Notices
C6 Corvette ZR1 & Z06 General info about GM’s Corvette Supercar, LS9 Corvette Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Suspension Setup for Street or Track
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Kraken

[Z06] What Benefits ZR1 vs Z06 Wheel Size?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-28-2011, 01:04 PM
  #1  
tim414
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
tim414's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: Pottsboro; Sometimes Dallas Texas
Posts: 6,112
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
St. Jude Donor '12

Default What Benefits ZR1 vs Z06 Wheel Size?

I have recently purchased a set of 360 Forged Wheels (Concave Mesh) in ZR1 sizes. They are supposed to arrive tomorrow with new tires already mounted.

I just read a thread which indicated the larger wheel size is NOT good for HPDE's/track, which IS something I plan to become more involved in.

Can someone enlighten me on the bennys of larger wheel size -vs- drawbacks of the larger size? I hate to believe I have made a multi-thou$and dollar mistake....in buying the 19x10/20x13 wheel size.

(My mods to start with were to be wheels/tires/suspension (got in on GB DRM Blitsens w/poly bushings ) followed by exhaust and cabin electronics.)

Someone please share your knowledge/insight on wheel sizes PLEASE....I hope I have not made a expensive mistake.....(I still have the factory 'speedline' wheels though!)

thanx
tim414 is offline  
Old 08-28-2011, 01:11 PM
  #2  
jschindler
Team Owner
 
jschindler's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 26,715
Received 341 Likes on 166 Posts

Default

Tim, I'm not sure what some of the track junkies will say, but I think the only real downsides would be that bigger wheels/tires add additional unsprung weight and rotating mass. In laymans terms, that simply means that handling, acceleration and braking could all suffer slightly. But in reality, I cannot imagine that you have anything to be concerned with.

I road raced motorcycles for a few years "back in the day". What I learned is that at an amateur level, way too many people spend too much time worrying about their vehicle having all the trick stuff to maximize lap times. Then someone goes blowing by you who has nowhere near the sophisticated equipment.

Most amateurs would be far better just making sure the vehicle is safe. Make sure everything is working, bolted down and safety wired, tires are inflated properly and the brakes are sound. Then worry about driving the car the way it is.
jschindler is offline  
Old 08-28-2011, 01:49 PM
  #3  
tim414
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
tim414's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: Pottsboro; Sometimes Dallas Texas
Posts: 6,112
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
St. Jude Donor '12

Default

Originally Posted by jschindler
Tim, I'm not sure what some of the track junkies will say, but I think the only real downsides would be that bigger wheels/tires add additional unsprung weight and rotating mass. In laymans terms, that simply means that handling, acceleration and braking could all suffer slightly. But in reality, I cannot imagine that you have anything to be concerned with.

I road raced motorcycles for a few years "back in the day". What I learned is that at an amateur level, way too many people spend too much time worrying about their vehicle having all the trick stuff to maximize lap times. Then someone goes blowing by you who has nowhere near the sophisticated equipment.

Most amateurs would be far better just making sure the vehicle is safe. Make sure everything is working, bolted down and safety wired, tires are inflated properly and the brakes are sound. Then worry about driving the car the way it is.

Thanks 'js'....I agree with your philosophy....that's why I chose the Invo tire rather than the Pilot Sport to start out with.....all the info I had read is that the money difference did not equal enough gain difference unless a highly skilled driver is in driver seat (which I am not).

Also the reason I chose to start with the particular mods wheel/tire/suspension parts.....

add: My thinking is that a wider 'foot print' in the rear would not be a bad thing. That's what lead me to look for better shocks too. These DRM Blitsens are supposed to allow the suspension to 'travel' over bumps rather than 'crash into' the bumps-allowing suspension to stay more stable and planted plus to adjust for the wider tire in rear.

Last edited by tim414; 08-28-2011 at 02:20 PM.
tim414 is offline  
Old 08-28-2011, 01:54 PM
  #4  
GMuffley
Le Mans Master
 
GMuffley's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2007
Location: Tallahassee FL
Posts: 6,007
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

The added weight/rotating mass is the only disadvantage as jschindler points out. Certainly not a major problem.
GMuffley is offline  
Old 08-28-2011, 02:00 PM
  #5  
peterpiper
Pro
 
peterpiper's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: LAX/Long Beach
Posts: 643
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Performance tire selection is a bit smaller in those sizes. -pp
peterpiper is offline  
Old 08-28-2011, 02:43 PM
  #6  
tim414
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
tim414's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: Pottsboro; Sometimes Dallas Texas
Posts: 6,112
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
St. Jude Donor '12

Default

Originally Posted by peterpiper
Performance tire selection is a bit smaller in those sizes. -pp


I think I had a choice of Pilot Sport, Invo, P-Zero.....
tim414 is offline  
Old 08-28-2011, 03:07 PM
  #7  
MitchAlsup
Le Mans Master
 
MitchAlsup's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2000
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 5,041
Received 1,592 Likes on 784 Posts

Default

There are 3 effects: Rotational inertia, weight, and tire performance.

20" wheels have the metal farther from the hub than 19" wheels, in addition there are 20" of that metal for evey 19% of metal in the smaller rims. THus more rotational inertia--and mostly more actual weight than the smaller wheels.

When it come to tire performance you really do want some side wall height. The ALMS prototypes get away wiht really scrawny tire side walls because they need more room for the brakes and are willing to give up a triffling of tire performance to get the brakes to last the distance.

5 years ago we were arguing whether the best drag tires were of 17" or 18" sizes. A few years ago wer were arguing whether the circuit tires were better in 17" or 18" sizes. The tires have advanced since then and the argument is now whether the best comprimize is between 18" and 19". 20" in my opinon, is on the downward side of tire performance. {You will never notice the difference on the streets between 19" adn 20" unless you have Mario's butt.}
MitchAlsup is offline  
Old 08-28-2011, 03:16 PM
  #8  
MOSPORT1
Melting Slicks
 
MOSPORT1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2006
Location: Whitby Ontario
Posts: 2,365
Received 42 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

just had a track day last week at Mosport,,, one of the other Z06s running
had switched to the 19/20 invo combo,,, he wasn't very happy with the performance,,,,

I'm sure other guys with track experience will chime in,, you should have just invested that $$ in track time with an instructor,,,, the Z is more than capable in it's stock form. I'm not sure what your experience with the Z is but any novice is going to take a long time to find out what it can do. So keep it stock and learn to drive it first..

if anything,, upgrade your brakes,,, high temp fluid and stainless lines to start. Then upgrade your pads. So use your new set up for the street and keep the stock ones for the track. The GYs aren't as bad as some say,, they might not be great for street but the do pretty good on the track..
MOSPORT1 is offline  
Old 08-28-2011, 03:40 PM
  #9  
160KTS
Burning Brakes
 
160KTS's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2010
Location: Phoenix Arizona
Posts: 1,069
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The larger the wheels the more rotating mass you're incurring which does slow you down. but I think more than the heavyness of the wheels the issue is the rubber band of a tire you have to run (345/25/20?) which leaves very little room for flex in the sidewall and if you want to drag race you will never catch traction. Also your tire choices are so limited that you're spending a fortune for tires you probably won't be too impressed with for track use (INVOs)
160KTS is offline  
Old 08-28-2011, 04:07 PM
  #10  
tim414
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
tim414's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: Pottsboro; Sometimes Dallas Texas
Posts: 6,112
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
St. Jude Donor '12

Default

Thanks. I have already decided that the factory speedline wheel will be 'off road' use, and as one guy suggested to keep these (360 Forged) for street use....I was thinking a wider foot print in the rear would not be a bad thing, but maybe it is.
tim414 is offline  
Old 08-28-2011, 04:24 PM
  #11  
AzDave47
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
AzDave47's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2011
Location: AZ
Posts: 13,238
Received 4,509 Likes on 2,598 Posts

Default

The DRM Bilstein shocks are the best improvement you did for both street and HPDE's.

18" front/rear wheels give the widest choice of track tires, but I was able to pick up a set of GM Speedlines 18/19 at a good price from a forum vendor so I went that way. If you have limited track experience, you will be best off using high traction street tires and spending $ on driver instruction. On a 90 second lap, good instruction can reduce your times by 5-10 seconds and improve your driving safety. Moving to track tires should occur when you are going thru cheaper street tires faster than a set of track tires. As others have mentioned, the 19/20 combo drawback is primarily higher unsprung weight and rotational inertia. An expensive lightweight 19/20 forged combo will probably be lighter than a cheap set of 18/19's
AzDave47 is offline  
Old 08-28-2011, 04:29 PM
  #12  
Everett Ogilvie
Melting Slicks
 
Everett Ogilvie's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 1999
Location: Desert Southwest
Posts: 2,728
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MitchAlsup
There are 3 effects: Rotational inertia, weight, and tire performance.

20" wheels have the metal farther from the hub than 19" wheels, in addition there are 20" of that metal for evey 19% of metal in the smaller rims. THus more rotational inertia--and mostly more actual weight than the smaller wheels.

When it come to tire performance you really do want some side wall height. The ALMS prototypes get away wiht really scrawny tire side walls because they need more room for the brakes and are willing to give up a triffling of tire performance to get the brakes to last the distance.

5 years ago we were arguing whether the best drag tires were of 17" or 18" sizes. A few years ago wer were arguing whether the circuit tires were better in 17" or 18" sizes. The tires have advanced since then and the argument is now whether the best comprimize is between 18" and 19". 20" in my opinon, is on the downward side of tire performance. {You will never notice the difference on the streets between 19" adn 20" unless you have Mario's butt.}
I agree with pretty much everything you said and wrote a reply to this thread earlier today but did not post it because this question comes up often and sometimes causes a pi$$ing match - BUT, the technical reasons are indisputable, and if one wants to OPTIMIZE their track performance then 18s all the way around are still the way to go, because of the track tire selection and for the technical reasons you already stated.

ALMS Corvette race cars use 18s front and rear (the prior GT1 car and the current GT2 car). Grand AM DPs use 18s front and rear, and so do the GT cars. Even LMP1 and P2s still use 18s (I just re-checked the rules).

The new Michelin slicks, especially the 31/71/18 on the rear, are moving back towards increased sidewall height - for compliance and forward bite exiting corners - this is well documented in the Michelin catalog.

Most tires for the larger diameter wheels have very short sidewalls which hurts performance (no compliance), and if they DON'T have short sidewalls, they raise the height of the car - again bad for performance.

My comments above are about optimizing track performance via one's wheel/tire choices, but plenty of Z06 guys do very well on track with the stock 18/19 sizes, especially for occasional track days. It is when they become truly addicted and the car starts to become less of a street car and more of a track car, that they buy a set of 18" wheels (and Hoosier A6s or Michelin slicks).
Everett Ogilvie is offline  
Old 08-28-2011, 06:13 PM
  #13  
TAILWAG
Melting Slicks
 
TAILWAG's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 2,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The stock OEM wheels are plenty...only some manufactures make wheels forth track...bbs, ccw, etc...you will carry more weight, rotational weight, wear your brakes a lot quicker and could probably risk bending those wheels too during track use. Keep them for the street and take your oem's for the track.
TAILWAG is offline  
Old 08-29-2011, 12:14 PM
  #14  
parsonsj
Racer
 
parsonsj's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2009
Location: Winter Springs FL
Posts: 429
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

A very rough rule of thumb (analysis from Mazda Racing) is that each 1" increase in wheel diameter is equivalent to adding 50 lbs of weight to the vehicle. That's per wheel. Weight is the right way to think of the performance penalty since larger wheels affect acceleration and braking.

My Z sports 19/20 around town, but runs on the track with 18s on all four corners.

That's roughly equivalent to shedding 300 lb. for track use.
parsonsj is offline  
Old 08-29-2011, 04:27 PM
  #15  
Admiral Ballsy
Racer
 
Admiral Ballsy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2010
Location: Indiana
Posts: 496
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

All else equal (and when is it, really?) the more rim/tire width and/or the shorter the sidewalls you run on the front, the 'twitchier' the steering, and the more tramlining you'll experience.

I've read a couple reviews that indicated that the ZR1 tramlines a lot more than the Z06/GS. I've never driven one, so I don't know personally.

Last edited by Admiral Ballsy; 10-07-2011 at 01:48 PM.
Admiral Ballsy is offline  
Old 10-07-2011, 01:38 PM
  #16  
ferravette
Pro
Support Corvetteforum!
 
ferravette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2002
Location: san diego/NYC cali/NY
Posts: 728
Received 24 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Interesting thread.

I bought my Z w 18s on the rear and was thinking to put 19s on to get back the performance i thought i lost. But after reading this thread, i think i will stay w 18s and just get some good tires. Any recommendations as to size and grip/brand. I am running about 600 RWHP. The rear rim is 12" wide. was thinking 345 30 r 18 (that should keep it close to stock height).
Thanks
ferravette is offline  
Old 10-07-2011, 01:47 PM
  #17  
Admiral Ballsy
Racer
 
Admiral Ballsy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2010
Location: Indiana
Posts: 496
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Z06SV
was thinking 345 30 r 18 (that should keep it close to stock height).
Thanks
Unloaded diameter of the stock 325/30s is about 26.7 inches. 345/30s on 18s would be smaller, about 26.2, and the effective diameter would be slightly smaller still since more sidewall generally means more static deflection under load.

I think the closest match would be 325/35s, but I have no idea if such a thing exists. That'd be just under 27.0, but would deflect a little more.

315/35 would be perfect but you'd be getting rather narrow for a 12-inch wheel.
Admiral Ballsy is offline  

Get notified of new replies

To What Benefits ZR1 vs Z06 Wheel Size?

Old 10-07-2011, 02:16 PM
  #18  
ferravette
Pro
Support Corvetteforum!
 
ferravette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2002
Location: san diego/NYC cali/NY
Posts: 728
Received 24 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Thanks for the Reply,

I have a MT et Street on there now 345/35R 18 and when i put a ruler to it i am almost at 28" under the car's weight. That's a bit higher than the actual calculations (4.8+4.8+18=27.6). Checked w tire rack no325/35 size. I'll do a little more checking, but if you have not heard of the size, it probably does not exist. Looks like i don't have too many choices.

Originally Posted by Admiral Ballsy
Unloaded diameter of the stock 325/30s is about 26.7 inches. 345/30s on 18s would be smaller, about 26.2, and the effective diameter would be slightly smaller still since more sidewall generally means more static deflection under load.

I think the closest match would be 325/35s, but I have no idea if such a thing exists. That'd be just under 27.0, but would deflect a little more.

315/35 would be perfect but you'd be getting rather narrow for a 12-inch wheel.
ferravette is offline  
Old 10-07-2011, 03:12 PM
  #19  
TapOut
Burning Brakes
 
TapOut's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA (Oahu, HI)
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I believe everyone has accurately answered your questions and concerns with the larger wheel sizing.....but no one has mentioned anything about the brand of wheel.

360's are big heavy street/show rims. All of their wheels are made for looks and not performance. That being said, most people keep their stockers as track wheels and throw on 360's etc for the street. The only wheels I would multipurpose would be CCW, HRE etc. And if you really wanted to track a 19/20 combo, or upgraded to the carbon brakes and required this setup....I would always go with the stock ZR1 wheels (Lighter than other 19/20 combos and tested by GM race engineers).
TapOut is offline  
Old 02-01-2013, 12:00 PM
  #20  
Rathmullan
Burning Brakes
 
Rathmullan's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2012
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,049
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by jschindler
Tim, I'm not sure what some of the track junkies will say, but I think the only real downsides would be that bigger wheels/tires add additional unsprung weight and rotating mass. In laymans terms, that simply means that handling, acceleration and braking could all suffer slightly. But in reality, I cannot imagine that you have anything to be concerned with.

I road raced motorcycles for a few years "back in the day". What I learned is that at an amateur level, way too many people spend too much time worrying about their vehicle having all the trick stuff to maximize lap times. Then someone goes blowing by you who has nowhere near the sophisticated equipment.

Most amateurs would be far better just making sure the vehicle is safe. Make sure everything is working, bolted down and safety wired, tires are inflated properly and the brakes are sound. Then worry about driving the car the way it is.
RIGHT ON!!!! Unless the only thing you are interestd in is beating that CTS-V or Camaro ZL-1 etc. in the 1/8 mile off a stop light, take the money you put into mods to increase horsepower and torque and go take a course at Bob Bondurant's or Ron Fellow's driving school. Both use C6 Grand Sports. Learn to properly use the horsepower and incredible handling capabilities you have in your C6! GM doesn't give away driving school instruction with each ZR1 as a marketing gimmick. They do it to enhance the driver ownership experience and, most importantly, personal safety. Because 638hp will definately get you in trouble and 430 hp can as well.
Rathmullan is offline  


Quick Reply: [Z06] What Benefits ZR1 vs Z06 Wheel Size?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:20 PM.