[Z06] Is this torque management?
#1
Cruising
Thread Starter
Member Since: Sep 2003
Location: TX
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is this torque management?
I revved up to about 3000 rpm and quickly released the clutch, which caused some clutch slip. Then at about 5700 rpm the engine would shut down, I shifted to 2nd and the engine went all the way to 7000 rpm with no problem. I tried this 3 times the same way and each time the engine would shut down at around 5700 rpm in first gear. After those tries, I went back to just a 2000 rpm launch, and first gear did just normal and the engine went to 7000 rpm. I did have both active handling and traction control turned off on all the above launches. I've never had the engine shut down in any previous corvette with the traction control and active handling turned off. Torque management is the only thought that comes to mind.
#6
Race Director
Originally Posted by dennis50nj
no tm retards timing shuts trottlebody
So Tm retards the timing and as a result shuts the throttle body?
#7
Race Director
Member Since: Aug 2000
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 10,649
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes
on
20 Posts
In first gear, when traction is very good and the tires are hooked, if you have the throttle on the floor, then your will hit the rev limiter way before the tac says you're at 7000.
On the C5Z we called that phenomenom "tac lag."
Some members are skeptical that the C6Z has tac lag. But mine does in those conditions; I've hit the limiter in 1st gear twice in 16 passes at an indicated 6000-6200 rpm. Once with a 3000 rpm launch in stock tires and the other a 3800 launch on DRs.
This 1st gear tac lag puts a premium on learning to internalize the rhythm of the LS7. That takes making passes and learning to feel with all the senses how close 7000 is while the rpms are eploding upward.
Ranger
On the C5Z we called that phenomenom "tac lag."
Some members are skeptical that the C6Z has tac lag. But mine does in those conditions; I've hit the limiter in 1st gear twice in 16 passes at an indicated 6000-6200 rpm. Once with a 3000 rpm launch in stock tires and the other a 3800 launch on DRs.
This 1st gear tac lag puts a premium on learning to internalize the rhythm of the LS7. That takes making passes and learning to feel with all the senses how close 7000 is while the rpms are eploding upward.
Ranger
Last edited by Ranger; 04-05-2006 at 01:29 PM.
#8
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Fallston Maryland
Posts: 6,635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ranger
In first gear, when traction is very good and the tires are hooked, if you have the throttle on the floor, then your will hit the rev limiter way before the tac says you're at 7000.
On the C5Z we called that phenomenom "tac lag."
Some members are skeptical that the C6Z has tac lag. But mine does in those conditions; I've hit the limiter in 1st gear twice in 16 passes at an indicated 6000-6200 rpm. Once with a 3000 rpm launch in stock tires and the other a 3800 launch on DRs.
Ranger
On the C5Z we called that phenomenom "tac lag."
Some members are skeptical that the C6Z has tac lag. But mine does in those conditions; I've hit the limiter in 1st gear twice in 16 passes at an indicated 6000-6200 rpm. Once with a 3000 rpm launch in stock tires and the other a 3800 launch on DRs.
Ranger
limiter.
#9
Originally Posted by outnumbered
So what you are saying is the TM lowers the rev limiter when it engages?I remember your day at MIR you had mentioned the lower rpm
limiter.
limiter.
At least that was my take on the explanation.
#10
Race Director
Member Since: Aug 2000
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 10,649
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes
on
20 Posts
Originally Posted by outnumbered
So what you are saying is the TM lowers the rev limiter when it engages?I remember your day at MIR you had mentioned the lower rpm
limiter.
limiter.
In the conditions Roadrunner2 (and I) described, the motor revs so fast in 1st gear that the tacometer reading lags behind the actual rpm of the motor. That means you hit the limiter (7100 actual) while the tacometer is showing around 6K plus or minus a few hundred.
The C5Z did the same thing in 1st gear in the conditions described.
Ranger
#11
Race Director
Originally Posted by Ranger
Sorry I wasn't more clear, outnumbered. TM plays no role in this.
In the conditions Roadrunner2 (and I) described, the motor revs so fast in 1st gear that the tacometer reading lags behind the actual rpm of the motor. That means you hit the limited (7100 actual) while the tacometer is showing around 6K plus or minus a few hundred.
The C5Z did the same thing in 1st gear in the conditions described.
Ranger
In the conditions Roadrunner2 (and I) described, the motor revs so fast in 1st gear that the tacometer reading lags behind the actual rpm of the motor. That means you hit the limited (7100 actual) while the tacometer is showing around 6K plus or minus a few hundred.
The C5Z did the same thing in 1st gear in the conditions described.
Ranger
#12
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Fallston Maryland
Posts: 6,635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ranger
Sorry I wasn't more clear, outnumbered. TM plays no role in this.
In the conditions Roadrunner2 (and I) described, the motor revs so fast in 1st gear that the tacometer reading lags behind the actual rpm of the motor. That means you hit the limiter (7100 actual) while the tacometer is showing around 6K plus or minus a few hundred.
The C5Z did the same thing in 1st gear in the conditions described.
Ranger
In the conditions Roadrunner2 (and I) described, the motor revs so fast in 1st gear that the tacometer reading lags behind the actual rpm of the motor. That means you hit the limiter (7100 actual) while the tacometer is showing around 6K plus or minus a few hundred.
The C5Z did the same thing in 1st gear in the conditions described.
Ranger
your participation on the forum.
#13
Race Director
Member Since: Aug 2000
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 10,649
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes
on
20 Posts
Originally Posted by Joe0121
Is it the same tacometer?
The central point is that best acceleration is had shifting as close to the limiter as possible without kissing it. But because of tac lag, that is a challenge in 1st gear and takes practice.
Ranger
#15
Safety Car
Originally Posted by Ranger
Sorry I wasn't more clear, outnumbered. TM plays no role in this.
In the conditions Roadrunner2 (and I) described, the motor revs so fast in 1st gear that the tacometer reading lags behind the actual rpm of the motor. That means you hit the limiter (7100 actual) while the tacometer is showing around 6K plus or minus a few hundred.
The C5Z did the same thing in 1st gear in the conditions described.
Ranger
In the conditions Roadrunner2 (and I) described, the motor revs so fast in 1st gear that the tacometer reading lags behind the actual rpm of the motor. That means you hit the limiter (7100 actual) while the tacometer is showing around 6K plus or minus a few hundred.
The C5Z did the same thing in 1st gear in the conditions described.
Ranger
Is the digital HUD just as limited in its ability to chase the engine electronics ?
#16
Race Director
Member Since: Aug 2000
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 10,649
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes
on
20 Posts
Originally Posted by bernrex
I've frequently experienced a tach lag of 200-300 RPM's. But, 1000 seems outrageous.
Is the digital HUD just as limited in its ability to chase the engine electronics ?
Is the digital HUD just as limited in its ability to chase the engine electronics ?
I turn off the HUD at the drags and rarely look at the tac in first gear unless I hit the limiter. Then I look and log the approximate rpm that was showing.
Ranger
#17
Cruising
Thread Starter
Member Since: Sep 2003
Location: TX
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ranger
Dunno, Doc.
I turn off the HUD at the drags and rarely look at the tac in first gear unless I hit the limiter. Then I look and log the approximate rpm that was showing.
Ranger
I turn off the HUD at the drags and rarely look at the tac in first gear unless I hit the limiter. Then I look and log the approximate rpm that was showing.
Ranger
#19
Le Mans Master
I've never experienced that much tach lag. My first thought is that the HUD does not have that kind of lag. It would be interesting to see someone verify whether or not this occurs on the HUD. It would then make sense to use the HUD instead of the tach in these conditions.