[Z06] 700rwhp all motor project for my Z by one the best in business-Cunningham Motorsports
#41
Burning Brakes
This forum crack me up with all the bad info and what not that gets posted LMFAO.
Op, good luck with the build, but shooting for 700+ rwhp, I seriously doubt you'll get close with any kind of modified plastic manifold.
Which WCCH heads are you looking to get? Good luck with the build!
Op, good luck with the build, but shooting for 700+ rwhp, I seriously doubt you'll get close with any kind of modified plastic manifold.
Which WCCH heads are you looking to get? Good luck with the build!
Only thing he should be looking at is a Holley Hi ram or single plane/ big time manifolds.
-Curtis
The following users liked this post:
Vato's C6Z06 (01-26-2016)
#42
Melting Slicks
You need to look around forum here
There was a guy who I think had a Monte Carlo out of Washington state that showed the LS7 motor he had in his car and he was trying to reach 700 hp NA. Now he had an automatic so a little tougher, but you will see all the stuff he had to do to get to 700 hp and I think he fell 8 hp short or may have finally made it. This will give you and idea if you are sticking to a 427 size motor. Someone may remember and can post a link.
The following users liked this post:
Vato's C6Z06 (01-26-2016)
#43
Melting Slicks
I see you are going 454
The extra 27 inches will help. But still look at Monte Carlo post.
The following users liked this post:
Vato's C6Z06 (01-26-2016)
The following users liked this post:
Vato's C6Z06 (01-26-2016)
#46
Safety Car
The following users liked this post:
Vato's C6Z06 (01-26-2016)
#49
Pro
Also, there is a difference between cubic inches gained by increasing the bore, and cubic inches gained by increasing the stroke...to get 454ci, you're doing both. In my experience, increasing the stroke doesn't yield as much HP per CI, as increasing the bore...and that is due to a few reasons. Look forward to seeing your results...motor should be a beast.
The following users liked this post:
Vato's C6Z06 (01-26-2016)
#50
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Nov 2005
Location: Kendall Park NJ
Posts: 6,964
Likes: 0
Received 335 Likes
on
247 Posts
Why limit yourself to a plastic intake on a great build? It is all about matching components.
Here is an N/A build designed by robz that has made 926 HP on Jesel's engine dyno on a start up tune. This is with an aluminum intake. Talk to you shop about various options. Good luck.
Here is an N/A build designed by robz that has made 926 HP on Jesel's engine dyno on a start up tune. This is with an aluminum intake. Talk to you shop about various options. Good luck.
#53
Melting Slicks
What is your rotating assembly composed of? Are you doing a solid roller?
#54
Safety Car
Member Since: Dec 1999
Location: Virginia Beach, VA & Port Charlotte, FL (snowbird)
Posts: 4,407
Received 1,095 Likes
on
578 Posts
If you're going with a solid roller then you need to be aware that solid roller lifters have a typically short life expectancy. When they fail they spew needle bearings and metal fragments throughout your engine and generally requires a subsequent entire engine tear-down to clean and inspect for additional damage. I would NEVER run them on a street driven engine, FWIW.
#57
Burning Brakes
If you're going with a solid roller then you need to be aware that solid roller lifters have a typically short life expectancy. When they fail they spew needle bearings and metal fragments throughout your engine and generally requires a subsequent entire engine tear-down to clean and inspect for additional damage. I would NEVER run them on a street driven engine, FWIW.
-Curtis
#58
Safety Car
Member Since: Dec 1999
Location: Virginia Beach, VA & Port Charlotte, FL (snowbird)
Posts: 4,407
Received 1,095 Likes
on
578 Posts
So you have a couple friends that are running solid rollers and they haven't crapped the bed yet? Then, you base your comment solely on those couple people?? You sir are the misinformed one. If you spend a couple minutes doing some research you might not be as likely to fire one from the hip again...
#59
Pro
Not all solid rollers are equal. A more mild, low lash solid roller will have greatly improved longevity, over older, more traditional solids. Just like with a hydraulic roller, it is all in how aggressive the lobes (and corresponding springs) are. If the lobes are almost square, its going to wear out parts very quickly. If the lash ramp isn't designed properly, that can be hard on parts as well.
The following users liked this post:
C6 Curtis (01-27-2016)
#60
Burning Brakes
So you have a couple friends that are running solid rollers and they haven't crapped the bed yet? Then, you base your comment solely on those couple people?? You sir are the misinformed one. If you spend a couple minutes doing some research you might not be as likely to fire one from the hip again...
Not all solid rollers are equal. A more mild, low lash solid roller will have greatly improved longevity, over older, more traditional solids. Just like with a hydraulic roller, it is all in how aggressive the lobes (and corresponding springs) are. If the lobes are almost square, its going to wear out parts very quickly. If the lash ramp isn't designed properly, that can be hard on parts as well.
-Curtis
The following users liked this post:
Dude_man (01-27-2016)