Easiest way to delete AFM and open NPP valves
#21
Le Mans Master
Because its a complex mechanical system that can't be good for an engine long term...not counting the fact that when it in that mode it sounds like fido's azz...It is an expensive Rube Goldberg at best.
Also those who have "tuned" it out get better mileage...
it is tragic you can't turn it off in sport or track and another illustration of GM being goofy for no good reason. It could be done with a software update for free....
Also those who have "tuned" it out get better mileage...
it is tragic you can't turn it off in sport or track and another illustration of GM being goofy for no good reason. It could be done with a software update for free....
I was concerned about longevity but I have a rep in Minneapolis with a Chrysler product with over 250,000 miles and it works fine and has no problems. As far as sound is concerned I can't hear it, do you run along side or what.
#23
Drifting
Try it for yourself. Pull the AFM valve (fuse #32) and the NPP fuse (either #41 or #42). Pulling the AFM fuse will trigger a CEL, but you can hear what crap it sounds like. The CEL will reset after 4-5 start-stop cycles. The NPP fuse doesn't trigger a CEL.
#25
Drifting
Yes indeed, best NPP AFM valve thread on this site. I have referred a lot of people to it. The information is correct and up to date.
OP, for more than you may want to know about the NPP behavior, I humbly suggest...
https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...ck-result.html
https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...ck-result.html
#26
Instructor
IMO, there is absolutely no reason to do this. Even if it were possible to tune out the AFM valve closure, the car sounds like absolute a$$ when in V4 mode and the AFM valves open. No performance advantage in keeping them open when in V4 either.
Try it for yourself. Pull the AFM valve (fuse #32) and the NPP fuse (either #41 or #42). Pulling the AFM fuse will trigger a CEL, but you can hear what crap it sounds like. The CEL will reset after 4-5 start-stop cycles. The NPP fuse doesn't trigger a CEL.
Try it for yourself. Pull the AFM valve (fuse #32) and the NPP fuse (either #41 or #42). Pulling the AFM fuse will trigger a CEL, but you can hear what crap it sounds like. The CEL will reset after 4-5 start-stop cycles. The NPP fuse doesn't trigger a CEL.
#27
Drifting
Yeah, I figured out why you asked your question... Your Borla exhaust right?
I can't recall if the valve logic resides in the BCM or CCM, but there there is a functional check of the actuators on every start cycle. The AFM valves must "see" a very precise feedback force from the valve springs as well as excursion limits. If these parameters are out of range for the AFM actuators (like having the valves plugged in but no reactive spring load), you will get a CEL. This is the case with the Borla exhaust you have. There's nothing in the "fake" valves it presents to the AFM actuators.
The NPP valves are not as tightly monitored, and removing them by fuse pull or connector disconnect will not cause a CEL. I have read in other owner reports that if they get stuck (corrosion/ice) that you can get a CEL.
I don't know if you disable AFM function through a tune (or AFM disable device like Range Technology) whether it then bypasses the actuator check that causes the CEL. Maybe someone here can chime in on that.
The only non-tune solution I have seen (and it's not elegant) if you want to KEEP your AFM mode during driving is to cut the AFM valves out of your OEM exhaust, leave them attached to the actuators, and tie them up out of the way.
I can't recall if the valve logic resides in the BCM or CCM, but there there is a functional check of the actuators on every start cycle. The AFM valves must "see" a very precise feedback force from the valve springs as well as excursion limits. If these parameters are out of range for the AFM actuators (like having the valves plugged in but no reactive spring load), you will get a CEL. This is the case with the Borla exhaust you have. There's nothing in the "fake" valves it presents to the AFM actuators.
The NPP valves are not as tightly monitored, and removing them by fuse pull or connector disconnect will not cause a CEL. I have read in other owner reports that if they get stuck (corrosion/ice) that you can get a CEL.
I don't know if you disable AFM function through a tune (or AFM disable device like Range Technology) whether it then bypasses the actuator check that causes the CEL. Maybe someone here can chime in on that.
The only non-tune solution I have seen (and it's not elegant) if you want to KEEP your AFM mode during driving is to cut the AFM valves out of your OEM exhaust, leave them attached to the actuators, and tie them up out of the way.
Last edited by xp800; 05-06-2016 at 01:06 PM.
#28
Instructor
Yeah, I figured out why you asked your question... Your Borla exhaust right?
I can't recall if the valve logic resides in the BCM or CCM, but there there is a functional check of the actuators on every start cycle. The AFM valves must "see" a very precise feedback force from the valve springs as well as excursion limits. If these parameters are out of range for the AFM actuators (like having the valves plugged in but no reactive spring load), you will get a CEL. This is the case with the Borla exhaust you have. There's nothing in the "fake" valves it presents to the AFM actuators.
The NPP valves are not as tightly monitored, and removing them by fuse pull or connector disconnect will not cause a CEL. I have read in other owner reports that if they get stuck (corrosion/ice) that you can get a CEL.
I don't know if you disable AFM function through a tune (or AFM disable device like Range Technology) whether it then bypasses the actuator check that causes the CEL. Maybe someone here can chime in on that.
The only non-tune solution I have seen (and it's not elegant) if you want to KEEP your AFM mode during driving is to cut the AFM valves out of your OEM exhaust, leave them attached to the actuators, and tie them up out of the way.
I can't recall if the valve logic resides in the BCM or CCM, but there there is a functional check of the actuators on every start cycle. The AFM valves must "see" a very precise feedback force from the valve springs as well as excursion limits. If these parameters are out of range for the AFM actuators (like having the valves plugged in but no reactive spring load), you will get a CEL. This is the case with the Borla exhaust you have. There's nothing in the "fake" valves it presents to the AFM actuators.
The NPP valves are not as tightly monitored, and removing them by fuse pull or connector disconnect will not cause a CEL. I have read in other owner reports that if they get stuck (corrosion/ice) that you can get a CEL.
I don't know if you disable AFM function through a tune (or AFM disable device like Range Technology) whether it then bypasses the actuator check that causes the CEL. Maybe someone here can chime in on that.
The only non-tune solution I have seen (and it's not elegant) if you want to KEEP your AFM mode during driving is to cut the AFM valves out of your OEM exhaust, leave them attached to the actuators, and tie them up out of the way.
#29
I am curious about MPG after disabling AFM. I have a feeling AFM does not do too much to improve MPG on our cars, but I am not seeing any documentation to prove or disprove my hypothesis...
#30
Drifting
My personal experience has been 1-3mpg decrease in steady-state highway mileage with AFM disabled. From an overall MPG decrease in mixed driving is more like 1-1.5mpg.
#31
I see, thanks for sharing. So Hawk's post on Page 1 claiming MPG increase by disabling AFM seems contrary? I have heard that claim before on another thread as well...
#32
Drifting
Maybe there are some speeds/gears where you're "lugging" in V4 mode and V8 is more efficient. There may also be differences in where these crossover points occur based on aero (base vs. Z51) or LT1/LT4 operational efficiency.
So...for me on my '15 A8 Z51, my mileage increase with AFM in 70-75mph cruising varies between 1-3mpg. Typically 1-2mpg on long trips. I see ~28mpg without AFM and 30-30.5 with it. Around town I don't see much of consequence that I can differentiate from inconsistent driving habits and traffic.
#34
Hey guys, I'm new here, & purchased a used 14 3LT with just under 700 miles. & since I purchased have found out that there is no NPP & AFM valves & the sound is not what expected, am looking @ a corsa or borla rear section exhaust? Is it worth it?
#36
Drifting
This code does NOT show up when I check for codes with my MSD Dashhawk.