C7Z06 Vs LPE 415 C4Zr-1 Vs c6Zr1.
#1
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
C7Z06 Vs LPE 415 C4Zr-1 Vs c6Zr1.
http://www.caranddriver.com/comparis...15-zr-1-page-5
So the C7Z is a bargain. I think these C7Z's will eventually pick up performance as new owners figure out how to drive and tweak them , irregardless of the aero dynamic - purpose built track car bloviation going on.
Excerpt from Article -- this C4 Zr1 was 640 hp and 510 lbs torque. -- It cost 111k back in the 96-98 time frame includes cost of car in "1995" and engine build done sometime after 1995--- The C7Z is a bargain!
Part-throttle clutch drops at 1100 rpm launched the car consistently. Full throttle could not be applied until second gear without provoking huge wheelspin. A slick-shifting gearbox kept the DOHC V-8 on full boil, and speeds wound up on the test computer like the altimeter on the space shuttle-60 mph in 3.6 seconds, 100 in 7.5 ticks, 150 in an astonishing 15.6 seconds. In the quarter-mile (11.6 seconds at 128 mph), the Lingenfelter enjoyed an untouchable lead over every other car.
So the C7Z is a bargain. I think these C7Z's will eventually pick up performance as new owners figure out how to drive and tweak them , irregardless of the aero dynamic - purpose built track car bloviation going on.
Excerpt from Article -- this C4 Zr1 was 640 hp and 510 lbs torque. -- It cost 111k back in the 96-98 time frame includes cost of car in "1995" and engine build done sometime after 1995--- The C7Z is a bargain!
Part-throttle clutch drops at 1100 rpm launched the car consistently. Full throttle could not be applied until second gear without provoking huge wheelspin. A slick-shifting gearbox kept the DOHC V-8 on full boil, and speeds wound up on the test computer like the altimeter on the space shuttle-60 mph in 3.6 seconds, 100 in 7.5 ticks, 150 in an astonishing 15.6 seconds. In the quarter-mile (11.6 seconds at 128 mph), the Lingenfelter enjoyed an untouchable lead over every other car.
Last edited by Mr. Gizmo; 12-27-2014 at 06:11 PM.
#2
Racer
Member Since: Mar 2008
Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.caranddriver.com/comparis...15-zr-1-page-5
So the C7Z is a bargain. I think these C7Z's will eventually pick up performance as new owners figure out how to drive and tweak them , irregardless of the aero dynamic - purpose built track car bloviation going on.
Excerpt from Article -- this C4 Zr1 was 640 hp and 510 lbs torque. -- It cost 111k back in the 96-98 time frame includes cost of car and engine build --- The C7Z is a bargain!
Part-throttle clutch drops at 1100 rpm launched the car consistently. Full throttle could not be applied until second gear without provoking huge wheelspin. A slick-shifting gearbox kept the DOHC V-8 on full boil, and speeds wound up on the test computer like the altimeter on the space shuttle-60 mph in 3.6 seconds, 100 in 7.5 ticks, 150 in an astonishing 15.6 seconds. In the quarter-mile (11.6 seconds at 128 mph), the Lingenfelter enjoyed an untouchable lead over every other car.
So the C7Z is a bargain. I think these C7Z's will eventually pick up performance as new owners figure out how to drive and tweak them , irregardless of the aero dynamic - purpose built track car bloviation going on.
Excerpt from Article -- this C4 Zr1 was 640 hp and 510 lbs torque. -- It cost 111k back in the 96-98 time frame includes cost of car and engine build --- The C7Z is a bargain!
Part-throttle clutch drops at 1100 rpm launched the car consistently. Full throttle could not be applied until second gear without provoking huge wheelspin. A slick-shifting gearbox kept the DOHC V-8 on full boil, and speeds wound up on the test computer like the altimeter on the space shuttle-60 mph in 3.6 seconds, 100 in 7.5 ticks, 150 in an astonishing 15.6 seconds. In the quarter-mile (11.6 seconds at 128 mph), the Lingenfelter enjoyed an untouchable lead over every other car.
#3
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
#4
Racer
Member Since: Mar 2008
Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thank you miss landers for the grammar correction. --- now cross your legs so your cooter doesn't show to the kids in the classroom.
Irregardless - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Irregardless - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Last edited by SidePipeMusic; 12-27-2014 at 05:20 PM.
#7
#8
Le Mans Master
http://www.caranddriver.com/comparis...15-zr-1-page-5
So the C7Z is a bargain. I think these C7Z's will eventually pick up performance as new owners figure out how to drive and tweak them , irregardless of the aero dynamic - purpose built track car bloviation going on.
Excerpt from Article -- this C4 Zr1 was 640 hp and 510 lbs torque. -- It cost 111k back in the 96-98 time frame includes cost of car and engine build --- The C7Z is a bargain!
Part-throttle clutch drops at 1100 rpm launched the car consistently. Full throttle could not be applied until second gear without provoking huge wheelspin. A slick-shifting gearbox kept the DOHC V-8 on full boil, and speeds wound up on the test computer like the altimeter on the space shuttle-60 mph in 3.6 seconds, 100 in 7.5 ticks, 150 in an astonishing 15.6 seconds. In the quarter-mile (11.6 seconds at 128 mph), the Lingenfelter enjoyed an untouchable lead over every other car.
So the C7Z is a bargain. I think these C7Z's will eventually pick up performance as new owners figure out how to drive and tweak them , irregardless of the aero dynamic - purpose built track car bloviation going on.
Excerpt from Article -- this C4 Zr1 was 640 hp and 510 lbs torque. -- It cost 111k back in the 96-98 time frame includes cost of car and engine build --- The C7Z is a bargain!
Part-throttle clutch drops at 1100 rpm launched the car consistently. Full throttle could not be applied until second gear without provoking huge wheelspin. A slick-shifting gearbox kept the DOHC V-8 on full boil, and speeds wound up on the test computer like the altimeter on the space shuttle-60 mph in 3.6 seconds, 100 in 7.5 ticks, 150 in an astonishing 15.6 seconds. In the quarter-mile (11.6 seconds at 128 mph), the Lingenfelter enjoyed an untouchable lead over every other car.
97 was when the LS motors were introduced, I had 98,2000, and 2001 LS6.
I honestly don't know how any corvette owner can be so far off on a post, even if you posted a typo on the year of the ZR1, the link shows an old modded lingenfelter , and the dates you write 96-98.... There was no ZR1, there wouldn't even be a Z06 for another 3 years and I know I paid 50k out the door for my 01Z06, I was the 1st on this forum to take delivery and post real dragstrip times.
Last edited by NytmereZ; 12-27-2014 at 05:47 PM.
#9
Le Mans Master
The point being is a modified ZRI costing 111 large prior to Y2K cannot come close to the performance of the new C7ZO6 available at a much lower cost not even considering the differences caused by inflation
Seems to me the OP is giving the new Z applause!
#10
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
And the C4 Zr-1 was a 25 year old design -- thats exactly the point.
This is why I hate magazines, you do know that there was no C4 Zr1 in 1996(95 was the last year) the sticker was not even close to 100k, HP was 405, etc
97 was when the LS motors were introduced, I had 98,2000, and 2001 LS6.
I honestly don't know how any corvette owner can be so far off on a post, even if you posted a typo on the year of the ZR1, the link shows an old modded lingenfelter , and the dates you write 96-98.... There was no ZR1, there wouldn't even be a Z06 for another 3 years and I know I paid 50k out the door for my 01Z06, I was the 1st on this forum to take delivery and post real dragstrip times.
97 was when the LS motors were introduced, I had 98,2000, and 2001 LS6.
I honestly don't know how any corvette owner can be so far off on a post, even if you posted a typo on the year of the ZR1, the link shows an old modded lingenfelter , and the dates you write 96-98.... There was no ZR1, there wouldn't even be a Z06 for another 3 years and I know I paid 50k out the door for my 01Z06, I was the 1st on this forum to take delivery and post real dragstrip times.
I am very happy you were or are a 01z06 owner. I was a proud c4 zr-1 owner and am familiar with all years, their strengths and issues.
Unless I am misreading the OP............
The point being is a modified ZRI costing 111 large prior to Y2K cannot come close to the performance of the new C7ZO6 available at a much lower cost not even considering the differences caused by inflation
Seems to me the OP is giving the new Z applause!
The point being is a modified ZRI costing 111 large prior to Y2K cannot come close to the performance of the new C7ZO6 available at a much lower cost not even considering the differences caused by inflation
Seems to me the OP is giving the new Z applause!
C7Z in 2014 = 85k -- base model with 5 k of options
111k c4Zr-1 in 1995 = 166k in 2014 dollars --
And I believe as these c7zs get sorted out and new owners figure out how to tweak and drive them - we will see some very impressive 1/4 mile times, as well as track times.
Last edited by Mr. Gizmo; 12-27-2014 at 06:07 PM.