C7 General Discussion General C7 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

LT1 Disappointment

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-25-2012, 12:34 PM
  #1  
DeYanko
3rd Gear
Thread Starter
 
DeYanko's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2011
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default LT1 Disappointment

Anyone else disappointed with a "New" engine that is heavier with only 14hp and 22lb-ft more than the current LS3?
Old 10-25-2012, 12:46 PM
  #2  
SK360
Melting Slicks
 
SK360's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 2,168
Received 241 Likes on 146 Posts

Default

Many threads on this already.

Final numbers are not announced yet, they will be with the C7. Lets stop jumping to conclusions about a car based on a motor architecture announcement.

Low end torque numbers are as much as +50tq higher then the LS3, this will be an absolute kick in the pants... but hey lets look at peak numbers only. :rollseyes:
Old 10-25-2012, 12:49 PM
  #3  
sprtplt
Burning Brakes
 
sprtplt's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2005
Location: Springfield MO
Posts: 987
Received 132 Likes on 59 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DeYanko
Anyone else disappointed with a "New" engine that is heavier with only 14hp and 22lb-ft more than the current LS3?
And don't forget cylinder deactivation, so yes.
Old 10-25-2012, 12:52 PM
  #4  
Landru
Race Director

 
Landru's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2002
Location: Wayne Township WI
Posts: 10,239
Received 1,047 Likes on 821 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DeYanko
Anyone else disappointed with a "New" engine that is heavier with only 14hp and 22lb-ft more than the current LS3?
So far not enough info; although, on a similar thread I made a crack the C7 better be great if it's to best the LS-7. From what we know HP #s may be very close to LS-7, and the C7 projected to be [significantly?] lighter. Will be interesting, not disappointing.

So, spoil your plans to buy one?
Old 10-25-2012, 01:03 PM
  #5  
DREAMERAK
Melting Slicks
 
DREAMERAK's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,216
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
St. Jude Donor '12-'13-'14, '16

Default

Originally Posted by DeYanko
Anyone else disappointed with a "New" engine that is heavier with only 14hp and 22lb-ft more than the current LS3?
The most disappointing thing for me are people posting negative comments about something they know very little about.
Old 10-25-2012, 01:07 PM
  #6  
goatts
Safety Car
 
goatts's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: Tampa FL
Posts: 3,860
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Actually it's better than I expected. Bottom line will be how does the car perform. Lap times, 1/4 mile etc. If it outperforms the C6 with the new interior etc it will be a hit.
Old 10-25-2012, 01:10 PM
  #7  
WaxWeekly
Burning Brakes
 
WaxWeekly's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: Yorba Linda CA
Posts: 823
Received 76 Likes on 45 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DREAMERAK
The most disappointing thing for me are people posting negative comments about something they know very little about.
Old 10-25-2012, 01:10 PM
  #8  
ctusser
Melting Slicks
 
ctusser's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2006
Location: Woodinville WA
Posts: 2,186
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

OK, I fell into the same trap by looking at the peak numbers initially and poo poo'ed the motor too. But look at the dyno print compared to an LS3, the average power and torque on this thing is head and shoulders above the LS3. You're only at peak power for a second, so this thing will perform like it has a lot more. Not to mention all that torque for low RPM day to day driving... It'll feel like a monster. And thats with a cam that's smaller than the LS3 cam. When the aftermarket catches up, do a cam swap and you'll have a hell of a performer.

Old 10-25-2012, 01:12 PM
  #9  
Ltrain925
Burning Brakes
 
Ltrain925's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,041
Received 56 Likes on 53 Posts

Default

The comments in these C7 threads are some of the most ridiculous comments i have ever seen.

You know nothing more than only a few HP/TQ more and a little heavier. Such senseless comments. Wait till it comes out, and as stated look at the dyno graph there is much more that only an increase in TQ/HP the power band is much, much, better.


^Thank you as I was writing this you posed up a dyno graph! haha
Old 10-25-2012, 01:12 PM
  #10  
RocketGuy3
Burning Brakes
 
RocketGuy3's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2012
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 933
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I'm obviously willing to (and having to) wait until more final info is released, but I will say that if 450 hp does end up being the actual power figure, then unless there are some awesome revelations about the C7 in terms of weight, chassis upgrades, pricing, other features, etc, I probably will completely lose interest in this car.

EDIT: And yes I understand the benefits of an improved torque curve and whatnot. That's still not enough power.
Old 10-25-2012, 01:18 PM
  #11  
LS1LT1
Team Owner
 
LS1LT1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2001
Location: Short Hills, NJ
Posts: 27,067
Received 21 Likes on 21 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SK360
Many threads on this already.

Final numbers are not announced yet, they will be with the C7. Lets stop jumping to conclusions about a car based on a motor architecture announcement.

Low end torque numbers are as much as +50tq higher then the LS3, this will be an absolute kick in the pants... but hey lets look at peak numbers only.
absolutely.
Old 10-25-2012, 01:24 PM
  #12  
CaryBob
Safety Car
Support Corvetteforum!
 
CaryBob's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2011
Location: Cary NC
Posts: 3,842
Received 344 Likes on 221 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RocketGuy3
I'm obviously willing to (and having to) wait until more final info is released, but I will say that if 450 hp does end up being the actual power figure, then unless there are some awesome revelations about the C7 in terms of weight, chassis upgrades, pricing, other features, etc, I probably will completely lose interest in this car.

EDIT: And yes I understand the benefits of an improved torque curve and whatnot. That's still not enough power.
Not enough for what purpose? Surely it will outperform anything in its price class. As a daily driver and occasional road course car, it shoukd be pretty decent. And the ZR1 version shoukd be a real winner.
Old 10-25-2012, 01:28 PM
  #13  
vant
Burning Brakes
 
vant's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Posts: 767
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DeYanko
Anyone else disappointed with a "New" engine that is heavier with only 14hp and 22lb-ft more than the current LS3?
How much heavier is it?
Old 10-25-2012, 01:30 PM
  #14  
ctusser
Melting Slicks
 
ctusser's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2006
Location: Woodinville WA
Posts: 2,186
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RocketGuy3

EDIT: And yes I understand the benefits of an improved torque curve and whatnot. That's still not enough power.
Since you're coming from the perspective of an 07 Lexus IS, 450+hp/tq must be a downer
Old 10-25-2012, 01:58 PM
  #15  
Telepierre
Safety Car
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Telepierre's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,938
Received 2,166 Likes on 1,253 Posts

Default

copied here with no commentary. just to indicate how far we have come and the potential of this platform...

When introduced in the 1997 Corvette the LS1 was rated at 345 hp (257 kW) at 5,600 rpm and 350 lbf·ft (470 N·m) at 4,400 rpm.
Old 10-25-2012, 02:15 PM
  #16  
RocketGuy3
Burning Brakes
 
RocketGuy3's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2012
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 933
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CaryBob
Not enough for what purpose? Surely it will outperform anything in its price class. As a daily driver and occasional road course car, it shoukd be pretty decent. And the ZR1 version shoukd be a real winner.
I don't know why people keep bringing up higher end models. Even the base model should have more power than that. By "not enough", I mostly mean relative to my expectations of a next gen Corvette. It's also a bit underwhelming relative to value-priced performance cars in other classes. Obviously this thing will outrun any of those cars around a track, but it just leaves you with the feeling that they should have been capable of getting more juice into that motor.

I might just buy one of the remaining C6's on a dealer lot on the cheap if the final figures aren't better. Why spend 50% more for ~5% more performance?


Originally Posted by ctusser
Since you're coming from the perspective of an 07 Lexus IS, 450+hp/tq must be a downer
Well of course it'll be faster than my car. What's your point? I fully expect it to be... I just expected it to be even faster. Besides which, at ~320 bhp (after a couple minor mods), my car isn't THAT far behind. It's not like I'm coming from a Prius or something.

Last edited by RocketGuy3; 10-25-2012 at 02:18 PM.
Old 10-25-2012, 02:17 PM
  #17  
LS1LT1
Team Owner
 
LS1LT1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2001
Location: Short Hills, NJ
Posts: 27,067
Received 21 Likes on 21 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ctusser
Since you're coming from the perspective of an 07 Lexus IS, 450+hp/tq must be a downer

Get notified of new replies

To LT1 Disappointment

Old 10-25-2012, 02:19 PM
  #18  
JoesC5
Team Owner
 
JoesC5's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Location: Springfield MO
Posts: 41,733
Received 1,699 Likes on 1,213 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by vant
How much heavier is it?
At 465 pounds, it's ~30 pounds heavier then the LS3, or ~20 pounds heavier then the LS7.
Old 10-25-2012, 02:19 PM
  #19  
Jinx
Le Mans Master
 
Jinx's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2000
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 8,099
Received 398 Likes on 207 Posts

Default

Imagine what stump-pullers GM's pickups are going to be when they get their version of this engine.

And even Escalades will feel quick.
Old 10-25-2012, 02:23 PM
  #20  
JoesC5
Team Owner
 
JoesC5's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Location: Springfield MO
Posts: 41,733
Received 1,699 Likes on 1,213 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RocketGuy3
I don't know why people keep bringing up higher end models. Even the base model should have more power than that. By "not enough", I mostly mean relative to my expectations of a next gen Corvette. It's also a bit underwhelming relative to value-priced performance cars in other classes. Obviously this thing will outrun any of those cars around a track, but it just leaves you with the feeling that they should have been capable of getting more juice into that motor.

I might just buy one of the remaining C6's on a dealer lot on the cheap if the final figures aren't better. Why spend 50% more for ~5% more performance?



Well of course it'll be faster than my car. What's your point? I fully expect it to be... I just expected it to be even faster. Besides which, at ~320 bhp (after a couple minor mods), my car isn't THAT far behind. It's not like I'm coming from a Prius or something.
Of course, GM had to leave a little on the table with the entry level engine in the entry level Corvette. That leaves them more to give you in an optional high-performance version of the C7.

Sure, you can purchase a left over C6 for a lot less then a new C7 will sell for in the first few months of production, but the MSRP of the new C7 will be very close to the MSRP of the outgoing 2013.

Last edited by JoesC5; 10-25-2012 at 02:26 PM.


Quick Reply: LT1 Disappointment



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:03 AM.