Headers and Tune good for +40 RWHP increase on stock LS3?
#21
1 3/4 Headers for stock LS3 A6?
Personally if the car is going to stay close to stock....1 7/8 is not the way to go on the 6.2L in the Vette.
2008 LS3 M6 Corvette before and after LG CAI and 1 3/4 SPro header
before dyno with B&B PRT,
vs
LG SPro 1 3/4 headers
High flow cats
LG Carbon CAI
LG Dyno tune
2009 LS3 M6 Corvette Baseline with cold air, after with LG S. Pro 1 3/4 headers and tune.
2008 LS3 M6 before and after Street Series headers and cold air induction
2008 LS3 M6 Corvette before and after LG CAI and 1 3/4 SPro header
before dyno with B&B PRT,
vs
LG SPro 1 3/4 headers
High flow cats
LG Carbon CAI
LG Dyno tune
2009 LS3 M6 Corvette Baseline with cold air, after with LG S. Pro 1 3/4 headers and tune.
2008 LS3 M6 before and after Street Series headers and cold air induction
Please advise?
Thanks,
Paul
#23
Race Director
Your dealer may be OK with headers but your dealers boss (GM) isn't. Headers will kill your Warranty since you messed with the pollution controls (O2 sensors deleted or moved).
#26
There seems to be a lot of folks here that have installed headers on there C6 / LS3.
A bone stock LS3 / A6 will normally make about 370 RWHP (SAE corrected) on a DynoJet.
Will adding a set of headers with cats, along with a good tune get an increase of about 40 RWHP (370 + 40 = 410 RWHP)?
Again, this is on a bone stock LS3 GS with A6 trans.
Thanks for your opinion ...
A bone stock LS3 / A6 will normally make about 370 RWHP (SAE corrected) on a DynoJet.
Will adding a set of headers with cats, along with a good tune get an increase of about 40 RWHP (370 + 40 = 410 RWHP)?
Again, this is on a bone stock LS3 GS with A6 trans.
Thanks for your opinion ...
#27
Safety Car
Hi, my car is a 2013 C6 A6 LS3 with factory NPP. I did LG Motorsport 1'7/8 Super Pro Headers. Before install the car put down 366RWHP stock, after install. I went to 393 RWHP/391TRQ. kEEP in mind this is just headers only, no other mods whatsoever, stock air box and dynoed at 5000+ feet of elevation.
Last edited by Seadawg; 02-10-2016 at 07:14 AM.
#30
On my '13 A6, I went from 366/380 to 439/451 RWHP/RWTQ with a set of Pfadt 1.75" LT's and midpipe w/ cats, Halltech MF107R, 160 stat, tune by Lethal Racing in Lafayette, LA. Dynocom dyno. So a little over 70 HP gains. Unfortunately, you won't be able to find these headers anywhere anymore, but I would think you should be able to get 50-55 hp out of any good set of longtubes and a tune, and an extra 5-10 out of a good CAI and a tuner who knows what they're doing with the MAF tuning.
Really looking forward to seeing how the Pfadt's perform once I throw a bigger cam in...hoping for 500RWHP without doing any head/crank/block work.
Really looking forward to seeing how the Pfadt's perform once I throw a bigger cam in...hoping for 500RWHP without doing any head/crank/block work.
#31
Advanced
On my '13 A6, I went from 366/380 to 439/451 RWHP/RWTQ with a set of Pfadt 1.75" LT's and midpipe w/ cats, Halltech MF107R, 160 stat, tune by Lethal Racing in Lafayette, LA. Dynocom dyno. So a little over 70 HP gains. Unfortunately, you won't be able to find these headers anywhere anymore, but I would think you should be able to get 50-55 hp out of any good set of longtubes and a tune, and an extra 5-10 out of a good CAI and a tuner who knows what they're doing with the MAF tuning.
Really looking forward to seeing how the Pfadt's perform once I throw a bigger cam in...hoping for 500RWHP without doing any head/crank/block work.
Really looking forward to seeing how the Pfadt's perform once I throw a bigger cam in...hoping for 500RWHP without doing any head/crank/block work.
Mike
#32
I can assure you that the fit and finish of the Pfadt headers are exceptional, and from what I've seen, the power advantage is indeed there. Whether or not the cost is justifiable will be your call; I mostly went with them because of my research into the tri-y design (better exhaust scavenging, etc.). According to my shop, my car was one of the lowest baseline LS3's they've run, and one of the highest that they've run with just boltons/tuned.
Oh and they sound incredible too (but I have a set of B&B PRT's as well...)
#33
Safety Car
4 into 1 headers make the most HP from what I have read.
NO DYNO, only "real world" track results with a heavy Grand Sport (A6) and a 260 lb. driver = Approx. 3570 lbs.
There is a "formula" (within 1-2%) if you look for it using the cars weight with driver and mph at the end of the 1/4 mile to figure out real "Wheel Horse Power".
MY GS with: 1) 1 3/4" 4 into 1 headers running stock mufflers 2) OEM air intake converted to a CAI 3) Intune "93" canned tune 4) sticky tires, put down 125 mph in the 1/4 which is over 500HP, do the math.
Curb weight 2010 GS (A6) + drivers weight + 1/4 mile speed = RWHP
There is a "formula" (within 1-2%) if you look for it using the cars weight with driver and mph at the end of the 1/4 mile to figure out real "Wheel Horse Power".
MY GS with: 1) 1 3/4" 4 into 1 headers running stock mufflers 2) OEM air intake converted to a CAI 3) Intune "93" canned tune 4) sticky tires, put down 125 mph in the 1/4 which is over 500HP, do the math.
Curb weight 2010 GS (A6) + drivers weight + 1/4 mile speed = RWHP
Last edited by C7/Z06 Man; 02-05-2015 at 06:22 PM.
#34
NO DYNO, only "real world" track results with a heavy Grand Sport (A6) and a 260 lb. driver.
There is a "formula" (within 1-2%) if you look for it using the cars weight with driver and mph at the end of the 1/4 mile to figure out real "Wheel Horse Power".
MY GS with: 1) 1 3/4" 4 into 1 headers running stock mufflers 2) OEM air intake converted to a CAI 3) Intune "93" canned tune 4) sticky tires, put down 125 mph in the 1/4 which is over 500HP, do the math.
Curb weight 2010 GS (A6) + drivers weight + 1/4 mile speed = RWHP
There is a "formula" (within 1-2%) if you look for it using the cars weight with driver and mph at the end of the 1/4 mile to figure out real "Wheel Horse Power".
MY GS with: 1) 1 3/4" 4 into 1 headers running stock mufflers 2) OEM air intake converted to a CAI 3) Intune "93" canned tune 4) sticky tires, put down 125 mph in the 1/4 which is over 500HP, do the math.
Curb weight 2010 GS (A6) + drivers weight + 1/4 mile speed = RWHP
That number IS ACCURATE for engine horsepower, however. Why? Because my car makes around 510 at the flywheel.
What type of headers do you have? A 60 hp increase is still impressive, especially with a canned tune.
#35
Safety Car
I may agree but look for that 1/4 mile formula. My car has been 11.32 and that takes some hp with a stock converter and full weight car except for the headers and rear rims/tires I borrowed. You will find my Grand Sport time slip (Grand Sport Man) in the C6 fast list for more info.
PS: 11.4 on all Bridgestone runflats that weigh more than the OEM Goodyears (rotating weight). 3 lbs more each for the rear and I think 2 lbs. each more for the fronts.
PS: 11.4 on all Bridgestone runflats that weigh more than the OEM Goodyears (rotating weight). 3 lbs more each for the rear and I think 2 lbs. each more for the fronts.
Last edited by C7/Z06 Man; 02-06-2015 at 12:56 PM.
#36
I may agree but look for that 1/4 mile formula. My car has been 11.32 and that takes some hp with a stock converter and full weight car except for the headers and rear rims/tires I borrowed. You will find my Grand Sport time slip in the C6 fast list for more info.
PS: 11.4 on all Bridgestone runflats that weigh more then the OEM Goodyears (rotating weight). 3 lbs more each for the rear and I think 2 lbs. each more for the fronts.
PS: 11.4 on all Bridgestone runflats that weigh more then the OEM Goodyears (rotating weight). 3 lbs more each for the rear and I think 2 lbs. each more for the fronts.
Still awesome numbers for a near stock car. I have a bit of work (practice) to do before I get to low 11's
#37
Safety Car
Hmm...think the extra half second and 5 mph could be due to the slightly different gear ratios (2.56 vs 2.73) or possibly just strip conditions. Edit: and wider tires
Still awesome numbers for a near stock car. I have a bit of work (practice) to do before I get to low 11's
Still awesome numbers for a near stock car. I have a bit of work (practice) to do before I get to low 11's
#38
Safety Car
I have a question? My car still holds the GS "stock" record @12.31 and now with the mods that I have listed above has gone 11.32 and over 9 mph faster; So how much hp does it take to pick up approx. a full second and 9+ mph in the 1/4 mile in a 3570 lb. car?
PS: Horsepower is in the MPH not so much et. They say if you can get the mph than you can get the et.
Example: A car that is doing mid/low elevens with the addition of a good high stall torque converter may pick up a half second or more over the stock converter with no other changes, also a good converter due to the additional torque multiplication and "possible" better high rpm coupling (efficiency) may add additional mph over a stocker, too. Not all stock or aftermarket converters are created equal. High stall aftermarket torque converters are usually a smaller diameter & physically lighter (less rotating mass/weight) than the stock units which can add both acceleration & mph.
PS: Horsepower is in the MPH not so much et. They say if you can get the mph than you can get the et.
Example: A car that is doing mid/low elevens with the addition of a good high stall torque converter may pick up a half second or more over the stock converter with no other changes, also a good converter due to the additional torque multiplication and "possible" better high rpm coupling (efficiency) may add additional mph over a stocker, too. Not all stock or aftermarket converters are created equal. High stall aftermarket torque converters are usually a smaller diameter & physically lighter (less rotating mass/weight) than the stock units which can add both acceleration & mph.
Last edited by C7/Z06 Man; 02-06-2015 at 12:33 PM.
#39
Safety Car
My question has gone un-answered
So let me take a stab at answering how much HP it takes for each tenth of a second faster but remember the faster the car goes and the more it weighs will up the HP requirements per tenth.
The last article I read on this subject said the average "rule of thumb" was: 13 HP per tenth of a second.
"Stock" my cars best was 12.31.
So to get to 11.91 would equal = 52 HP (4 times 13)
I added "just" a homemade CAI and my best went from 12.31 to a 12.01 best.
According to the 13 hp per tenth rule of thumb average of the article and I have also read somewhere that a tenth is also equal to 1 mph. So that 11.32 or approx. 1 whole second pickup from stock and the 9+ mph makes sense i.e. 1 second = 10 mph.
Bottom line: 10 times 13 = +130 HP on that good air day to run that number.
The last article I read on this subject said the average "rule of thumb" was: 13 HP per tenth of a second.
"Stock" my cars best was 12.31.
So to get to 11.91 would equal = 52 HP (4 times 13)
I added "just" a homemade CAI and my best went from 12.31 to a 12.01 best.
According to the 13 hp per tenth rule of thumb average of the article and I have also read somewhere that a tenth is also equal to 1 mph. So that 11.32 or approx. 1 whole second pickup from stock and the 9+ mph makes sense i.e. 1 second = 10 mph.
Bottom line: 10 times 13 = +130 HP on that good air day to run that number.
#40
Burning Brakes
There seems to be a lot of folks here that have installed headers on there C6 / LS3.
A bone stock LS3 / A6 will normally make about 370 RWHP (SAE corrected) on a DynoJet.
Will adding a set of headers with cats, along with a good tune get an increase of about 40 RWHP (370 + 40 = 410 RWHP)?
Again, this is on a bone stock LS3 GS with A6 trans.
Thanks for your opinion ...
A bone stock LS3 / A6 will normally make about 370 RWHP (SAE corrected) on a DynoJet.
Will adding a set of headers with cats, along with a good tune get an increase of about 40 RWHP (370 + 40 = 410 RWHP)?
Again, this is on a bone stock LS3 GS with A6 trans.
Thanks for your opinion ...