Stock Ported LS3 manifold vs Ported Fast 102
#1
Stock Ported LS3 manifold vs Ported Fast 102
i have a full bolt on cammed c6 making 476rwhp and 410rwtq.
im planning to do my heads also and was wondering should i just have my Stock ls3 and throttle body ported or should i go with a Ported Fast 102 and nick williams 102 throttle body.
will there a big gain with the Ported Fast 102 and nick williams 102 throttle body over the Ported LS3 manifold and stock throttle body or should i just save my money and go with the heads and ported ls3 manifold.
thanks
im planning to do my heads also and was wondering should i just have my Stock ls3 and throttle body ported or should i go with a Ported Fast 102 and nick williams 102 throttle body.
will there a big gain with the Ported Fast 102 and nick williams 102 throttle body over the Ported LS3 manifold and stock throttle body or should i just save my money and go with the heads and ported ls3 manifold.
thanks
#2
Race Director
Member Since: Mar 2007
Location: Missouri City Texas
Posts: 11,331
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes
on
14 Posts
The FAST will probably not pick up a lot of peak power over the ported LS3, but you will pick up very nice power under the curve.
Personally I'd stick with a stock ported TB rather than going to a 102 (would rather spend the money elsewhere).
Personally I'd stick with a stock ported TB rather than going to a 102 (would rather spend the money elsewhere).
#3
Le Mans Master
#4
Team Owner
#5
Race Director
Member Since: Mar 2011
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 13,249
Received 3,066 Likes
on
2,073 Posts
2021 C6 of the Year Finalist - Modified
I got almost zero gain from just smoothing the opening of a stock TB on an LS1 heads, headers, cam car before.
If you want more airflow from the TB ... you need to get a TB with a larger diameter blade in it.
#6
Race Director
Member Since: Aug 2005
Location: Hudson WI
Posts: 13,598
Received 181 Likes
on
162 Posts
NCM Sinkhole Donor
LS2's pick up a bunch, GM fixed the intake on the LS3. I am putting LS3 heads on my LS2 and have a FAST 102 just because I think i want it. If I didn't already have it I would have bought an LS3 intake and been very happy after having it ported.
#7
Ive seen results showing three very well known porters "ported" ls3 intakes loose power to stock.
If it were me the only choice would be stock or FAST. I have the FAST on mine, I researched and have 5-6 decent graphs all showing gains over stock.
If it were me the only choice would be stock or FAST. I have the FAST on mine, I researched and have 5-6 decent graphs all showing gains over stock.
#8
Race Director
Member Since: Mar 2007
Location: Missouri City Texas
Posts: 11,331
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes
on
14 Posts
When you say you would opt for a ported throttle body ... are you talking about a throttle body with a larger diameter throttle blade in it?
I got almost zero gain from just smoothing the opening of a stock TB on an LS1 heads, headers, cam car before.
If you want more airflow from the TB ... you need to get a TB with a larger diameter blade in it.
I got almost zero gain from just smoothing the opening of a stock TB on an LS1 heads, headers, cam car before.
If you want more airflow from the TB ... you need to get a TB with a larger diameter blade in it.
#9
Burning Brakes
has anyone ever drag tested a Fast intake on a stock or near stock ls3 and seen an improvement? dyno improvements are nice but if there is no improvment at the track it doesn't mean much.