C7 General Discussion General C7 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

A different view on the 450hp/450tq numbers…

Old 01-22-2013, 03:34 PM
  #21  
Chicago1
Race Director
 
Chicago1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2008
Location: Rio Rancho NM
Posts: 12,053
Received 321 Likes on 208 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JerriVette
I don't believe the lt1 will have less hp than the srt8 which is at 470 hp.
Yes but it weights over 2 tons. The zl1 has what 550+ and is about as fast or a bit faster then a ls3 c6 with 436hp(with npp) All about power to weight and how it gets put down. hell my C5 has no problems with them..(The srt8 I meant)
Old 01-22-2013, 03:37 PM
  #22  
Lancer033
Le Mans Master
 
Lancer033's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2002
Location: Norfolk VA
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Kappa
The ZR1 was estimated at 620. The ZL1 was estimated at 550. That's the history we have to go by. My guess is 465-470hp. More than enough for a base car.
enough to keep me happy. I can't believe i'm actually going to say this, but hp isn't the only number that matters for a car's performance. I'd rather see GM spend their development time on making the car handle better. Maybe I'm
Old 01-22-2013, 03:39 PM
  #23  
sam90lx
Le Mans Master
 
sam90lx's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2010
Location: Ventura CA
Posts: 7,775
Received 172 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mgg
Don't get your panties in a wad! The base C7 will smoke a base C6 you can bet on that. Its called technology. That does not mean a base C6 is not a fine car, but it is a generation old when it comes to technology and that results in advantages for the newer model.
And you know this how.......

Have you seen 0-60 or 1/4 miles times?
Old 01-22-2013, 03:41 PM
  #24  
Daekwan06
Safety Car
 
Daekwan06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2011
Location: Arlington VA
Posts: 4,210
Received 19 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

1) The 450/450 number was crank. Pretty easy to figure that out when the LT1 was publicly introduced way back in November at its own Press Conference.

2) Estimated, means estimated. Who knows what the finalized number will be, but the estimated 450 would mean "atleast" that much. Wouldnt be surprised to see 470-480 as a final number.
Old 01-22-2013, 03:41 PM
  #25  
chaase
Team Owner
 
chaase's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2003
Location: East Meadow NY
Posts: 23,461
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
St. Jude Donor '12

Default

Originally Posted by glass slipper
The LT1 is definitely a good engine and no doubt the extra torque will be fantastic in the lower RPMs...absolutely no arguments there.

However, when racing, I don't dip below 4000 RPM so the extra torque doesn't mean squat to me. HP is what accelerates a vehicle so HP is what I want. Therefore, I will complain loudly with my wallet if the LT1 comes in at 450 HP...there's not enough of a performance difference between 436 and 450 to move me to the C7. The Camaro tail lights means GM better come to market with at least 475 HP for me to even think about it, 500 HP will help me seriously consider a C7. My 2˘ from a different perspective.
Torque is what accelerates your vehicle, not HP. HP is a function of torque and acceleration is accomplished by torque.
Old 01-22-2013, 03:42 PM
  #26  
Kappa
Melting Slicks
 
Kappa's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,826
Received 530 Likes on 234 Posts

Default

People get stuck on power/weight but with cars today, its kind of unreliable. I think the C7 will most likely be a good bit faster through the traps than a C6 or GS.

R&T said that Corvette engineers were telling them that the base Stingray could take the C6 GS on the track. Take it for what you will. We won't find out for a good while but the Z51 should be in the low/mid-7:30's at the Nurburgring IMO.
Old 01-22-2013, 03:42 PM
  #27  
Daekwan06
Safety Car
 
Daekwan06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2011
Location: Arlington VA
Posts: 4,210
Received 19 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sam90lx
And you know this how.......

Have you seen 0-60 or 1/4 miles times?
Actually yes.

They've gone on record as saying 0-60 times will be under 4 seconds.

And we already know the LT1 has atleast 20hp more than the LS3. Which should mean better 1/4 miles times too.
Old 01-22-2013, 03:46 PM
  #28  
sam90lx
Le Mans Master
 
sam90lx's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2010
Location: Ventura CA
Posts: 7,775
Received 172 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Daekwan06
Actually yes.

They've gone on record as saying 0-60 times will be under 4 seconds.

And we already know the LT1 has atleast 20hp more than the LS3. Which should mean better 1/4 miles times too.
Hell, GM said that! Well then it must be Biblical !
Old 01-22-2013, 03:56 PM
  #29  
Kappa
Melting Slicks
 
Kappa's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,826
Received 530 Likes on 234 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sam90lx
Hell, GM said that! Well then it must be Biblical !
Considering that they are the ones that designed and tested the car, probably against all of the C6 models, yeah.
Old 01-22-2013, 03:59 PM
  #30  
JoesC5
Team Owner
 
JoesC5's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Location: Springfield MO
Posts: 41,733
Received 1,699 Likes on 1,213 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Daekwan06
1) The 450/450 number was crank. Pretty easy to figure that out when the LT1 was publicly introduced way back in November at its own Press Conference.

2) Estimated, means estimated. Who knows what the finalized number will be, but the estimated 450 would mean "atleast" that much. Wouldnt be surprised to see 470-480 as a final number.
If you were to ask me my weight and I said I estimated it to be 215 pounds, would I be lying if it were actually 213 pounds?
Old 01-22-2013, 04:04 PM
  #31  
Daekwan06
Safety Car
 
Daekwan06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2011
Location: Arlington VA
Posts: 4,210
Received 19 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sam90lx
Hell, GM said that! Well then it must be Biblical !
Considering GM makes the car. I'd put much more faith in what they have to say about its performance.. than Sam90LX from the "internetz" has to say about its performance.
Old 01-22-2013, 04:06 PM
  #32  
sam90lx
Le Mans Master
 
sam90lx's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2010
Location: Ventura CA
Posts: 7,775
Received 172 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Kappa
Considering that they are the ones that designed and tested the car, probably against all of the C6 models, yeah.
They also said it would be lighter but by all accounts it appears to be heavier.

Anything else is pure BS until real testing happens.
Old 01-22-2013, 04:09 PM
  #33  
Kappa
Melting Slicks
 
Kappa's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,826
Received 530 Likes on 234 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sam90lx
They also said it would be lighter but by all accounts it appears to be heavier.

Anything else is pure BS until real testing happens.
GM themselves never said it would be lighter. That was an rumor spread through this forum and various magazines.
Old 01-22-2013, 04:09 PM
  #34  
Daekwan06
Safety Car
 
Daekwan06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2011
Location: Arlington VA
Posts: 4,210
Received 19 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JoesC5
If you were to ask me my weight and I said I estimated it to be 215 pounds, would I be lying if it were actually 213 pounds?
We can always make a friendly wager payable to the charity of your choice. Or charity of my choice (Wounded Warrior Project) http://www.woundedwarriorproject.org/

I'm definitely open to betting a few bucks that when the C7 base coupe is sitting on dealer floors, available for sale.. it will be officially rated MORE than 450hp in the factory brochure.

Last edited by Daekwan06; 01-22-2013 at 04:11 PM.
Old 01-22-2013, 04:11 PM
  #35  
sam90lx
Le Mans Master
 
sam90lx's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2010
Location: Ventura CA
Posts: 7,775
Received 172 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Daekwan06
Considering GM makes the car. I'd put much more faith in what they have to say about its performance.. than Sam90LX from the "internetz" has to say about its performance.
Do you work at GM Fan Boy? Did'nt think so.
Old 01-22-2013, 04:13 PM
  #36  
Aaron Keating
Drifting
 
Aaron Keating's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by glass slipper
The LT1 is definitely a good engine and no doubt the extra torque will be fantastic in the lower RPMs...absolutely no arguments there.

However, when racing, I don't dip below 4000 RPM so the extra torque doesn't mean squat to me. HP is what accelerates a vehicle so HP is what I want. Therefore, I will complain loudly with my wallet if the LT1 comes in at 450 HP...there's not enough of a performance difference between 436 and 450 to move me to the C7. The Camaro tail lights means GM better come to market with at least 475 HP for me to even think about it, 500 HP will help me seriously consider a C7. My 2˘ from a different perspective.
The much stiffer and lighter frame should be enough to whet your appetite. The decreased deflection, alone would make an upgrade to the C7 worth it if you're up for frequent track duties. To say nothing of totally redesigned suspension geometry and better feedback to the driver.
Of the little things wrong with the car it's likely performance isn't one of them. Not from what I've seen in GT5 at least.
Old 01-22-2013, 04:18 PM
  #37  
ANTIVNOM
Safety Car
 
ANTIVNOM's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 4,607
Received 77 Likes on 32 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by -CM-
I think they are witholding the numbers so that the buzz can be rekindled in the near future.
This. I have no doubt the real number is higher than 450. Remember they set the target coal for the ZR1 at 600 - it came in at 638. Ditto the Z06, when it came out the initial target was less than 500 and it came in a 505.

Get notified of new replies

To A different view on the 450hp/450tq numbers…

Old 01-22-2013, 04:18 PM
  #38  
Daekwan06
Safety Car
 
Daekwan06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2011
Location: Arlington VA
Posts: 4,210
Received 19 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sam90lx
Do you work at GM Fan Boy? Did'nt think so.
Do I really need to work at GM to believe what GM says about the car.

How many times have you driven the new C7? Clearly you must be a C7 expert to be so confident that GM is wrong.
Old 01-22-2013, 04:20 PM
  #39  
Destrukt
Got Boost?!
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Destrukt's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2008
Location: Houston Texas
Posts: 1,271
Received 42 Likes on 31 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15-'16-'17-'18.'19

Default

Guys. Guys! C'mon, we all know this is the BASE model. What we all want is the "Z06" version and what the performance numbers will be. I guarantee we will be satisfied with the "upgraded" version. The base model should cater to the taste of the average Vette owner, while people like us will be waiting for the track attack version =) It is a marketing scheme. We know how this is going to play out. Sit tight and relax for two more years. In two years, you WILL have the Vette that you are hoping for.
Old 01-22-2013, 04:24 PM
  #40  
sam90lx
Le Mans Master
 
sam90lx's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2010
Location: Ventura CA
Posts: 7,775
Received 172 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Daekwan06
Do I really need to work at GM to believe what GM says about the car.

How many times have you driven the new C7? Clearly you must be a C7 expert to be so confident that GM is wrong.
No, I just dont spew BS 8 months before a car is released to the public!
No one knows anything for sure except GM and im not even sure they are a 100% sure.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: A different view on the 450hp/450tq numbers…



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:00 AM.