Catch Can necessary?
#21
Pro
I have a Z06 which has a supercharger unlike the Z51 which is NA.
The dual catch can works on a Z51 because the throttle body has both ports for external connections to the catch can. The Z06 only has one port on the throttle body and the other location port is inside the supercharger manifold. No one has found a way to access the internal port to connect to a catch can.
The dual catch can works on a Z51 because the throttle body has both ports for external connections to the catch can. The Z06 only has one port on the throttle body and the other location port is inside the supercharger manifold. No one has found a way to access the internal port to connect to a catch can.
* ECS Supercharger
* ECS Alky Meth Kit
* 1 7/8" American Racing Headers
In addition to the performance parts, I opted to have the LMR catch can in my setup with the new revision - relocation kit. Just like everyone reading this thread, I did a fair amount of research before purchasing my particular catch can. For me, this setup was not cheap at all. In fact, it was very expensive, somewhere around $1100 for the catch can + revision (not including the cost of installation). I am happy with my purchase and does give me a good deal of piece of mind. I just caution those who think ALL catch cans are created equal. Please do your research.. they are not all the same.
https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...post1589165325
#22
Burning Brakes
LMR cans are high quality and the best for FI applications. If you are staying NA and want to keep all gasses contained than look at the UPR setup. Mightymouse is also a great choice, kind of filling the needs between the other 2. IMPO these are the best setups out there and I have tried several others in previous applications, both NA and FI.
#23
Drifting
GM could have designed a catch can system that when full drains back into a valve cover, like my EcoBoost Twin Turbo Ford Flex. THANK YOU FORD! Can't believe it cost much when you build thousands of similar engines.
Recently switched out my 15' Z51 stock intake manifold for a Faster Prom's ( J. Formato) ported intake. Since I installed my UPR catch can almost immediately after Vette purchase, I hand NO oil in my stock intake!
Recently switched out my 15' Z51 stock intake manifold for a Faster Prom's ( J. Formato) ported intake. Since I installed my UPR catch can almost immediately after Vette purchase, I hand NO oil in my stock intake!
#24
Safety Car
How big an issue is that, compared to coking of the valves? I'm not sure anyone here knows.
#25
Team Owner
#26
Pro
#27
Team Owner
The only thing I've noticed on my tips is excessive condensation during warm up / initial startup. No oily exhaust tips here either. Just did a video of my startup and you can even see the condensation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xeOQ0Pmug-I
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xeOQ0Pmug-I
After several supercharged cars. If they need a catch can they go.
Last edited by 3 Z06ZR1; 04-28-2015 at 02:52 AM.
#28
Team Owner
The drawback to that approach is that all the combustion byproducts and condensate that come through the PCV, and would normally get burned and blown out the tailpipe, end up back in the crankcase, contaminating your oil.
How big an issue is that, compared to coking of the valves? I'm not sure anyone here knows.
How big an issue is that, compared to coking of the valves? I'm not sure anyone here knows.
#29
Pro
On a side note, I think the chrome / stainless tips look GREAT on cars with chrome rims!
#30
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Apr 2002
Location: Tellico Plains Tennessee
Posts: 2,390
Received 586 Likes
on
266 Posts
[QUOTE=meyerweb;1589512152]The drawback to that approach is that all the combustion byproducts and condensate that come through the PCV, and would normally get burned and blown out the tailpipe, end up back in the crankcase, contaminating your oil. QUOTE]
I thought of this too. After much contemplation I decided the oil and condensates that could get drained back into the engine already came from the engine, moisture and all. The can doesn't "generate" any contaminates, simple catches what's there. It doesn't catch anything that isn't already in your oil. Since the heat of the oil boils off the moisture anyway there doesn't seem to be much of a problem. Unless I'm missing something. A catch can that self drains would seem to me a plus.
I thought of this too. After much contemplation I decided the oil and condensates that could get drained back into the engine already came from the engine, moisture and all. The can doesn't "generate" any contaminates, simple catches what's there. It doesn't catch anything that isn't already in your oil. Since the heat of the oil boils off the moisture anyway there doesn't seem to be much of a problem. Unless I'm missing something. A catch can that self drains would seem to me a plus.
#31
Pro
[QUOTE=Frodo;1589518345]
The catch can is mounted remote from the engine and remains at a lower temperature. I believe the catch can creates additional condensation which remains in the can during the separation process. There is likely more condensation in the captured liquid the lower the outside temperature. Engine damage would result dumping that moisture back into the valve covers.
The drawback to that approach is that all the combustion byproducts and condensate that come through the PCV, and would normally get burned and blown out the tailpipe, end up back in the crankcase, contaminating your oil. QUOTE]
I thought of this too. After much contemplation I decided the oil and condensates that could get drained back into the engine already came from the engine, moisture and all. The can doesn't "generate" any contaminates, simple catches what's there. It doesn't catch anything that isn't already in your oil. Since the heat of the oil boils off the moisture anyway there doesn't seem to be much of a problem. Unless I'm missing something. A catch can that self drains would seem to me a plus.
I thought of this too. After much contemplation I decided the oil and condensates that could get drained back into the engine already came from the engine, moisture and all. The can doesn't "generate" any contaminates, simple catches what's there. It doesn't catch anything that isn't already in your oil. Since the heat of the oil boils off the moisture anyway there doesn't seem to be much of a problem. Unless I'm missing something. A catch can that self drains would seem to me a plus.
Last edited by vettetwo; 04-28-2015 at 11:07 PM.
#32
Drifting
I have always poured the oil that accumulates in the catch cans in my cars, back into the oil reservoir or the oil inlet in a valve cover. I have yet to see anything but OIL in my catch cans. NO water or other noticeable contaminants.
In my Twin Turbo Ford Flex, Ford has the oil that blows out the PCV system going into a reservoir ( their version of a catch can) built into one of the valve covers. When it is full, it simply overflows back into the engine with all the water, contaminants etc. that have accumulated. So.. I figure if it's good enough for Ford EcoBoost engines, it's good enough for my GM cars.
At least Ford was thoughtful enough to add a catch can. WHY??? Because you don't want oil blow by caking on your intake valves in a D.I.Engine. Check out the history of this in Audi 2.0T D. I. engines.
In my Twin Turbo Ford Flex, Ford has the oil that blows out the PCV system going into a reservoir ( their version of a catch can) built into one of the valve covers. When it is full, it simply overflows back into the engine with all the water, contaminants etc. that have accumulated. So.. I figure if it's good enough for Ford EcoBoost engines, it's good enough for my GM cars.
At least Ford was thoughtful enough to add a catch can. WHY??? Because you don't want oil blow by caking on your intake valves in a D.I.Engine. Check out the history of this in Audi 2.0T D. I. engines.
#33
Pro
In my Twin Turbo Ford Flex, Ford has the oil that blows out the PCV system going into a reservoir ( their version of a catch can) built into one of the valve covers. When it is full, it simply overflows back into the engine with all the water, contaminants etc. that have accumulated. So.. I figure if it's good enough for Ford EcoBoost engines, it's good enough for my GM cars.