C7 General Discussion General C7 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Pfadt C7 Headers really SUCK

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-29-2013, 08:02 AM
  #1  
0Xplosive Performance
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
Xplosive Performance's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2010
Location: Longwood Florida
Posts: 28,247
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts
St. Jude Donor '13
Default Pfadt C7 Headers really SUCK



46 RWHP
with tune


Let me try to explain it this way traditional headers (4 into 1 with or without merge spikes or power spike) have one purpose and that is to get exhaust out of the engine. Our competitors headers do just that. But what separates us from them, is our headers don’t just let the exhaust fumes flow out at a leisurely pace, our headers forcefully suck the exhaust out like a demonic vacuum. This speeds up the combustion process allowing you to draw more air and fuel into the engine while sucking that exhaust out faster, resulting in more horsepower as well as keeping a consistent “Dip-Free” torque curve. Pair this technology with the highest precision welds, aircraft-grade stainless steel and Made in USA pride, and you have the finest Corvette headers on the market. Pfadt Tri-Y headers have been meticulously designed by our engineers to give you the most consistent “Dip-Free” tire shredding power.
It took 292 Engine Dyno tests to get Pfadt Tri-Y headers absolutely perfect, and that is why people choose ours over traditional 4-1 headers made by the competition—because Pfadt Tri-Y headers are the quickest, most efficient, most balanced headers on the market, with a consistent power curve across your RPM range.
Think of Pfadt Tri-Y headers as multiple HOV lanes in rush hour traffic. Think of traditional 4-1 headers as four fast lanes of traffic merging into a one-lane tunnel. Now which one gets you home faster? Since we don’t have the wave crashing of 4-1 headers, you won’t see any dips on your torque curve, which means you have full power at your foot when you need it most.
And that’s why you need Pfadt Tri-Y headers for your C5/C6/C7 Corvette. Because, with Pfadt Tri-Y headers, you have the most horsepower at your disposal at all times.


Pfadt Tri-Y VS. 4-1
What’s the difference between Pfadt Tri-Y headers and the traditional 4-1 headers made by the competition? Let’s put it into layman’s terms. A traditional header is essentially a giant barn door for each cylinder. The cylinder fires and belches out exhaust through the largest possible hole. This is the extent of 4-1 header technology and, with this technology, your only option to increase exhaust flow is to buy a larger diameter header to get that exhaust gas out. Going larger diameter tubes raises the torque curve higher up into the RPM range
Now a Pfadt Tri-Y header is also a giant barn door, except our headers act as if you have a 747 Jumbo Jet firing up its engine on the other side of your barn door, essentially sucking out all that exhaust gas for you as well as a few bales of hay and the farmer’s daughter. Our Tri-Y headers speed up the exhaust flow out of the engine allowing you to bring more air in, therefore creating massive horsepower gains.


How Do Pfadt Tri-Y Headers Work?
There are a lot of engineering explanations and math and other calculations that go into our headers, but let’s keep it simple and focus on the concept of scavenging. Pfadt Tri-Y headers are set up to overlap pairs of cylinders, merging 4 pairs of cylinders BEFORE they meet up together in the crossover pipe. Cylinder A releases a high-pressure exhaust pulse which causes increased low-pressure in cylinder B's exhaust primary, whisking away the exhaust remnants in that pipe. This is scavenging. By coordinating these pulses and inducing scavenging, one cylinder actually helps suck the spent exhaust fumes away from its partner cylinder. Then the cylinders switch roles, and then they switch again and again with every spark, to produce an extraordinary acceleration of the exhaust evacuation.

What about Wave Crashing?
Our Pfadt Tri-Y headers also eliminate wave crashes that are problematic in traditional 4-1 headers. When you have 4 outlets feeding into one pipe you are sure to get a crash - there’s just not enough room to expel the exhaust waves when the exhaust gasses merge. They only have two ways to go - away from the engine or back towards it, and the exhaust that goes back towards the engine is now disrupting the next fire, and the next fire, and so on and so forth. You can see these wave crashes, or dips, on many Dyno charts – there just isn’t a consistent vertical curve. Pfadt Tri-Y headers provide “Dip-Free” power. Since we have eliminated Wave Crashing you have a consistent, dip-free, torque curve at your disposal at every RPM.

Why Are They Called Tri-Y?
The reason they are called Tri-Y is because we take two cylinders and pair them into a Y formation (1st Y) and we do the same with the second pair of cylinders (2nd Y). Then we take those two pairs and pair them into a final Y and the final Y actually does the same thing the first two Y’s do, it sucks the paired exhausts on through your exhaust system.



Pfadt Tri-Y Specifications
  • TRI-Y Design, 4-2-1 tube merging
  • Makes much more torque under the curve, while still increasing top end HP
  • 1.875/2.125" tube diameter
  • CNC flanges with OEM locating features
  • Fully hand-TIG welded on-site
  • T-304 16 Gauge Stainless Steel
  • Fully Brushed Stainless Steel Finish
  • V-Band Clamp connections
  • Equal length long tubes
  • 1-piece X-Pipe available with and without Catalytic Converters
  • Full 3" collector and X-pipe
  • Comes with bullet-nosed flange bolts for installation
  • O2 Sensor extenders below
  • Cometic Multi-Layer Steel gasket upgrades below
  • Exhaust system with Cats is 24lbs lighter than factory
  • Exhaust system without Cats is 27lbs lighter than factory.
  • Made in USA
$1999.00
INSTALLED
PM CALL
FOR DELIVERED PRICE
Old 10-29-2013, 08:12 AM
  #2  
GoldenRod
Advanced
 
GoldenRod's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

46 RWHP with headers and tune... that is phenomenal. Nice work guys.
Old 10-29-2013, 10:07 AM
  #3  
Blackdevil77
Drifting
 
Blackdevil77's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2009
Location: Malverne New York
Posts: 1,403
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Very interesting read and sales pitch. It certainly got my attention. I'd love to see a dyno graph comparing your headers with traditional headers from a competitor like ARH or Kooks.
Old 10-29-2013, 11:05 AM
  #4  
C7pimp
Drifting
 
C7pimp's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,747
Received 768 Likes on 245 Posts
Default

I understand the concept, but they can't actually create a vacuum stronger than the pressure being forced out of the cylinders. That's just physics.

The dyno numbers don't lie and these headers are an excellent product but they don't actually suck exhaust out of the cylinder, that would be impossible without some sort of a vacuum mechanism.

They are tubes with no other mechanism attached, so how can they actually create a vacuum strong enough to actually suck the exhaust out at a greater rate than the pressure being expelled from the combustion chamber?

The fact that they allow the pressure to escape in much greater efficiency is a no-brainer. I think anyone who understands the basic concept of a well designed exhaust manifold gets that.


Again, I'm not knocking the effectiveness and quality of your products, because I know they are very good for the type that they are. I'd just like to see a bit more scientific explanation of how they are literally sucking exhaust out as opposed to letting the exhaust "escape" much more efficiently.

Last edited by C7pimp; 10-29-2013 at 11:51 AM.
Old 10-29-2013, 01:23 PM
  #5  
joenationwide
Racer
 
joenationwide's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Leesburg VA
Posts: 300
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by C7pimp
I understand the concept, but they can't actually create a vacuum stronger than the pressure being forced out of the cylinders. That's just physics.

The dyno numbers don't lie and these headers are an excellent product but they don't actually suck exhaust out of the cylinder, that would be impossible without some sort of a vacuum mechanism.

They are tubes with no other mechanism attached, so how can they actually create a vacuum strong enough to actually suck the exhaust out at a greater rate than the pressure being expelled from the combustion chamber?

The fact that they allow the pressure to escape in much greater efficiency is a no-brainer. I think anyone who understands the basic concept of a well designed exhaust manifold gets that.


Again, I'm not knocking the effectiveness and quality of your products, because I know they are very good for the type that they are. I'd just like to see a bit more scientific explanation of how they are literally sucking exhaust out as opposed to letting the exhaust "escape" much more efficiently.
Well a vacuum is a negative pressure and "pressure being forced out of the cylinders" is a positive pressure, they way you put it seems like they are opposing forces but I think the vacuum is assisting the pressure pulse.

I too would like to see a PFadt engineer or scavenging expert give a clear explanation of what is happening.

To me it seems the flow of the exhausting cylinder A's gases flowing past cylinder B's primary tube junction is like a venturi effect across an orifice (creating a low pressure and sucking the gases from it).
Old 10-29-2013, 02:10 PM
  #6  
Br0
Instructor
 
Br0's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2013
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by joenationwide
Well a vacuum is a negative pressure and "pressure being forced out of the cylinders" is a positive pressure, they way you put it seems like they are opposing forces but I think the vacuum is assisting the pressure pulse.
You are absolutely correct.


Originally Posted by C7pimp
I understand the concept, but they can't actually create a vacuum stronger than the pressure being forced out of the cylinders. That's just physics.

The dyno numbers don't lie and these headers are an excellent product but they don't actually suck exhaust out of the cylinder, that would be impossible without some sort of a vacuum mechanism.

They are tubes with no other mechanism attached, so how can they actually create a vacuum strong enough to actually suck the exhaust out at a greater rate than the pressure being expelled from the combustion chamber?

The fact that they allow the pressure to escape in much greater efficiency is a no-brainer. I think anyone who understands the basic concept of a well designed exhaust manifold gets that.


Again, I'm not knocking the effectiveness and quality of your products, because I know they are very good for the type that they are. I'd just like to see a bit more scientific explanation of how they are literally sucking exhaust out as opposed to letting the exhaust "escape" much more efficiently.

It's called exhaust "scavenging", and yes this effect can in fact suck the exhaust from the cylinder.

Your physics is somewhat correct, but you appear to thinking as if there was only one single exhaust pulse exiting the cylinder. This scavenging effect is created by the prior pulse downstream in the header that literally leaves a vacuum behind it that aides in sucking any remaining gases out of the cylinder for the next pulse that the pressure forcing the exhaust out didnt get.

This largely depends on proper sizing of the piping, and any disruptions in the pulse's flow that may be created by bends, turns, merging pipes, etc. Its kind of like, if you break up the pulse either by giving it too much space to dissapate or by turns, bends, or merging pipes, you lose some suction created by the pulse. Scavenging is not only important at the headers, but for the entire flow route of the exhaust, as this effect continues to be beneficial all the way through the pipe.

This is how I have always understood this concept, so correct me if i am mistaken. Headers, can, in fact have a profound impact on the scavenging effect.

Last edited by Br0; 10-29-2013 at 02:18 PM.
Old 10-29-2013, 02:12 PM
  #7  
themonk
Team Owner
 
themonk's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2006
Location: Calgary, AB. There's a reason why white was the only color offered on every year Corvette. Proud Canadian German Jamaican!
Posts: 97,155
Received 1,456 Likes on 799 Posts
St. Jude Donor '09, '12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17

Default

Will it void the warranty?
Old 10-29-2013, 02:47 PM
  #8  
alexanderjonesz06
Navigator
 
alexanderjonesz06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2013
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by C7pimp
I understand the concept, but they can't actually create a vacuum stronger than the pressure being forced out of the cylinders. That's just physics.
Close but no cigar. You can certainly create a vacuum with exhaust pulses .....and when you put a vacuum on the exhaust port of a cylinder that is about to vent exhaust, you are essentially sucking air out when that valve opens.
Remember, airflow is created by a pressure differential. Its simple physics. Positive pressure on one side + vacuum on the other will create much more flow than positive pressure alone. This is where headers make their real power, and this is where a tri-y design makes even more power than standard headers. The tri-y pairs cylinders together (the y-merging) to create vacuum on venting cylinders. Its an brilliant design
Old 10-29-2013, 02:48 PM
  #9  
9157
Naples FL
Support Corvetteforum!
 
9157's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2010
Location: FL
Posts: 1,353
Received 168 Likes on 90 Posts

Default

Is it's set up using the factory x pipe and cat's!
Old 10-29-2013, 03:04 PM
  #10  
torque_k.hunter23
Intermediate
 
torque_k.hunter23's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2013
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Amazing numbers. Good work guys, I wish I lived closer to you!
Old 10-29-2013, 03:17 PM
  #11  
Varcix
Burning Brakes
 
Varcix's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: Estero FL
Posts: 983
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

How much louder are these with out the cats?? ...Interested in bringing my C7 up next visit to Orlando!
Old 10-29-2013, 03:23 PM
  #12  
0Xplosive Performance
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
Xplosive Performance's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2010
Location: Longwood Florida
Posts: 28,247
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts
St. Jude Donor '13
Default

Originally Posted by 9157
Is it's set up using the factory x pipe and cat's!
It is not using stock x pipe and cats its using the complete system with x pipe and high flow cats.
Old 10-29-2013, 03:27 PM
  #13  
Zerski
Pro
 
Zerski's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Posts: 648
Received 52 Likes on 39 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by themonk
Will it void the warranty?
Also interested to know this
Old 10-29-2013, 03:38 PM
  #14  
genv6.2gm
Instructor
 
genv6.2gm's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2011
Posts: 189
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by C7pimp
I understand the concept, but they can't actually create a vacuum stronger than the pressure being forced out of the cylinders. That's just physics.
the pressure is not linear either throughout the valve lift curve where i would think the vacuum impose close to a static value at the valve seat.

therefore at the point of maximum pressure out of the cylinder, the vacuum may not be that valuable, but in areas where the there isn't high pressure....(maybe at low valve lift and slower engine speeds)...you will see greater benefit.

Originally Posted by themonk
Will it void the warranty?
if the pipes don't the tune will...

Last edited by genv6.2gm; 10-29-2013 at 03:43 PM.
Old 10-29-2013, 03:40 PM
  #15  
0Xplosive Performance
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
Xplosive Performance's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2010
Location: Longwood Florida
Posts: 28,247
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts
St. Jude Donor '13
Default

Originally Posted by Zerski
Also interested to know this
That is the age old question under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, which is enforced by the FTC
The Magnuson Moss Warranty Act was enacted by Congress back in 1975 to ensure that consumers are protected from misleading warranties being offered by manufacturers. The act does not require that companies offer warranties, but only regulates how the warranties are disclosed to the public if they are offered.
During the development of Magnuson Moss, Congress was concerned that companies would deceive consumers by telling them they must use a parts offered by the manufacturer in order to maintain their product’s warranty. that the non-OE part caused the failure.A provision was included to the act that prohibited the conditioning of a warranty on the use of any of the manufacturer’s parts or services needed to maintain the product. Under interpretations by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the only way that a warranty could be denied based on the use of a non-original equipment part would be for that non-OE part to have caused the failure. Further, the onus is on the manufacturer of the product to prove that the non-OE part caused the failure.
You can add aftermarket parts now headers increase the flow and scavanging of exhaust gases resulting in increased performance. The same as a cold air intake and high flow air intake systems. In a nut shell it comes down to the what the warranty issue is and the dealer your working with.

Last edited by Xplosive Performance; 10-29-2013 at 03:43 PM.
Old 10-29-2013, 03:46 PM
  #16  
genv6.2gm
Instructor
 
genv6.2gm's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2011
Posts: 189
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

can you tell us what kind in changes of mixture in terms of lambda with a stock tune from stock manifold to your header?
(looking to see if it can be run on the stock tune and how much of an impact will they make to stock values)


also what type of variance from cylinder to cylinder in terms of percentage as far as temp and A/F?


BTW looks like a great product for a great price!

Last edited by genv6.2gm; 10-29-2013 at 03:50 PM.
Old 10-29-2013, 03:49 PM
  #17  
TTRotary
Race Director
 
TTRotary's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2000
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,381
Received 404 Likes on 160 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Xplosive Performance
Under interpretations by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the only way that a warranty could be denied based on the use of a non-original equipment part would be for that non-OE part to have caused the failure. Further, the onus is on the manufacturer of the product to prove that the non-OE part caused the failure.
True, but the dealer could cause other problems, such as reporting the fact that federally mandated emissions equipment has been removed from the car, which could be a nasty fine. They could also void the 70K mile emissions warranty.

The simple solution to all of this is just to save the oem pipes and bolt them back on before it goes in to the dealer for warranty work. Probably a 45mn deal at most.

Get notified of new replies

To Pfadt C7 Headers really SUCK

Old 10-29-2013, 05:05 PM
  #18  
rawhide
Advanced
 
rawhide's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2003
Location: dillsburg pa
Posts: 62
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default exhausted

Since I took up time and space in school I know a lot about physics. High velocity gases flowing by a opening create a vacuum. If the headers are tuned correctly one exhaust flow will help pull the next and no two will reach the collector at the same time. I installed LG long tube headers on my 02 but had issues with the oxygen sensors being further away from the engine and got codes ( not all the time ) on the dash.
Old 10-29-2013, 05:46 PM
  #19  
427bob
Pro
 
427bob's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2013
Location: FL
Posts: 714
Received 296 Likes on 93 Posts

Default

The question I have with any of these claims is how much was the tune and how much was the headers?
If the tune got ya 40 and the headers 6....
Like to see some independent testing done by someone with no pony in this race!
Old 10-29-2013, 06:00 PM
  #20  
0Xplosive Performance
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
Xplosive Performance's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2010
Location: Longwood Florida
Posts: 28,247
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts
St. Jude Donor '13
Default

Originally Posted by disc0monkey
can you tell us what kind in changes of mixture in terms of lambda with a stock tune from stock manifold to your header?
(looking to see if it can be run on the stock tune and how much of an impact will they make to stock values)


also what type of variance from cylinder to cylinder in terms of percentage as far as temp and A/F?


BTW looks like a great product for a great price!
You can run the headers with the stock tune no problems we have customers do it all the time. Between the O2's and MAF the stock tune will compensate for the increased air maintaining A/F close to Stoichiometric. The possible problem occurs when the downstream O2 is moved farther downstream it takes longer for it to come to temp and may throw an emission code and check engine light. The advantage to a tune after headers is to not only tune A/F ratio's by the manfactures leave a lot on the table in order to meet CAFE reg. So you can pick up performance, driveability, torque by a tune that not only looks at A/F ratio but timing curves, VE tables, MAF Curves and all the things that go into making the car performance at peak performance and in a safe condition.


Quick Reply: Pfadt C7 Headers really SUCK



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:18 AM.