C7 4 wheel drive like Porche 911?
#2
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: North Dallas 40 TX
Posts: 6,453
Received 4,376 Likes
on
2,067 Posts
#3
Team Owner
#4
Advanced
Member Since: Dec 2010
Location: Pennington NJ
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm pretty sure that most people on this forum don't want to own a Porsche, they're here because they are Corvette fans. Porsche does do some things that broaden their market and GM would probably be able to do the same for the Corvette by adding features to the lineup. The 911 is currently offered in 23 trim levels compared to Corvette's 6. Adding AWD would bring in some buyers that may not have bought a Corvette without this. The same would be true for adding a 6 cyl or small 8, etc. These are options, not forced on you. The benefit being is that they move more vehicles, keeping the cost lower for all of us. I personally don't want those things, but I would be happy to see a broader Corvette lineup and higher sales.
#5
Team Owner
I'm pretty sure that most people on this forum don't want to own a Porsche, they're here because they are Corvette fans. Porsche does do some things that broaden their market and GM would probably be able to do the same for the Corvette by adding features to the lineup. The 911 is currently offered in 23 trim levels compared to Corvette's 6. Adding AWD would bring in some buyers that may not have bought a Corvette without this. The same would be true for adding a 6 cyl or small 8, etc. These are options, not forced on you. The benefit being is that they move more vehicles, keeping the cost lower for all of us. I personally don't want those things, but I would be happy to see a broader Corvette lineup and higher sales.
#7
Team Owner
#8
Pro
Bugatti Veyron
Lamborghini Aventador LP700-4
Porsche 911 Turbo S
Nissan GT-R
Yeah what Am I smoking
#9
Team Owner
Also, all but the GT-R cost WELL over 100k dollars. The Lamborghini several time that of the Zr1, and we won't even talk about the cost of the Bugatti Veyron.
Really, debating with you is far too easy.
Edit: Man my typing is all over the place tonight.
Last edited by JustinStrife; 07-23-2011 at 10:01 PM.
#10
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: North Dallas 40 TX
Posts: 6,453
Received 4,376 Likes
on
2,067 Posts
There is no physical way for it to not cause weight gain over a car built the same way without it. It reqiuires more parts. And since almost all systems will channel 100% of the torque to the rear wheels the drive componets can't be lighter. The track 911's are not AWD. The top Ferrari sports cars are not AWD.
#11
Advanced
Member Since: Dec 2010
Location: Pennington NJ
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#12
Team Owner
#13
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: North Dallas 40 TX
Posts: 6,453
Received 4,376 Likes
on
2,067 Posts
Which of the GT-R's are RWD? Which of the Lamborghini's are RWD? Only a single track model.
So most of the AWD models the AWD is sort of forced on you unless you want to buy the more expensive track model.
Once, they go down the AWD path it becomes about safety to protect us from ourselves so we have to have it. And it adds weight, reduces fuel mileage, and takes the edge off the handling.
I don't want it forced on me, and I don't want the RWD car compromised to accomodate the "option" of AWD.
The Corvette is profitable as it is, it will produce more sales and when the economy improves and the new generation comes out.
#14
Pro
The Z06 and ZR1 ran faster lap times around the Ring, or haven't you heard?
Also, all but the GT-R cost WELL over 100k miles. The Lamborghini several time that of the Zr1, and we won't even talk about the cost of the Bugatti Veyron.
Really, debating with you is far too easy.
Also, all but the GT-R cost WELL over 100k miles. The Lamborghini several time that of the Zr1, and we won't even talk about the cost of the Bugatti Veyron.
Really, debating with you is far too easy.
All the other cars handle better in the corners, plus they launch much better than the Z06 or ZR1, Try looking at the benefit of all around performance, the Corvette can win at some and lose at others, but I would feel the AWD giving the Vette the added improvement to cornering and Launch would much benefit it compared to the extra weight it would acquire, especially since most of the other cars are much more heavy. The other cars are not more expensive because they have AWD, if you haven't figured that out.
Like you said, the GT-R is cheaper, also much much heavier and it only lost against the 2012 models, what happens when the GT-R brings their 2012 model or loses weight And most of it's amazing performance has to do with it's AWD system.
#15
I don't think the Corvette brand is strong enough to be bothered to offer 23 trims. Offering A GT2/3, Turbo, C2, C2S, C4S, GTS, etc, etc is never going to happen. Porsche can do this because the brand is extremely profitable and revolves around the 911. I'm sure it would be neat, but personally, I like RWD. If, when, I buy a Porsche it will not be AWD. Plus, it's in Corvette DNA (FR RWD).
By the way, I work at a Porsche dealer. I make a living on Porsche.
By the way, I work at a Porsche dealer. I make a living on Porsche.
#16
Melting Slicks
Corvette with all wheels drive?
I really hope not...
I really hope not...
#18
I firmly belive the standard Vette should retain RWD, but...
When Porsche added AWD to its 993 generation, it didn't become a Subaru. Likewise the Diablo when it gained AWD; it remained still very much a Lamborghini.
Could it not be argued that part of the reason why they have such a strong brand image and why they are extremely profitable is precisely because they offer so many variants and thus appeal to a wider audience than if they offered only 6 trim levels?
The prices of those models don't necessarily reflect the actual cost of making those variants (although Porsche will tell you every chance they get about extensive R&D, testing, etc). The initial costs (associated with testing and certification) are centered around initial, base models and the base engines. A GT2 RS is so expensive not because it is that much harder to make; it's that expensive because it's limited (500 units) and because Porsche know people are willing to pay it.
A Veyron is expensive because of some pretty insane performance targets (250+ mph, plus the durability to match, even in desert climates), which the Corvette doesn't have to deal with. On top of that, only 300 are made.
As for Corvette losing a ton of buyers if they adopt AWD...what if they gain a ton of buyers by having AWD? And if the base model retains RWD, that's a net gain of a ton of buyers who would otherwise not be adding to GM's coffers.
When Porsche added AWD to its 993 generation, it didn't become a Subaru. Likewise the Diablo when it gained AWD; it remained still very much a Lamborghini.
The prices of those models don't necessarily reflect the actual cost of making those variants (although Porsche will tell you every chance they get about extensive R&D, testing, etc). The initial costs (associated with testing and certification) are centered around initial, base models and the base engines. A GT2 RS is so expensive not because it is that much harder to make; it's that expensive because it's limited (500 units) and because Porsche know people are willing to pay it.
A Veyron is expensive because of some pretty insane performance targets (250+ mph, plus the durability to match, even in desert climates), which the Corvette doesn't have to deal with. On top of that, only 300 are made.
As for Corvette losing a ton of buyers if they adopt AWD...what if they gain a ton of buyers by having AWD? And if the base model retains RWD, that's a net gain of a ton of buyers who would otherwise not be adding to GM's coffers.
#20
Drifting
Porsche is an entire car brand, and the entire brand revolves around the 911. Every car porsche builds is based off the 911.
Corvette is a MODEL that the Chevy BRAND sells. No other car within the Chevy BRAND is based off of the corvette. Just because the new camaro has IRS, does NOT mean it's modeled after the vette.
Meaning, Chevy can't possibly make 23 trim levels with millions of options for one single CAR in it's line up. Again, Porsche can do this, because the 911 is the basis for ALL of it's cars. From a distance, you couldn't tell the difference between a 911, a Carrera, or even really the Boxter S, if your mother's life depended on it. Why? Because they are ALL based on the same model of car. It is both a huge positive, AND a negative. Dude spends 180,000 on a high end 911 turbo or GT2, only to have his car look REMARKABLY similar to a Carrera or Caymen. In essence, the entire BRAND of Porsche only really makes 4 different cars...the 911, the Boxter, the abysmal panamera, and the Cayan SUV. One entire company devoted to just 4 vehicles. They had damn well BETTER offer a cornucopia of trim levels and variations.
On the other hand, a dude that shells out the 40-50 grand for a vette need not fear that some other chevy rolling up is going to look even REMOTELY similar. No one, not even someone who is half blind, is going to mistake a Cobalt, Cruz, or Camaro, for a Vette. Period. And THAT is why it would cost GM a literal FORTUNE to adopt the Porsche business model.
Having said that, however, I think it would be FREAKING AWESOME if they did. People that can't afford the high end could by a Boxter version of the version, a smaller engined, maybe lighter weight car that's fun in the corners, but maybe lacks a bit of steam over long straights. Others who can afford it, can buy a "normal" vette, with a hosto of trim options. And then the Z06. As many different models of it as people could afford to dream about. From the standard, mid front mounted, RWD "911", all the way to some god forsaken exotic, pure race track version that costs a small fortune.
Corvette is a MODEL that the Chevy BRAND sells. No other car within the Chevy BRAND is based off of the corvette. Just because the new camaro has IRS, does NOT mean it's modeled after the vette.
Meaning, Chevy can't possibly make 23 trim levels with millions of options for one single CAR in it's line up. Again, Porsche can do this, because the 911 is the basis for ALL of it's cars. From a distance, you couldn't tell the difference between a 911, a Carrera, or even really the Boxter S, if your mother's life depended on it. Why? Because they are ALL based on the same model of car. It is both a huge positive, AND a negative. Dude spends 180,000 on a high end 911 turbo or GT2, only to have his car look REMARKABLY similar to a Carrera or Caymen. In essence, the entire BRAND of Porsche only really makes 4 different cars...the 911, the Boxter, the abysmal panamera, and the Cayan SUV. One entire company devoted to just 4 vehicles. They had damn well BETTER offer a cornucopia of trim levels and variations.
On the other hand, a dude that shells out the 40-50 grand for a vette need not fear that some other chevy rolling up is going to look even REMOTELY similar. No one, not even someone who is half blind, is going to mistake a Cobalt, Cruz, or Camaro, for a Vette. Period. And THAT is why it would cost GM a literal FORTUNE to adopt the Porsche business model.
Having said that, however, I think it would be FREAKING AWESOME if they did. People that can't afford the high end could by a Boxter version of the version, a smaller engined, maybe lighter weight car that's fun in the corners, but maybe lacks a bit of steam over long straights. Others who can afford it, can buy a "normal" vette, with a hosto of trim options. And then the Z06. As many different models of it as people could afford to dream about. From the standard, mid front mounted, RWD "911", all the way to some god forsaken exotic, pure race track version that costs a small fortune.