C7 General Discussion General C7 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

GS vs. 911 Motor Trend review

Old 10-18-2016, 02:18 PM
  #41  
HPT
Racer
 
HPT's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 460
Received 129 Likes on 72 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by vetteLT193
Something is off with the Porsche numbers. I can't fathom that big of a delta from 2014 when the car had 400 HP and it did the quarter in 12.4 @ 116 and 0-60 in 4.0 seconds.

20 HP does not shave a second off a quarter mile time. Plus other articles are saying mid to upper 3 second 0-60's. one referenced .2 quicker than the regular 911 putting it at 3.9 and other 3.6. Automobile mag tested it at 3.7 with the PDK.

My guess is Porsche did a bit too much 'magazine tuning' this particular vehicle
This is the problem with bench racing. The 991.2 CS doesn't just get a "20 HP" bump over the 991. In the real world, it's more like a 25-30 RWHP bump to go with the additional 80 WTQ from idle to about 5500 RPM. Their power and torque curves are as good as they get for a turbocharged engine, and their 1/4 mile results are absolutely in line with the expectation from even before the car was released. Not going to look up time slips from owners, but those are better than magazine times anyway.

As for 0-60 times...who cares. Performance cars have long been at a level which rendered 0-60 MPH meaningless.
Old 10-18-2016, 02:34 PM
  #42  
pkincy
Safety Car
 
pkincy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2003
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 4,276
Received 645 Likes on 485 Posts

Default

Used GT4s are well over a $100k.
Old 10-18-2016, 02:48 PM
  #43  
TARANTULA
Melting Slicks
 
TARANTULA's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,566
Received 1,035 Likes on 468 Posts

Default

They should change the name of this thread to Enter here Corvette fanbois
Old 10-18-2016, 03:11 PM
  #44  
thegame
Le Mans Master
 
thegame's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2002
Location: Bergen County NJ
Posts: 9,862
Received 491 Likes on 275 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TARANTULA
They should change the name of this thread to Enter here Corvette fanbois
I know totally weird right since we are on CORVETTEFORUM
Old 10-18-2016, 03:18 PM
  #45  
sunsalem
Race Director
 
sunsalem's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2014
Posts: 11,905
Received 2,146 Likes on 1,521 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by thegame
I know totally weird right since we are on CORVETTEFORUM
Yeah, totally illogical.
Old 10-18-2016, 03:38 PM
  #46  
dead of night
Instructor
 
dead of night's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2016
Posts: 109
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

I don't know why the 911 absorbed the bumps better, since the GS has magnetic ride suspension.
Old 10-18-2016, 03:45 PM
  #47  
davidtcpa
Go Canes!
Support Corvetteforum!
 
davidtcpa's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2009
Location: Boca Raton FL
Posts: 5,975
Received 329 Likes on 241 Posts
St. Jude Donor '11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-'18-'19-'20-'21


Default

Originally Posted by fleming23
It may not be exactly on par, but the GT4 can be had for under 100k, and is pretty damn close to Grandsport territory on a track. I could not care less about 0-60 or 1/4 mile times for either car as neither were designed to be dragstrip warriors but rather track toys.
MSRP is $86,400 plus transportation, taxes and "regionally required equipment". I would bet you will not be able to get a new one anywhere under $100K at a dealer in the US. I new GTS is $92K+ plus tax, dealer fees, etc.

Last edited by davidtcpa; 10-18-2016 at 03:45 PM.
Old 10-18-2016, 03:48 PM
  #48  
Ivan Viera
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Ivan Viera's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2015
Posts: 174
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dead of night
I don't know why the 911 absorbed the bumps better, since the GS has magnetic ride suspension.


It must be the overall tunning including the springs because Magnetic reacts faster than PASM, MT has always said in the past that 911 is the best damped car.
Old 10-18-2016, 03:54 PM
  #49  
\Boost Monkey/
Melting Slicks
 
\Boost Monkey/'s Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,356
Received 774 Likes on 417 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fleming23
It may not be exactly on par, but the GT4 can be had for under 100k.....


Yeah, good luck with that.

EDIT: Cheapest i found on the net in US = 101k

Last edited by \Boost Monkey/; 10-18-2016 at 04:05 PM.
Old 10-18-2016, 04:01 PM
  #50  
fleming23
Melting Slicks
 
fleming23's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2009
Location: Dallas Georgia
Posts: 2,787
Received 594 Likes on 408 Posts
2020 Corvette of the Year Finalist (track prepared)
C3 of Year Winner (track prepared) 2019

Default

Originally Posted by pkincy
Used GT4s are well over a $100k.
Originally Posted by davidtcpa
MSRP is $86,400 plus transportation, taxes and "regionally required equipment". I would bet you will not be able to get a new one anywhere under $100K at a dealer in the US. I new GTS is $92K+ plus tax, dealer fees, etc.
Originally Posted by \Boost Monkey/
Yeah, good luck with that.

You do know they were sold out prior to being launched, right?
And you do know they opened up production and increased allocations beyond the initial run, right?

A friend of mine and close neighbor is on his 2nd GT4, the first purchased and subsequently sold for under $100k. The 2nd was slightly over due to adding PCCBs and LWBs. The market might be driving prices up right now, but there are dealers that sold at MSRP, which, like I said, is under $100k.

Last edited by fleming23; 10-18-2016 at 04:02 PM.
Old 10-18-2016, 04:03 PM
  #51  
\Boost Monkey/
Melting Slicks
 
\Boost Monkey/'s Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,356
Received 774 Likes on 417 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fleming23
And you do know they opened up production and increased allocations beyond the initial run, right?

A friend of mine and close neighbor is on his 2nd GT4, the first purchased and subsequently sold for under $100k. The 2nd was slightly over due to adding PCCBs and LWBs. The market might be driving prices up right now, but there are dealers that sold at MSRP, which, like I said, is under $100k.
Yup, just read that and changed my post.

I saw a few for sale, but none under 100k. One was 101k sticker but that was the cheapest i can find.
Old 10-18-2016, 04:07 PM
  #52  
fleming23
Melting Slicks
 
fleming23's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2009
Location: Dallas Georgia
Posts: 2,787
Received 594 Likes on 408 Posts
2020 Corvette of the Year Finalist (track prepared)
C3 of Year Winner (track prepared) 2019

Default

Originally Posted by \Boost Monkey/
Yup, just read that and changed my post.

I saw a few for sale, but none under 100k. One was 101k sticker but that was the cheapest i can find.
No doubt demand has influenced current market prices. This is pretty common among most P-cars. I don't think market adjustments should be factored into the discussion as it is not a set or definable variable.
Old 10-18-2016, 04:13 PM
  #53  
\Boost Monkey/
Melting Slicks
 
\Boost Monkey/'s Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,356
Received 774 Likes on 417 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fleming23
No doubt demand has influenced current market prices. This is pretty common among most P-cars. I don't think market adjustments should be factored into the discussion as it is not a set or definable variable.
Well P dealers are ordering optioned up. I found some without a markup but like I said the cheapest was 101k sticker and price (unless they are including ADM in sticker, which is done sometimes).

Average seems to be in the 120k range. As high as 145k.
Old 10-18-2016, 04:21 PM
  #54  
jimmyb
Race Director
 
jimmyb's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 13,934
Received 4,248 Likes on 2,023 Posts

Default

The thing that bugs me about these Motor Trend shoot outs is that ever since Corvettes got REALLY good tires (C6 ZR1, late C6 Z06/07) MT can't bring themselves to give the CAR credit. Now, back in the bad old days (Goodyear EMT's), they (MT) never mentioned how crappy the Goodyears were or how good the Michelin PS's were on the Porsche. But EVERY freakin' test where a Corvette is shod with PSSC2's, there's always a comment, almost like Corvette is cheating. I guess I should be happy that they did mention the Porsche's DSG advantage.....
The following users liked this post:
sdurg24 (10-23-2016)
Old 10-18-2016, 04:32 PM
  #55  
jimmyb
Race Director
 
jimmyb's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 13,934
Received 4,248 Likes on 2,023 Posts

Default

Not the same track or driver but the GS was 6.9 seconds a lap faster than the Cayman GT4 in this years Car and Driver Lighning Lap.

I think Porsche is still, at some level, protecting the 911 from it's mid-engine siblings.

Last edited by jimmyb; 10-18-2016 at 04:34 PM.
Old 10-18-2016, 04:43 PM
  #56  
OnPoint
The Consigliere
Support Corvetteforum!
 
OnPoint's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: 2023 Z06 & 2010 ZR1
Posts: 22,243
Received 5,431 Likes on 2,268 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jimmyb
Not the same track or driver but the GS was 6.9 seconds a lap faster than the Cayman GT4 in this years Car and Driver Lighning Lap.

I think Porsche is still, at some level, protecting the 911 from it's mid-engine siblings.

I too think they're still protecting the 911. Which is a shame as the Cayman has the better platform, IMO.

If Porsche released a 500-550 hp Cayman I'd put one in my garage in a heartbeat. But I'm not one of the long running members of the Porsche camp who would take umbrage at such. I'd just view it as a great play and enjoy the superior machine to the 911.
Old 10-18-2016, 05:09 PM
  #57  
Liter of cola
Racer
 
Liter of cola's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2016
Posts: 434
Received 27 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZoratZ06
Previous Porsche owner and current C7Z owner and I have to admit, I was blown away by the 3.1s 0-60 and qtr mi times in this article. Yes I know it was DCT...but not AWD and the car weighs 3350lbs with 420hp. That's 'awefully' quick given those weight/power figures. I can't think of another car with those specs that even comes close. Heck the 430 Scuderia with 490hp barely matches that, same for the 458. Even the 500hp GT3RS was 3.0 or 3.1, with DCT. Even the A8 in the GS would not come close to that. And the 0-100mph time of 7.9 is silly quick. Something just doesn't seem right...3350lbs with only 420hp...WOW!

I love Porsche's...always have...The C7Z is my first Vette. The 2 main reasons: They finally upgraded the Vette interior AND it's SOOOOO much more fun to drive. You need a GT3 to even come close to the enjoyment I get from my Z06. That's coming from a long time Porsche and Ferrari guy. Never thought those words would come from my mouth, lol...Having said that, it's hard to say anything negative about a Porsche...they are so solid.
The engine is right on top of the rear tires + tons of r&d on that DCT launch control. The times dont surprise me.

Get notified of new replies

To GS vs. 911 Motor Trend review

Old 10-18-2016, 05:36 PM
  #58  
jimmyb
Race Director
 
jimmyb's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 13,934
Received 4,248 Likes on 2,023 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by vetteLT193
Something is off with the Porsche numbers. I can't fathom that big of a delta from 2014 when the car had 400 HP and it did the quarter in 12.4 @ 116 and 0-60 in 4.0 seconds.

20 HP does not shave a second off a quarter mile time. Plus other articles are saying mid to upper 3 second 0-60's. one referenced .2 quicker than the regular 911 putting it at 3.9 and other 3.6. Automobile mag tested it at 3.7 with the PDK.

My guess is Porsche did a bit too much 'magazine tuning' this particular vehicle
Great minds and all.....

When I saw those acceleration figures, I went to the Porsche site also. All I can say is "Lucy, you got some 'splainin to do"
Old 10-18-2016, 05:41 PM
  #59  
slo17gs
Instructor
 
slo17gs's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2016
Location: Springfield Missouri
Posts: 175
Received 37 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Newton06
Well, the Porsche fanbois think the C7 is a 'Seiko' compared to the 911 being a 'Tag'.
Tag's are actually a poor-man's Rolex. LOL.

They're whining about the Cup tires, and chiding the build quality of the C7.

I also love the comments about the 'feel' of driving a 911. What does that mean exactly? Is a device massaging the driver's prostrate for God's sake?

When I go to the track, I talk with drivers of all cars, and all are gracious and respectful, regardless of whether they are driving real high-dollar cars like Lambos, and Ferarris; they are true car lovers. Even the Viper owners are nice (saw a beautiful new ACR at VIR last month).

For the price of the as-tested 911, you could buy a new Z06 and a Z51!

The C7 haters on MT forums are probably pugnacious wanna-be's or douche-nozzles that valet at the country club and are more concerned about image and 'prestige'. Funny thing is, in affluent areas, 911's are as common as Civics...
Don't really have any comment on what you said about the cars but as someone who owns several Tag and Rolex watches among other brands, the Tag is far from a "poor mans" Rolex. The movements that Tag uses in their Caliber 16, Caliber 17, Caliber 36, and Caliber 1887 watches are considerably better than anything Rolex puts out. Their build quality is easily as good and considering my last Tag Grand Carrera cost $7000, it's significantly less expensive than even my cheapest Rolex. Just an FYI....
Old 10-18-2016, 06:00 PM
  #60  
Liter of cola
Racer
 
Liter of cola's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2016
Posts: 434
Received 27 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jimmyb
Great minds and all.....

When I saw those acceleration figures, I went to the Porsche site also. All I can say is "Lucy, you got some 'splainin to do"
You know i think you guys are right... porsche says the 911 s is capable of 3.7 sec 0-60 with the pdk and sport chrono. Pretty odd they put down 3.1. Sounds like porsche sent out a beefed up press car.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: GS vs. 911 Motor Trend review



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:24 PM.