the ZR-1 are AWD (or mid/rear-engined). Even the Porsche Panamera Turbo, weighing 1,000 lbs more, is quicker (0-60 3.4 sec) with 145 less HP.

GM should at least offer an AWD version of the C-7
Agreed. If they want to keep up (and make the vehicle safer to use with so much power) its needed. For the purists and the sake of a low entry price.. make RWD standard. But for those who want max performance & traction.. offer an AWD version.
Daekwan06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2012, 05:16 PM   #18
su8pack1
CF Senior Member
 
su8pack1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Eastern PA
Default

su8pack1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2012, 05:16 PM
 
Go Back   Corvette Forum > C6 Corvette, 2005 - 2013 > C6 Corvette General Discussion
Reload this Page Corvette Snaps Spot on Top 100 Most Powerful Cars
 
 
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Click for Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:43 PM.


Emails & Password Backup