SteveDoten@ARH

ARH Big Tube C6 ZO6 headers with H-pipe are now available for high horsepower Supercharged, Nitrous or N/A combinations producing 900 to 1500 RWHP. The system is designed for standard deck height engines.
Features include:

2” X 2-1/8” primaries with 3-1/2” merge collectors with V-Bands
3-1/2” H-pipe with V-Bands (Pictured)
Optional extended H-Pipe with reduction to adapt 3” Connection Pipes to rear axle (Direct Bolt-In Kit)
Fully Tig Welded Construction using all USA manufactured 304 S/S
Great Fit and Easy Installation
Will fit standard C6 with mild modifications

Built to handle whatever you can throw at it, this is the last system your high powered C6 ZO6 will ever need. Call us to discuss your needs and what this system can do for you.


Current lead time is 2-3 weeks, these were designed and will be built here at our World Class ARH manufacturing facility in Deer Park, NEW YORK.

SteveDoten@ARH

Priced at $2995, with connection pipes to the rear mufflers

dascorcha21

good stuff! think i met you down at ls fest!

gotjuice?

Great, May need to update from the 2 inch ones that are on mine. You need to make a 3.5 over the axle muffler now.

White_Lightning

Damn i thought they wouldnt fit so we went with your normal 2" headers..

Frans96ss

I will be testing these things out soon on this

Blackonblacksls

I emailed about these. Haven't heard back

schpenxel

Useless without pics..

SteveDoten@ARH

Having some computer upgrades here today and Thursday, apologize for anyone I may have missed.

Be back in the AM.

b16gsr

wow those are serious, nice job ARH.

0Shane@CountyCorvette

Great work ARH! I'm sure we'll use a set of these in the near future.

-Shane

0Jeremy@RPMTransmissions

These are awesome! Has any back to back testing been done with the 2"/3" version?

AR Headers

Jeremy, The gains may be very significant depending on the application. These headers are clearly for high horsepower applications similar to some of the builds that have gone thru RPM.

Nick
A.R. Headers

SteveDoten@ARH

[QUOTE=Frans96ss;1587950322]I will be testing these things out soon on this

Streetk14

So is ARH going to be switching over to V-bands across the board in the future? That's one feature I do miss from my Pfadt headers. ARH headers with V-bands and a 1-piece X-pipe would be a winner in my book.

SteveDoten@ARH

The V-bands really aren't going to benefit any street driven car, I personally drive 20,000 miles/year with the ARH ball/socket setup, no leaks.

Frans96ss

i agree.. The ARH ball and socket are perfectly fine..... even after years on a car with taking them on and off multiple times they are still perfect

Unreal

Vbands just make it a pain in the butt for systems to fit, since there is no play. That is one of the reasons certain brands that used them were such hit/miss on fitment/rubbing. With the variations in the cars, a mass produced vband system isn't really a good thing, unless you want to take a chance that they may or may not fit.

Now this system still needs some fab work or uses an extension with play to mate up to the back, so it isn't an issue using them, but a vband setup that bolts to OEM stuff is tough.

Streetk14

I don't have any problems with the ball & socket setup on my ARH headers, but the V-bands worked great on both sets of Pfadt headers I had. One of those sets had other issues, but that's another story. I guess the V-bands just seem less "old school" to me. I know there's no performance benefit.

Maybe it's the 1-piece X-pipe that I miss more than the V-bands. I know it's probably done that way (i.e. separate rear connecting pipes) for adjustability with different axle-back exhausts, but getting the adjustment right and having it stay that way is probably my one beef with my ARH headers. I just hate those slip-fit joints I guess.

Unreal

Yah, but from a manufacturing stand point, and keeping customers happy, their design is the best. If I was custom welding something up, I would do V-bands, but for something you want to sell and fit on every car, I wouldn't even consider it unless it was a connection you knew would have issues, something like a vband t-body where clearance/etc isn't an issue.