C7 General Discussion General C7 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

If Jim Mero has truly done a 2:50 - 2:51 at VIR

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-01-2013, 10:23 AM
  #81  
skank
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
skank's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: Carmel CA
Posts: 2,801
Received 1,152 Likes on 514 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Kappa
Yup, in C/D's hands the C7 Z51 will probably be a 2:55-57 car. Still very, very quick for the money, especially if they test a stripped down model ie 1LT with Z51.

The ZL1 ran a 2:57 and the 991S was around 2:58 I think so the C7 should be good.
Yes, the ZL1 did a 2:57.5 and the 911-991S did a 2:58.9. I'm thinking 2:54 looks possible. Mero was effusive about the C7s handling.
Old 05-01-2013, 10:24 AM
  #82  
gthal
Safety Car
 
gthal's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2013
Posts: 4,937
Received 1,170 Likes on 486 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by drmustang
I have respect for the guys who track cars on these road courses as they are likely far better drivers than I am. The track times being discussed here for late model Vettes as well as guestimates on the C7 seem to be in about a 5 second range for a lap that requires just under 3 minutes to complete. Are these differences significant? Will anyone will feel a difference on the street between a car that runs a 2:51 and another that turns a 2:55? I am not being facetious as I really don't know and am interested. I know that a car that runs 11 flat vs one that turns 12 flat on a dragstrip is a profoundly different experience when street driven in most cases.
Short answer is yes.

A car that is 5 seconds faster on a 3 minute road course is notably faster. After a couple of laps, the trailing car wouldn't even be in your rear view mirror at all.

In daily driving I don't expect you would feel a huge difference though. In very spirited street driving (aka illegal driving ) you would IMO. Remember, track times are more than just pure HP/torque. You are more likely to "feel" increases in HP/torque on the street than you are to feel all of the components of the car working better together in a way that materially improves lap times on a road course... braking, suspension, chassis stiffness, power, etc...
Old 09-09-2014, 06:09 AM
  #83  
skank
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
skank's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: Carmel CA
Posts: 2,801
Received 1,152 Likes on 514 Posts

Default

It looks like our VIR lap time projections came true from a year ago. There were many on this thread that would not believe the Stingray would do a 2:53 at VIR.

Last edited by skank; 09-09-2014 at 06:13 AM.
Old 09-09-2014, 07:45 AM
  #84  
redzone
Le Mans Master
 
redzone's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2002
Location: Concord NC
Posts: 6,353
Received 149 Likes on 88 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by skank
It looks like our VIR lap time projections came true from a year ago. There were many on this thread that would not believe the Stingray would do a 2:53 at VIR.
We also didn't know it was going to get a repave and widening....
Old 09-09-2014, 08:20 AM
  #85  
Bill17601
AIR FORCE VETERAN
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Bill17601's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2009
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,223
Received 439 Likes on 196 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by redzone
We also didn't know it was going to get a repave and widening....
Don't forget new tire technology and the temperature of the day etc..more excuses then a married man. Duh.
Old 09-09-2014, 09:57 AM
  #86  
HyperX
Team Owner

 
HyperX's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: Cary IL and Parrish FL
Posts: 29,074
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
St. Jude Donor '10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17

Default

Pretty bad that the Camaro beat it though....

Chevy Corvette Stringray 02:53.8
Porsche 911 Turbo S 02:51.2
Chevy Camaro Z/28 02:50.9
Ferrari F12 Berlinetta 02:50.8
Dodge Viper TA 02:49.9
Nissan GTR Nismo 02:49.4
Porsche 918 Spyder 02:43.1
Old 09-09-2014, 10:02 AM
  #87  
LFZ
Team Owner
 
LFZ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2003
Location: Lake Norman NC
Posts: 30,205
Received 310 Likes on 227 Posts

Default

Bad that a Camaro beat it? That isn't just a Camaro...LOL. It would have been embarassing if it didn't beat the Stingray.
Old 09-09-2014, 10:07 AM
  #88  
HyperX
Team Owner

 
HyperX's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: Cary IL and Parrish FL
Posts: 29,074
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
St. Jude Donor '10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17

Default

Originally Posted by LFZ
Bad that a Camaro beat it? That isn't just a Camaro...LOL. It would have been embarassing if it didn't beat the Stingray.
It is a Camaro with an LS7 engine and it weighs 600 lbs more than the stingray.
Old 09-09-2014, 10:11 AM
  #89  
LFZ
Team Owner
 
LFZ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2003
Location: Lake Norman NC
Posts: 30,205
Received 310 Likes on 227 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HyperX
It is a Camaro with an LS7 engine and it weighs 600 lbs more than the stingray.
Yea... That's all it is. LMAO.
Old 09-09-2014, 11:27 AM
  #90  
racerns
Melting Slicks
 
racerns's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2002
Location: Smithfield VA
Posts: 2,627
Received 118 Likes on 67 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by redzone
We also didn't know it was going to get a repave and widening....
Yes, that has shown to be good for ~2 sec on the Full course, which is the majority of the Grand Course. So to compare it to the previous times it would be closer to a 2:55. But the other factor is, did they really get their beat lap before the engine let go?
Old 09-09-2014, 11:40 AM
  #91  
Stingray23
Le Mans Master
 
Stingray23's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 8,585
Received 601 Likes on 221 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LFZ
Bad that a Camaro beat it? That isn't just a Camaro...LOL. It would have been embarassing if it didn't beat the Stingray.


Originally Posted by HyperX
It is a Camaro with an LS7 engine and it weighs 600 lbs more than the stingray.


Originally Posted by LFZ
Yea... That's all it is. LMAO.
Old 09-09-2014, 11:50 AM
  #92  
HyperX
Team Owner

 
HyperX's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: Cary IL and Parrish FL
Posts: 29,074
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
St. Jude Donor '10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17

Default

Originally Posted by Stingray23








No wonder GM is not releasing the C7 Nurburing numbers.

How can a 600 lbs heavier car with 50hp more beat the C7? Pathetic.
Old 09-09-2014, 12:07 PM
  #93  
Lavender
Melting Slicks
 
Lavender's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,732
Received 320 Likes on 172 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HyperX
No wonder GM is not releasing the C7 Nurburing numbers.

How can a 600 lbs heavier car with 50hp more beat the C7? Pathetic.
That 600lbs heavier car will run circles around most any stock C6 Z06 on the track too...
Old 09-09-2014, 12:13 PM
  #94  
HyperX
Team Owner

 
HyperX's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: Cary IL and Parrish FL
Posts: 29,074
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
St. Jude Donor '10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17

Default

Originally Posted by Lavender
That 600lbs heavier car will run circles around most any stock C6 Z06 on the track too...
LOL.

2012 Z06 Nurburing time - 7:22:68

2014 Z28 Nurburing time - 7:37:4

A Z06 has the same engine as the z28 and is almost 700 lbs lighter.
Old 09-09-2014, 12:56 PM
  #95  
skank
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
skank's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: Carmel CA
Posts: 2,801
Received 1,152 Likes on 514 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HyperX
Pretty bad that the Camaro beat it though....

Chevy Corvette Stringray 02:53.8
Porsche 911 Turbo S 02:51.2
Chevy Camaro Z/28 02:50.9
Ferrari F12 Berlinetta 02:50.8
Dodge Viper TA 02:49.9
Nissan GTR Nismo 02:49.4
Porsche 918 Spyder 02:43.1
I was at Laguna Seca when Motor Trend and Randy Pobst had the Corvette C7, Ferrari F12, and Porsche 911S test. I saw Pobst drive the C7 within 2 tenths of a second of the F12.The Corvette engineers were there that day and they downloaded the latest suspension specs to the display car that they were testing. They ran the C7 again and matched the F12 time. I'm not sure if it was Pobst driving or the Corvette engineers driving it, but I heard somebody yell out the time that was hand timed. Somebody asked if they wanted to use the new time. One of the other editors said no as it didn't have the timing equipment hooked up. They were totally fair and accurate with their protocol. Regardless, how can the F12 be 3 seconds faster around VIR when the Laguna Seca results show a closer gap?? I think the Motor Trend test with a pro driver (Pobst) might be more accurate. The Motor Trend test will be out shortly as well. I believe they did the Best Drivers Car Test in early June at Laguna. Both the C7 and the Z28 will be in that test so we can compare then.

Last edited by skank; 09-09-2014 at 01:02 PM.
Old 09-09-2014, 01:17 PM
  #96  
sam90lx
Le Mans Master
 
sam90lx's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2010
Location: Ventura CA
Posts: 7,775
Received 172 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by redzone
We also didn't know it was going to get a repave and widening....
Exactly.....run the ZR1 and Z06 now!
Old 09-09-2014, 02:50 PM
  #97  
Lavender
Melting Slicks
 
Lavender's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,732
Received 320 Likes on 172 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HyperX
LOL.

2012 Z06 Nurburing time - 7:22:68

2014 Z28 Nurburing time - 7:37:4

A Z06 has the same engine as the z28 and is almost 700 lbs lighter.
Comparing Camaro's lap done @ pouring rain to a lap done by the Z06 @ perfect conditions.

Now I know everything.

And just for the sake of arguing..what about a Z06 that doesn't have MPSC equipped?

Get notified of new replies

To If Jim Mero has truly done a 2:50 - 2:51 at VIR

Old 09-09-2014, 02:53 PM
  #98  
sam90lx
Le Mans Master
 
sam90lx's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2010
Location: Ventura CA
Posts: 7,775
Received 172 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Lavender
Comparing Camaro's lap done @ pouring rain to a lap done by the Z06 @ perfect conditions.

Now I know everything.

And just for the sake of arguing..what about a Z06 that doesn't have MPSC equipped?
Pouring? How about damp and sprinkles in areas?
Old 09-09-2014, 02:55 PM
  #99  
HyperX
Team Owner

 
HyperX's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: Cary IL and Parrish FL
Posts: 29,074
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
St. Jude Donor '10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17

Default

Originally Posted by Lavender
Comparing Camaro's lap done @ pouring rain to a lap done by the Z06 @ perfect conditions.

Now I know everything.

And just for the sake of arguing..what about a Z06 that doesn't have MPSC equipped?
It was all about the tires... dump the crappy good years for the Michelins and you got your speed... nothing else matters...

oh and rolling start vs no rolling start as the notes say
Old 09-09-2014, 03:18 PM
  #100  
Lavender
Melting Slicks
 
Lavender's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,732
Received 320 Likes on 172 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HyperX
It was all about the tires... dump the crappy good years for the Michelins and you got your speed... nothing else matters...

oh and rolling start vs no rolling start as the notes say
I see..

Nurburgring and tires. Have you ever driven over there?


Quick Reply: If Jim Mero has truly done a 2:50 - 2:51 at VIR



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:35 AM.