C6 Corvette General Discussion General C6 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Z51 Shock life

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-07-2012, 03:02 PM
  #1  
Rogers 07
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
Rogers 07's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: Jupiter Fl
Posts: 1,746
Received 33 Likes on 15 Posts
Default Z51 Shock life

Just looking for input about shock absorber life, My 07 Z51 equipped coupe now has over 100,000 miles on the original shocks, The car still seems to handle fine and the compression and rebound seems to be good at all four corners, So, If they were loosing some dampening ability, would you know it? Should I just replace them due to the milage? The car is obviously a daily driver, so comfort is little bit more important to me than an aggressive handling/Racing type shock. I like the way the Z51 suspension rides, solid and firm but not enough to rattle your fillings if you know what I mean!!
If you have some experience with the shocks on your C6, your input is appreciated.
Thanks
Old 12-07-2012, 05:28 PM
  #2  
Rogers 07
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
Rogers 07's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: Jupiter Fl
Posts: 1,746
Received 33 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Any one have any thoughts on this?
Old 12-07-2012, 05:48 PM
  #3  
dK_C6_LS3
Instructor
 
dK_C6_LS3's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2012
Location: Phoenixville PA
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I've always heard that between 60K and 100K is the average life of a shock, usually has to do with the number of compression and decompression cycles the unit goes though, and combine that with the age of the shock and wear on seals internal hardware. I would change them out at 100K, IMO.
Old 12-07-2012, 06:49 PM
  #4  
raspyc6
Le Mans Master
 
raspyc6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2012
Location: Tampa Florida
Posts: 5,084
Received 35 Likes on 30 Posts

Default

I am just short of 40k miles but I wanted the Koni FSD's so bad I could not wait and had to pull the trigger. The thought of no loss in performance with respect to handling, a more pleasant ride overall and ~ half an inch seated lower sounded right to me.
Old 12-07-2012, 07:02 PM
  #5  
laconiajack
Safety Car
 
laconiajack's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: Mooresville (Race City USA) NC
Posts: 4,681
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rogers 07
Just looking for input about shock absorber life, My 07 Z51 equipped coupe now has over 100,000 miles on the original shocks, The car still seems to handle fine and the compression and rebound seems to be good at all four corners, So, If they were loosing some dampening ability, would you know it? Should I just replace them due to the milage? The car is obviously a daily driver, so comfort is little bit more important to me than an aggressive handling/Racing type shock. I like the way the Z51 suspension rides, solid and firm but not enough to rattle your fillings if you know what I mean!!
If you have some experience with the shocks on your C6, your input is appreciated.
Thanks
You might be disappointed if you replaced them since "comfort is (a) little bit more important to me than an aggressive handling/racing type shock." If it ain't broke why fix it?
Old 12-07-2012, 08:18 PM
  #6  
Homeboy77
Pro
 
Homeboy77's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2009
Location: Toccoa GA
Posts: 510
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

I have a 2005 Z51 and my shocks, still stock and at 113k , feel the same as the day I bought the car. I will keep it that way until I either feel some different or see unusual tire wear. I assume a Z51 is rougher handling than stock, but I like it and my tires have been wearing evenly. Feels like driving a race car. Love it!!!!
Old 12-07-2012, 08:27 PM
  #7  
ls1121
Le Mans Master
Support Corvetteforum!
 
ls1121's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2011
Location: Charlotte NC
Posts: 8,049
Received 319 Likes on 225 Posts
St. Jude Donor '14-'15

Default

It has been my experience that "Normal" shocks last about 60,000 miles.
most will not notice the difference because it is gradual over a long period of time.
Old 12-07-2012, 08:34 PM
  #8  
Gearhead Jim
Team Owner
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Gearhead Jim's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: Far NW 'burbs of Chicago
Posts: 23,930
Received 2,047 Likes on 1,359 Posts
St. Jude Donor '13

Default

With over 100k on your shocks, they have probably softened a fair amount but did it so gradually it's hard to notice. I suspect that new Z51 shocks would "shock" you.

We've owned two Z51 C6's, and I would call the Z51 shocks "brutally stiff". On the bombed-out roads of Illinois, I finally gave in and changed our current 2009 Z51 over to the base model shocks. That means it still has the Z51 springs, sways, and cooler.
The ride is much nicer, especially on the frost heaves that smack both front and then both wheels, every 50'.

On rapid transitions, like an autocrosser would do, it probably loses some handling. But for normal highway driving and occasional spirited runs on a twisty back road, it's still pretty nice.
Old 12-07-2012, 08:36 PM
  #9  
Homeboy77
Pro
 
Homeboy77's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2009
Location: Toccoa GA
Posts: 510
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

"Normal" shocks last about 60,000 miles.
I would normally agree. Based on years of experience. This car just seems to be different. At 113k, I am on original suspension, original clutch and no major repairs, except an AC compressor. I am very impressed with corvette C6. Wish I bought it sooner.
Old 12-07-2012, 08:38 PM
  #10  
Gearhead Jim
Team Owner
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Gearhead Jim's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: Far NW 'burbs of Chicago
Posts: 23,930
Received 2,047 Likes on 1,359 Posts
St. Jude Donor '13

Default

Originally Posted by raspyc6
I am just short of 40k miles but I wanted the Koni FSD's so bad I could not wait and had to pull the trigger. The thought of no loss in performance with respect to handling, a more pleasant ride overall and ~ half an inch seated lower sounded right to me.
Let us know what you think.

Many folks say the FSD's performed as claimed: softer ride over bumps, but remaining stiff during quick turn-ins.

Others say they are just another stiff shock, can't tell the difference between FSD and Z51.

Old 12-07-2012, 08:43 PM
  #11  
JerriVette
Race Director
 
JerriVette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2003
Location: Bergen county NJ
Posts: 15,822
Received 3,947 Likes on 2,177 Posts

Default

At 55k miles I swapped out z51 shocks for bilstein sport shocks.

Ordered from tire rack,had them installed and bump control is much better.
Old 12-07-2012, 09:32 PM
  #12  
Mike's LS3
Safety Car
 
Mike's LS3's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area CA
Posts: 4,301
Received 732 Likes on 473 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JerriVette
At 55k miles I swapped out z51 shocks for bilstein sport shocks.

Ordered from tire rack,had them installed and bump control is much better.
At 43k miles, my 08 Z51 shocks felt a little wobbly around turns and sloppy over bumps. Its a gradual wear over time so some do not notice as much as others. I replaced them with the Bilstein Sports and glade I did. Much more stable around turns and a more planted feel over bumps. I would recommend them highly for the Z51 suspension!
Old 12-08-2012, 08:40 AM
  #13  
Kenny94945
Le Mans Master
 
Kenny94945's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Sausalito CA
Posts: 5,746
Received 443 Likes on 381 Posts

Default

Here's an opinion.

To test the shocks dampening, you have to do that once the shock oil is warmed up.
I've found whenever a shock is cold the dampening seems OK not matter the mileage when testing on a bench by hand without a dedicated test machine.

With Sport motorcycles, I can feel the dampening fade at 5000 and an oil change (w/ gas recharge) is necessary.

I've read on the net that some Miata drivers feel their car's shock loss dampening at 20K mileage.

My 05 Z51 has 35K miles and the shocks seem OK.

So perhaps, as above co-members have noted, replacement at 50K might be the maintenance. Road course or highway miles would make a difference in replacement miles too. At 100K, seems shock replacement for the OP would be noticable.
Old 12-08-2012, 10:22 AM
  #14  
AORoads
Team Owner
 
AORoads's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: Northern, VA
Posts: 46,100
Received 2,478 Likes on 1,941 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15
"In honor of jpee"

Default

Up on a lift, any signs of oil leakage/seepage from any of the four shocks? If not, tires seem to be wearing normally across the entire surface?
Old 12-08-2012, 10:37 AM
  #15  
Rogers 07
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
Rogers 07's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: Jupiter Fl
Posts: 1,746
Received 33 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AORoads
Up on a lift, any signs of oil leakage/seepage from any of the four shocks? If not, tires seem to be wearing normally across the entire surface?
Tire wear is good, Its even all the way across, No signs of leakage from the shocks, My thoughts were that with 100000 miles, the shocks may need to be replaced due to normal wear. Based on what others have stated here, if it isn't broken why fix it!! I think I will leave then alone for a while longer !!!

Thanks for all the input guys.
Old 12-08-2012, 10:39 AM
  #16  
SSTEVEGS
Melting Slicks
 
SSTEVEGS's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2007
Location: Waynesville NC
Posts: 2,116
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

I had an 87 Caprice with original shocks and nearly 300,000 miles and an 04
GMC 2500HD with 450,000 miles.

I just replaced (by choice) my 40,000 mile 2008's Z51 shocks with
DRM Bilstein Z06 shocks. They're a lot stiffer in ride but I like
them better around curves, plus they're better for wheel hop and keep the
rear planted for better traction. My original shocks are in a box and still perfect.

If your shocks aren't leaking and you're happy with their ride, don't "fix"
them; they're still good.
JMHO
Old 12-08-2012, 11:53 AM
  #17  
B-Vette
Melting Slicks
 
B-Vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: Edmonton Alberta
Posts: 2,303
Received 38 Likes on 34 Posts

Default

So if he has to replace the stock Z51 ones, are the Bilstein's a better choice? Curious because I too have Z51 suspension.
Old 12-08-2012, 08:23 PM
  #18  
laconiajack
Safety Car
 
laconiajack's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: Mooresville (Race City USA) NC
Posts: 4,681
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gearhead Jim
With over 100k on your shocks, they have probably softened a fair amount but did it so gradually it's hard to notice. I suspect that new Z51 shocks would "shock" you.

We've owned two Z51 C6's, and I would call the Z51 shocks "brutally stiff". On the bombed-out roads of Illinois, I finally gave in and changed our current 2009 Z51 over to the base model shocks. That means it still has the Z51 springs, sways, and cooler.
The ride is much nicer, especially on the frost heaves that smack both front and then both wheels, every 50'.

On rapid transitions, like an autocrosser would do, it probably loses some handling. But for normal highway driving and occasional spirited runs on a twisty back road, it's still pretty nice.
Listen to a man who knows!

Get notified of new replies

To Z51 Shock life




Quick Reply: Z51 Shock life



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:51 PM.