Trinity Animation C7 high res stills for wallpaper
#21
Burning Brakes
Member Since: Sep 2003
Location: Middle Tn
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
All I can say is that compared to this Z06 shot, the C7 rendering presents very well. The front fenders seem just as wide and of a similar shape. I really like the fender vent. The side and doors seem to have a deeper inset and are even more curvaceous than the Z. The rear is different (a bit more of a badazz glare) but not bad. I like the side marker lights a whole lot more than the C6's.
#22
It does look a lot better but that door sure does look awfully thick. If you take the C6's base width of 72.6" and subtract the shoulder room of 55.2" that leaves you 17.4" Divide that by 2 makes it 8.7" thickness per door. The door rendering looks to be much thicker than that IMO. But it sure do look good. Even the wheel openings look like a wide body. Maybe it is a wide body version?
#23
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Nov 2002
Location: North shore,Ma./Naples Florida
Posts: 3,059
Received 272 Likes
on
144 Posts
All I can say is that compared to this Z06 shot, the C7 rendering presents very well. The front fenders seem just as wide and of a similar shape. I really like the fender vent. The side and doors seem to have a deeper inset and are even more curvaceous than the Z. The rear is different (a bit more of a badazz glare) but not bad. I like the side marker lights a whole lot more than the C6's.
Last edited by Frankie2blue; 08-26-2012 at 10:52 PM.
#24
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Jan 2010
Location: Cali for ya Republic
Posts: 2,041
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This really starts to represent what I have been feeling all along. The C6 is going to look old, tired and dated compared to the C7. As much as I love my C6, I have no doubt I will feel the same about it as I did the C5 when the C6 came out. Car looks killer to me in the above rear view. Sorry, but the C6 looks frumpy in comparison to my eyes.
#26
Melting Slicks
Remember , Akerson said to Wellburn that the original C7 concept was too wide so that was changed.
The dimensions of the C6 are pretty spot so if they can shave an inch here or there it would be magical !
#27
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Jan 2010
Location: Cali for ya Republic
Posts: 2,041
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With a lower height you can make a narrower car look wider. Lamborghini has been playing this trick for a long time.
#28
I see someone going on about it being higher while you say it is lower. It is nuances like that we can't really tell so far IMO. And really, it will all be up to the buyer how high or low he or she wants it to be. Many C6sers have adjusted the height of their C6s.
#29
Have faith, all!
#30
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Jan 2010
Location: Cali for ya Republic
Posts: 2,041
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To me, if you really look at the pics of the C6Z and the C7 I put up earlier in the thread, they look pretty close to the same.
I see someone going on about it being higher while you say it is lower. It is nuances like that we can't really tell so far IMO. And really, it will all be up to the buyer how high or low he or she wants it to be. Many C6sers have adjusted the height of their C6s.
I see someone going on about it being higher while you say it is lower. It is nuances like that we can't really tell so far IMO. And really, it will all be up to the buyer how high or low he or she wants it to be. Many C6sers have adjusted the height of their C6s.
Also there are two guys receiving it at the garage entrance. If it's as high as a C6, they must be tall. But they look like regular Joes. Anyway, that's my 2 cents.
Last edited by Nitrous Oxide; 08-27-2012 at 11:57 AM.
#32
Le Mans Master
In that shot, it looks really good!! Still not crazy about the taillights but I guess I could live with them!! What I like about the rear even less than the lights is the exhaust pipes all boxed in!!! The curves down the body in that side profile are more rounded and look pretty cool!!
#35
#37
Safety Car
The jalopnik render looked better.
But the worst thing about it is the Camaro rear end. That Camaro rear bumper needs to go even before its released... If your coming out with a brand new design for chevy's flagship car, why would you design a major part of the car to make it look like another car that is already several years old... Many people that i've shown the pic to say "It's got a Camaro bumper on it".
I hope it gets better before it's released.
But the worst thing about it is the Camaro rear end. That Camaro rear bumper needs to go even before its released... If your coming out with a brand new design for chevy's flagship car, why would you design a major part of the car to make it look like another car that is already several years old... Many people that i've shown the pic to say "It's got a Camaro bumper on it".
I hope it gets better before it's released.
#38
Safety Car
Dang , I just posted the same thing LOL.
That seems to be a big thing many people are seeing also when they look at the pic... It kinda looks like the old "parts bin sharing" thing .
The Vette rear end should always be kinda unique... I think the C7's Camaro bumper should be redesigned while its being designed if that makes any sense.
That seems to be a big thing many people are seeing also when they look at the pic... It kinda looks like the old "parts bin sharing" thing .
The Vette rear end should always be kinda unique... I think the C7's Camaro bumper should be redesigned while its being designed if that makes any sense.
#39
Safety Car
I'd still like to see some of the iconic round Vette tail lights in the design. Maybe have the lights rising up out of the top of the rear bumper a little bit...
Sorry for the crappy pshop
Sorry for the crappy pshop