[Z06] Carbon Fiber drive shaft.
#2
Race Director
As far as I know only one company makes a CF drive-shaft for the Vette and LG Motorsports has a agreement with them to sell it. There are many good reasons to go with the CF shaft(higher criticle speed, lighter rotational mass,...), but it is expensive.
#5
when i asked I got a response that the CF drive shaft was 1-2 pounds HEAVIER than stock, there is only one reason to go CF is if you're making big power, enough to break the stock driveshaft.
#6
Instructor
The Pfadt Carbon Fiber unit weighs 3.6lbs on my scale. It uses extremely strong hardware (The nuts that are supplied are 8740, the studs are 17-4PH)
Aaron Pfadt was asked about drag racing. His response:
Aaron Pfadt was asked about drag racing. His response:
We have not only analysed the system in CAD with FEA, we have verified these parts on our test fixture to 2300 lb-ft of torque - and to 1350 lb-ft of torque 500,000 times. We have also raced with this part in our 558 HP to the wheels race car for 2 seasons. This piece only sees engine torque in a Corvette application, you can not load this hard enough to break it. Josh designed this as a system, each component is designed to a specific load and safety factor. That way we have no piece that is out of sync with the other components and consequently too heavy or too weak.
Launch this part as hard as you would like with whatever drag tires you would like. You will not break it.
-Aaron
Launch this part as hard as you would like with whatever drag tires you would like. You will not break it.
-Aaron
#7
Instructor
Thread Starter
Member Since: Mar 2005
Location: Lodi California
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#8
Race Director
This shouldn't be the case with a properly sized CF shaft. It would reduce any NVH associated with the driveshaft, as the criticle speeds are much higher in a similar diameter CF shaft versus a aluminum or steel shaft.
I guess it could transmit tranny NVH a bit better, but that shouldn't be the case unless the tranny has a problem anyway.
#11
Safety Car
This shouldn't be the case with a properly sized CF shaft. It would reduce any NVH associated with the driveshaft, as the criticle speeds are much higher in a similar diameter CF shaft versus a aluminum or steel shaft.
I guess it could transmit tranny NVH a bit better, but that shouldn't be the case unless the tranny has a problem anyway.
I guess it could transmit tranny NVH a bit better, but that shouldn't be the case unless the tranny has a problem anyway.
#12
Instructor
Thread Starter
Member Since: Mar 2005
Location: Lodi California
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Any time you start getting rid of pieces with dampening capability, you're going to gain transferred NVH. I don't think he was saying that the driveshaft will generate it, but just transmit it. Remember, the driveshaft is ultimately tied to the wheels... it's going to transmit anything those pick up, be it bumps in the road, vibration from the tire, etc.
#13
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Jan 2003
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 8,596
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes
on
15 Posts
Any time you start getting rid of pieces with dampening capability, you're going to gain transferred NVH. I don't think he was saying that the driveshaft will generate it, but just transmit it. Remember, the driveshaft is ultimately tied to the wheels... it's going to transmit anything those pick up, be it bumps in the road, vibration from the tire, etc.
#15
Former Vendor
We have had great luck with the ones from LGM. You can either run both rubbers, one rubber or none. I think they suggest running one rubber and one solid mount. We have done it about all the way possible. I run two rubbers in my racecar and it works very well!
Randy
Randy
#16
Former Vendor
Member Since: Aug 2005
Location: Lewisville TX
Posts: 16,898
Received 406 Likes
on
300 Posts
St. Jude Donor '03-'04-'05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13
We ran them in the Challenge cars since 2004, as well as a number of other Corvette teams ran our shafts in their cars too. Track proven products that are guaranteed to last!
The biggest factor with these shafts was not weight, and ours comes in right about stock weight, but strength and twist. The main goal is to reduce twist and deflection in the shaft to better put the power to the ground and keep you on the road without having to worry about broken shafts.
We have been working with ACPT for our driveshaft needs in all of the race cars for a number of years now, back to the TransAm days.
#17
and we got a bunch of people saying they are lighter, LGM says same weight, Hinson says theirs is 1-2 pounds heavier and some members saying making them sound lighter...
#18
Former Vendor
If you break my shaft, Ill replace it free of charge.
I dont care if someone says it wont break. I have customers that will break anything Its how you stand behind it when things do go wrong.
I dont care if someone says it wont break. I have customers that will break anything Its how you stand behind it when things do go wrong.
#19
I used the LG carbon shaft in my build. I replaced one of the rubber couplers with the aluminium piece
.
The shaft fitted up fine and I've done 3k+ miles since it was installed, without any problems.
I haven't noticed any increase in NVH as a direct consequence of fitting the carbon shaft and the single aluminium coupler.
There has been a increase in NVH as a consequence of fitting the Exedy GTO4SD clutch, which very much changes the nature of the car.
All things considered, I don't find that too hard to live with, though others may find it intrusive.
The car without doubt launches in a far more positive and predictable fashion compared to the standard setup - the drive line feels far less 'soft' and has much less 'slop'.
I find it much easier to modulate the take off.
I decided to use the Carbon shaft because, quite simply, I think it is a better product than the standard offering - it is certainly stronger.
Regarding benefits and power gains from reduction of rotating mass of the carbon shaft - well my own two cents would be that there would be small benefit to be had in that area, because of the relatively small radius of the shaft.
Perhaps from the point of view of both cost and mechanics, the reduction in the weight of the wheels and the clutch would, pro rata, would show more benefits in the power stakes.
No doubt the forum's engineers and statisticians will have a sharper perspective than I, on that one!
.
The shaft fitted up fine and I've done 3k+ miles since it was installed, without any problems.
I haven't noticed any increase in NVH as a direct consequence of fitting the carbon shaft and the single aluminium coupler.
There has been a increase in NVH as a consequence of fitting the Exedy GTO4SD clutch, which very much changes the nature of the car.
All things considered, I don't find that too hard to live with, though others may find it intrusive.
The car without doubt launches in a far more positive and predictable fashion compared to the standard setup - the drive line feels far less 'soft' and has much less 'slop'.
I find it much easier to modulate the take off.
I decided to use the Carbon shaft because, quite simply, I think it is a better product than the standard offering - it is certainly stronger.
Regarding benefits and power gains from reduction of rotating mass of the carbon shaft - well my own two cents would be that there would be small benefit to be had in that area, because of the relatively small radius of the shaft.
Perhaps from the point of view of both cost and mechanics, the reduction in the weight of the wheels and the clutch would, pro rata, would show more benefits in the power stakes.
No doubt the forum's engineers and statisticians will have a sharper perspective than I, on that one!
#20
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Jan 2003
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 8,596
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes
on
15 Posts
I have a LGM carbon prop shaft in a customers 40 Ford Deluxe hotrod. Its got all C5 powertrain with the exception of the engine which is a tall deck dart based small block displacing 427 inches with Brodix 18 degree heads, a BIG solid roller cam with Hillborn stack style EFI with 2.5" throttle plates and a MEFI ECU controlling the fuel and timing. This engine made over 750hp on a engine dyno, the original propshaft deflected over .300" on one hard street pull from first to second gear, the noise was hellacious, I thought the engine went away, but it was the prop shaft that was hitting the torque tube. We replaced it with a custom carbon fiber unit from Lou a couple years ago and no problems since.