C6 Forced Induction/Nitrous C6 Corvette Turbochargers, Superchargers, Pulley Upgrades, Intercoolers, Wet and Dry Nitrous Injection, Meth
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

NA cam in supercaharged application....

Old 03-29-2014, 06:03 PM
  #1  
Blue by U
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Blue by U's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Knoxville TN
Posts: 1,065
Received 31 Likes on 28 Posts

Default NA cam in supercaharged application....

Looking for some opinions here. I am trying to plan a new build and have recently talked to a cam tech at comp. I gave him the specs for the cam i have in my current setup that is supercharged now. The cam was originally purchased for NA setup. The cam does good in HP, but I feel that torque is low. It made 740 hp and 603 torque on dyno, on 8psi. My new forged setup will be more boost. This is a 427 ls7. specs are ls1, but I am running ls7 1.8 rockers. The current cam specs are:
.623 lift int. and exh.
duration @ .050 239 int. 251 exh.
Lobe separation 115
The tech said with this duration that is basically a blower cam. He said it could be tweaked some, but gains would be minimal.
Old 03-29-2014, 06:21 PM
  #2  
Unreal
Team Owner
 
Unreal's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2007
Location: Gilbert AZ
Posts: 24,035
Received 2,313 Likes on 1,793 Posts

Default

Not bad, wouldn't call it a blower cam. You could put something in that would drive a lot nicer if wanted but if more power is the goal that cam should work pretty damn well.

For example my blower cam is a 230/246 .650.650 116 LSA. Made 1050rwhp with ease.
Old 03-29-2014, 06:29 PM
  #3  
Blue by U
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Blue by U's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Knoxville TN
Posts: 1,065
Received 31 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Unreal
Not bad, wouldn't call it a blower cam. You could put something in that would drive a lot nicer if wanted but if more power is the goal that cam should work pretty damn well.

For example my blower cam is a 230/246 .650.650 116 LSA. Made 1050rwhp with ease.
cam drives pretty good (thanks to tune), sounds great. I do like it, but am wanting what I can get as far as power. If there will be no gains, I don't see the point in spending the money. Are you running the YSI? Thanks for the help!
Old 03-29-2014, 09:19 PM
  #4  
Unreal
Team Owner
 
Unreal's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2007
Location: Gilbert AZ
Posts: 24,035
Received 2,313 Likes on 1,793 Posts

Default

Yes Ysi. Can there be gains, yes. Worth a cam swap, not to me.
Old 03-29-2014, 09:36 PM
  #5  
jon6.0
Melting Slicks
 
jon6.0's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 2,987
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

I would do a smaller pulley before I put a different cam in that engine.
Old 03-29-2014, 10:59 PM
  #6  
C6 Curtis
Burning Brakes
 
C6 Curtis's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2012
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 1,145
Received 30 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

Umm That's a baby cam for a ysi set up. My blower cam is 243/259 .664/.664 116LSA for 1100+whp

-Curtis
Old 03-29-2014, 11:29 PM
  #7  
lane_change
Melting Slicks
 
lane_change's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2010
Location: Katy TX
Posts: 2,378
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

How would this cam work on a s/c setup?

248/262 .651/.631 111 LSA

Seems like too much overlap to me, but just curious what others think.

Last edited by lane_change; 03-31-2014 at 11:46 AM.
Old 03-30-2014, 11:05 PM
  #8  
slow02gt
Advanced
 
slow02gt's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2012
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lane_change
How would this cam work on a s/c setup?

248/262 111 LSA 660 lift

Seems like too much overlap to me, but just curious what others think.
you already know my answer to that lol
Old 03-31-2014, 07:37 PM
  #9  
Blue by U
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Blue by U's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Knoxville TN
Posts: 1,065
Received 31 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lane_change
How would this cam work on a s/c setup?

248/262 .651/.631 111 LSA

Seems like too much overlap to me, but just curious what others think.
I'm thinking LSA needs to be more 115 range
Old 03-31-2014, 08:03 PM
  #10  
1320IN9
Le Mans Master
 
1320IN9's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,161
Received 104 Likes on 56 Posts

Default

i'm running one of vette-air "carlos" black mamba cam on my ls7 D1 procharged ls7, not the most blower friendly cam but still put down 755/657 on a pretty conservative tune, has some more left in it for sure, im also still on stock bottom and heads, you should just pulley down and see what it does, cheaper than switching the cam and the results may surprise you..
Old 04-01-2014, 02:43 AM
  #11  
Blue by U
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Blue by U's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Knoxville TN
Posts: 1,065
Received 31 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

Thanks guys for all the different input. This technically would not be a cam change since it will be a new bottom end build. This is why I am thinking of a whole new blower specific cam, that way I can just leave the cam I am using now in the motor it is in now. I am just trying to figure out what cam specs make a cam blower specific. I am gathering 115 to 116 LSA, but still uncertain on duration at .050 , but if what I have now is good enough I don't see the point in the added expense unless there is substantial power, torque, to be had. New build will be seeing a bigger blower as well.

Get notified of new replies

To NA cam in supercaharged application....



Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: NA cam in supercaharged application....



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:17 PM.