Base Lined my Stock C7 7spd in VA
#4
Team Owner
thanks for posting.
#8
As racerns already stated....the 427whp was using the STD correction on the DynoJet Dynometer. There are less restrictions using STD over SAE. STD corrected dynos usually read ~ 4% higher than SAE (which is what more people dyno with due to being more realistic with real world factors). Using that math...it actually equals out to be about 411whp with the SAE correction (411 x .04 = 16.44, 16.44 + 411 = 427.44)
#9
Melting Slicks
As racerns already stated....the 427whp was using the STD correction on the DynoJet Dynometer. There are less restrictions using STD over SAE. STD corrected dynos usually read ~ 4% higher than SAE (which is what more people dyno with due to being more realistic with real world factors). Using that math...it actually equals out to be about 411whp with the SAE correction (411 x .04 = 16.44, 16.44 + 411 = 427.44)
It is really just how the Dyno operator chooses to display the data. A Dynojet measures it the same no mater what correction factor is applied to the results. STD correction will always give you higher numbers (than SAE) and that tends to make people happier.
#10
Late Model Domestics
Thread Starter
I have it in Standard and SAE I will dyno in standard after every mod so the increase will be measured in the same correction.
#12
Late Model Domestics
Thread Starter
Ill print the graph and post it tomorrow.
SA:
This is from a magazine article on "dynojet" dynos.
SAE j1349 correction:
29.23 in/hg.
77 degree temp
0 percent humidity
Standard correction:
29.92 in/hg.
68 degree temp
0 percent humidity
What this all means is that "Standard" will give you 2.6 percent better numbers (very popular for the import crowd). The example the magazine gave was a Vette making 412 (SAE corrected hp). With the Standard correction it made 423. All that you will have to do is multiply your "Standard rwhp" by .974 This should equal SAE (the one everyone uses). Up here in the great white North (Washington) the temps are in the 40-50 degree area, along with 29.9-30 in/hg. So, our numbers are actually corrected down from what it made at the rear. Usually, 96-97 percent of actual posted numbers. If you dyno when it's a hotter temp or higher altitudes the numbers will usually correct up to equal the desired temp, humidity and pressure of the correction factor.
SA:
This is from a magazine article on "dynojet" dynos.
SAE j1349 correction:
29.23 in/hg.
77 degree temp
0 percent humidity
Standard correction:
29.92 in/hg.
68 degree temp
0 percent humidity
What this all means is that "Standard" will give you 2.6 percent better numbers (very popular for the import crowd). The example the magazine gave was a Vette making 412 (SAE corrected hp). With the Standard correction it made 423. All that you will have to do is multiply your "Standard rwhp" by .974 This should equal SAE (the one everyone uses). Up here in the great white North (Washington) the temps are in the 40-50 degree area, along with 29.9-30 in/hg. So, our numbers are actually corrected down from what it made at the rear. Usually, 96-97 percent of actual posted numbers. If you dyno when it's a hotter temp or higher altitudes the numbers will usually correct up to equal the desired temp, humidity and pressure of the correction factor.
#14
Late Model Domestics
Thread Starter
#15
407 sounds much more accurate. the baseline number means nothing unless you mod the car and retest on a similar day to see what the mods add. Your car is no more powerful or weaker than 99.9% of the Stingrays out there.
#19
Race Director
#20
Late Model Domestics
Thread Starter
Have you driven the New Z yet?