C7 General Discussion General C7 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

If GM offered a "stripper Vette", would you buy?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-10-2017, 07:20 PM
  #41  
roadbike56
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
roadbike56's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2011
Location: Holly Springs NC
Posts: 14,378
Received 1,609 Likes on 1,037 Posts
St. Jude Donor '16-'17,'22,'24

Default

From a marketing concept, the stripper, low priced Corvette sounds good, but in actual practice, it will flop.
Today you already have folks like yours truly who opt for a slightly used C7 with more options than a new base, 1LT coupe. That situation will get worse as the GS and Z06 add some age. Why would anyone want to go to a stripper instead of a two year old, 2LT, Z51. Given the costs of making the changes to produce the "stripper", the price won't be that much lower than the current base, 1LT, coupe. Add to that the target market expects the basic Corvette to be well equipped. IMHO, the stripper will be a dud that fills up some dealers lots and gets sold for fire sale prices just to unload them.
Old 03-10-2017, 07:33 PM
  #42  
stevebz06
Melting Slicks
 
stevebz06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,075
Received 304 Likes on 205 Posts

Default

They would go for the "stripper" because it would theoretically be higher performance. For people that place a value on lap times, even a tenth of a second is worth something. Few people listen to their radio or check the Nav while lapping, so these things are worse than useless to them. People that buy BMW's and Porsches will spend big bucks to get factory "strippers", so why not Corvette buyers?
Old 03-10-2017, 07:34 PM
  #43  
SK360
Melting Slicks
 
SK360's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 2,168
Received 241 Likes on 146 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by obxchartercaptain
young and having money is a oxymoron.
For some I guess.
Old 03-10-2017, 07:47 PM
  #44  
ZenicaPA
Burning Brakes
Support Corvetteforum!
 
ZenicaPA's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2016
Location: Bucks County PA
Posts: 1,055
Received 269 Likes on 174 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sunsalem
Maybe it's because it is Friday...I dunno:




Twice in one day a forum member burns an image into my retinas that will forever haunt me.

Thanks.
Old 03-10-2017, 09:48 PM
  #45  
bigsapper
Drifting
Support Corvetteforum!
 
bigsapper's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2001
Location: Plano TX
Posts: 1,757
Received 294 Likes on 219 Posts

Default

COPO Corvette.
Old 03-10-2017, 11:26 PM
  #46  
fsvoboda
Melting Slicks
 
fsvoboda's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2013
Location: East Lansing, MI
Posts: 3,119
Received 795 Likes on 565 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stevebz06
They would go for the "stripper" because it would theoretically be higher performance. For people that place a value on lap times, even a tenth of a second is worth something. Few people listen to their radio or check the Nav while lapping, so these things are worse than useless to them. People that buy BMW's and Porsches will spend big bucks to get factory "strippers", so why not Corvette buyers?
As some already have mentioned, much of this stuff is integrated into one system (radio, nav, climate control) so you would not save weight with a different version. In fact, I am surprised that there isn't an option to add nav to C7 after purchase, an easy profit center for GM. On my wife's 2014 Jeep Cherokee all the nav parts already were there, and adding it was a simple software upgrade, took about fifteen minutes in my driveway on the phone to Chrysler.

Old 03-10-2017, 11:33 PM
  #47  
Bill Dearborn
Tech Contributor
 
Bill Dearborn's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 1999
Location: Charlotte, NC (formerly Endicott, NY)
Posts: 40,096
Received 8,930 Likes on 5,334 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by cuisinartvette
Not everyone wants lots of gadgets, electronics power everything

Could regulations keep GM from making it (wheres Tadge)
Rather than how trim levels? do the ZR1, a base no frills deal or one thats just fully loaded

Less complicated elecronics, modules bumper to bumper
Lighter weight
Deeper gears say 3.70, simple 6 spd close ratio trans noone needs 7+ gears
Manual trans
no VVT if they could get away with it
Minimal power accessorys, manual seats, manual ac power windows tunes thats about it....maybe ABS; just remove as many nannys and sensors as possible
Could be much funner to drive, light quick; make plenty of them so it didnt become some high buck ltd production deal; Base engine nothing smaller or larger as most would mod em

Lower price of course

Think GM could sell a ton of these if they made them or would there be some huge surcharge with the "its special" thing


Still could drive a vette for Camaro money
(should offer the same option for that car too!)

Couldnt afford one myself but if I could Id buy one in a hot second.

What say you?
They did that in 1999 and 2000. It was called the Fixed Roof Coupe. Sales didn't do well until they turned it into the C5Z06 and added some features in 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004. Features included were HUD, ABS, Traction Control and Active Handling. You forget that once they pay for developing a lot of the features like stability control for the main model it actually would cost them more to put in a dumbed down system. All of the money is in the software so reducing the number of 1s and 0s in the module memory does little to reduce cost but can raise costs due to making another part number to control.

Bill
Old 03-11-2017, 12:05 AM
  #48  
Vetteman Jack
Administrator

Support Corvetteforum!
 
Vetteman Jack's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: In a parallel universe. Currently own 2014 Stingray Coupe.
Posts: 343,020
Received 19,307 Likes on 13,978 Posts
C7 of the Year - Modified Finalist 2021
MO Events Coordinator
St. Jude Co-Organizer
St. Jude Donor '03-'04-'05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-'18-'19-
'20-'21-'22-'23-'24
NCM Sinkhole Donor
CI 5, 8 & 11 Veteran


Default

I could do without a number of the things that come standard on a new Vette, but some thing I would want to have. While it might be tempting to buy a stripper Vette, I'm not sure I would be happy in the long run.
Old 03-11-2017, 01:11 AM
  #49  
Pacembellum
Melting Slicks
 
Pacembellum's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2016
Location: CA
Posts: 3,090
Received 689 Likes on 507 Posts
Default

That is what I would, buy very stripped.

My perfect vette.

2017 Z06 chassis
N/A LS7 with quality heads, cam, and about 600hp crank
1LZ electronics suite
3LZ comp seat upholstery but manual controls, leather dash, suede headliner, suede paneling.

No options beyond that.
Old 03-11-2017, 01:21 AM
  #50  
themonk
Team Owner
 
themonk's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2006
Location: Calgary, AB. There's a reason why white was the only color offered on every year Corvette. Proud Canadian German Jamaican!
Posts: 97,155
Received 1,456 Likes on 799 Posts
St. Jude Donor '09, '12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17

Default

I don't need AC, pwr seats, HUD or leather....just how much weight that saves I don't know, probably not much so unless 200 lbs of weight is saved by not having those items I'd rather have them than not.
Old 03-11-2017, 07:27 AM
  #51  
Squeaky Wheel
Burning Brakes

 
Squeaky Wheel's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2015
Location: Lagrange KY
Posts: 1,177
Received 385 Likes on 239 Posts
Default

While I like most of the creature comforts like powered windows, mirrors etc, I could easily live without the touch screen and all its icons. I find them terribly distracting. Just give me a good quality audio with standard buttons and an aux port for a line in, similar to what could be had in the C6. Also a similar HVAC system. I HATE menus!
Old 03-11-2017, 08:06 AM
  #52  
roadbike56
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
roadbike56's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2011
Location: Holly Springs NC
Posts: 14,378
Received 1,609 Likes on 1,037 Posts
St. Jude Donor '16-'17,'22,'24

Default

Originally Posted by stevebz06
They would go for the "stripper" because it would theoretically be higher performance. For people that place a value on lap times, even a tenth of a second is worth something. Few people listen to their radio or check the Nav while lapping, so these things are worse than useless to them. People that buy BMW's and Porsches will spend big bucks to get factory "strippers", so why not Corvette buyers?
Steve,
You're reference is not the same as the OPs. You're talking about a lighter, higher performing car that might lose some of the creature comforts in the package to achieve it's goal. That Corvette probably would sell as a performance option, but it wouldn't cost less than the current versions of the C7. The cost of engineering such an option would be passed on to the consumer. Still, you may have a point that a lighter Corvette with better track times might sell enough to be viable, at a higher price.
The OP is referring to a lower priced C7 based on providing less creature comfort systems. The points being made by most here is, no that won't work due to the costs of re-engineering, the cost of setting up the plant to offer this option (the C7 keeps costs down by making some systems standard such as power seats and power windows) and that buyers would simply opt for a used C7, especially a late model certified example, instead of the "stripper" Corvette.
With your example, say a lighter weight Z51 with an LT4 engine and GS wheels/tires. Oh yeah, that might sell even if it costs a few bucks more.

Last edited by roadbike56; 03-11-2017 at 08:07 AM.
Old 03-11-2017, 08:42 AM
  #53  
JoesC5
Team Owner
 
JoesC5's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Location: Springfield MO
Posts: 41,733
Received 1,699 Likes on 1,213 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Bill Dearborn
They did that in 1999 and 2000. It was called the Fixed Roof Coupe. Sales didn't do well until they turned it into the C5Z06 and added some features in 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004. Features included were HUD, ABS, Traction Control and Active Handling. You forget that once they pay for developing a lot of the features like stability control for the main model it actually would cost them more to put in a dumbed down system. All of the money is in the software so reducing the number of 1s and 0s in the module memory does little to reduce cost but can raise costs due to making another part number to control.

Bill
In 1993, when GM was laying out their next generation(C5) models, they were estimating the fastback coupe at around $40,000 and the "Billy Bob" FRC at around $30,000.

The 1997 Fastback coupe came in at $37,495, lower than they originally estimated.

By 1999, the fastback coupe was $39,171 and the 1999 "Billy Bob" FRC was $38,777.

After adding back in all the stuff people wanted, the "Billy Bob" FRC was not the low cost "stripper" model as first envisioned back in 1993.

Last edited by JoesC5; 03-11-2017 at 08:44 AM.
Old 03-11-2017, 09:21 AM
  #54  
2K14C7
Le Mans Master
Support Corvetteforum!
 
2K14C7's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2001
Location: St. Peters MO
Posts: 5,676
Received 520 Likes on 322 Posts
C7 of Year Finalist (stock) 2019
2018 C7 of Year Finalist

Default

The C5 FRC was an interesting concept. Trouble was hardly anyone wanted to buy it. Then someone at GM decided to take the FRC and increase the HP, tweak the suspension and some other items and put Z06 badges on it. It was an instant hit.
Old 03-11-2017, 09:23 AM
  #55  
SMT1004
Burning Brakes
 
SMT1004's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2014
Posts: 901
Received 187 Likes on 127 Posts
Default

1LT at 45k (7M) or 46k (8A) could be considered the stripper version the OP is mentioning. At these deeply discounted prices it allows some to get into a new vette, that was me.

I would think in this market the cost to create a lesser content version than the 1LT would be cost prohibitive. The upgrades to the assembly line, materials, etc. would eat up any additional profit margin for GM.

Does GM still sell rolling chassis to race teams?
Old 03-11-2017, 10:16 AM
  #56  
Extreme Engineering
Racer
 
Extreme Engineering's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2009
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts

Default Body in White

What ever happened to the body in white option that they used to sell to race teams? These truly were strippers with little to no interior, accessories etc. This would be the ultimate kit car!
Old 03-11-2017, 10:17 AM
  #57  
Extreme Engineering
Racer
 
Extreme Engineering's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2009
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts

Default Body in White

What ever happened to the body in white option that they used to sell to race teams? These truly were strippers with little to no interior, accessories etc. This would be the ultimate kit car!

Get notified of new replies

To If GM offered a "stripper Vette", would you buy?

Old 03-11-2017, 01:17 PM
  #58  
ZERRY 316
Racer
 
ZERRY 316's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2017
Location: Glendale Arizona
Posts: 450
Received 94 Likes on 63 Posts
Default

Buy a C3 and update it with what you want.
Old 03-11-2017, 01:32 PM
  #59  
fsvoboda
Melting Slicks
 
fsvoboda's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2013
Location: East Lansing, MI
Posts: 3,119
Received 795 Likes on 565 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SMT1004

Does GM still sell rolling chassis to race teams?
BTW, if you look for Corvettes on Ebay from time to time you will see essentially such chassis, wrecked cars without body panels but mechanically sound, in rolling, driveable form. They are quite inexpensive.

Old 03-11-2017, 04:06 PM
  #60  
spinkick
Melting Slicks
 
spinkick's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2003
Location: Brighton Mi
Posts: 3,052
Received 544 Likes on 324 Posts

Default

As long as you can select her hair color, I wouldnt mind if the car came with one.


Quick Reply: If GM offered a "stripper Vette", would you buy?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:56 PM.