C7 General Discussion General C7 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

A little bit of inside info on the 'possible' C7 ZR1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-11-2012, 02:52 PM
  #21  
QUIKAG
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
QUIKAG's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2000
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 5,972
Received 50 Likes on 31 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JoesC5
I'm much more impressed with the DOHC engine used in the Mercedes SLS AMG over the Ferrari. How much does the Ferrari engine weigh? The LT1 weighs 465 pounds, and the 6.3L Mercedes engine only weighs 455 pounds. The Mercedes has 1.28 HP/lb. That is a much more usefull measurement then HP/L.

The Mercedes has 583 horspower at 6,800 RPM and 479 lbs-ft at 4750 RPM. Compare that to the 398 lbs-ft with the Ferrari. No need to wind the hell out of the Mercedes to get it going.

Of course, neither the Ferrari or the Mercedes is going to get by without the purchaser paying a gas guzzler tax and the manufacturer paying the EPA a fine for the crappy gas mileage they get.

Wouldn't surprize me though, if the supercharged version of the LT1 in the C7, even with the addtiional weight of the supercharger, etc, comes in with the car weight per horsepower lower then the the Ferrari or Mercedes SLS AMG , and blows the Ferrari and the Mercedes out of the water with the supercharged C7's gas mileage above 25 MPG highway. The Mercedes only gets 13 city and 19 highway.
All very good points, Joe. You are right in the 6.2L SLS AMG motor is probably a better comparison. In Black Series guise, doesn't it make 620hp or so and rev out to 8,000rpm? That or a similiar engine in a 3,000lb C7 ZR1 would be awesome BUT you are right the gas mileage would suck and I'd be worried about 100k powertrain warranty reliability hence another reason GM probably won't do NA.

RJ-92, if you're right on the engine geometry not being ideal for an 8,000rpm+ motor, then that probably kills 100% the possibility of an NA motor. Of course, GM may know something we don't on technology for the LT1 platform. I guess we will know for sure in a few years.
Old 12-11-2012, 03:00 PM
  #22  
jschindler
Team Owner
 
jschindler's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 26,715
Received 341 Likes on 166 Posts

Default

I expect the ZR1 to have turbos. I have had a few turbos going back 30 years. I currently have a BMW 550 with a 4.4 liter twin turbo - 400hp, 450 lb ft torque. The car has virtually zero lag, an unbelievable torque spread and I have averaged 27.5 mpg on three long trips in the car.

Before I got this car I always preferred the naturally aspirated route. But I can't really say that now that I have the 550.
Old 12-11-2012, 03:13 PM
  #23  
bamawrx
Instructor
 
bamawrx's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2012
Location: Alabama
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ferrari does make one hell of an engine, but after 30K miles? Check on the cost of a refresh for one of the current F car power plants. GM will not be putting something like that on the market. Whatever they do use will have to be 100K reliable, and as has been mentioned be able to survive some HPDE time.

Also the DCT's are heavy. Unless they can get the weight down, way down, I don't see one in our near future. I think the earlier poster was right that GM will improve the product by making it lighter, stronger, reliable, etc not necessarily by huge HP increases. Depending on the track one of the fastest production cars in the world is Z06/Z07 package. Has fastest slalom speed tested by mototrend right now. Add some HP's, lighten it up , other improvements, and there you go. F car killer for way less than half the money and a 100K power train warranty. These are exciting times for car enthusiasts.
Old 12-11-2012, 03:15 PM
  #24  
Kappa
Melting Slicks
 
Kappa's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,826
Received 530 Likes on 234 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jschindler
I expect the ZR1 to have turbos. I have had a few turbos going back 30 years. I currently have a BMW 550 with a 4.4 liter twin turbo - 400hp, 450 lb ft torque. The car has virtually zero lag, an unbelievable torque spread and I have averaged 27.5 mpg on three long trips in the car.

Before I got this car I always preferred the naturally aspirated route. But I can't really say that now that I have the 550.
Yeah, the N54 motor in my 335 is great aside from the normal BMW reliability problems. Great low end torque, wide powerband, great highway gas mileage, quiet, and smooth.

GM is no stranger to turbos and I'm sure someone has already cooked up plans for a TT LTx motor. They've got the turbo 4s already and the TT V6 should come out later this week in the Silverado.
Old 12-11-2012, 03:49 PM
  #25  
QUIKAG
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
QUIKAG's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2000
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 5,972
Received 50 Likes on 31 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Kappa
Yeah, the N54 motor in my 335 is great aside from the normal BMW reliability problems. Great low end torque, wide powerband, great highway gas mileage, quiet, and smooth.

GM is no stranger to turbos and I'm sure someone has already cooked up plans for a TT LTx motor. They've got the turbo 4s already and the TT V6 should come out later this week in the Silverado.
Huh? More info on this TT V6 in the Silverado? I had heard the ATS-V was going to get a twin turbo V6 in the upper 400hp range (of course, not official). I guess it makes sense to have a GM response to the Ecoboost 3.5L V6 Ford is putting in the F-150.


Okay, so we all agree the next ZR1 engine is going to be a 5.5L twin turbo LT9 making 680-700hp and have about 650lb/ft of torque while also getting 25+mpg. Sounds good. Where do I sign?
Old 12-11-2012, 04:46 PM
  #26  
dbs1vette
Drifting
 
dbs1vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2012
Location: Lakeside AZ
Posts: 1,265
Received 16 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

The LT1 will be somewhere near 465-480hp. Couple that with very good hiway mpg and a car weighing less then 3100lbs and you have 85% of the potential customers covered. Give it a few years for additional power tweaks and you will be close to 500hp.
Then the performance variant of the Z06 with more displacement and 620-650hp to slap the Viper and GT500 silly and you have now covered the next 10% of vette owners.
One more version, with the ZR1 which will defintly be FI and you have a 725-750hp version to run with any exotic along with the accompanying weight reduction and improved handling and braking on all models and 3-4 years from now all the naysayers will have to find something else to whine about. And the last 5% have what they wanted.
It won't be because the general has not got the weight to power ratio equation worked out that folks ain't buying vettes.
Old 12-11-2012, 04:56 PM
  #27  
SouthernSon
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
SouthernSon's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Deal's Gap 2004 NCM Motorsports track supporter
Posts: 13,915
Received 1,103 Likes on 717 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by QUIKAG

....... The engine won't heat up like my C6 ZR1 at the track, lighter weight, so better chance for the brakes to work longer, etc. The Corvette racecars GM uses are naturally aspirated 5.5L engines. Hmmmm......

The more I think about it, the more innovative and exciting a nice NA engine would on the ZR1 with the associated weight reduction, better cooling, etc. As a C6 ZR1 owner, I wouldn't care at all if the engine horsepower was actually a little less than my current LS9 if I got all the other benefits mentioned above.
Give me light weight and better balance. My track prepared C5Z (at a 3200#'s or so with no driver) gets hot in the driveline with acceleration, hot fluids and hot brakes when stopping. Tires wear quicker, get greasy quicker and don't cycle as many times as they would if car were lighter. Even with 2pc. rotors and DTC 70's with a passenger I am pushing 3700#'s and stopping distances get iffy real quick.
Old 12-11-2012, 08:00 PM
  #28  
ROUTE 66
Burning Brakes
 
ROUTE 66's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Paris Tex
Posts: 1,202
Received 79 Likes on 51 Posts

Default Lighter weight

I have been thinking and saying we will be seeing more carbon fiber possible full body CF by the end of the C7 run...Thank you...
Old 12-11-2012, 10:47 PM
  #29  
barry1me
Instructor
 
barry1me's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2012
Location: Brighton Michigan
Posts: 201
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a feeling the C7 will have a motor that is forced induction 6.2L that may happen to be called the LT4 and it may have 660hp....I dont know but just my thoughts
Old 12-11-2012, 10:52 PM
  #30  
barry1me
Instructor
 
barry1me's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2012
Location: Brighton Michigan
Posts: 201
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by QUIKAG
Huh? More info on this TT V6 in the Silverado? I had heard the ATS-V was going to get a twin turbo V6 in the upper 400hp range (of course, not official). I guess it makes sense to have a GM response to the Ecoboost 3.5L V6 Ford is putting in the F-150.


Okay, so we all agree the next ZR1 engine is going to be a 5.5L twin turbo LT9 making 680-700hp and have about 650lb/ft of torque while also getting 25+mpg. Sounds good. Where do I sign?
sorry TTV6 Silverado is not going to happen....GM is way behind on Ford and the TTV6 route. now maybe keep your eyes on what Dodge has in the future.
Old 12-12-2012, 02:53 AM
  #31  
bob53
Melting Slicks
 
bob53's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 1999
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,373
Received 302 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

My 2 cents -

DOHC will not happen due to the hood line. The DOHC option would be too tall to fit in the engine bay, especially if the car is slightly smaller than the C6 as has been suggested. It is also not congruent with GM's history of SBC motors - the Z06/ZR1 or whatever they come out with will share a great deal with the LT1.

FI works and it's the simplest solution. The C6 ZR1 could have had 700 HP with more tweaking from the factory. Now with DI and a cam phaser, GM can easily get another 50-60 HP more from the same configuration (conservative tune) using a TVS supercharger and 6.2 liter motor. Turbos would be nice too - less issue with heat soak.

I hope they bring the Z06 back with a successor to the LS7. Imagine a 427 with DI and cam phaser!!! 550-575 HP with gobs of low end torque due to the cam phaser. If they can pull this off and make it weight less than the 06-08 Z06's, that would be a killer combination.
Old 12-12-2012, 12:29 PM
  #32  
Bill Dearborn
Tech Contributor
 
Bill Dearborn's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 1999
Location: Charlotte, NC (formerly Endicott, NY)
Posts: 40,094
Received 8,928 Likes on 5,333 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Z_Rocks
Now, my question is, is GM going to unveil their plans for other models at the C7 introduction night or is it something that might drag on till the car gets to showroom around fall?
I hope/wish the full lineup is disclosed, so we can plan accordingly.
Announcing future models/plans would not be a very smart marketing idea. Everybody would wait, sales would tank and the so called future products might never happen.

Bill
Old 12-12-2012, 12:46 PM
  #33  
Paulchristian
Melting Slicks
 
Paulchristian's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,170
Received 174 Likes on 121 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dbs1vette
The LT1 will be somewhere near 465-480hp. Couple that with very good hiway mpg and a car weighing less then 3100lbs and you have 85% of the potential customers covered. Give it a few years for additional power tweaks and you will be close to 500hp.
Then the performance variant of the Z06 with more displacement and 620-650hp to slap the Viper and GT500 silly and you have now covered the next 10% of vette owners.
One more version, with the ZR1 which will defintly be FI and you have a 725-750hp version to run with any exotic along with the accompanying weight reduction and improved handling and braking on all models and 3-4 years from now all the naysayers will have to find something else to whine about. And the last 5% have what they wanted.
It won't be because the general has not got the weight to power ratio equation worked out that folks ain't buying vettes.
so I would have to spend close to $100k on a ZO6 variant to slat a $60k GT500 silly? No thank you. Not to worry though, the base C7 will best a GT500 out of the gate. If it doesn't,..
Old 12-12-2012, 01:19 PM
  #34  
jimmyb
Race Director
 
jimmyb's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 13,934
Received 4,248 Likes on 2,023 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ROUTE 66
I have been thinking and saying we will be seeing more carbon fiber possible full body CF by the end of the C7 run...Thank you...
Car and Driver (1/13 issue) is reporting that the C7 (all versions) will be all CF body panels along with CF used for structure stiffness (floor pan, etc).

Jimmy
Old 12-14-2012, 08:19 PM
  #35  
johnglenntwo
Le Mans Master
 
johnglenntwo's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2010
Location: Beaverton OR
Posts: 8,788
Received 164 Likes on 148 Posts
Default You forgot your E85!

Originally Posted by QUIKAG
This isn't as juicy as the other info on the brakes and the person I spoke with was very evasive about any details at all on the C7 ZR1, but I did get a little bit of info from him/her.

-There is not yet a definitive green light on the C7 ZR1 (or equivalent), but it's highly likely for obvious reasons (success of the C6 ZR1).

-There are only two prototypes built at this time of what could 'potentially' be the C7 ZR1.

-They haven't decided on the engine, but I asked some very pointed questions and I looked for nonverbal cues on 'his/her' face. I asked whether the engine was going to be forced induction or a very high revving NA engine and I got a very slight smile. I don't know how to read that. He/she insinuated final decisions haven't been made which led me to believe they are still considering BOTH avenues. I pressed and said I would personally think it would be quite hard to achieve horsepower/durability targets with a naturally aspirated engine and the guy went on a very small tangent and said in the future, it's not going to always be about horsepower, but weight, efficiency, and other factors while still achieving huge performance targets.

I then asked since the LT1 is a clean sheet and the issues they have with the LS-based engine and the turbo C6 ZR1 mules burning to the ground, I would think GM could have factored turbocharged application into the LT1 architecture. The 'person' at that point just gave me a blank look and didn't say anything. So, again not sure how to read that?!?!

-3rd generation magnetic suspension is going to have a much broader range between comfort mode and sport mode. So, get ready for a truly Cadillac comfy ride in tour mode and rock and roll performance mode at the other end.

-dual clutch transmission- one 'person' said it's 8-speed normal automatic at this point and dual-clutch is on the shelf for now. I asked another person who seemed to be more knowledgeable 'person' about how awesome it would be to have a dual-clutch transmission at least in the Z06 and ZR1 equivalents. He/she agreed that it would be nice, but didn't give anything else away, so I don't know. I think GM Powertrain is really working hard on it, but the base model Vette is going to have a 7-speed manual and a 'normal' 8-speed automatic. I don't think that is new info.

That's about all the info I got. Certainly interesting stuff coming up soon though and it's a GREAT time to be a Corvette fan.
You are the guy who was burning down your ZR1 a couple of years ago on a summer Texas track, right?

Turbos, DI, E85, and I bet your selling!

Old 12-14-2012, 08:32 PM
  #36  
GS_V
Racer
 
GS_V's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2011
Location: SATANville,NY N.Y.
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by SlickShoes
So what we know is...



We don't know anything.
not sure how to read that?!?!
Old 12-14-2012, 09:59 PM
  #37  
SBC_and_a_stick
Safety Car
 
SBC_and_a_stick's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2012
Location: North California
Posts: 4,737
Received 551 Likes on 311 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bob53
My 2 cents -

DOHC will not happen due to the hood line. The DOHC option would be too tall to fit in the engine bay, especially if the car is slightly smaller than the C6 as has been suggested. It is also not congruent with GM's history of SBC motors - the Z06/ZR1 or whatever they come out with will share a great deal with the LT1.

FI works and it's the simplest solution. The C6 ZR1 could have had 700 HP with more tweaking from the factory. Now with DI and a cam phaser, GM can easily get another 50-60 HP more from the same configuration (conservative tune) using a TVS supercharger and 6.2 liter motor. Turbos would be nice too - less issue with heat soak.

I hope they bring the Z06 back with a successor to the LS7. Imagine a 427 with DI and cam phaser!!! 550-575 HP with gobs of low end torque due to the cam phaser. If they can pull this off and make it weight less than the 06-08 Z06's, that would be a killer combination.
Going DOHC for the ZR1 would be as congruent to Chevy history as supercharging. Especially with the LT moniker for this generation engine. See LT5.

To get from 640hp to 700hp the LS9 has to get a very extreme pulley. There are diminishing returns to raising the boost and it gets incrementally less safe to do so and give a warranty.

Anyway, given the info that is out there my guess is that there will be three versions of this motor, all pushrod:
6.2L 475 hp N/A with VVT for the base
7L bored out LT1 575hp N/A with dual VVT for a Z06 like car
6.2L 750hp Supercharged dual VVT for a ZR1 like car

That's what I gather with the info we have out there and a bit of educated guessing. Add to that 15% increase in HP on E85 for all three.

Last edited by SBC_and_a_stick; 12-14-2012 at 10:01 PM.

Get notified of new replies

To A little bit of inside info on the 'possible' C7 ZR1

Old 12-14-2012, 11:27 PM
  #38  
ucfsaxman
Racer
 
ucfsaxman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2012
Location: Springfield Ohio
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I think for most of the C7's run you will have 2 models the base and a higher performance version maybe and a big maybe you will have 3 engine models like the current C6 depending on the market. The C6 had nearly every special model known to corvette. They brought in both performance model monikers from the C4(ZR-1), GS and the C5(ZO6) all at once you had the base, GS, ZO6, ZR1. Some of it was demand from consumers but I also think some decisions may have been made because of the economic downturn they knew that they had to keep the C6 alive a little longer than planned at least that's what I've heard from a few members here. We will see though because the market is certainly filled with way more high performance cars than in the C5's run. I just hope the economy and market will support multiple high performance models of the C7.
Old 12-16-2012, 10:09 AM
  #39  
Mr. Gizmo
Le Mans Master
 
Mr. Gizmo's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2010
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 5,886
Received 641 Likes on 476 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by QUIKAG
I think GM Powertrain is really working hard on it, but the base model Vette is going to have a 7-speed manual and a 'normal' 8-speed automatic. .
How Many Speed transmissions do we need? Perhaps a10 speed manaual and an 11 speed for the c8?

Gm has gone backwards on the Automatic since the 4L80e.
Old 12-18-2012, 03:11 AM
  #40  
The Highlander
Drifting
 
The Highlander's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2003
Location: Brighton, MI
Posts: 1,696
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

If the 7L is dead... i just wish that they give the BORE size a healthy 4.125 so that we with the aftermarket can build easily and cheaply a 427 engine like the ls7.

Thank you very much.


Quick Reply: A little bit of inside info on the 'possible' C7 ZR1



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:11 AM.