[Z06] OEM Air Filter Question
#1
Team Owner
Thread Starter
OEM Air Filter Question
I bought a stock filter but it has a manufacture date of 2005 (clean one). It is different at one end than the 2008 filter (dirty one). They are both the same at the other end.
Looks like the filament ends on the 2005 are open not closed like the 2008.
Question is: Will the 2005 restrict air flow compared to the 2008 ??
Side by side
2008
2005
Both same at other end
DH
Looks like the filament ends on the 2005 are open not closed like the 2008.
Question is: Will the 2005 restrict air flow compared to the 2008 ??
Side by side
2008
2005
Both same at other end
DH
#4
Team Owner
Thread Starter
here ya go... don't get too wrapped up in the drama, it's a 3 year old post
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c6-t...same-pics.html
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c6-t...same-pics.html
DH
#5
Team Owner
Thread Starter
here ya go... don't get too wrapped up in the drama, it's a 3 year old post
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c6-t...same-pics.html
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c6-t...same-pics.html
DH
#6
Race Director
The changes in the car in between: NT-05's replaced OEM tires, Coleman lightweight two-piece front rotors, EE PCV catch can and the LS9 air filter.
Last edited by AzDave47; 05-03-2012 at 08:33 PM.
#7
Le Mans Master
You guys really just need to get a K&N filter. I popped the one out of my ZR1 which was still brand new and threw in a K&N. Definitely could feel a little difference.
#8
Race Director
Some of us would just as soon not have oil going into the intake. That is one of the reasons I got an EE PSV system catch can, too. The ZR-1 filter flows more air than the stock engine can use (good to 800+HP).
#9
Le Mans Master
1 CFM = 28.328 l / min
So the stock ZR1 filter is figured at 850 CFM.
850 x 28.328 = 24,078.8 liters/min
Take the 24,078.8 and divide it by 7.0 liters. This will give you 3,439.82. That is the rpm at which your filter lost efficiency if your motor was actually gulping up 7 liters per revolution.
Shoot lets say we are only capable of using half of our motors. So take 24,078.8/3.5 = 6,879.65 rpms would be the inefficiency point.
The stock 90mm throttle body will flow 1170 CFM. The K&N flows 1100 CFM. Sooooooooo you do the math.
#10
Team Owner
Thread Starter
#12
Race Director
I don't know who came up with that figure but that cannot be right.
1 CFM = 28.328 l / min
So the stock ZR1 filter is figured at 850 CFM.
850 x 28.328 = 24,078.8 liters/min
Take the 24,078.8 and divide it by 7.0 liters. This will give you 3,439.82. That is the rpm at which your filter lost efficiency if your motor was actually gulping up 7 liters per revolution.
Shoot lets say we are only capable of using half of our motors. So take 24,078.8/3.5 = 6,879.65 rpms would be the inefficiency point.
The stock 90mm throttle body will flow 1170 CFM. The K&N flows 1100 CFM. Sooooooooo you do the math.
1 CFM = 28.328 l / min
So the stock ZR1 filter is figured at 850 CFM.
850 x 28.328 = 24,078.8 liters/min
Take the 24,078.8 and divide it by 7.0 liters. This will give you 3,439.82. That is the rpm at which your filter lost efficiency if your motor was actually gulping up 7 liters per revolution.
Shoot lets say we are only capable of using half of our motors. So take 24,078.8/3.5 = 6,879.65 rpms would be the inefficiency point.
The stock 90mm throttle body will flow 1170 CFM. The K&N flows 1100 CFM. Sooooooooo you do the math.
#13
Race Director
#14
Le Mans Master
#15
Le Mans Master
#17
Team Owner
Thread Starter
http://i714.photobucket.com/albums/w...rx/filters.jpg
Dave does the one on the left look like your LS9 filter. Does the middle one look like your old LS7 filter.
Doesn't look like the LS9 is the same size as LS7 and why the black grating ???
DH
Dave does the one on the left look like your LS9 filter. Does the middle one look like your old LS7 filter.
Doesn't look like the LS9 is the same size as LS7 and why the black grating ???
DH
Last edited by Dirty Howie; 05-04-2012 at 12:47 AM.
#18
Race Director