Restrictor plate question....
#1
Instructor
Thread Starter
Member Since: Mar 2009
Location: Somewhere in IL IL
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Restrictor plate question....
Looking to see the "actual" difference and average difference from input gathered from each owner....
For all the FI owners who have used both restrictor plate and non-restrictor plate set up on your kit - how much boost did you make before and after using the plate?
If you can, please state what pulley size you used, plus mods
Thanks in advance for all your help
Hulk
For all the FI owners who have used both restrictor plate and non-restrictor plate set up on your kit - how much boost did you make before and after using the plate?
If you can, please state what pulley size you used, plus mods
Thanks in advance for all your help
Hulk
#2
Melting Slicks
Looking to see the "actual" difference and average difference from input gathered from each owner....
For all the FI owners who have used both restrictor plate and non-restrictor plate set up on your kit - how much boost did you make before and after using the plate?
If you can, please state what pulley size you used, plus mods
Thanks in advance for all your help
Hulk
For all the FI owners who have used both restrictor plate and non-restrictor plate set up on your kit - how much boost did you make before and after using the plate?
If you can, please state what pulley size you used, plus mods
Thanks in advance for all your help
Hulk
#3
Le Mans Master
9.5# with, 11.5# without. "Without" meaning taking the whole intake off the blower inlet. I think it's a 3.5" pulley that came with my ECS kit.
#7
Premium Supporting Vendor
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Providing the most proven supercharger kits for your C5/6/7 609-752-0321
Posts: 23,319
Received 1,086 Likes
on
657 Posts
I just finished an LS2 that we removed the restrictor plate today, I'll post up before an after graphs when I get a chance. The car was in the low 600rwhp area I think prior to removing the plate, afterwards it pulled 725rwhp.
This should be exactly what you are looking for since the only mods are ARH, ECS alky kit, and our base six rib Paxton Novi 1500 kit.
This should be exactly what you are looking for since the only mods are ARH, ECS alky kit, and our base six rib Paxton Novi 1500 kit.
#11
Instructor
Thread Starter
Member Since: Mar 2009
Location: Somewhere in IL IL
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#12
you should make your own. start with a 1" or so size hole and work up from there. i put three tabs on the restrictor so it would stay om the inlet tube. then put the air filter over the restrictor. making my own i was able to run a 3.4 pulley with a 10% overdrive cank. essentially maxxing out my d1sc. if i would have known about this trick i would have bought a f1a. my shift points are 6200 rpm. this is in a trailblazer ss. with a stock bottomed ls3 crate motor running meth and 10 lbs of boost
#13
Heel & Toe
Member Since: Sep 2008
Location: Harlingen TEXAS
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
my installer felt the need to keep the restrictor in place using the brackets (they insist that it fell out, making another 150hp, going lean and blowing up my first engine)
#14
Premium Supporting Vendor
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Providing the most proven supercharger kits for your C5/6/7 609-752-0321
Posts: 23,319
Received 1,086 Likes
on
657 Posts
Odd, I have never had one fall out?
#16
Heel & Toe
Member Since: Sep 2008
Location: Harlingen TEXAS
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
... I talked to Chris when they mentioned it, and he told me that it was pretty much impossible for it to happen. My opinion... my installer is an idiot (I have plenty of other reasons for saying that and no, they are not forum vendors)
#17
Instructor
I thought the purpose of the plate was to increase low end torque (increase low end boost - without overboosting at the top)?
On the graphs from 5 liter eater above - comparing runs #1 and #9 - I do not see much difference in low end torque? (might just be too many lines for me to read clearly).
Anyone have any scans to show this difference more clearly? (Or, feel free to correct me if I have the concept entirely wrong.)
Thanks in advance....
On the graphs from 5 liter eater above - comparing runs #1 and #9 - I do not see much difference in low end torque? (might just be too many lines for me to read clearly).
Anyone have any scans to show this difference more clearly? (Or, feel free to correct me if I have the concept entirely wrong.)
Thanks in advance....
The following users liked this post:
BAHUMAT2JZ (04-25-2016)
#18
Instructor
Thread Starter
Member Since: Mar 2009
Location: Somewhere in IL IL
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey BluV,
I don't think the restrictor plate is designed to create more low-end torque than without... I think it the smaller pulley is what is responsible for creating more low end torque regardless if it's with or without the plate...
The plate is there to restrict the total amount of air that enters your motor at the top end to prevent your stock motor from blowing up!
Smaller pulley creates more power down low... restrictor plate limits max air drawn in from the smaller pulley
But of course, this is my understanding and the folks at ECS can definitely provide a more accurating understanding... Hopefully they can chime in on your concerns
I don't think the restrictor plate is designed to create more low-end torque than without... I think it the smaller pulley is what is responsible for creating more low end torque regardless if it's with or without the plate...
The plate is there to restrict the total amount of air that enters your motor at the top end to prevent your stock motor from blowing up!
Smaller pulley creates more power down low... restrictor plate limits max air drawn in from the smaller pulley
But of course, this is my understanding and the folks at ECS can definitely provide a more accurating understanding... Hopefully they can chime in on your concerns
#20
Safety Car
Member Since: Feb 2008
Location: TEXOMA
Posts: 3,712
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08-'09
Hey BluV,
I don't think the restrictor plate is designed to create more low-end torque than without... I think it the smaller pulley is what is responsible for creating more low end torque regardless if it's with or without the plate...
The plate is there to restrict the total amount of air that enters your motor at the top end to prevent your stock motor from blowing up!
Smaller pulley creates more power down low... restrictor plate limits max air drawn in from the smaller pulley
But of course, this is my understanding and the folks at ECS can definitely provide a more accurating understanding... Hopefully they can chime in on your concerns
I don't think the restrictor plate is designed to create more low-end torque than without... I think it the smaller pulley is what is responsible for creating more low end torque regardless if it's with or without the plate...
The plate is there to restrict the total amount of air that enters your motor at the top end to prevent your stock motor from blowing up!
Smaller pulley creates more power down low... restrictor plate limits max air drawn in from the smaller pulley
But of course, this is my understanding and the folks at ECS can definitely provide a more accurating understanding... Hopefully they can chime in on your concerns