C6 Forced Induction/Nitrous C6 Corvette Turbochargers, Superchargers, Pulley Upgrades, Intercoolers, Wet and Dry Nitrous Injection, Meth
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

boosted Ls2's. ....lbs boost/hp?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-11-2015, 05:18 PM
  #21  
NormWild
Drifting
 
NormWild's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2008
Location: Lehigh Valley Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,955
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by schpenxel
How much boost is yours making?

Pretty sure the hp per psi is more like 25, but am interested in hearing from someone that has a better idea
Originally Posted by C U IN REARVEIW
is your 605whp number without meth? I see a 627whp number too....either way that is good power!
605 was without Meth on a different dyno, current numbers are on a Mustang Dyno with Methanol.

Boost is at 11 or 12 lbs., can't remember. It definitely wasn't 10. Run the 4.0 with full Meth and see what it makes. Easy to pulley down later. Don't get caught up in the numbers, T-trim is a beast on the top side for the street. Lots of guys make good peak numbers in cool weather but without the Meth they are making no where near that power in the summer, especially after a few pulls. I've seen more than a few 500 whp N/A cars whoop up on F/I guys making 150 more hp under ideal dyno conditions.

Last edited by NormWild; 05-11-2015 at 05:22 PM.
Old 05-11-2015, 10:52 PM
  #22  
C U IN REARVEIW
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
C U IN REARVEIW's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: ocean springs mississippi
Posts: 5,656
Received 110 Likes on 101 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NormWild
605 was without Meth on a different dyno, current numbers are on a Mustang Dyno with Methanol.

Boost is at 11 or 12 lbs., can't remember. It definitely wasn't 10. Run the 4.0 with full Meth and see what it makes. Easy to pulley down later. Don't get caught up in the numbers, T-trim is a beast on the top side for the street. Lots of guys make good peak numbers in cool weather but without the Meth they are making no where near that power in the summer, especially after a few pulls. I've seen more than a few 500 whp N/A cars whoop up on F/I guys making 150 more hp under ideal dyno conditions.
As it stands my tuner is planning a speed density tune with meth as a safety feature
Old 05-12-2015, 06:07 AM
  #23  
BoosTTed C6
Pro
 
BoosTTed C6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2011
Location: Colts Neck NJ
Posts: 564
Received 65 Likes on 48 Posts

Default

760 at 14 psi through 4.10s. Stock bottom end. 4 years and 15000 miles.
Old 05-12-2015, 08:15 AM
  #24  
schpenxel
Race Director
 
schpenxel's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 16,664
Received 1,194 Likes on 1,053 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15

Default

Originally Posted by C6SC
760 at 14 psi through 4.10s. Stock bottom end. 4 years and 15000 miles.
Ls2? Meth?
Old 05-13-2015, 11:21 AM
  #25  
C U IN REARVEIW
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
C U IN REARVEIW's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: ocean springs mississippi
Posts: 5,656
Received 110 Likes on 101 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NormWild
I've been running a 4.0 inch pulley since day one, car has always made good power (in my sig). Exact same set up as yours. I might be wrong but I remember for every 1 psi in boost you pick up about 10 hp. So a 3.8 won't make that much difference.

Use the Meth to make power, crank it up and spray it. The theory there is if you run your tune Meth dependent, when you don't have Meth (pump failure, run out) you want the ECU to yank all your timing and make the car fall on its face. Motors blow because of the knock you don't know you have.
When using meth for power you need to have iat sensor after meth injection point correct? So it can catch the temperature increases?
Old 05-13-2015, 11:25 AM
  #26  
C U IN REARVEIW
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
C U IN REARVEIW's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: ocean springs mississippi
Posts: 5,656
Received 110 Likes on 101 Posts

Default

Is there concern for climate/temperature changes when using speed density tune?
Old 05-13-2015, 01:02 PM
  #27  
schpenxel
Race Director
 
schpenxel's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 16,664
Received 1,194 Likes on 1,053 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15

Default

Originally Posted by C U IN REARVEIW
Is there concern for climate/temperature changes when using speed density tune?
I know I see a change in fuel trims from morning to evening that gets even worse if I'm sitting in traffic in the evening (in SD). In the morning something that's -2% fuel trims will be +2 or 3%

I have no idea if that's normal, but mine has always done that. I'm a fan of using a MAF sensor when it's feasible as the changes are much smaller (if any)
Old 05-13-2015, 01:03 PM
  #28  
schpenxel
Race Director
 
schpenxel's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 16,664
Received 1,194 Likes on 1,053 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15

Default

Originally Posted by C U IN REARVEIW
When using meth for power you need to have iat sensor after meth injection point correct? So it can catch the temperature increases?
Yes
Old 05-13-2015, 03:25 PM
  #29  
NormWild
Drifting
 
NormWild's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2008
Location: Lehigh Valley Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,955
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by C U IN REARVEIW
When using meth for power you need to have iat sensor after meth injection point correct? So it can catch the temperature increases?
Correct, if you are going SD Tune you can just spray before your MAF as you will no longer be using it. If you keep the MAF tune you will need to relocate your IAT which is located in the MAF housing (you can't spray over the MAF Sensor).

I'm sure your tuner already told you but going to SD you will need a 2 Bar MAP Sensor.
Old 05-13-2015, 03:28 PM
  #30  
NormWild
Drifting
 
NormWild's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2008
Location: Lehigh Valley Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,955
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by C U IN REARVEIW
Is there concern for climate/temperature changes when using speed density tune?
Primary reason I haven't gone SD. I've never heard a good explanation of how this is handled by the ECU. There really is no benefit of switching to SD, I looked to switch a bunch of times but was talked out of it.
Old 05-13-2015, 03:34 PM
  #31  
schpenxel
Race Director
 
schpenxel's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 16,664
Received 1,194 Likes on 1,053 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15

Default

Originally Posted by NormWild
Primary reason I haven't gone SD. I've never heard a good explanation of how this is handled by the ECU. There really is no benefit of switching to SD, I looked to switch a bunch of times but was talked out of it.
It uses volumetric efficiency to estimate airflow, not too complicated.

The VE table has volumetric efficiency values for different RPM/manifold pressures and from there can calculate how much air goes into each cylinder on each intake stroke.

It can and does work well, and the calculations are faster than reading a MAF (especially at lower/slower airflows) but I still see fuel trims change a lot more when using it vs. the MAF.
Old 05-13-2015, 03:47 PM
  #32  
NormWild
Drifting
 
NormWild's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2008
Location: Lehigh Valley Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,955
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by schpenxel
It uses volumetric efficiency to estimate airflow, not too complicated.

The VE table has volumetric efficiency values for different RPM/manifold pressures and from there can calculate how much air goes into each cylinder on each intake stroke.

It can and does work well, and the calculations are faster than reading a MAF (especially at lower/slower airflows) but I still see fuel trims change a lot more when using it vs. the MAF.
Thanks for the explanation, makes sense. I've looked to change, if for no other reason to clean up the charge tube and get rid of the MAF. But because there is no performance benefit I've left is alone.
Old 05-13-2015, 03:58 PM
  #33  
schpenxel
Race Director
 
schpenxel's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 16,664
Received 1,194 Likes on 1,053 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15

Default

Originally Posted by NormWild
Thanks for the explanation, makes sense. I've looked to change, if for no other reason to clean up the charge tube and get rid of the MAF. But because there is no performance benefit I've left is alone.
Yeah I wouldn't bother if what you have is working. I switched to the card style MAF to get rid of the ugly LS2 style MAF contraption but that was about it

I didn't explain volumetric efficiency very well.. Basically if a cylinders volume is 1 liter, and on the intake stroke at a particular MAP/RPM it will bring in 0.75 liters of air, then you could say the VE would be 75% for that point on the table. Obviously with a supercharger you can get over 100%
Old 05-13-2015, 09:26 PM
  #34  
C U IN REARVEIW
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
C U IN REARVEIW's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: ocean springs mississippi
Posts: 5,656
Received 110 Likes on 101 Posts

Default

Car made 530whp on 8 lbs of boost....? Pretty disappointing. ....since also using meth (post maf for protection only).

I spoke with tuner and he said he was surprised at that number as the car felt as if it was going to come off the dyno and said he thinks it is probably closer to 600whp (after expressing my disappointment). ......? Said it was pretty humid/hot evening (south Mississippi) and it only made 8lbs but would be closer to 10lbs in a cooler environment. ....his building is really hot normally.....thoughts

Last edited by C U IN REARVEIW; 05-13-2015 at 09:29 PM.
Old 05-13-2015, 09:36 PM
  #35  
Arctic Vette
Melting Slicks
 
Arctic Vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,299
Received 25 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Sorry to hear id be disappointed too..
Old 05-13-2015, 10:20 PM
  #36  
schpenxel
Race Director
 
schpenxel's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 16,664
Received 1,194 Likes on 1,053 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15

Default

Yeah I thought you'd see a little more than that too.. got a graph/afr/timing?
Old 05-13-2015, 10:49 PM
  #37  
Detoxx03
Safety Car
 
Detoxx03's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2010
Location: Detroit
Posts: 4,150
Received 377 Likes on 245 Posts

Default

Seems way off. I would actually use the meth unless your tuner doesn't know how to tune it.

Last edited by Detoxx03; 05-13-2015 at 10:52 PM.

Get notified of new replies

To boosted Ls2's. ....lbs boost/hp?

Old 05-13-2015, 11:08 PM
  #38  
C U IN REARVEIW
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
C U IN REARVEIW's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: ocean springs mississippi
Posts: 5,656
Received 110 Likes on 101 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by schpenxel
Yeah I thought you'd see a little more than that too.. got a graph/afr/timing?
I am picking the car up tomorrow. Not sure if he will presenthave a print out ready, but will ask for one. tuner seems to know his stuff and has produced some nice results on various build....not sure what's up. ....dyno off (dynojet)?
Old 05-13-2015, 11:14 PM
  #39  
C U IN REARVEIW
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
C U IN REARVEIW's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: ocean springs mississippi
Posts: 5,656
Received 110 Likes on 101 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Detoxx03
Seems way off. I would actually use the meth unless your tuner doesn't know how to tune it.
Was planning to as i did an iat relocation kit w/ ls3 maf (2005 car) and he said where the meth was spraying it would corrode iat sensor. ...so we did speed density tune and sprayed meth on top for safety....? So basically the car is not recofnizing any of the benefits from the meth.....How much power would be lost in a 85* humid dyno atmosphere?
Old 05-13-2015, 11:15 PM
  #40  
C U IN REARVEIW
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
C U IN REARVEIW's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: ocean springs mississippi
Posts: 5,656
Received 110 Likes on 101 Posts

Default

Would this be considered a safe setup? Would sacrifice some power for longjevity. ..


Quick Reply: boosted Ls2's. ....lbs boost/hp?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:09 AM.