C7 General Discussion General C7 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Less tech and more HP please!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-23-2013, 11:47 PM
  #41  
sam90lx
Le Mans Master
 
sam90lx's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2010
Location: Ventura CA
Posts: 7,775
Received 172 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

Everyone keeps bringing up epa, cafe....
So are the 580hp ZL1, the 662hp Shelby, the 565hp Caddy immune to this?

I guess I dont understand!

All I know is before too long 4 door sedans will be putting out 450 if they are not already.
Old 01-24-2013, 12:00 AM
  #42  
Aaron Keating
Drifting
 
Aaron Keating's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sam90lx
Everyone keeps bringing up epa, cafe....
So are the 580hp ZL1, the 662hp Shelby, the 565hp Caddy immune to this?

I guess I dont understand!

All I know is before too long 4 door sedans will be putting out 450 if they are not already.
All 3 of those cars are slapped with the gas guzzler tax. So I guess they aren't immune.

And there's a whole lot more to a car than ponies. If it were just ponies the ZL1 would stomp a ZO6 around any given track. And it can't beat the ZO anywhere, let alone a track.

And again none of those cars are base model cars. Their base models, sport in the 300 horse power range. And not a single one of them likely moves as much in volume in top trim as a base model vette will.
I'm more inclined to think GM lowballed the pony count until they could test the car. GT says the thing will wring out 460+ which is frankly more than enough on a Base Model Anything.

I mean if we're going to be comparing non base models to base models lets get really silly. The C7 will have over 150 more horse power than a base model Mustang, Camaro, or CTS. Does that help put it into perspective for you?

To also put it into perspective the C6R in the ALMS only carries 450 horsepower. That's the Top Dog in Road Racing.
Old 01-24-2013, 12:02 AM
  #43  
rcallen484
Race Director
 
rcallen484's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,355
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sam90lx
Everyone keeps bringing up epa, cafe....
So are the 580hp ZL1, the 662hp Shelby, the 565hp Caddy immune to this?

I guess I dont understand!

All I know is before too long 4 door sedans will be putting out 450 if they are not already.
Obviously those are not the base models of those cars. The performance model Corvette, when marketing dictates it be released, will be ???
Old 01-24-2013, 01:28 AM
  #44  
lt4obsesses
Le Mans Master
 
lt4obsesses's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2006
Location: H-Town Texas
Posts: 5,139
Received 481 Likes on 261 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sam90lx
I dont care if you can or cant hook up 600 hp to the wheels, if it comes in at 450....it is a ****** number. The 67-69 L88 Vettes layed down 450 hp....this is 2013 and we have the same HP ??

You could not get L88's or other early 427s to hook up but what a blast and they were King Kong on the roads.....The C7 will not be feared!
Chevrolet actually discouraged the general public from ordering the L88 because of the inherant danger of that monster.

But alas, the base engine in 1968, since we are talking about a base car, was a 327 rated at 300hp. Of course there were more engine choices in 1968 than we have color choices today.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevrolet_Corvette_(C3)
Old 01-24-2013, 02:13 AM
  #45  
SCM_Crash
Le Mans Master
 
SCM_Crash's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2009
Location: Los Angeles California
Posts: 9,526
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kappa
Not again...do we have to keep going over this?
Seriously.



Originally Posted by DRLC5
I think the 45/450 in the base C7 will be good enough for most people, But not for me. I am sure the HI PO model will have well over 500hp. The team working on the C7 understands they have to keep up with the HP wars. Hell My V has close to 600 flywheel hp and close to 600tq with minor mods. I love the feeling it gives me when I push the gas. It kicks my GS ***..lol..I Could only imagine these HP/TQ numbers in the new C7.
No... I'm pretty sure the engineers know that they don't need to keep up with the Jones' when it comes to power in order to beat the Jones'.

Maybe the MARKETING team thinks that, but the engineers are smarter than the marketing team.
Old 01-24-2013, 04:19 AM
  #46  
mattkilla2015
Racer
 
mattkilla2015's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2012
Posts: 363
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BrooklynC6
I agree with the OP. 450 HP and a 4 second 0-60 with a 12 second range quarter is just not competitive any more. We'll see when the production car comes out though ... Yes more to the Vette than straight line speed but 95% of owners never road track their cars ( I however did ) and want paper bragging rights. Bull**** like that sells cars.
I don't think 0-60 or quarters matter nearly as much anymore. Traction and launch is the biggest issues with 0-60. Marketing should change from that to cars that go from 0-100-0 or 0- 120-0 would be better for what kind of stright line performance along with 1 mile drags. When I see hypercars tested these are the kinds of stats they use. Power to weight is much more important then just hp. For the people who want bragging rights, the c7 has a lot of tech stuff they can tell their friends.
Old 01-24-2013, 04:31 AM
  #47  
DanTheFireman
Burning Brakes
Support Corvetteforum!
 
DanTheFireman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: Wellington FL
Posts: 987
Received 13 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Aaron Keating
Yeah, and those were big blocks which were 200 to 300lbs heavier than a given cast iron SBC (400 heavier than the LSX/ New LT family.)

They were also running Leaded Gasoline which is the equivalent of 113 octane, got a whopping 7 or 8 mpgs. Which means less time to enjoy the goodies under the hood, come track day.

The engines themselves were unreliable, and failure prone due to the imprecise fuel delivery system, especially at anything less than WOT. The cooling systems sucked ***** as well. The ignition system also sucked hard core, as it was pre electronic ignition.

Oh and to top it all off? That was Gross Horsepower, not Net (which means After all Accessories is on the engine) nor was it SAE certified HP. If you were to use 60s HP ratings, an L98 TPI would tip the scales at 320 horse power.

The cars themselves were piles of crap in everything but the aesthetics department and would Murder You should you even think about getting into anything more mild than a fender bender, the fiber glass quality was craptastic.

And the car's steering, braking and handling blew chunks.

Also, given GTs track record of nailing factory specs, the C7 is probably going to be abit north of 450, the figure GT5 has given us is 468 hp IIRC. And this is the Base Model car.
People that keep comparing to the GT500 also forget, Ford ain't going to sell 10k to 30k of those GT500s every year. I don't think they even build that many of them.
Great response.
After driving my father-in-law's mint '71, I don't think there's a base anything nowadays that won't make the ride of the vintage cars seem pitiful. The nostalgia factor is great but I'll stick with the C6 until the new one hits.
Old 01-24-2013, 07:52 AM
  #48  
redzone
Le Mans Master
 
redzone's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2002
Location: Concord NC
Posts: 6,353
Received 149 Likes on 88 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Aaron Keating
All 3 of those cars are slapped with the gas guzzler tax. So I guess they aren't immune.
Actually,the car with the most HP(GT00),does not have a gas guzzler tax.
Old 01-24-2013, 07:58 AM
  #49  
Shurshot
Le Mans Master
 
Shurshot's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: Lake Wylie SC
Posts: 8,228
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by BlueOx

BTW, don't forget there is a 1000 hp Mustang out there already!
http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/27/s...ew-york-debut/
One thing I learned from that link on the 1000Hp mustang................. machine cut wheels would look real nice on a night-race blue C7
Old 01-24-2013, 08:07 AM
  #50  
Bill17601
AIR FORCE VETERAN
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Bill17601's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2009
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,223
Received 439 Likes on 196 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by redzone
Actually,the car with the most HP(GT00),does not have a gas guzzler tax.
What is that?
Old 01-24-2013, 08:43 AM
  #51  
BWF07
Le Mans Master
 
BWF07's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Palm Harbor not far from Sebring Florida
Posts: 9,483
Received 819 Likes on 388 Posts
St. Jude Donor '11
Oldtimer

Default

Originally Posted by Racer
I am not sure why you ACT(?) so clueless?
The ZR1 is the one that kicks the exotics butt.
GM has different models of Corvettes, the base C7 is not the competition of some of these cars you are talking about, that car will come in time.............you have complained about everything about this car so far, and now another ridiculous, lack of knowledge post(s). Please post the track numbers of this car that you are saying won't be at all competitive?

Haters gonna hate.
You really don't understand much do you? If you read the different post it might enlighten you. I have said over and over that the base C7 rated at 450 (estimated) hp is not a car that can compete with the exotic European cars it is designed to compete against. The Corvette was never intended to be a match for the Mustang or any other of the US muscle/pony cars that is what the Camaro is for. Of course I like everyone else have no track numbers to compare it with. But if you have any common knowledge of the cars in question, you should know that this car cannot compete with the likes of Ferrari, Porsche (expect the base cars), Lamborghini and so on.

This thread was about more horsepower and all I have said in my post is until GM releases the high performance version it will not be a world class car. I have no doubt that this car will out perform the base C6 as well as the GS. We just have to wait for the C7 Z06, ZR1 or whatever they call it. That will be the car that they will use to compare Corvette to the world.

As far as you constant use of the Haters gonna hate I truly wish you would grow up and act a little more like an adult that phrase has to be so juvenile if that is possible.
Old 01-24-2013, 08:47 AM
  #52  
FloydSummerOf68
Race Director
 
FloydSummerOf68's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2007
Location: Missouri City Texas
Posts: 11,331
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

The Corvette has always sold so well because it doesn't REALLY have any direct competitors.

To get something similar you pay much more (Granted you always get much more interior for your money). There is no direct 2 seat sports car in the 50k range that competes with Corvette. That's why it's successful. 400hp, 450hp....doesn't matter. If it's selling around 50k it will sell.
Old 01-24-2013, 09:15 AM
  #53  
sam90lx
Le Mans Master
 
sam90lx's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2010
Location: Ventura CA
Posts: 7,775
Received 172 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

I guess no one gets it!

I will hope and wait for the "Performance" version of the C7.
Old 01-24-2013, 09:18 AM
  #54  
Kappa
Melting Slicks
 
Kappa's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,826
Received 530 Likes on 234 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sam90lx
I guess no one gets it!

I will hope and wait for the "Performance" version of the C7.
Gets what? That you are obsessed with a number instead of all the factors that go into making a car fast?
Old 01-24-2013, 09:23 AM
  #55  
Thud
Team Owner
 
Thud's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 1999
Location: Bagpipes put the "fun" in "funeral"
Posts: 69,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BrooklynC6
I agree with the OP. 450 HP and a 4 second 0-60 with a 12 second range quarter is just not competitive any more. We'll see when the production car comes out though ... Yes more to the Vette than straight line speed but 95% of owners never road track their cars ( I however did ) and want paper bragging rights. Bull**** like that sells cars.
It's the same as all those "trail-rated" SUV's that are only driven to the mall.

It's impossible to fully utilize even 400hp on the street without driving like an azzhat. But, marketing is what it is....
Old 01-24-2013, 09:29 AM
  #56  
sam90lx
Le Mans Master
 
sam90lx's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2010
Location: Ventura CA
Posts: 7,775
Received 172 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Kappa
Gets what? That you are obsessed with a number instead of all the factors that go into making a car fast?
That I expected more than a 14hp increase over my GS.
Old 01-24-2013, 09:33 AM
  #57  
sam90lx
Le Mans Master
 
sam90lx's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2010
Location: Ventura CA
Posts: 7,775
Received 172 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BrooklynC6
I agree with the OP. 450 HP and a 4 second 0-60 with a 12 second range quarter is just not competitive any more. We'll see when the production car comes out though ... Yes more to the Vette than straight line speed but 95% of owners never road track their cars ( I however did ) and want paper bragging rights. Bull**** like that sells cars.
BrooklynC6, I think you and I are the only ones who agree on this!

Everyone says GM is going after the younger crowd....kids will get laughed at when they tell their buddies they got's 450HP !

Get notified of new replies

To Less tech and more HP please!!

Old 01-24-2013, 09:35 AM
  #58  
sam90lx
Le Mans Master
 
sam90lx's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2010
Location: Ventura CA
Posts: 7,775
Received 172 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Kappa
Gets what? That you are obsessed with a number instead of all the factors that go into making a car fast?
12 sec. 1/4 is not fast!
Old 01-24-2013, 09:54 AM
  #59  
FloydSummerOf68
Race Director
 
FloydSummerOf68's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2007
Location: Missouri City Texas
Posts: 11,331
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sam90lx
BrooklynC6, I think you and I are the only ones who agree on this!

Everyone says GM is going after the younger crowd....kids will get laughed at when they tell their buddies they got's 450HP !
How many cars under 55k have more than 450hp?

I guess you get laughed at a lot because your car is 430hp?

Lord knows I can't keep the hecklers off me when they find out my LS2 only made 400hp stock.

How much would it have taken to not be laughed at? Are Z06's laughed at with 505?

I think we're also getting too caught up int he 450 number. That is NOT the official number. That's a placeholder until the actual numbers come out. Personally I believe it'll come in around 475.

Last edited by FloydSummerOf68; 01-24-2013 at 10:04 AM.
Old 01-24-2013, 09:56 AM
  #60  
FloydSummerOf68
Race Director
 
FloydSummerOf68's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2007
Location: Missouri City Texas
Posts: 11,331
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sam90lx
12 sec. 1/4 is not fast!
How many stock cars go 11s?

I'm not sure when a 12.0 became slow stock, but it must've been during the last week.


Quick Reply: Less tech and more HP please!!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:15 AM.