[Z06] How about all wheel drive on some Zo6's
08-08-2005, 06:29 AM
#1
Drifting
Thread Starter
Member Since: May 2005
Location: santa rosa beach florida
Posts: 1,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How about all wheel drive on some Zo6's
I was just thinking out loud, if there were a Z with all wheel drive offered(like the porsche), what would be the performance diff between that and the rear wheel drive? Or would it be worth the trouble? 
08-08-2005, 07:46 AM
#3
Burning Brakes
Originally Posted by blandcastle
I was just thinking out loud, if there were a Z with all wheel drive offered(like the porsche), what would be the performance diff between that and the rear wheel drive? Or would it be worth the trouble?
08-08-2005, 09:42 AM
#4
Team Owner
Member Since: Aug 2000
Posts: 67,942
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
St. Jude Donor '12
2012 Election Contest Winner
Originally Posted by BBQ
It seems logical that this would be the next step...on C7? Although some on this board will cry about weight. Audi, Lambo, porsche all seem to have a winning formula with it.
08-08-2005, 10:55 AM
#5
Le Mans Master
AWD sucks. 
It adds weight (200lb?
) and robs of power.
The only thing it’s good for is launching, although if you do launch to take advantage of the traction AWD provides, it’s incredibly hard on driveline.
Just look at all the AWD exotics. They can’t take more than a few dozen launches before destroying their clutches etc.
Also take a look at all “high performance” versions of any cars that come with AWD – they are RWD for a good reason - Porsche GT3, GT2, Diablo SV.
I’m sure they’ll make a high performance version of Murcielago which will be RWD too, mark my words
It adds weight (200lb?
) and robs of power.The only thing it’s good for is launching, although if you do launch to take advantage of the traction AWD provides, it’s incredibly hard on driveline.
Just look at all the AWD exotics. They can’t take more than a few dozen launches before destroying their clutches etc.
Also take a look at all “high performance” versions of any cars that come with AWD – they are RWD for a good reason - Porsche GT3, GT2, Diablo SV.
I’m sure they’ll make a high performance version of Murcielago which will be RWD too, mark my words
08-08-2005, 11:17 AM
#6
Drifting
Member Since: Jul 2002
Location: Sayville NY
Posts: 1,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by blandcastle
I was just thinking out loud, if there were a Z with all wheel drive offered(like the porsche), what would be the performance diff between that and the rear wheel drive? Or would it be worth the trouble?
Adds weight
Robs power
Most race cars are rwd for a reason (F1, nascar, lemans...)
Costs more
Kills longevity
Harder to repair
08-08-2005, 11:21 AM
#7
Safety Car
Originally Posted by EuG
AWD sucks.
It adds weight (200lb? ) and robs of power.
The only thing it’s good for is launching, although if you do launch to take advantage of the traction AWD provides, it’s incredibly hard on driveline.
Just look at all the AWD exotics. They can’t take more than a few dozen launches before destroying their clutches etc.
Also take a look at all “high performance” versions of any cars that come with AWD – they are RWD for a good reason - Porsche GT3, GT2, Diablo SV.
I’m sure they’ll make a high performance version of Murcielago which will be RWD too, mark my words
It adds weight (200lb?
) and robs of power.The only thing it’s good for is launching, although if you do launch to take advantage of the traction AWD provides, it’s incredibly hard on driveline.
Just look at all the AWD exotics. They can’t take more than a few dozen launches before destroying their clutches etc.
Also take a look at all “high performance” versions of any cars that come with AWD – they are RWD for a good reason - Porsche GT3, GT2, Diablo SV.
I’m sure they’ll make a high performance version of Murcielago which will be RWD too, mark my words
08-08-2005, 02:51 PM
#8
Heel & Toe
Member Since: May 2005
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would go for a awd Z06. Sure, it may add some weight and rob some power, but it would also let you put power down much easier. Imagine running a stiff road race suspension, with street tires, and being able to hook up with 600+ hp. I've been reading up on 996TT's and they really dont seem to have much, if any, problems with the awd system holding up to increased power. Oh, and I think the reason race cars are RWD and not AWD is not necesarily because RWD is better, but because AWD isnt allowed under the rules/regs of most sanctioning bodies. GT2's and GT3's are RWD I believe for homolgation (sp?).
Bring on the AWD C7 Z06!
Bring on the AWD C7 Z06!
08-08-2005, 02:59 PM
#9
Safety Car
Originally Posted by ChaseN
I would go for a awd Z06. Sure, it may add some weight and rob some power, but it would also let you put power down much easier. Imagine running a stiff road race suspension, with street tires, and being able to hook up with 600+ hp. I've been reading up on 996TT's and they really dont seem to have much, if any, problems with the awd system holding up to increased power. Oh, and I think the reason race cars are RWD and not AWD is not necesarily because RWD is better, but because AWD isnt allowed under the rules/regs of most sanctioning bodies. GT2's and GT3's are RWD I believe for homolgation (sp?).
Bring on the AWD C7 Z06!
Bring on the AWD C7 Z06!
08-08-2005, 04:14 PM
#12
Burning Brakes
Originally Posted by ChaseN
I would go for a awd Z06. Sure, it may add some weight and rob some power, but it would also let you put power down much easier. Imagine running a stiff road race suspension, with street tires, and being able to hook up with 600+ hp. I've been reading up on 996TT's and they really dont seem to have much, if any, problems with the awd system holding up to increased power. Oh, and I think the reason race cars are RWD and not AWD is not necesarily because RWD is better, but because AWD isnt allowed under the rules/regs of most sanctioning bodies. GT2's and GT3's are RWD I believe for homolgation (sp?).
Bring on the AWD C7 Z06!
Bring on the AWD C7 Z06!
08-08-2005, 04:19 PM
#13
Team Owner
All of you who think it is less reliable need to seriously look at Subaru - bone-dead reliable. Period. Yes, it adds weight, but damn does it allow you to hook the power, and the handling difference (even in the dry) with AWD makes it all worth while.
08-08-2005, 04:29 PM
#16
Get Some!
Originally Posted by EuG
AWD sucks.
It adds weight (200lb? ) and robs of power.
The only thing it’s good for is launching, although if you do launch to take advantage of the traction AWD provides, it’s incredibly hard on driveline.
Just look at all the AWD exotics. They can’t take more than a few dozen launches before destroying their clutches etc.
Also take a look at all “high performance” versions of any cars that come with AWD – they are RWD for a good reason - Porsche GT3, GT2, Diablo SV.
I’m sure they’ll make a high performance version of Murcielago which will be RWD too, mark my words
It adds weight (200lb?
) and robs of power.The only thing it’s good for is launching, although if you do launch to take advantage of the traction AWD provides, it’s incredibly hard on driveline.
Just look at all the AWD exotics. They can’t take more than a few dozen launches before destroying their clutches etc.
Also take a look at all “high performance” versions of any cars that come with AWD – they are RWD for a good reason - Porsche GT3, GT2, Diablo SV.
I’m sure they’ll make a high performance version of Murcielago which will be RWD too, mark my words
And will raise the engine height and therefore the center of gravity, I don't want it or need it in a Z06 style car.
08-08-2005, 04:33 PM
#17
☠☣☢ Semper Ebrius ☢☣☠
Originally Posted by MAJ Z06
And will raise the engine height and therefore the center of gravity, I don't want it or need it in a Z06 style car.
08-08-2005, 04:53 PM
#18
Get Some!
Originally Posted by Scissors
Serious.
Last edited by LTC Z06; 08-08-2005 at 04:55 PM.
08-08-2005, 05:00 PM
#19
Safety Car
Originally Posted by EuG
AWD sucks.
It adds weight (200lb? ) and robs of power.
The only thing it’s good for is launching, although if you do launch to take advantage of the traction AWD provides, it’s incredibly hard on driveline.
Just look at all the AWD exotics. They can’t take more than a few dozen launches before destroying their clutches etc.
It adds weight (200lb?
) and robs of power.The only thing it’s good for is launching, although if you do launch to take advantage of the traction AWD provides, it’s incredibly hard on driveline.
Just look at all the AWD exotics. They can’t take more than a few dozen launches before destroying their clutches etc.
SCCA weight penalized the snot out of them and they still kicked butt...
Then they come back to SCCA and kicked butt AGAIN in the SpeedGT races...won the title 2 years in a row...Audi Sports Site
But there is the question of how to package that in the C6...not easy to do. Would take a total rethink of the way the Z06 was layed out. Don't see that happening anytime soon, since they spent so much money on R&D for the new Z...
Would be an interesting car though...pull the corners in all weather conditions. Racing would be fun with AWD...
(EuG) Not picking on you...you were the first post that I clicked on...
Last edited by 1991Z07; 08-08-2005 at 07:09 PM. Reason: Typo
08-08-2005, 06:11 PM
#20
Team Owner
Originally Posted by Scissors
Serious.
You boys never heard of running the drive-shafts through the oil pan. Don't they do this right now on the in-line 6 in the blazer equivalent? Centre of gravity need not change. Chevy had a TT LT5 with shafts through the oil pan back in 90.