fisher auto

Just saw it today love the front and hate the back. Sorry about the pics. Check it out!

GMuffley

Not sure about the look.

Katech_Zach

Those are not pictures of the C7. That is what Car & Driver thinks the C7 might look like.

426 Hemi

Whew, yeah---there's a lot going on there!

BRCC

I have my doubts on that rear end it's not the traditional 4 tail light configuration and I don't believe they will stray far from that. I do like the front end but again they have not addressed the front license plate problem, if in fact this is close to the new C7

fastskyline

yea i dont think its going to look anything like this. especially that ugly back end. if it does look like that ill be buying a GTR instead of that.

Landru

If true, there's an awful lot of C6 in it.

REPZ06

Car and Driver are just guessing on what the C7 will look like . The magazine industry is hurting for sales, so putting pictures of a future generation is a way to sell magazines even if their way off. I don't believe them unless they have spy pics of the car. To me that looks like a C6 and that ugly transformer car put together . If that's any hint on what the C7 will look like I'll be keeping my C6 Z06.

kingpin111

How do you know?
What do you know?
I think you should tell us!
We are waiting!

Turbooo2u

I'm willing to bet that some of the design cues that are shown on that cover are correct. I remember when the mags gave us a "sneak peak" of the C5 and C6, and that got about 50% right.

Katech_Zach

I know what should be common sense to people posting "pictures" of the C7. GM is not going to give exclusive pictures to Car & Driver in 2011 of a car that is not going to be out until 2013. And shame on Car & Driver for being so misleading. That's just poor journalism.

Blackdevil77

That rear end is down right ugly

Turbooo2u

But if this is a 2013 model, production C7 Vettes could be rolling down the Bowling Green assembly line in 15 or 16 months. If thats the case, I figure that mules have already been built and tested. Someone knows what the car looks like. Maybe they have some inside information.

mammoth713

yeah that drawing looks like they took a c6 and punched out of its shell.. i kind of like the back except the part that sticks out so far..

i doubt they'd stray away from some form of 4 individual tail lights, its part of what a corvette is defined as..


those rims look good though

honestly i bet GM has some trick up their sleeves where it will feature an optional turbo (or twin turbo) V6... I wouldnt be surprised. with all the MPG and whatnot hype going on now.. (i'd prefer a v8 obviously unless it was some super high tech engineering feat embodied in a v6), don't forget, the GTR is a V6

Katech_Zach

I said out in 2013. 2014MY. ...if
we are lucky.

spicytuna

Can't see them straying from the 4 light design.

BadboyZ06

That looks like the concept Vette GM had on display at the International Auto Show last December in San Diego. I took a few pictures of is but I'm not sure how to post them from my computer.

Dave concrete

I hope your right thats one ugly ***.

383vett

According to the article, the new powers to be at GM were not happy with the "wide" look of the C6 rear and want to narrow it down, hence the deviation from the quad lights.

spicytuna

The new powers? Obama?

I sure hope it isn't the near rear. They already struck out with the rear end of the Camaro (IMHO) so I'd hate to see them go two for two.