C7 Tech/Performance Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Tech Topics, Basic Tech, Maintenance, How to Remove & Replace
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Easiest way to delete AFM and open NPP valves

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-06-2015, 11:35 PM
  #21  
jimman
Le Mans Master
 
jimman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 1999
Location: Imperial Beach CA
Posts: 7,695
Received 47 Likes on 30 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by hawkgfr
Because its a complex mechanical system that can't be good for an engine long term...not counting the fact that when it in that mode it sounds like fido's azz...It is an expensive Rube Goldberg at best.


Also those who have "tuned" it out get better mileage...


it is tragic you can't turn it off in sport or track and another illustration of GM being goofy for no good reason. It could be done with a software update for free....

I was concerned about longevity but I have a rep in Minneapolis with a Chrysler product with over 250,000 miles and it works fine and has no problems. As far as sound is concerned I can't hear it, do you run along side or what.
Old 05-05-2016, 12:45 PM
  #22  
westman
Instructor
 
westman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2011
Location: Boise Idaho
Posts: 200
Received 18 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Is it possible to tune out the AFM valves without deactivating the AFM?
Old 05-05-2016, 02:03 PM
  #23  
xp800
Drifting
 
xp800's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2007
Location: Macomb MI
Posts: 1,425
Received 235 Likes on 151 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by westman
Is it possible to tune out the AFM valves without deactivating the AFM?
IMO, there is absolutely no reason to do this. Even if it were possible to tune out the AFM valve closure, the car sounds like absolute a$$ when in V4 mode and the AFM valves open. No performance advantage in keeping them open when in V4 either.

Try it for yourself. Pull the AFM valve (fuse #32) and the NPP fuse (either #41 or #42). Pulling the AFM fuse will trigger a CEL, but you can hear what crap it sounds like. The CEL will reset after 4-5 start-stop cycles. The NPP fuse doesn't trigger a CEL.
Old 05-05-2016, 06:39 PM
  #24  
red 1
Racer
 
red 1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Location: Louisville Ky
Posts: 354
Received 101 Likes on 61 Posts

Default

You can buy a Range disabler like I did to keep the engine in V8 mode all of the time.
Old 05-05-2016, 07:36 PM
  #25  
Boiler_81
Drifting
 
Boiler_81's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2002
Location: MI
Posts: 1,517
Received 429 Likes on 307 Posts

Default

Yes indeed, best NPP AFM valve thread on this site. I have referred a lot of people to it. The information is correct and up to date.


Originally Posted by xp800
OP, for more than you may want to know about the NPP behavior, I humbly suggest...

https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...ck-result.html

Old 05-06-2016, 12:22 PM
  #26  
westman
Instructor
 
westman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2011
Location: Boise Idaho
Posts: 200
Received 18 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by xp800
IMO, there is absolutely no reason to do this. Even if it were possible to tune out the AFM valve closure, the car sounds like absolute a$$ when in V4 mode and the AFM valves open. No performance advantage in keeping them open when in V4 either.

Try it for yourself. Pull the AFM valve (fuse #32) and the NPP fuse (either #41 or #42). Pulling the AFM fuse will trigger a CEL, but you can hear what crap it sounds like. The CEL will reset after 4-5 start-stop cycles. The NPP fuse doesn't trigger a CEL.
It's a long story full of pain and suffereing...
Old 05-06-2016, 01:05 PM
  #27  
xp800
Drifting
 
xp800's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2007
Location: Macomb MI
Posts: 1,425
Received 235 Likes on 151 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by westman
It's a long story full of pain and suffereing...
Yeah, I figured out why you asked your question... Your Borla exhaust right?

I can't recall if the valve logic resides in the BCM or CCM, but there there is a functional check of the actuators on every start cycle. The AFM valves must "see" a very precise feedback force from the valve springs as well as excursion limits. If these parameters are out of range for the AFM actuators (like having the valves plugged in but no reactive spring load), you will get a CEL. This is the case with the Borla exhaust you have. There's nothing in the "fake" valves it presents to the AFM actuators.

The NPP valves are not as tightly monitored, and removing them by fuse pull or connector disconnect will not cause a CEL. I have read in other owner reports that if they get stuck (corrosion/ice) that you can get a CEL.

I don't know if you disable AFM function through a tune (or AFM disable device like Range Technology) whether it then bypasses the actuator check that causes the CEL. Maybe someone here can chime in on that.

The only non-tune solution I have seen (and it's not elegant) if you want to KEEP your AFM mode during driving is to cut the AFM valves out of your OEM exhaust, leave them attached to the actuators, and tie them up out of the way.

Last edited by xp800; 05-06-2016 at 01:06 PM.
Old 05-06-2016, 09:51 PM
  #28  
westman
Instructor
 
westman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2011
Location: Boise Idaho
Posts: 200
Received 18 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by xp800
Yeah, I figured out why you asked your question... Your Borla exhaust right?

I can't recall if the valve logic resides in the BCM or CCM, but there there is a functional check of the actuators on every start cycle. The AFM valves must "see" a very precise feedback force from the valve springs as well as excursion limits. If these parameters are out of range for the AFM actuators (like having the valves plugged in but no reactive spring load), you will get a CEL. This is the case with the Borla exhaust you have. There's nothing in the "fake" valves it presents to the AFM actuators.

The NPP valves are not as tightly monitored, and removing them by fuse pull or connector disconnect will not cause a CEL. I have read in other owner reports that if they get stuck (corrosion/ice) that you can get a CEL.

I don't know if you disable AFM function through a tune (or AFM disable device like Range Technology) whether it then bypasses the actuator check that causes the CEL. Maybe someone here can chime in on that.

The only non-tune solution I have seen (and it's not elegant) if you want to KEEP your AFM mode during driving is to cut the AFM valves out of your OEM exhaust, leave them attached to the actuators, and tie them up out of the way.
You are correct in your assumption about the borla exhaust. Going off the recommendations of a Borla tech, the result has been an absolute nightmare trying to get the system to work with the computer. The car does sound like absolute @ss when switching between AFM modes. After doing exhaustive research (pun intended), my final solution to the problem, is to remove the borla system, cut the AFM sections of the OEM exhaust out and mate them to the Borla for re-installation.
Old 05-11-2016, 01:52 PM
  #29  
xxaarraa
Racer
 
xxaarraa's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2016
Posts: 478
Received 104 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

I am curious about MPG after disabling AFM. I have a feeling AFM does not do too much to improve MPG on our cars, but I am not seeing any documentation to prove or disprove my hypothesis...
Old 05-11-2016, 01:58 PM
  #30  
xp800
Drifting
 
xp800's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2007
Location: Macomb MI
Posts: 1,425
Received 235 Likes on 151 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by xxaarraa
I am curious about MPG after disabling AFM. I have a feeling AFM does not do too much to improve MPG on our cars, but I am not seeing any documentation to prove or disprove my hypothesis...
My personal experience has been 1-3mpg decrease in steady-state highway mileage with AFM disabled. From an overall MPG decrease in mixed driving is more like 1-1.5mpg.
Old 05-11-2016, 02:06 PM
  #31  
xxaarraa
Racer
 
xxaarraa's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2016
Posts: 478
Received 104 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by xp800
My personal experience has been 1-3mpg decrease in steady-state highway mileage with AFM disabled. From an overall MPG decrease in mixed driving is more like 1-1.5mpg.
I see, thanks for sharing. So Hawk's post on Page 1 claiming MPG increase by disabling AFM seems contrary? I have heard that claim before on another thread as well...
Old 05-11-2016, 02:25 PM
  #32  
xp800
Drifting
 
xp800's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2007
Location: Macomb MI
Posts: 1,425
Received 235 Likes on 151 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by xxaarraa
I see, thanks for sharing. So Hawk's post on Page 1 claiming MPG increase by disabling AFM seems contrary? I have heard that claim before on another thread as well...
I can only claim to know my experiences.

Maybe there are some speeds/gears where you're "lugging" in V4 mode and V8 is more efficient. There may also be differences in where these crossover points occur based on aero (base vs. Z51) or LT1/LT4 operational efficiency.

So...for me on my '15 A8 Z51, my mileage increase with AFM in 70-75mph cruising varies between 1-3mpg. Typically 1-2mpg on long trips. I see ~28mpg without AFM and 30-30.5 with it. Around town I don't see much of consequence that I can differentiate from inconsistent driving habits and traffic.
Old 05-13-2016, 02:17 PM
  #33  
john.wayne
Instructor
 
john.wayne's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: KY
Posts: 189
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default Hey red 1, sent you a PM

Originally Posted by red 1
You can buy a Range disabler like I did to keep the engine in V8 mode all of the time.
Thanks,

John Wayne
Old 05-13-2016, 03:54 PM
  #34  
TBBE
Advanced
 
TBBE's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2016
Posts: 52
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Hey guys, I'm new here, & purchased a used 14 3LT with just under 700 miles. & since I purchased have found out that there is no NPP & AFM valves & the sound is not what expected, am looking @ a corsa or borla rear section exhaust? Is it worth it?
Old 05-13-2016, 03:56 PM
  #35  
TBBE
Advanced
 
TBBE's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2016
Posts: 52
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Sorry meant NO NPP but obviously have the AFM valves*******
Old 05-14-2016, 12:42 AM
  #36  
EcoBrick Bob
Drifting
Support Corvetteforum!
 
EcoBrick Bob's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2008
Location: Naples, FL & Clear Lake, IA
Posts: 1,340
Received 76 Likes on 63 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Kracka
I haven't heard of the NPP fuse pull causing any lights or error codes, but I personally have not tried it.
I was told by Hendrick Chevy-Naples that I had a Hard Code showing in my ECM related to the NPP Valve system. I have an "add a fuse" system with a switch in my car, that I can use to effectively disable the fuse and open the NPP at any time. They told me that it is no issue with them, but they had no idea what GM might do to my warranty if they knew about it. I was given the bulletin on this issue.

This code does NOT show up when I check for codes with my MSD Dashhawk.



Quick Reply: Easiest way to delete AFM and open NPP valves



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:13 AM.