This is interesting......
03-23-2017, 08:29 PM
#21
Le Mans Master
These kinds of cars (similar to the ACR) are purpose built for a race track. Hence a rear wing for downforce. They aren't designed to sit in a garage being waxed or drive to Cars and Coffee. Nothing wrong with any of this, but if you don't plan to drive on a race track or don't require the additional downforce provided by a functional wing then you are looking at the wrong car.
03-23-2017, 09:48 PM
#24
Team Owner
Member Since: Oct 2013
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Posts: 25,347
Received 7,752 Likes
on
4,181 Posts
CORVETTE TODAY Host
St. Jude Donor'15
Looks damn good to me....love the nose a LOT!
03-24-2017, 12:25 AM
#25
Melting Slicks
Looks very close to what I saw last week. I have a pair of Canon Image Stabilizer Binoculars and was looking at the front end of the ZR1 up close at the Cork Screw where it was going slow. This rendering or whatever it is, appears to be very close to what I saw at Laguna Seca. VERY VERY CLOSE !!!
Last edited by skank; 03-24-2017 at 07:10 AM.
The following 3 users liked this post by skank:
03-24-2017, 12:31 AM
#26
Race Director
Track or no track, I like it. Rear wing and all!!
Looks bad-***!!
Looks bad-***!!
03-24-2017, 08:13 PM
#29
Team Owner
03-25-2017, 10:49 PM
#32
Even if you never go to a track the wing still has a purpose: great place to set your cup at the local Car's and Coffee.
If you do go go to a track, it's got to be worth at least 2 seconds.
If you do go go to a track, it's got to be worth at least 2 seconds.
03-26-2017, 09:34 AM
#33
Drifting
I've always loved the look of the P GT3. Even though completely different platforms, there's a resemblance in the look, including the wing, the beefy black wheels and tires and the lowered riding height, that excites me...I believe Tadge is a P admirer.
Hope the car looks just like this.
Hope the car looks just like this.
03-26-2017, 09:54 AM
#34
Race Director
03-26-2017, 10:11 AM
#35
Team Owner
03-26-2017, 02:53 PM
#36
Melting Slicks
Quote:
grcor asked:
Can you please tell us why you are not molding the fenders to eliminate the need for spats, protective film, and splash guards?
Quote:
Tadge answered:
All Corvette exterior features and surface shapes are designed for maximum performance and great aesthetics. Around the front wheel openings, both the C6 (Z06, GS and ZR1) and C7 (GS and Z06) feature what you are calling spats arcing down the forward edge. These features create high pressure on the front/top and low pressure on the back/underside resulting in down force and evacuation of hot air from the wheel opening. The aerodynamic studies for both C6 and C7 independently proved their value. To work, they need to be a very specific shape - specifically a sharp break in the surface where the spat meets the fender. I have been asked many times why we couldn't just form that shape from the front fender so it would be all one painted piece instead of looking "tacked on". We looked at that and decided it looked pretty bad when painted bright colors. Your eye is immediately drawn to that feature and it does not look integrated or graceful. Naturally the question is, "If it is so important, why don't we see it on the C7.R race car?" The reason is that the race car sits so low to the ground it can take advantage of even more efficient aerodynamic features such as an "underwing" that sits beneath the front splitter. "Ok, then why don't we see it on other street cars?". Well, actually you do. There are several, typically very serious performance cars that have similar features such as the Porsche GT3RS.
Last edited by skank; 03-26-2017 at 03:06 PM.
03-27-2017, 05:12 PM
#37
Team Owner
Wrong, here is the correct technical reason for the spats from Tadge Juechter himself in the Ask Tadge Forum. I suggest you read more of that forum to educate yourself on these aerodynamic functional components.
Quote:
grcor asked:
Can you please tell us why you are not molding the fenders to eliminate the need for spats, protective film, and splash guards?
Quote:
Tadge answered:
All Corvette exterior features and surface shapes are designed for maximum performance and great aesthetics. Around the front wheel openings, both the C6 (Z06, GS and ZR1) and C7 (GS and Z06) feature what you are calling spats arcing down the forward edge. These features create high pressure on the front/top and low pressure on the back/underside resulting in down force and evacuation of hot air from the wheel opening. The aerodynamic studies for both C6 and C7 independently proved their value. To work, they need to be a very specific shape - specifically a sharp break in the surface where the spat meets the fender. I have been asked many times why we couldn't just form that shape from the front fender so it would be all one painted piece instead of looking "tacked on". We looked at that and decided it looked pretty bad when painted bright colors. Your eye is immediately drawn to that feature and it does not look integrated or graceful. Naturally the question is, "If it is so important, why don't we see it on the C7.R race car?" The reason is that the race car sits so low to the ground it can take advantage of even more efficient aerodynamic features such as an "underwing" that sits beneath the front splitter. "Ok, then why don't we see it on other street cars?". Well, actually you do. There are several, typically very serious performance cars that have similar features such as the Porsche GT3RS.
Quote:
grcor asked:
Can you please tell us why you are not molding the fenders to eliminate the need for spats, protective film, and splash guards?
Quote:
Tadge answered:
All Corvette exterior features and surface shapes are designed for maximum performance and great aesthetics. Around the front wheel openings, both the C6 (Z06, GS and ZR1) and C7 (GS and Z06) feature what you are calling spats arcing down the forward edge. These features create high pressure on the front/top and low pressure on the back/underside resulting in down force and evacuation of hot air from the wheel opening. The aerodynamic studies for both C6 and C7 independently proved their value. To work, they need to be a very specific shape - specifically a sharp break in the surface where the spat meets the fender. I have been asked many times why we couldn't just form that shape from the front fender so it would be all one painted piece instead of looking "tacked on". We looked at that and decided it looked pretty bad when painted bright colors. Your eye is immediately drawn to that feature and it does not look integrated or graceful. Naturally the question is, "If it is so important, why don't we see it on the C7.R race car?" The reason is that the race car sits so low to the ground it can take advantage of even more efficient aerodynamic features such as an "underwing" that sits beneath the front splitter. "Ok, then why don't we see it on other street cars?". Well, actually you do. There are several, typically very serious performance cars that have similar features such as the Porsche GT3RS.
The GM Corvette engineers actually did want to have a Z06-specific bumper built, which would have been slightly wider and had a larger grille opening. The problem is that GM accountants didn't approve the budget to create the new bumper. It is very costly to do this, as it would have to undergo a full suite of crash-testing and other red tape approvals. So, they did cheap out, and did settle for re-using the base C7 bumper. The spats were an inexpensive way to achieve the aero properties they were looking for, based on a narrow bumper profile. Simply making wider fenders might actually have been worse, getting them to transition well with the narrow bumper. Might even have caused worse aero, for all we know.
03-27-2017, 08:56 PM
#38
Instructor
The installation of the rear wing should be a no cost option...I wouldn't want it on my car
03-27-2017, 10:45 PM
#39
Melting Slicks
Like Juechter said, there are other cars with the same aero solution which is absolutely true. Look at the Porsche GT3RS. And where did you drag that comment from on your rebuttal? It obviously came from some forum member here who has no affiliation with Team Corvette and has no engineering or design basis for his assessment.
Last edited by skank; 03-28-2017 at 06:39 AM.
03-28-2017, 08:28 PM
#40
Old render or not, I like the look of this one. And I can understand how folks don't like the wing, but it's not like the Corvette team is just putting it on there for looks. It'll be a functional piece of the car, just like it is with the ACR.