What RWHP/RWTQ is standard for a LT1 Stingray with just CAI, cat-back and tune?
#1
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
What RWHP/RWTQ is standard for a LT1 Stingray with just CAI, cat-back and tune?
As the title says, what kind of RWHP/RWTQ are people seeing with just a Cold Air Intake, Cat-Back exhaust and a tune? Better yet, post up your dyno graphs if you have them.
Thanks,
TJ
Thanks,
TJ
#2
I would say the average for a MN7 on a dynojet corrected to SAE 5 is around 430 - 435 RWHP and around the same TQ numbers, with a tune, CAI, and cat-back. Those modifications do not increase power much at all. Headers will show higher gains than a cat-back, but not that much for a virtually stock car. The LT1 manifolds actually flow quite well. People add headers mostly for the sound.
#3
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
I would say the average for a MN7 on a dynojet corrected to SAE 5 is around 430 - 435 RWHP and around the same TQ numbers, with a tune, CAI, and cat-back. Those modifications do not increase power much at all. Headers will show higher gains than a cat-back, but not that much for a virtually stock car. The LT1 manifolds actually flow quite well. People add headers mostly for the sound.
Thanks,
TJ
#4
According to Trifecta and Diablo a tune alone ought to account for 20 to 25 HP increase at the flywheel. On a stock motor without a tune, a CAI and a catback might add 10 HP from results I've seen on the forum.
#5
I made 418whp 441tq
2014 GMC Sierra Z71 6.2 L86(LT1)
Intake/long tubes/exhaust/Pat G Tune
Made 363whp before tune then, 389 with just intake and tune...then final numbers after FBO was 418/441
2014 GMC Sierra Z71 6.2 L86(LT1)
Intake/long tubes/exhaust/Pat G Tune
Made 363whp before tune then, 389 with just intake and tune...then final numbers after FBO was 418/441
Last edited by CampyWampy; 02-12-2016 at 02:21 PM.
#6
Team Owner
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: cookeville tennessee
Posts: 28,846
Received 1,762 Likes
on
1,529 Posts
The following users liked this post:
CampyWampy (02-15-2016)