LS2 with L76 intake, L92 heads and cheater cam
02-10-2007, 02:34 PM
#1
Drifting
Thread Starter
Member Since: Sep 2002
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LS2 with L76 intake, L92 heads and cheater cam
so I am thinking of this combo...
Vararam CAI, L76 intake, ported TB, L92 heads (possibly milled to keep stock compression ratio), Thunder racing cheatr camshaft ( 214/230 .601/.578 117 LSA.) and AR headers with corsa sport exhaust and HPtuned...
so what do you think it will make in RWHP?
I am thinking around 450RWHP....
similar combo from another forum member....
honker CAI, ported TB, Fast intake, AFR 205 cc heads, thunder racing cheaTR camshaft (214/230 .601/.578 117 LSA.) full length headers with stock catback and he is making around 450RWHP...
Vararam CAI, L76 intake, ported TB, L92 heads (possibly milled to keep stock compression ratio), Thunder racing cheatr camshaft ( 214/230 .601/.578 117 LSA.) and AR headers with corsa sport exhaust and HPtuned...
so what do you think it will make in RWHP?
I am thinking around 450RWHP....
similar combo from another forum member....
honker CAI, ported TB, Fast intake, AFR 205 cc heads, thunder racing cheaTR camshaft (214/230 .601/.578 117 LSA.) full length headers with stock catback and he is making around 450RWHP...
02-10-2007, 02:47 PM
#2
Moderator
Member Since: Dec 2002
Location: Lakewood Ranch, FL
Posts: 40,065
Received 3,578 Likes
on
1,619 Posts
Just wondering why Chev doesn't use this kind of conbination out the door?
02-10-2007, 07:10 PM
#4
Pro
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: San Antonio Texas
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sounds good but i would get a bigger cam
Torquer V.3 Camshaft
231/234 .643"/.598" 111 LSA
http://texas-speed.com/shop/item.asp?itemid=669
Torquer V.3 Camshaft
231/234 .643"/.598" 111 LSA
http://texas-speed.com/shop/item.asp?itemid=669
Last edited by vr6aaron; 02-10-2007 at 07:52 PM.
02-10-2007, 08:50 PM
#5
Drifting
02-12-2007, 10:04 PM
#9
Heel & Toe
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Indianapolis IN
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
He probably doesn't want more lope at idle...unless that one ^^ is stealthier than it appears. But to the original poster, are you doing any fuel system upgrades, or do you think the ls2 can handle 450? Just wondering
02-13-2007, 10:24 AM
#10
Tech Contributor
Why go through all that when a cam only swap will net you 435rwhp with a texas speed torquer II for half the price installed.
02-15-2007, 10:24 AM
#14
I think you may need more duration with that heads\intake combo.. Although, I think you are on the right path with the intake\exhaust split will be good because the exhaust on the L92 heads don't flow that well on the exhaust side...
02-15-2007, 10:30 AM
#15
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Jan 2003
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 8,596
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes
on
15 Posts
Big power, little cam
Here are results from a head, cam and header package that I completed and tuned last night.
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=659243
The heads I used are TSP stage 2.5 LS6 castings, American Racing headers, and LPE GT11 cam that has similar numbers to the "cheater" cam that you are considering. It has more lift at .631/.644 and is ground on a 118 LSA. I got 440 RWHP and 406 RWTQ out of this combination. That is just shy of 6hp from one C6 Z that I dyno'd last year!
The car also retains the STOCK rear exhaust, and it also has a LS2 Port Works ported intake.
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=659243
The heads I used are TSP stage 2.5 LS6 castings, American Racing headers, and LPE GT11 cam that has similar numbers to the "cheater" cam that you are considering. It has more lift at .631/.644 and is ground on a 118 LSA. I got 440 RWHP and 406 RWTQ out of this combination. That is just shy of 6hp from one C6 Z that I dyno'd last year!
The car also retains the STOCK rear exhaust, and it also has a LS2 Port Works ported intake.
02-15-2007, 02:17 PM
#16
Tech Contributor
TJwong's power was measured on a mustang dyno which gives lower numbers than a dynojet. His car is also a A6 so they may very well be 30rwhp off what a M6 on a dynojet would show. Great gains as low as 1500rpm. Good combo.
The exhaust being stock doesnt change anything. Testing has repeatedly shown no gain for the corsas you are planning on installing. Call cartek and ask them if you need convincing.
The exhaust being stock doesnt change anything. Testing has repeatedly shown no gain for the corsas you are planning on installing. Call cartek and ask them if you need convincing.
02-15-2007, 04:07 PM
#17
TJwong's power was measured on a mustang dyno which gives lower numbers than a dynojet. His car is also a A6 so they may very well be 30rwhp off what a M6 on a dynojet would show. Great gains as low as 1500rpm. Good combo.
The exhaust being stock doesnt change anything. Testing has repeatedly shown no gain for the corsas you are planning on installing. Call cartek and ask them if you need convincing.
The exhaust being stock doesnt change anything. Testing has repeatedly shown no gain for the corsas you are planning on installing. Call cartek and ask them if you need convincing.
SpinMonster... It was a Mustang Dyno, but it looked like the stock numbers were close to what dynojet guys are putting down... I could be wrong, just an observation...
Great results!!! I bet it it a really nice street setup... It's nice to have a car with stock manners and still put down serious power! I bet that car is a blast to drive... Congrats!
Last edited by xstang; 02-15-2007 at 04:11 PM.
03-23-2007, 08:58 AM
#20
Drifting
