C7 General Discussion General C7 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Less tech and more HP please!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-28-2013, 07:01 PM
  #121  
jkcam6017
Burning Brakes
 
jkcam6017's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,106
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bill17601
My advice is to enjoy the time we are in and drive some very cool and fast cars.
Amen. This ain't going to last forever.
Old 01-28-2013, 08:07 PM
  #122  
arkus
Melting Slicks
 
arkus's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2008
Location: CA
Posts: 3,155
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jkcam6017
Amen. This ain't going to last forever.


638 hp vettes
662 hp mustangs
640 hp vipers

this will not last too much longer
Old 01-29-2013, 01:50 PM
  #123  
Subw00er
Racer
 
Subw00er's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

I think 450 is perfect. With my c5z06 at 405, I remember thinking wow if this had another 50hp, it'd be perfect. Too much HP sucks, you end up driving around on 4 mm of throttle. You cant use that power on a street car. 450 is enough for 18-0mph, lots of off the line grunt, some power sliding, and general fun. The only reason you'd want more is to show your friends how much of a **** you are.

I would lose the tech too though.
Old 01-29-2013, 02:03 PM
  #124  
Rapid Fred
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Rapid Fred's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Chadds Ford PA
Posts: 10,087
Received 1,314 Likes on 754 Posts

Default

Headline of this thread should have been "less tech and more lightness, please."

A 3K lb, 450 HP C7 would be a serious blast to drive. One wonders if the extra weight for DI, 7th gear, VVT and cylinder deactivation (heavier torque tube and muffler flaps) costs some portion of the MPG gains those technologies allow (of course, the VVT is what give 450 HP and low-end grunt -- might have to keep that one!). Clearly on the highway the extra weight means about nothing, but the "city" mileage is surely a function of weight -- and 10% less ought to count for something...

I am no engineer, but the engineering calculations to prove the overall benefits exceeded the weight penalties must have been something to see....
Old 01-29-2013, 02:20 PM
  #125  
BWF07
Le Mans Master
 
BWF07's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Palm Harbor not far from Sebring Florida
Posts: 9,483
Received 819 Likes on 388 Posts
St. Jude Donor '11
Oldtimer

Default

Everyone wants more horsepower, but unless you track your car (drags or road course) where can you truly use the horsepower of a ZR1 Ferrari 458 of F12, GT500 or Viper to mention a few. As already stated, 450 is more then enough to get the adrenalin pumping on the street.
Old 01-29-2013, 02:26 PM
  #126  
sam90lx
Le Mans Master
 
sam90lx's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2010
Location: Ventura CA
Posts: 7,775
Received 172 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Torch Z
Headline of this thread should have been "less tech and more lightness, please."

A 3K lb, 450 HP C7 would be a serious blast to drive. One wonders if the extra weight for DI, 7th gear, VVT and cylinder deactivation (heavier torque tube and muffler flaps) costs some portion of the MPG gains those technologies allow (of course, the VVT is what give 450 HP and low-end grunt -- might have to keep that one!). Clearly on the highway the extra weight means about nothing, but the "city" mileage is surely a function of weight -- and 10% less ought to count for something...

I am no engineer, but the engineering calculations to prove the overall benefits exceeded the weight penalties must have been something to see....



Quick Reply: Less tech and more HP please!!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:38 AM.