C7 General Discussion General C7 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

If the C7 is 10% lighter than the C6...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-10-2013, 05:44 PM
  #21  
jschindler
Team Owner
 
jschindler's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 26,715
Received 341 Likes on 166 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Achmed
and 4-5% more powerful, do you think it will have similar 0-60, 1/4 mile and top speed as the C6 Z06? I'm thinking yes.
ET might come close, trap speed will favor the car with more power. I had a Z06, don't anymore. But I don't know why I'd be pissed as someone mentioned. Maybe he thinks that the owners of Blue Flame sixes still haven't gotten over V8's being put in Corvettes.
Old 01-10-2013, 05:46 PM
  #22  
jschindler
Team Owner
 
jschindler's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 26,715
Received 341 Likes on 166 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Jawnathin
No. Some people here swear it did, but it did not. Similar horsepower does not mean equal performance. Not even with the Z51 package. The LS3 helped narrow the gap though.

The C6 Grand Sport is probably the closest non-Z C6 competitor for the C5 Z06. Their performance numbers are about equal. The C5 Z is very impressive for a 10 year old car.
I was one of the first C6 owners. I had two close friends with C5 Z06's - both with headers, cold air and a tune. They pulled me slightly and that is with the mods. I promise you that bone stock the cars were virtually even. It would be a pissing match to call one faster than the other.
Old 01-10-2013, 05:47 PM
  #23  
Z06Norway
Melting Slicks
 
Z06Norway's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2000
Location: Merritt Island Florida
Posts: 2,225
Received 241 Likes on 145 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 458it
Yeah, the c7 is going 2 be faster. Especially , on the straight.It's not only about the weight, its about the new transmission, new traction system and the things like that...
So, yeah, feel sorry for the guys that are planning 2 keep their c6s...
i dont, C6Z is still a fantastic car, evolution (hopefully) will always bring us foreward

Rune
Old 01-10-2013, 05:49 PM
  #24  
Racer
Team Owner
 
Racer's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: Manitoba/San Jose del Cabo
Posts: 25,021
Received 77 Likes on 56 Posts
Cruise-In III Veteran
St. Jude Donor '11

Default

Originally Posted by jschindler
ET might come close, trap speed will favor the car with more power. I had a Z06, don't anymore. But I don't know why I'd be pissed as someone mentioned. Maybe he thinks that the owners of Blue Flame sixes still haven't gotten over V8's being put in Corvettes.
You can bet your ***, C6 Z06 owners will be pissed. BUT, I don't think they have anything to worry about. Now the 427 convertible, that is another story, it better not be to cocky when a C7 Coupe pulls up beside it.
Old 01-10-2013, 06:00 PM
  #25  
Flex182
Burning Brakes

 
Flex182's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2007
Location: Murfreesboro Tennessee
Posts: 806
Received 176 Likes on 87 Posts

Default

it will definitely be lighter than a base C6 but some of you guys that are thinking lighter than a C6 Z06 are crazy, and if it is, it better be a crap load lighter to out perform it on a track, given the HP/ tq numbers we know. I just don't see it, but hey anything can happen this day and age. I will say the C7 will probably be a better driving car than the C6 Z06 but just not a better performer. Could be really close, It will be interesting when the Nurburgring lap times are done . That will be the true test in my book.
Old 01-10-2013, 06:07 PM
  #26  
Z06-1
Pro
 
Z06-1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2010
Posts: 630
Received 69 Likes on 41 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Racer
You can bet your ***, C6 Z06 owners will be pissed. BUT, I don't think they have anything to worry about. Now the 427 convertible, that is another story, it better not be to cocky when a C7 Coupe pulls up beside it.
I have a z06 and not planning on getting a c7 right away , why would I be pissed ? I'm sure the c7 will be spectacular and all but unless they come out with a c7 zo6 I'm sure on the track I can hang with a base c7 if not whip it's azz (depending on the driver) or the quarter mile . That's my opinion
Old 01-10-2013, 06:07 PM
  #27  
99SoCalFRC
Pro
 
99SoCalFRC's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2005
Location: Bakersfield CA
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jimmyb
Actually, there's not much difference in weight. These numbers are straight from Chevrolet's website:
2013 Corvette Coupe 1LT weighs 3,225 pounds
2013 Corvette Z06 1LZ weights 3,175 pounds

So, assuming Car and Driver is correct on the C7 specs (all Carbon Fiber body panels, Aluminum frame, Carbon Fiber floorboards), it is very possible the base C7 will be a good deal lighter than a Z06.

Jimmy
Sure it could be lighter, but if the C7 has 470 HP it's going to need to be 350 pounds lighter. If it's 450HP it's going to need a 550 pound weight advantage.

I think some members are seeing the world thru the C7 rose colored glasses. The C6Z is a devastatingly fast car and already pretty short on weight. It's got more displacement and easily more power than the C7 will.

I fall in to the "reasonable" crowd who think the C7 will fall between the C6 and C6Z performance wise.
Old 01-10-2013, 06:08 PM
  #28  
bob53
Melting Slicks
 
bob53's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 1999
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,373
Received 302 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

Some of you people assume that the entire self-worth of every corvette owner is somehow, ridiculously, intertwined with not being outdone/outrun/outclassed. Some of us are beyond the physical and mental age of 18... I EXPECT the C7 in some form to trump the C6 Z06 and ZR1 (and I own a C6Z). If the base C7 can keep up with a C6 Z06, great! That demonstrates progress and will ensure the corvette remains an incredible bargain for the performance.

As for weight - I suspect the new vette will be very close to 3000 lbs because it will be slightly smaller. Take a look at the unlocked video as of today. The new frame has slightly different proportions when you look at the front, midsection, and rear. The rear part of the frame where the hydroformed rails are again narrower appears to be shorter in length. I suspect this may indicate a slightly smaller car.
Old 01-10-2013, 06:10 PM
  #29  
Dominic Sorresso
Le Mans Master
 
Dominic Sorresso's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: Bartlett IL
Posts: 6,256
Received 691 Likes on 425 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RJ-92
No way its 10% lighter. That's 300 lbs which would bring you in around 2800. If its more than 100lbs lighter, i'd be surprised. 5% lighter would be awesome.
When the C5Z came out, Chevrolet was careful not to exceed the hp of the
C4 ZR-1. That's their modus operandi. Then they slowly pull away.
C7 base may very well be same hp/lb ratio a C6 Z. But the lighter car will always run better simply due to lower MASS.
I have been communicating w a power train guy on a different forum. He does WOT tuning for the Corvette and says "hang on to your hats".
Hype? He sounds pretty enthusiastic.
Old 01-10-2013, 06:12 PM
  #30  
Bad_AX
Burning Brakes
 
Bad_AX's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2011
Location: Virginia
Posts: 978
Received 99 Likes on 77 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Achmed
and 4-5% more powerful, do you think it will have similar 0-60, 1/4 mile and top speed as the C6 Z06? I'm thinking yes.
Without doubt, the C7 Corvette is going to be a great car and better in most every way than the C6. Will it outperform the C6 Z06? I would be very surprised if the base C7 will outperform the outgoing Z06, except maybe for fuel economy.

Will the new Base C7 outperform the Ferrari 458 Italia? Fat chance, but the Z06 will and then some. Will the Base C7 outperform the new Viper? Not likely, but the old dinosaur ZR1 will, and Z06 with Z07 options would most likely hang with it.

Just sayin.
Old 01-10-2013, 06:14 PM
  #31  
Bad_AX
Burning Brakes
 
Bad_AX's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2011
Location: Virginia
Posts: 978
Received 99 Likes on 77 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Jawnathin
No. Some people here swear it did, but it did not. Similar horsepower does not mean equal performance. Not even with the Z51 package. The LS3 helped narrow the gap though.

The C6 Grand Sport is probably the closest non-Z C6 competitor for the C5 Z06. Their performance numbers are about equal. The C5 Z is very impressive for a 10 year old car.
Old 01-10-2013, 06:20 PM
  #32  
Bad_AX
Burning Brakes
 
Bad_AX's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2011
Location: Virginia
Posts: 978
Received 99 Likes on 77 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 458it
Yeah, the c7 is going 2 be faster. Especially , on the straight.It's not only about the weight, its about the new transmission, new traction system and the things like that...
So, yeah, feel sorry for the guys that are planning 2 keep their c6s...
The Ferrari 458 Italia has a Newer Transmission (7-speed twin clutch paddle shift), and more horse power, but for some reason it's still slower than a Z06. Oh, and it gets much worse fuel economy.
Old 01-10-2013, 06:30 PM
  #33  
1985 Corvette
Le Mans Master
 
1985 Corvette's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Jacksonville Florida
Posts: 5,167
Received 387 Likes on 236 Posts

Default

Why would C6Z guys be ticked? Eight model years of a great run plus mopping the floor with almost everything since 2005. The first exotic fighter C4 ZR-1 met the same fate. The cycle continues. I don't believe the "no more 427s" quotes. Too much marketing potential and excitement to ignore it. GM has been saying "yes we can" to the masses saying, "no they can't" since the LT5.

I specifically remember Dave Hill saying that the 427 displacement was purely coincidence......uh huh.
Old 01-10-2013, 06:36 PM
  #34  
Jawnathin
Melting Slicks
 
Jawnathin's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,437
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

C6Z owner - Wouldn't be pissed at all. I expect the car to continue to evolve, that is progress and I welcome it. I have high hopes for the C7, one could be in my garage.

I'm sure there are more reasons, but off the top of my head...

1.) New cars don't change the performance of my car. Its the same and impressive as it ever was.
2.) I paid significantly less for my C6Z than it would have cost to get me into even a no-frills base C7 and won't be hit nearly as hard by depreciation.
3.) I've been able to drive a car long before the C7 announcement, let alone availability.
4.) The LS7/7.0L/427 is pretty special and while its unclear if it'll come back again, if it does, it certainly won't be in a base C7.
Old 01-10-2013, 06:47 PM
  #35  
DREAMERAK
Melting Slicks
 
DREAMERAK's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,216
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
St. Jude Donor '12-'13-'14, '16

Default

Originally Posted by jimmyb
Actually, there's not much difference in weight. These numbers are straight from Chevrolet's website:
2013 Corvette Coupe 1LT weighs 3,225 pounds
2013 Corvette Z06 1LZ weights 3,175 pounds

So, assuming Car and Driver is correct on the C7 specs (all Carbon Fiber body panels, Aluminum frame, Carbon Fiber floorboards), it is very possible the base C7 will be a good deal lighter than a Z06.

Jimmy
GM says C6 3208 here:http://www.chevrolet.com/corvette-sp...imensions.html
Old 01-10-2013, 06:53 PM
  #36  
99SoCalFRC
Pro
 
99SoCalFRC's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2005
Location: Bakersfield CA
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

FWIW to get to the same power to weight as a C6Z, a 3,000 pound C7 needs 481 HP, a 2,800 can do it with about 455.

This of course totally leaves out the fact that the C7 will not have any rear tires close to what the C6Z has.
Old 01-10-2013, 06:55 PM
  #37  
DREAMERAK
Melting Slicks
 
DREAMERAK's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,216
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
St. Jude Donor '12-'13-'14, '16

Default

Originally Posted by 99SoCalFRC
Sure it could be lighter, but if the C7 has 470 HP it's going to need to be 350 pounds lighter. If it's 450HP it's going to need a 550 pound weight advantage.

I think some members are seeing the world thru the C7 rose colored glasses. The C6Z is a devastatingly fast car and already pretty short on weight. It's got more displacement and easily more power than the C7 will.

I fall in to the "reasonable" crowd who think the C7 will fall between the C6 and C6Z performance wise.
If the C7 is 10% lighter, as some in the media are saying, its going to be very close.

Get notified of new replies

To If the C7 is 10% lighter than the C6...

Old 01-10-2013, 06:59 PM
  #38  
Dominic Sorresso
Le Mans Master
 
Dominic Sorresso's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: Bartlett IL
Posts: 6,256
Received 691 Likes on 425 Posts

Default

Don't forget rotational mass. Even at similar weights, where is the CG?
Old 01-10-2013, 07:04 PM
  #39  
Achmed
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
Achmed's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,684
Received 82 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

Lots of C6Z owners will not be pissed, but then there are some that will be, the same types who argue profusely on the "C7 faster with E85" thread or the ones who post in anger that the GS was made with similar body to the Z06 but for less cost.
Old 01-10-2013, 07:05 PM
  #40  
DREAMERAK
Melting Slicks
 
DREAMERAK's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,216
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
St. Jude Donor '12-'13-'14, '16

Default

Originally Posted by 99SoCalFRC
FWIW to get to the same power to weight as a C6Z, a 3,000 pound C7 needs 481 HP, a 2,800 can do it with about 455.

This of course totally leaves out the fact that the C7 will not have any rear tires close to what the C6Z has.
10% reduction is -320lbs, C7 2900 lbs at 465hp = 6.23 that beats a 2013 Z06 3175 lbs at 505hp for 6.28 lbs per hp.


Quick Reply: If the C7 is 10% lighter than the C6...



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:15 AM.