C7 Tech/Performance Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Tech Topics, Basic Tech, Maintenance, How to Remove & Replace
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

100% Real World, C7 Intercooler testing by ProCharger (Horizontal and Vert. data)

Old 11-12-2014, 12:25 PM
  #41  
0ProChargerTech
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
ProChargerTech's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,095
Received 68 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kracka
If you're skeptical, just buy the horizontal intercooler. This is why they offer the choice to customers.
Nailed it.

We just wanted to make sure people knew that we have had ZERO overheating complaints thus far, and that the Vertical intercooler works quite wonderfully.
Old 11-12-2014, 06:49 PM
  #42  
carlrx7
Safety Car
 
carlrx7's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2008
Location: TEXOMA
Posts: 3,712
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08-'09

Default

Originally Posted by ProChargerTech
The Vertical intercooler has nearly no IAT rise when used for 1/4,1/2 and Full Mile Pulls.
This blows my mind! Incredible. Using the 72% increase you mentioned in the above posts.

Base IAT = 100F
I'd consider nearly no rise as less than 5.
Than Verticle = 105F
72% increase
Than Horizontal = 109F


Does that sound right?

Only reason my mind is blown because of my previous recorded supercharger temps from my C6 setup. 100 base and 160 at the top of the quarter. My TT kit would go up to 130 IAT.

Very impressed!

-Carl
Old 11-13-2014, 02:27 AM
  #43  
chuntington101
Melting Slicks
 
chuntington101's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,141
Received 113 Likes on 100 Posts

Default

Thanks for posting data ProCharger! Very interesting findings. I would have liked to have seen strain gauges on the suspension components to prove the was no impact to aero but that might be one step too far! Your not an OEM after all.

Do you have any flow data / CAD type analysis for the horizontal intercooler and scoops? It would be interesting to see.

Also did you guys look at probably the best intercooler scoop ever made, Porsche 993 turbo (air cooled engines)? It used several small scoops and was very effective at getting air to the top mounted intercooler.

Once again thanks for posting the information you have. It's always great, if very infrequent, to see after market providers publishing this kind of test data to back up there claims. Well done!
Old 11-13-2014, 12:31 PM
  #44  
0ProChargerTech
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
ProChargerTech's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,095
Received 68 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chuntington101
Thanks for posting data ProCharger! Very interesting findings. I would have liked to have seen strain gauges on the suspension components to prove the was no impact to aero but that might be one step too far! Your not an OEM after all.
Oh how we would have loved to take it to that step. We have some ideas to try on our next track testing session, but that won't be till spring. To cold here in KC, to safely test at those speeds right now.

Also did you guys look at probably the best intercooler scoop ever made, Porsche 993 turbo (air cooled engines)? It used several small scoops and was very effective at getting air to the top mounted intercooler.
What you speak of, is much like our final design, that worked the best.





Once again thanks for posting the information you have. It's always great, if very infrequent, to see after market providers publishing this kind of test data to back up there claims. Well done!
Your very welcome, we appreciate it!
Old 11-13-2014, 02:43 PM
  #45  
chuntington101
Melting Slicks
 
chuntington101's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,141
Received 113 Likes on 100 Posts

Default

Are the fins on the diffuser vertical, forward facing or rearward? It's difficult to see from the renderings.
Old 11-13-2014, 02:48 PM
  #46  
Kracka
Le Mans Master
 
Kracka's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2014
Location: Oak Point, TX
Posts: 9,575
Received 5,675 Likes on 2,897 Posts

Default

It appears they angle rearward.
Old 11-13-2014, 05:21 PM
  #47  
0ProChargerTech
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
ProChargerTech's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,095
Received 68 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chuntington101
Are the fins on the diffuser vertical, forward facing or rearward? It's difficult to see from the renderings.
Rear facing.

The write up explains the issues we faced when trying to point any scoop forward. It would cause lift of the nose, and effect the transition at high speed braking coming into a high speed turn.

So the rear facing scoops, keep the handling normal.
And it uses the natural flow of the air going under the car, to do the work of "drawing" air down through the intercooler core.

Works like a Champ!
Old 11-14-2014, 08:36 PM
  #48  
Theta
Tech Contributor
 
Theta's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: Saint Louis MO
Posts: 4,761
Likes: 0
Received 218 Likes on 110 Posts
St. Jude Donor '14-'15
Default

In case anyone is interested, and I don't think ProCharger will mind me saying this, we (and by we, I really mean Ron and company at Vengeance) are going to be testing their aero diffuser on my car with an ECS unit and comparing IATs vs. the normal OEM rubber flaps.

Should be interesting - I'm all for trying new ideas!
Old 11-17-2014, 10:45 AM
  #49  
0ProChargerTech
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
ProChargerTech's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,095
Received 68 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Theta
In case anyone is interested, and I don't think ProCharger will mind me saying this, we (and by we, I really mean Ron and company at Vengeance) are going to be testing their aero diffuser on my car with an ECS unit and comparing IATs vs. the normal OEM rubber flaps.

Should be interesting - I'm all for trying new ideas!
Doesn't bother us, one bit.

It would be an honor to see every lay down intercooler have a "ProCharger Style" diffuser on the bottom.

The normal OEM rubber flaps didn't really do that bad, as we stated in our write up. Though they had a major downfall on drastically lowered cars, due to the ground clearance issue. And at high speeds, the flaps would begin to just lay over, thus dropping down the IAT effectiveness. Unless your running on a road course, or standing 1/2 or 1 mile runs, you might not see the full effect/difference.

However, there really is no downside to the "MutiVane" even if you just free up a bunch of ground clearance on the nose.

Old 11-17-2014, 02:06 PM
  #50  
Blown-C7
Pro
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Blown-C7's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2008
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a C7 with the horizontal intercooler (ECS Novi 1500 unit), and has the rubber air dam as you indicated in your article. My concern has been that under high speeds the air dam will bend over thus dramatically affecting the efficiency, and overall air flow into the cooler. I run Texas Mile, and other 1/2 mile events so am very interested here....can I just get the air diffuser kit that will fit on my existing horizontal intercooler, or to get the most effect would i need to go to the vertical unit? If putting on my current horizontal unit, does it fit easily, or does it have to be modified? Pricing for both options??
Thanks
Matt
713-299-8035
Old 11-17-2014, 02:48 PM
  #51  
0ProChargerTech
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
ProChargerTech's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,095
Received 68 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 02txceta
I have a C7 with the horizontal intercooler (ECS Novi 1500 unit), and has the rubber air dam as you indicated in your article. My concern has been that under high speeds the air dam will bend over thus dramatically affecting the efficiency, and overall air flow into the cooler. I run Texas Mile, and other 1/2 mile events so am very interested here....can I just get the air diffuser kit that will fit on my existing horizontal intercooler, or to get the most effect would i need to go to the vertical unit? If putting on my current horizontal unit, does it fit easily, or does it have to be modified? Pricing for both options??
Thanks
Matt
713-299-8035
"Ideally" it would be our intercooler, with our diffuser
That is the version that we know with 100% certain will work killer for what you are wanting to do.

Yes, our diffuser will bolt into any C7's lower splash panel.
(Or you can order the GM lower panel from us, thats Pre-cut with already)

Due to the size difference of the ECS intercooler vs. ours, it would be hard to tell how different the holes would line up. Since ideally you want the diffuser to pull air through the core only. (don't really want air slipping past the end tanks of the intercooler)

You can look at our post, and the Cad files give you a good idea of the size of the hole on the underside of the OEM splash panel. Best idea would be to compare that to yours, and see if it will work. (Guess you could always then use a "block off" plate, to block the sections of the end tanks if they were exposed, so that only the core was visible)
Old 11-19-2014, 02:29 AM
  #52  
chuntington101
Melting Slicks
 
chuntington101's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,141
Received 113 Likes on 100 Posts

Default

Hi ProCharger. Just going back to the original tests, you say that the scoop feeding air from the bottom of the car through the cooler caused aero issues. Can you explain that a little more? Did it create too much downforce at the front? It can't really cause lift as you are moving air from a lower session of the car to a higher. I guess it depends on where that air then goes and what impacts it has on the airflow over other sections of the car. However I can't see it having that much impact.

Also, dose the louvered setup you supply with the kit reverse flow at slow speeds with air rising through the core? Not saying this is a bad thing as thanks to the rad being laid forward you will naturally get some convection air flow now anyway. Dose this help the intercooler also?

Thanks in advance and sorry for the probing questions. Once again I'm NOT putting this design down just interested in it.
Old 11-20-2014, 10:48 AM
  #53  
0ProChargerTech
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
ProChargerTech's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,095
Received 68 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chuntington101
Hi ProCharger. Just going back to the original tests, you say that the scoop feeding air from the bottom of the car through the cooler caused aero issues. Can you explain that a little more? Did it create too much downforce at the front? It can't really cause lift as you are moving air from a lower session of the car to a higher. I guess it depends on where that air then goes and what impacts it has on the airflow over other sections of the car. However I can't see it having that much impact.
For months this forum had lots of "theories" of what the effects of scoops and flaps would do on horizontal intercoolers. Not saying there is anything wrong with that, and there was lots of good chatter about it.

However, we had to wait till we had warmer weather, to make the investment in the track rental be worth it. (No sense in testing them if its 50 degrees out)

Anyways, without a doubt having an enclosed scoop on the BOTTOM side of the intercooler, caused a MAJOR aerodynamic issue. I'm not an Aero engineer, however the first time the car came down the front strait away, you could visually tell something was not good with the front end. The wheel gap looked like the car was trying to do a wheelie at high speed, and then after the driver came back in from the session, he was like "That is sketchy" and he explained how bad the braking transition into the high speed corners had been effected.

We then tried (3) versions of the enclosed forward facing scoop on the bottom. All had the same results. Not to mention our driver didn't even want to test them past 135+ mph, due to the lift of the nose.

One would "think" the scoop on the top would have this same effect, however it just wasn't the case in the testing we did. The scoop on the top was fine aerodynamically, however over time caused the engine coolant temperatures to rise. (Likely due to the intercooler stealing the airflow away from the radiator)

Also, dose the louvered setup you supply with the kit reverse flow at slow speeds with air rising through the core? Not saying this is a bad thing as thanks to the rad being laid forward you will naturally get some convection air flow now anyway. Dose this help the intercooler also?
When a car is at low speed, our blowers aren't making much boost if any at all, thus no real heat being developed. So the air flow of the blower cools the core, as well as the core acting like a heat sink.

Thanks in advance and sorry for the probing questions. Once again I'm NOT putting this design down just interested in it.
Nothing wrong with questions! Its how we all learn.
Old 02-26-2015, 11:34 PM
  #54  
11B250
Melting Slicks
 
11B250's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2013
Location: Palm Beach County FL
Posts: 2,048
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

I'm bringing an old topic back up but I wanted to ask.

What disadvantage does the horizontal cooler have vs the vertical? You say vertical outperforms horizontal. What does it outperform in? Power? Vertical can push out more hp because the air is slightly cooler on IAT?

I don't see why everyone wouldn't wanna go with horizontal setup if it gives the most consistent IAT and ECT.

I might decide I'll drag and street race and get vertical but what do I do if I wanna get a taste of road racing for one weekend... I can't because I have a vertical setup?

Why not just offer horizontal only and be done with it? Are you going to gain that much more power with a vertical over a horizontal?
Old 02-27-2015, 12:20 AM
  #55  
beachcomber
Drifting
 
beachcomber's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2010
Location: Prosper TX
Posts: 1,586
Received 49 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

I have the horizontal intercooler on my procharger. I don't track it, but do stay on it heavily. Zero issues and very very pleased.
Old 02-27-2015, 10:40 AM
  #56  
0ProChargerTech
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
ProChargerTech's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,095
Received 68 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 11B250

I don't see why everyone wouldn't wanna go with horizontal setup if it gives the most consistent IAT and ECT.

I might decide I'll drag and street race and get vertical but what do I do if I wanna get a taste of road racing for one weekend... I can't because I have a vertical setup?

Why not just offer horizontal only and be done with it? Are you going to gain that much more power with a vertical over a horizontal?
The vertical gives the coolest air charge temp.
Just slightly over out side temp actually, even at the end of the 1/4 mile.
Thus it gives the best performance, and the lowest timing reduction, while street driving, or drag racing.

If you are going to Road race the car, then go horizontal. You won't be let down with that either. With the air scoops added to the bottom of the intercooler, we have made it very effective in this position.


Originally Posted by beachcomber
I have the horizontal intercooler on my procharger. I don't track it, but do stay on it heavily. Zero issues and very very pleased.
Never a doubt in our mind you would.

We did plenty of testing to make sure the Vertical intercooler would cause literally ZERO issues
Old 02-27-2015, 12:09 PM
  #57  
11B250
Melting Slicks
 
11B250's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2013
Location: Palm Beach County FL
Posts: 2,048
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ProChargerTech
The vertical gives the coolest air charge temp.
Just slightly over out side temp actually, even at the end of the 1/4 mile.
Thus it gives the best performance, and the lowest timing reduction, while street driving, or drag racing.

If you are going to Road race the car, then go horizontal. You won't be let down with that either. With the air scoops added to the bottom of the intercooler, we have made it very effective in this position.




Never a doubt in our mind you would.

We did plenty of testing to make sure the Vertical intercooler would cause literally ZERO issues
so if 2 exact cars raced (with only diff being horizontal vs vertical) in exact conditions at the 1/4 track, the vertical car will be faster because of lower IAT and thus less timing pulled.

however if you take both said cars to a road race event, vertical is going to give serious problems after some laps where the horizontal will not have any issues.

so if you even THINK of doing a road race course, you should really get horizontal. a no brainer.

I will keep this in mind when it's time to add a power adder

Get notified of new replies

To 100% Real World, C7 Intercooler testing by ProCharger (Horizontal and Vert. data)

Old 02-27-2015, 04:25 PM
  #58  
0ProChargerTech
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
ProChargerTech's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,095
Received 68 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 11B250
so if 2 exact cars raced (with only diff being horizontal vs vertical) in exact conditions at the 1/4 track, the vertical car will be faster because of lower IAT and thus less timing pulled.

however if you take both said cars to a road race event, vertical is going to give serious problems after some laps where the horizontal will not have any issues.

so if you even THINK of doing a road race course, you should really get horizontal. a no brainer.

I will keep this in mind when it's time to add a power adder
In a nut shell you nailed it.
Hence why we offer both intercoolers.

The vertical vs horizontal won't be that big of a different in the 1/4
But it is a difference. And the more elevated the power levels are, the more this will become known.

Thanks again for the question.
Old 02-27-2015, 04:40 PM
  #59  
beachcomber
Drifting
 
beachcomber's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2010
Location: Prosper TX
Posts: 1,586
Received 49 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Ok, now I'm even confused. I have the ProCharger with horizontal IC. In all these posts within this thread, don't think any post clearly says if you plan to do 'x' with your car, use this setup with vertical, or horizontal, etc.

Just when I thought I made the right choice with the horizontal, after reading this thread I'm second guessing myself....
Old 02-27-2015, 05:08 PM
  #60  
0ProChargerTech
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
ProChargerTech's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,095
Received 68 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by beachcomber
Ok, now I'm even confused. I have the ProCharger with horizontal IC. In all these posts within this thread, don't think any post clearly says if you plan to do 'x' with your car, use this setup with vertical, or horizontal, etc.

Just when I thought I made the right choice with the horizontal, after reading this thread I'm second guessing myself....
Every post has pretty much said the exact same thing.
(As well as our blogs, etc)

The only reason we have found to use the horizontal intercooler, is if a person is planning on using the car on a road race course. (not the road, but an actually track day event, such as a time attack)

Competitors of ours, and people in this forum seemed to argue that for some reason. However now over a year later with hundreds of systems out there (mostly Vertical) we have yet to have a single complaint about engine overheating, or any issues at all actually.

That being said. Do not feel that you made the wrong choice, since we spent a great deal of time perfecting that Horizontal unit to maximize its effectiveness with the lower scoops.

So much so, that we often sell just the scoops to customers running our competitors products that have horizontal intercoolers.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 100% Real World, C7 Intercooler testing by ProCharger (Horizontal and Vert. data)



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:28 PM.